May the force be with you

Tuesday, March 8, 2016

Clearing the confusions (UPDATED AND FINALIZED)

So, maybe due to the fact that I made the news because of my cyber-revenges, those Olgino/Kremlin trolls are starting to use garbage arguments to sow confusions to their own good.

Well, since they had technically lost the formal argument when they violated the Godwin's law by overhyping the role of Nazis in the Ukrainian crisis, so they started to employ ad hominem attacks, and use Chewbacca defense styled arguments to ramp up the confusion even after the violation of Godwin Law.

Since they had formally lost the argument due to the aforementioned Godwin Law, the confusions they sown against me is now boiled down to just two things at the time of writing:

1. Claiming that I am a complete fraud just because the hack doesn't require much advanced programming.

2. Claiming that cynical motives (only to get attention for myself, or the like) is the only motive that drove me to do the big dumps.

Not to say more, I am gonna write an expose of one particular Olgino twitter troll called @Non_Disclosure here. Pictures are followed with counterarguments and even mocking statements against the troll.

I am gonna use both syntatical and semantical perspective and viewpoints to look at those arguments made by the particular troll.


Lets look at picture #1

 #1 Response: Yeah, I am indeed revenging against the Russians for causing the MH17 tragedy. If I were just self promoting, I would not have gone to great length to expose the pictures of an air force serviceman's family into the dump. Period.


Now, picture #2
 

#2 Response: Now its the turn for the Olgino/Kremlin troll to boast and self promote. But however, the mongodb or related thing had began its step to become an open secret when I described it in my chat with the reporter, but it's not the main point for the reporter at that time anyways.

Regarding my technical abilities, if I were that cheap and fraud who overestimates my abilities, I would have:

  • Put names like "1337" "hacker" or the like into my twitter username and overstress it on my twitter bio, therefore fit into the username corollary narrative.
  • Omitting the magic word "disclosure" and also simply not revealing the type of the database compromised (MongoDB) during the interview.
  • Simply don't even mind to take a time to home-brew a pwned music HTML file and put it into the data dump, and also, don't even mind to compile and post the python code specifically for trolls onto my Google site which is addressed specifically for trolls and simply cowering away.
Besides that, if my technical abilities were as thin as the troll claimed, I would just dump the km.ru data onto the internet and not hacking further, including but not limited to, spending huge effort and using google dorks commands to search and hack Russian accounts and sites after determining that a given particular km.ru address is attached to the accounts/sites.

So, with these factors,  argument #2 is just a garbage argument that stinks.


Now, photo #3:
 #3 Response: Most counterarguments to the argument #2 would be suitable to be applied to this argument, but anyways, as I might have elaborated before on my google site response to the pathetic Kremlin trolls (and also on my tweets which will be indirectly shown next), by the troll's logic, Bill Gates is a fraudster for having an opportunity to learn the BASIC code which is created by someone else, and then use it into his Microsoft products, during the early years of Microsoft. Nice try troll.

Though I consider my programming skills elementary in relative to those hackers who done "grandiose" hacks like the Ashley Madison hack (FYI, I am a first year student studying computer science in a university, at the time of the creation of this post), the troll's argument #3 is simply pushing a narrative, which is  loaded with a form of nirvana fallacy and appeal to emotion fallacies (from his wording), over the fact, which should not be polluted with a particular narrative, in general and ideally.

Well, according to Wikipedia:

"In the computer security context, a hacker is someone who seeks and exploits weaknesses in a computer system or computer network."

Regardless of my programming skills, and the troll's ad nauseam rants, my actions (including the km.ru hack) is perfectly within the realm of the hacker domain/definition, based on the Wikipedia intepretation. But frankly and humbly, I consider myself "proto-hacker" instead.


Now, photo #4:


#4 Response: The counterarguments against troll argument #3 should be valid to counter this argument as well. Put it simply, the troll is in essentially committing an argumentum ad nauseam fallacy.


Photo #5:
 #5 Response: I'm not gonna to repeat ad nauseam again, instead, counterarguments #1 and counterarguments #3 should be sufficient.

Frankly, I would not post Skype conversation logs or child photos into the data dump, if I did the breaches just for cynical reasons, instead of sentimental reasons. At this point, I could acknowledge that I am possibly committing an act of cyberwarfare, or even cyberterrorism.

Next, Photo #6:

For this argument, frankly, seriously and honestly, I would not have the dark side (anger) power to propel me to dump Skype conversations, contact books and even family photos into the km.ru/nival data dump and then post it into the internet, if cynical reasons (aka "for my own naked, self promiting/boasting/attention seeking methodology") is the only motive for the hack.

Taking account with strategical viewpoints, if I done the dumps only to seek fame and attention for just myself, it's virtually certain that my adventure will continue shortly afterwards, instead of running out of dark side revenge power and then this. Ockham's razor.

The reason why I chose the character Anakin Skywalker from Star Wars as my online persona is because I, similar to him, is vulnerable to emotional outbursts.


Next, Photo #7:



So, going to the end, this is actually the troll's response to my tweet.

The troll might call it delusional of self importance for using "hybrid warfare" during my engagement with him while behind the block screen, but I call it as some kind of Newton's third law.

Within the realm of the topics regarding the Ukrainian Crisis, I borrowed the term "hybrid warfare" from the media which describes the concurrent occurrences of Russian soldiers operating in Ukraine, and Putin denying the involvement. I really love irony, sometimes.

Or put it very simply, perhaps the troll did not even notice the quotation marks around "hybrid warfare" in my tweet. Maybe he can't get the humor and satire and may just as pathetic and rigid as the shooters who attacked Charlie Hebdo back in 2015.

So, here's my turn





Obviously, if the troll can call out people or shame people for using relatively elementary skills to accomplish a hack/breach, he should be able to watch out for his own errors during his adventure. Right?


But, the troll didn't.

Instead, the troll forgot to add an opening tag into his html pseudocode in his tweet. Normally, HTML tags are in pairs, which is used to open and close a statement, unless the tag is <br>, which denotes a line break.


Looks like the only pseudo HTML tag </sarcasm> is not intended for line break purposes, but rather an attempt to denote that his tweet is a sarcasm. Well, this is a clear case of a pot calling the kettle black, ironic isn't it?

From the troll's HTML mishap, it is possible to deduce that the troll fits into the narrative of the username corollary, which is a subset of the Law of Image Overcompensation, where:

"The amount of effort a person, group, or organization puts into projecting any image for themselves is inversely proportional to how accurate that image is."


Besides that, in order to overcompensate his image, the troll used a quote from a famous person in his twitter profile's banner. But I felt a sense of irony from that picture instead.

The person whose quote the troll used in his profile banner is Friedrich Nietzsche, who is some kind of absent minded philosopher whose ideas included the "ubersmench" ideology, which influenced the Nazis and form the basis of the Nazi ideology. For that, if I remembered correctly, the Great Soviet Encyclopedia even labelled Nietzsche as the fascist who had used his ideology to enable Nazi to flourish and cause havoc during the 1930s-1940s. You should have get that irony by now.


Ultimately, the so called "ideals", which this troll is defending, is detrimental to the progress of mankind from Kardashev 0 to Kardashev 1 civilization. You could call me idealistic or simply naive, but there's no way that I am a fame seeking whore, at least in this time.

Anyway, for sake of transparency, you may view at my full engagement logs with the troll in the following links, and make up your own mind:

1

2

3 (indirect engagement)

4  (indirect engagement)

5

6

7

8

9

10 

11

12

13


14


15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

and the expose style responses:
1


2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13




I bet that the coward troll don't dare to link to his full engagement logs between him and me, anyways.


Maybe low life haters like the troll I am documenting in here should have their places exchanged with the captives/hostages held by ISIL for humanity's sake. Seriously.

Or maybe the only way to force the Kremlin trolls (including the troll I mentioned in here) to deal with their failure and get a life is to have themselves or their parents (especially their mothers) /relatives/friends get threw out from this dimensional realm/plane of existence in a great Halloween Metrojet crash style tragedy. That way the trolls would have tasted all of their own medicine, from A to Z.

Einstein was probably right about the thing that there are two infinities, one is the infinity of the universe, and another one is the infinity of human stupidity. And compared to the later infinity, the infinity of the universe is just a lemonade for him.

Maybe if you know the true identity (identities) of a person (or persons) behind the particular Kremlin troll account (or the rest of Kremlin troll accounts), perhaps you should start spreading the troll's (trolls') true identity and simultaneously, have yourself and your friends cut off any kinds of non essential/emergency contacts and relationships with them, both online and offline, to let those losers have their own medicine.


UPDATE: Another day, another ad nauseam arguments again (Picture up, counterargument down)



 <sarcasm> Maybe the troll is too lazy to feel the true power of the "dark side" emanating from the data dump, which is now in the Internet Archive. </sarcasm>

The End? Really? Or is this troll a pathological liar after all? We will see next.


 Looks like the troll is a pathological liar after all who should be shunned at most instances, for failing to keep his word "The End...lol Check Checka"

For the last time, if I lack technical skills, as he claimed, I would never even care to create that homemade pwned music file and the python code in the google site response. Period.

 Regarding the "hacking" definition, I am just following the term definition in Wikipedia, BTW.







The Bill Gates analogy might be a bad analogy after all, but actually, from the conversation logs outlined in here, (it seems that) he did not fully address the Yuri Gagarin analogy directly. He is simply playing cherrypicking tactics, which is a kind of fallacy.

Maybe, at this point, he had been stuck in a form of ideological gridlock, where if he choose to believe his views that I am a complete skiddie after all, he would have to (or forced to ) believe that Yuri Gagarin was just another wannabe who did not qualify for FAI records (and thus harm his pro-Russian causes). It's now a zero sum game for him, so this is the breaking point, after this point, he switched to bullying tactics to cover up that zero sum game.

Regarding the Yuri Gagarin analogy, the troll might have fallen into the description of the law of cherry picking.

The Law of Cherry Picking: If a user posts his or her side of an argument, and a number of other users try to refute it with well-thought-out posts and cited sources, the original user will only respond to the easiest replies to argue with, ignoring all of the others.


Maybe the troll himself really have a delusion of grandeur after all, due to his mind projecting the fact that he is such a low life into his tweets (mind projection). His delusion of grandeur is further shown when he tried to whitewash the fact that he's a troll by putting up a Nietzsche quote (we will find more about this next)




This is just me being humble. Frankly. There's no point for him to over interpret.



Even if the Wikipedia definition is not authoritative, the merriam-webster definition would still give the same result and outcome. According to this excerpt from merriam-webster dictionary:

Simple Definition of hacker


computers : a person who secretly gets access to a computer system in order to get information, cause damage, etc. : a person who hacks into a computer system 


-excerpt ends-

Get a life, kremlin troll.



So, parallel to the Bill Gates analogy, by the troll's logic,  Linus Torvalds can be considered a fraud and even a parasite the moment he used Unix programming from AT&T in his Linux product. Faulty logic.

Temporarily deviating from the topic, maybe the troll had failed to realize that there are something that is called open source (mongodb is included in this category) , which can let you to base your works upon without legal threats from the original creator/propagator.

Now back to topic, to put it simply and precisely, perhaps the troll had failed to understand the concept of "standing on the shoulders of giants", where virtually all things, discoveries and feats that we have by now/the time this post is written are based upon our predecessors sweat and effort. Honestly, I could say that I am just standing on the shoulders of giants.


It is an act of cyberwarfare or even cyberterrorism the moment I do these hacks for revenge and shock value purposes, by broad definition of these words.





The troll forgot that services like twitlonger.com can let him to tweet longer than 140 characters.

Nope, seriously, the python lessons are not in first week. Fuck the troll.

Whether the troll like it or not, based on his ideology and his account type, Nietzsche is not the best candidate to refer with in his banner, due to the controversial history of Nietzsche which involves the ubermensch ideology.

Taking account into Nietzsche controversial history (especially regarding the ubermensch ideology), it is safe to assume that the attempts by the troll to whitewash himself are a complete and utter failure.

By using non sequitur/red herring arguments like "get over it" to deflect the Nietzsche argument, the troll had indirectly admit that the fact that Nietzsche was indeed a very controversial person who had developed the "ubersmensch" ideology which greatly helped the Nazis. Maybe the troll's choice of philosopher in the profile banner would parallel the possibility that the troll's mind is as insane as Nietzsche in later stage of latter's life,  just as my choice of Anakin Skywalker as a reference when developing a hacker persona parallel the fact that both me and him are vulnerable to emotional outbursts.

This is actually me getting emotional here. Maybe the troll left out the "The reason why I chose the character Anakin Skywalker from Star Wars as my online persona is because I, similar to him, is vulnerable to emotional outbursts." part of this original hit piece. Ockham's razor.

Don't forget that in fact, he have already lost his credibility a long time ago by violating godwin's law by over representing the role of Nazis in the Ukrainian crisis and resorting to tactics such as chewbacca defenses to confuse viewers. This hit piece is specifically to dissipate those confusions created by those trolls.




He's not a critic, he's sadistic and pathetic troll. Normally, bona fide critics would choose to back down/compromise if the critic realised that he is violating godwin's law or commiting other fallacies, after being alerted either by himself or others, and they would normally back their arguments with hard facts and make sure that their arguments are consistent and not fall into the ad nauseam loop, and they would avoid provocative and confrontational languages altogether if they want to criticize something or someone in a bona fide style. Trolls are actually different than normal bona fide critics, for the former being a sadistic hater who would use provocative and confrontational languages  through the whole time and spilling out ad nauseam logical loop and ad hominem attacks instead of civilized debate.

Ad nauseam argument loops from him, even after he is shown facts after facts and logics after logics, is showing no sign of subsistence. Adding with the fact that he is using provocative and confrontational and even graphic languages all the time, he should qualify as a troll/bully/hater instead.

In summary, here's the guide to determine whether a user is a troll or not, and the troll I am describing in here seems to fit into virtually all of the narratives in below:

  • Pithy put-downs
  • Name-calling and insults
  • Ad hominem attacks that try to negate an opinion by alleging negatives about the person supporting it
  • Impugning other's motives
  • Emotional rants
  • Bullying and harassment
  • Completely off-topic posts
  • Posting inaccurate "facts"


So, again, I found his rudeness disturbing, from most of his tweets. Consequently, he should be qualify as a sadistic troll and not a bona fide critic. Again, sadistic bullies like this troll, which are egoistic, pathetic and possibly psychopathic, should exchange their places with the captives/hostages held by ISIL, for humanity's sake.


Yeah, that situation (the Metrojet thing) is the last possible bet to have the troll to get his senses and life. Or maybe they should be thrown into Soviet style mental wards "to have their own medicine", literally.

 Well, another sign that the troll is losing the argument anyways. His parents would be ashamed of the troll's behavior.

Unknown for him, the famous hacking group Anonymous is still doing exactly this kind of "2006-styled" job. As of 2016, Anonymous still have themselves or the others to dox any people they doesn't like. As of the time this post is updated, there are many Anonymous' operations which involves dumping infos of ISIL terrorists into pastebin.

#OpIceISIS is one of such operations.

He might call it "2006 old fashioned work", but in fact it is called "Human Flesh Search Engine", which is a favourite activity in my country too.



Actually, he is trying to show the disclaimer tweet that this blog is NSFW itself. I bet that if he has a blog which has explicit languages, he won't care to put up such a disclaimer.


Its clear that the dark side is strong with this troll, due to his choice of the youtube video in the tweet.
To be honest, that youtube video is a MV which is used by the troll to indirectly convey the message which is something like "I hate you" to me.

But his choice of youtube video had further exposed/betrayed his childish behavior, because...





I expected that he would chose more matured MV like those from Michael Jackson or even from Star Trek/ Star Wars/ House of Cards stuffs. I really can't stop laughing at his choice of youtube video.

That Dungeons and Dragons game are considered childish when compared to WoW, DOTA or even ROBLOX, at least from a particular/given/random elite online gamer community's overall perspective.


Wait, isn't the "I hate you" thing reminds you of that Anakin Skywalker (the character whom I referred on my hacker name) on Mustafar? So the picture below is my open response to the troll:


So, time to go for next picture.

 If you haven't caught any subtle and direct sign that he is utterly losing the arguments, this is the clearest sign that the troll had gone to a form of emotional collapse. At this point he is now steering the dimension of the arguments into sex/NSFW domain by using the NSFW terms to conduct ad hominem attack against me.



 For the photo above.... I am gonna present this photo as a counterargument to the troll "@Non_Disclosure":


The troll had failed to realize the perspective of other people (even his fellow trolls) other than his own. Possible proof that the troll got Asperger's or simply ADHD (pity him). Period.



As said before, the 'cyberwarfare' word is a broad definition expression. I don't care about being exposed (in terms of identity) since I use proxy. Again, despite Ossipov's tweet which is shown before in here, he is still in blue pill mode in regards to the shock effect of the hack.


So, this is it, he switched to cyberbullying and defaming, indirectly admitting his loss. If my SCADA hacks still did not truly overwhelm him, nothing except the most dramatic situations will.


I bet that what happens after his tweet barrages is the troll smashing up his keyboard and rant like a crybaby, like that "angry German Kid".



So, to sum it up, there are two possiblities behind the motives of the troll:
1. Monetary motives
2. Psychological motives

If the first case is valid, then he is just another hypocrite who had sold his life and his mind to Kremlin bureaucrats.

If the second case is valid, then he might be suffering from ADHD after all. In this case, he should be pitied upon. Maybe if you know him in real life, you should recommend him for a psychological treatment or drugs.

Other than that, here's just a thought..

If the universe of the movie "Unfriended" exists, and if I was in that universe and in a ever remote possiblity I died in the MH17 plane crash, and in another dimension that overlaps the 4 dimensional realm of our "own",  if I saw the "Unfriended" version of the troll I am describing in here now trolling and attacking another (proto-) hacker that might possibly took the role of the "hacker who revenged against Russia" on Twitter, I bet that as a ghost/demon, I am sure that I would fuck up the entire life of the troll "@non_disclosure" like Laura Barns did against his enemies in the movie/universe, or maybe I would even outdid Laura Barns.

#JAT moment ends, looks like this piece is going to end soon.

Oh wait, looks like the mind projection explanation to the troll's motive is right all along. Because...




See that Kama Britt user in the troll's followers list? Look at Kama's description, and you will see who is the real fraud, sham, con artist, troll is.

So, the troll, who is so righteous about originality and honesty, is now reneging against his values by purchasing at least one Twitter followers from shady corners in the Internet, and now even had the gall to become a pot which calls the kettle black. If I were his parents, I would disown him at the moment I found out his behavior, seriously. I hate those people whose words is far far louder than his actions/behavior.


Finally, this is one final thing, to mock the particular troll....





May the force be with you.


UPDATE (8/4/2016):

Looks like the troll "@Non_Disclosure" is no saner than those flat-earthers or those who believe that Putin is a reptilian alien after all.

So, now,  I just came across an earlier hit piece by a top notch hacker who is known as "The Jester" and had taken down several jihadist websites before, which describes the stalker Rachel Marsden troll and possibly and consequentally the troll I mentioned on here.

To clear up confusion, I am meaning this Rachel Marsden.

Here's Jester's hit piece:
http://web.archive.org/web/20160316203903/http://jesterscourt.cc/2013/08/07/rachel-marsden-come-on-down/

So, after I read Jester's hit piece, I felt that the link between the troll "@Non_Disclosure" and Rachel Marsden is not just a coincidence after all. Here's why:

1. First of all, the troll "@Non_Disclosure" has been using extremely vulgar and offensive words against anyone who doesn't feed or agree with his/her worldview, including me. Meanwhile, if we look at the personal history of Rachel Marsden, we will find out that she's actually a habitual stalker who's being even convicted with stalking charges by a criminal court.

Don't believe me? Check these out:

http://web.archive.org/web/20160303200521/http://thetyee.ca/Mediacheck/2007/04/05/RMarsden/

 http://web.archive.org/web/20160408091536/http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/bc-woman-faces-charge-of-harassment/article1028326/

http://web.archive.org/web/20160408091056/http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/11/5/406822/-

2. Next, "@Non_Disclosure" has been caught using erotic NSFW words to attack others who don't agree with him/her. Here's snapshot of the troll doing that:

So, regarding this, the erotic NSFW words spilled out by ND (the name initials of the troll "@Non_Disclosure") has an eerie parallel and connection with the fact that Rachel Marsden has been called out as an "erototroll" by the top notch hacker "Jester". Besides that, Rachel Marsden has once involved in a controversy that is known as 1997 Simon Fraser University harassment controversy.

That sound cringey and creepy isn't it?

3. "@Non_Disclosure" has also been caught using lenny faces across his/her tweets.







According to the Urban Dictionary, the lenny face symbol has sexual nature. This would correlate with the fact that is outlined in #2. Adding insult to Rachel's injury, Rachel's chomo father Claude Arthur Marsden has even being convicted for doing inappropriate conduct against a 16 years old teen.

Don't believe me? Let's find out.

Besides that, Rachel has also been caught making false harassment charges against a faculty in a Canadian University

4. When I was debunking ND's garbage arguments with a Wikipedia definition, ND counteracted by simply doubting, questioning, deriding and denying the nature/authoritativeness of that Wikipedia's definition.



Once again, ND's tweet has eerie parallel with Rachel Marsden's one time affair with Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales a long time ago.

http://web.archive.org/web/20160304130659/http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/03/03/rachel-marsden-and-jimmy-_n_89566.html

At this point, looks like I should call "@Non_Disclosure"/ND as an erototroll, instead of Kremlin/Olgino troll.

5. The writing styles of the erototroll ND and Rachel Marsden are eerily similar, as an example, they both tend to use the word "lol" in their post.




For the sake of reference, if you want the conversation logs with Jimmy Wales and Rachel Marsden, you can access it here.

FYI, here's some articles that shed Rachel Marsden's history in a critical light:

http://web.archive.org/web/20060526202300/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Marsden
https://web.archive.org/web/20100630213923/http://www.wikitruth.info/index.php?title=Uncensored:Rachel_Marsden


6. You might notice that pro Russian viewpoints are prevalent in ND's tweets which is consequently captured in here. This has an eerie parallel with the fact that Rachel Marsden is now working in Sputnik Radio Paris and is hosting a radio show titled "World Disorder with Rachel Marsden".

7. Now, we are coming to the strongest link between the erototroll ND and the stalker Rachel Marsden.

Saying "no I don't" in an account that she/he "didn't operate"? Looks startling.

So, we had discussed the parallels between ND and Marsden, now lets discuss the scenario where Rachel Marsden is indeed behind the @Non_Disclosure account.

1. If Rachel Marsden is indeed behind the @Non_Disclosure account, then the psychological projection explanation would be the sole and best explanation behind ND's motives.

Here's Wikipedia article about the psychological projection phenomenon:

http://web.archive.org/web/20160329215218/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection

FYI, Rachel Marsden has been famously hauled out of Fox News building after being caught doing erratic behavior.

Don't believe me? Take a look:

http://web.archive.org/web/20070602111431/http://www.nypost.com/seven/05312007/gossip/pagesix/eye_opener_pagesix_.htm

http://web.archive.org/web/20160325224237/http://gawker.com/264624/rachel-marsden-escorted-from-fox-studios

2. If Rachel is behind the ND account, then this would prove that Rachel Marsden is a despicable coward after all. Having unsuccesfully stalked the Jester before, so she now stalk recent/younger/startup hackers like me. Cowards/frauds/stalkers like ND/Marsden makes my blood boils and even <sarcasm> overloading my Vader respirator.</sarcasm>

3. If ND is Rachel Marsden, then maybe I am on the same boat with the top notch hacker "Jester", Jimmy Wales and even potentially ex French president Nicolas Sarkozy. I would be thankful and glad to join her "exclusive/mile-high club".

4. If ND is Rachel, then the Sputnik Radio in Paris is committing a serious mistake by neglecting to check her background prior to her employment. If so, this would be a big shame to Kremlin and its causes. If Kremlin let's Rachel's activity goes unchecked, Putin and his pals would not just regarded as "party of crooks and thieves", they will be regarded as something worse, eg "party of stalkers and liars". In here, I would also suggest those who are pro-Russian to be wary of her in order to not let the bad apple (ND/Rachel Marsden) to spoil the whole bunch of good apples (pro-Kremlin causes).

5. Again, if Rachel really runs the ND account, and judging by Rachel's past history, then all kinds of insults against ND/Marsden, no matter how worse they are, are now automatically valid. Douchebags like ND/Marsden are a disgrace to the whole mankind.

6. Once again, if Rachel really runs the ND account, then the psychology majors in universities can take the case of ND/Marsden erototroll as a best example of psychological projection and a case study to see how far a psycho/stalker can go.

7. So, if Rachel is ND on Twitter, then I have a message for her:

Dear Rachel Marsden/Non Disclosure:

I have been fully aware of your stalking/harassing activity against me since I had dumped the km.ru/nival datas online.

From beginning, as a pro-Russian fanatic, maybe you've realized that you and your minions has lost the formal argument regarding the Ukrainian Crisis by violating the Godwin's law when you and your minions has overrepresented and overhyped the role of Nazis in the Ukrainian Crisis, so you just boil your arguments down to two things: claiming that I don't have technical skills to dump the data and paradoxically, claiming that I do the data dump for cynical reasons.

FYI, I had debunked nearly all of your arguments in here, but despite the hard facts presented to you, you are still in confirmation bias mode by going around the circle and still repeatedly calling me a fake and an attention whore.

Madam, no matter how strong your wording are in your ad nauseam arguments, people will still remember that you are committing an ad nauseam logical fallacy, whether we all like it or not.

So, maybe you are really delusional and paranoid as some people claimed, you just keep your harassment campaign against me ongoing, which has led me to do my legwork and to find out who you are.

Thanks to the top notch hacker Jester, whom you have unsuccessfully stalked and who wrote an expose against you, now I truly realized how horrible, how sadistic, how pathetic, how delusional, how fraud, how paranoid you are.

You are really a coward who had unsuccessfully stalked Jester and even attempted to stalk the ex-President Nicholas Sarkozy, so you now turn to stalk those younger/recent/startup hackers like me. Cowards like you are a disgrace to the whole humanity.

So, in parallel to what Jester had said against you a long time ago, you have misused your ‘journalistic privileges’ and the reputation of journalists anywhere with a miserably failed attempt to further your stalking and discreditation/disinformation against me to naively underhype the shock values caused by my km.ru/nival hacks and to force me to stop revenge against your employer's employer Vladimir Putin? Really? Or are you too envy and too jealous of the hacks that I've done to revenge against Russians? Well fuck you lady. Joke’s on you. Better yet, you are the joke. Your motives for any attempt to discredit me, or smear me are clear to see and represent a disgusting abuse of your alleged ‘professional status’. It’s people like you that causes people to not trust the many hardworking and honorable actual journalists out there.

After checking your past shady history, maybe you are indeed jealous and envy about the fact that I done those hacks at a young/teenage age. Perhaps this has something to do with your teenage/college time when you are doing pathetic/absurd things by falsely accusing people of raping you. You are a low-life and even a fraudster who had insulted all of the rape victims, and you are a low life brat like that "affluenza teen" Ethan Couch who are too pathetic, too egocentric and too obsessed with materialism and cynicism.

So, you want some fame by stalking me and other right? Let me tell you that you will be remembered as the Justin Bieber or Miley Cyrus of internet stalking/trolling. Which will give you an even lower status than even Kim Kardashian who absurdly being famous by being famous.

I wish that you will come to your senses and turn to a new leaf before you turn 50, because at that time, if you are still as asshole as you are now, I bet that midlife crisis will troll you very hardly, yes it's very hardly, when you at that time realized that you have achieved nothing but simply cause suffering to people around you, and standing at the wrong side of history regarding the MH17 incident.

If in this point you sensed that midlife crisis might be karma/the will of the force after all, yes, it's karma or the will of the force, and they are both bitches which will troll you very hardly as midlife crisis if you don't stop your trolling/stalking activities and stay doing your real work, e.g. the radio broadcaster job you are doing right now.

May the force have mercy on you.

From:
Cyber Anakin

So that's the end of message against Rachel Marsden/Non Disclosure.

Finally, due to these possible revelations, maybe we should start cutting off any non-essential contacts with Rachel Marsden/Non Disclosure, in order to have Rachel to taste her own medicine, from A to Z. Maybe Rachel Marsden's place is best belonged to a mental hospital, for the sake of all humanity.

May the force be with you, and may the force have mercy on that erototroll Rachel Marsden/Non Disclosure.

That's the end of this final update.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Close

Edit profile


Close

Edit profile



Edit Settings Sign out
Notify me
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Deze site gebruikt cookies van Google om services te leveren, advertenties te personaliseren en verkeer te analyseren. Informatie over je gebruik van deze site wordt gedeeld met Google. Als je deze site gebruikt, ga je akkoord met het gebruik van cookies.Meer informatieIk snap het
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%