use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
7,051 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Other Subs: Related /r/News /r/PoliticalDiscussion /r/WorldPolitics /r/WorldEvents /r/GeoPolitics /r/InternationalPolitics /r/InternationalBusiness /r/Business /r/Economics /r/Environment /r/History /r/WikiLeaks /r/HumanRights /r/NSALeaks /r/doctorswithoutborders /r/Features /r/UpliftingNews /r/globalhealth /r/modded /r/NewsOfTheWeird /r/Insidernews N. America /r/Politics /r/USA /r/USANews /r/Canada /r/Cuba /r/Mexico /r/PuertoRico S. America /r/Argentina/ /r/Brasil /r/Chile /r/Colombia /r/Guyana /r/Venezuela Europe /r/Armenia /r/Azerbaijan /r/Belgium /r/Bosnia /r/Bulgaria /r/Croatia /r/Denmark /r/Europe /r/France /r/Georgia /r/Germany /r/Greece /r/Ireland /r/Italy /r/TheNetherlands /r/Poland /r/Portugal /r/Romania /r/Russia /r/Scotland /r/Serbia /r/Spain /r/Sweden /r/Switzerland /r/Turkey /r/UnitedKingdom /r/UKPolitics /r/Ukraina /r/Ukraine /r/UkrainianConflict Asia /r/Afghanistan /r/China /r/India /r/IndiaNews /r/Malaysia /r/NorthKoreaNews /r/Pakistan /r/Philippines /r/Singapore /r/Sino /r/Turkey Middle East /r/Iran /r/Iraq /r/Israel /r/Kurdistan /r/LevantineWar /r/MiddleEastNews /r/MideastPeace /r/Palestine /r/Syria /r/Yemen /r/YemeniCrisis Africa /r/Africa Oceania /r/Australia /r/NewZealand /r/Westpapua
Other Subs:
Related
N. America
S. America
Europe
Asia
Middle East
Africa
Oceania
Display Panama Papers submissions
Filter Panama Papers
Display Refugee Crisis submissions
Filter Refugee Crisis
Display Syria/Iraq submissions
Filter Syria / Iraq
Display North Korea submissions
Filter North Korea
Display Israel/Palestine submissions
Filter Israel / Palestine
Display all submissions
Filter all dominant topics
See gilded /r/worldnews comments
Message the moderators
Welcome! /r/worldnews is for major news from around the world except US-internal news / US politics
/r/worldnews is for major news from around the world except US-internal news / US politics
Worldnews Rules Disallowed submissions US internal news/US politics Editorialized titles Misleading titles Editorials, opinion, analysis Feature stories Non-English articles Images, videos or audio clips Petitions, advocacy, surveys All caps words in titles Blogspam (if stolen content/direct copy) Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr Old news (≥1 week old) articles See the wiki for details on each rule Disallowed comments Bigotry / Other offensive content Personal attacks on other users Memes/GIFs Unlabeled NSFW images/videos URL shorteners See the wiki for details on each rule Continued or outstandingly blatant violation of the submission or commenting rules will result in your being temporarily banned from the subreddit without a warning. Please don't ever feed the trolls. Downvote, report and move on. What Moderators Do and Can't Do
See the wiki for details on each rule
Continued or outstandingly blatant violation of the submission or commenting rules will result in your being temporarily banned from the subreddit without a warning.
Please don't ever feed the trolls. Downvote, report and move on.
Sticky Posts • A list of all recent stickied posts.
• A list of all recent stickied posts.
1 in 50 British men are unknowingly raising a child which isn't theirs, research suggests (independent.co.uk)
NewYooserMan が 9時間前 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]Furchfurch 105ポイント106ポイント107ポイント 7時間前 (76子コメント)
It is perfectly legal in the UK for a presumed father to DNA test his children with or without the mothers consent. £99 testing kit in Boots £89 on line. If you have any doubts you are welcome to test your children
[–]FoeHammer7777 49ポイント50ポイント51ポイント 6時間前 (75子コメント)
For a DNA test, sure. But how long does the not-father have to disown their not-child and no longer have to pay for him? What about restitution from the mother?
[–]Furchfurch 57ポイント58ポイント59ポイント 6時間前* (68子コメント)
Well there is a bit of history here: Having a child is deemed by the courts to be a pleasure and a privilege so: You can have DNA test as soon as the child is born. You do not have to pay Child support if the child is not yours BUT Generally you cannot claim back Child support if you have already paid it to the mother.
It is a case of buyer beware.
Some men do not want to know if they are the father or not. Some men are happy to pay for a child that is not theirs.
There is no time limit on when you can do DNA test and dispute parentage. Mostly it happens when their is a divorce.
The father and the man who pays child support is always the biological father. Married or not.
We do not have paternity fraud as such in the UK since a father can always legally DNA test his children with or without the mothers consent. The truth is entirely up to the father,.
So I think we have it right in the UK.
[–]latingamer1 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 4時間前 (12子コメント)
What about sperm banks? Aren't the men that go there biological fathers? Are there laws that account for that?
[–]Furchfurch 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 4時間前 (11子コメント)
Provided a sperm sample is donated at a registered sperm bank then a man is exempt from all child support.
PRIVATE ARRANGEMENT:
If a sample is given by way of a private arrangement between a man and a woman then the man is responsible for child support and he is the the biological father.
[–]latingamer1 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 4時間前 (8子コメント)
Thanks!
[–]Nezaus [スコア非表示] 1時間前 (7子コメント)
I hear France the figure is 1 in 4 or maybe even as high as 1 in 3, infidelity and cheating are part of French life it would seem...the government of France decided to make DNA testing illegal because it came to the conclusion society would collapse if all the native French men found out the kid ain't theirs. Mistresses can't claim for child support either ...so the French government logic punishes both sexes. ..and the only ones popping out kids in France are the A-rabs
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] 1時間前* (0子コメント)
Yes the French system is crazy. The UK system works because of advances in science and the law recognises this: DNA.
It is not about men getting off "scot free" it is about linking children with their true biological fathers and also recognising that a person is responsible for their actions including any resulting children.
I think the UK, Australian, German, Danish Swedish etc etc is the correct way. I do suspect more USA states will go down this route, some have.
[–]GlaxoJohnSmith [スコア非表示] 1分前 (0子コメント)
Is that 1 in 4 French men or 1/4th of the French population?
Either way, that seems kind of high even for France.
[–]kiloi [スコア非表示] 1時間前 (4子コメント)
Do you even think before writing such absurdity or are you really just that stupid ???
Last year when a similar study was published for France, the conclusion was that the figures could reach 1 in 30 not 1 in 3 !
[–]BiggestFloppiestDick [スコア非表示] 43分前 (3子コメント)
I agree this isn't the case, I mean, maybe in 1950? French women are wayyyyyyy less hot these days
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] 35分前 (0子コメント)
I do not think men and women are that different in any western culture.
[–]Slinkyfest2005 [スコア非表示] 23分前 (1子コメント)
Given my last couple trips, I politely but vehemently disagree.
Got nothing on Sweden though.
[–]Earthborn92 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (1子コメント)
This is all very logical. I believe France has polar opposite laws on this. The UK laws seem very fair.
Additional question: what if rape is involved somehow? What if the biological father had died?
If a man rapes a woman then the woman is offered morning after pills at the Police station or she can get them at a chemist. If it was a genuine rape then it would be strange for her to decline the pills. If a man is convicted of rape which resulted in the birth of a child, the woman has a right to not have him named as the father if she does not want to.
As for death:
If the man dies he is still the biological father. The child would be entitled to some of the mans wealth (in the will) potentially.
[–]CDXXRoman [スコア非表示] 7分前 (0子コメント)
In the US if you claim the child for long enough then its your responsibility.
Its going to be up to a judge and he's obligated to do what's best for the child. Courts hate making children bastards.
[–]Tripoteur [スコア非表示] 28分前 (1子コメント)
That's really messed up.
Just because you can legally check if it's true or not doesn't mean it's OK for some monstrous woman to lie to you and tell you she's pregnant with your child.
It should totally be fraud.
Man, these laws. And people ask me why I don't want a girlfriend...
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] 19分前 (0子コメント)
Not really because the man can always test if he wants. You cannot make it compulsory to test, lots of men do not want to know, and the woman might not genuinely know who the father is. Men sleep around as well so you cannot just blame women. Ignorance is bliss for many. Say the woman was at an orgy the father could be one of several.
[–]Kasper-X-Hauser [スコア非表示] 42分前 (3子コメント)
Okay, say it's NOT your kid, but you've paid for a period. Can you trade it in and credit some credit for your next one?
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] 37分前 (2子コメント)
No. Anything you have paid goes to the mother not the state. It is a fathers right to DNA test his children so if he has doubts and he wants to test he can. But he cannot test when the Kid is 14 and then ask for a refund for all the years he has paid money to the mother. That is his stupidity, loss.
[–]Kasper-X-Hauser [スコア非表示] 33分前 (1子コメント)
I knot kids are mine. My wife can point out my specific flaws that each inherited.
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] 22分前 (0子コメント)
In the UK most men go along with it and do not DNA test, even though it is really cheap and easy. If you get divorced then most men do a DNA test since we are talking big money that you will have to pay out for child support. Also what is the reason for the divorce. Lots of statistics on this are based on 20% of people who ask for a DNA test are found not to be the father. But only men who have doubts ask for a test so it is very misleading.
[–]TheAngryGoat [スコア非表示] 18分前 (0子コメント)
It could certainly be worse. However fucked up the legal system is in this country when it comes to these things, it's at least not as bad as in the US, where rape victims can be forced to pay tens of thousands to their rapists to pay for the rape baby.
[+]canteloupy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-41ポイント-40ポイント-39ポイント 5時間前 (46子コメント)
And once you acted as a father for years you can hardly deny the child that support and relationship from one day to the next...
[–]Furchfurch 60ポイント61ポイント62ポイント 5時間前 (16子コメント)
Why. Surely the biological father should be providing that support. A man also has rights you know. You cannot force him to be a father to a child that is not his. You should blame the cheating mother not the father. She is the one that harmed the child.
[+]canteloupy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-44ポイント-43ポイント-42ポイント 5時間前 (15子コメント)
Well that's when you act like the responsible adult you're supposed to be towards the children. They are people, they look to you. They don't care about their DNA.
[–]Furchfurch 48ポイント49ポイント50ポイント 5時間前 (14子コメント)
So the mother should not cheat! The presumed father is faultless in this. The mother has to take responsibility not the father. A man has no rights over whether the child is born or not! You cannot guilt trip him into taking responsibility for a child that is not his as a result of a cheating partner.
[–]JackalopeSix -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 4時間前 (1子コメント)
The child is also faultless.
[–]Furchfurch 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
Exactly but the mother is 100% not faultless. So the mother has wronged the child and the presumed father.
[+]canteloupy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-15ポイント-14ポイント-13ポイント 4時間前 (11子コメント)
That's all well and good but five years later is a bit late. Assign blame to the person who cheated but you cant just abandon kids who depend on you.
[–]Furchfurch 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 4時間前 (9子コメント)
But if he did not know until 5 years later? The woman could have told him at the time. Legally he can abandon the child, it is up to him and besides it is the biological father who is responsible. We have the law 100% morally and legally correct in the UK in this area (for once).
[+]canteloupy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12ポイント-11ポイント-10ポイント 3時間前 (8子コメント)
I for one find i disgusting that abandonment is legalized if you find out something another adult did to you years ago. Kids are not a tool for retribution they are people.
[–]CheesewithWhine 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
You can't force people to parent children that aren't theirs.
[–]Swayze_Train 30ポイント31ポイント32ポイント 5時間前 (28子コメント)
That's easy to say from the outside, its very different when that child is a living testament to betrayal, failure, and humiliation.
Its simple to say "don't feel that way", but feelings aren't something you just switch off when inconvenient.
[+]canteloupy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-27ポイント-26ポイント-25ポイント 5時間前 (27子コメント)
The kid hasn't done anything to anyone. They are not responsible. This is desertion.
[–]Furchfurch 30ポイント31ポイント32ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
Desertion that is 100% caused by a cheating partner.
[–]ThoseIrishJews 31ポイント32ポイント33ポイント 5時間前 (1子コメント)
Neither has the father. Yes he fucked the kids mom, buts that's all he did. He didn't knock her up, that's some other saps responsibility. Let the cheater go track down whoever the father really is and get him to pay.
[–]Furchfurch 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
As it is the law in the UK.
[–]APsWhoopinRoom 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
But shouldn't the rights of the man take priority over those of the kid that isn't his? The kid has absolutely no entitlement to anything of someone who isn't related to them (except in the case of adoption)
[–]Swayze_Train 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント 5時間前 (19子コメント)
So the father is just supposed to disconnect his emotions? No matter how justified you feel in expecting that, it is simply unrealistic.
[–]canteloupy -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 4時間前 (18子コメント)
You really think people raise a kid for a few years and then can just throw them out even though the kid is in zero way responsible for any of this and you are the only father they know?
Really this is about being the bigger person. You can be as mad and betrayed as you want at your partner but not the kids.
[–]a_lumberjack 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 4時間前 (4子コメント)
There are arguments both ways. Yes, ideally you don't just walk away. But that should be a choice. Becoming a parent should be a choice. Having a permanent financial obligation to your cheating spouse for a kid is difficult.
[–]Furchfurch 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
The biological father has the obligation for the child. It is not difficult the law is clear in the UK.
[–]canteloupy -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 3時間前 (2子コメント)
I don't find that true at all. Parents and that includes adoptive parents have an absolute responsibility to their children, and DNA does not a family make.
[–]Furchfurch 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 4時間前* (3子コメント)
It is up to the wronged man what he does. It is his choice. It is nothing to do with being a bigger person. A wronged man has rights as well as women and children.
If a society is going to make the man stay then that society should also punish the cheating woman with a prison sentence for the harm she has done?
[–]canteloupy 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 3時間前 (2子コメント)
You seem to fail to take any view of the children's interests in these cases, honestly. Try to represent yourself as the little boy in the situation and not the dad to gain some perspective.
[–]sonicthehedgedog 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 3時間前 (5子コメント)
This is not up to you or anyone but the not-father. Personally I wouldn't walk away, but if someone else decides it's too much for them to handle, he's not a bad person, just had to make a tough call. Why the fuck we can accept a woman making the hard decision of ending a late stage pregnancy but we can't let a man who has no legal obligation to simply walk away from a life of constant humiliation if that's how he sees it? Think about it for a second. Yes there are obvious psychological traumas for the child depending on the age, but this is no justification to put the blame on the other victim here.
[–]Furchfurch 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Agreed. And the child still has a father in the true biological dad, it just may not be who he thought was his father.
[–]canteloupy -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 3時間前 (3子コメント)
Honestly, the lie is the wrong here, the child is not a punishment but a human person. You cannot just change your moral obligations towards a person who counts on you because your feelings and ego are hurt .
[–]Swayze_Train 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Again, that's a justified expectation, but completely unrealistic.
Its telling somebody they have a justified moral obligation to fly, and then pushing them off a bridge. You can be completely correct in crossing your arms and tapping your feet and expecting them to fly, but that isn't going to give them wings.
The fact that the kid needs a loving and supportive environment isn't going to make the man less of a cuckold, or the wife less of a liar, or the man's legacy any less shattered.
[–]APsWhoopinRoom 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
That is a problem for the people actually related to the kid. If the Mom didn't want this to happen, she shouldn't have cheated. You can't expect someone to pay for a kid that isn't theirs (with the obvious exception in the case of adoption).
[–]nestabilnost 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Sure... you sound like those women who cheated and than relly on the attachment or the good will of the man who was cheated to support the kids if one day he finds out.
Sure I would feel for the kid, but fuck me if I would ever give you a penny to feed him if you could afford it. If you couldn't afford I would feed him but only if I take custody.
If you really want the kid, don't cheat, or if you do at least make sure you can afford it on your own.
[–]fishbellyblack 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2時間前 (1子コメント)
They have been deserted by their biological father, sympathy for that should not be mandatory
[–]Furchfurch 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
The biological father usually does not know he is a father. In the UK there have been many cases where biological fathers have enforced their parental rights against the mother's wishes. She wanted to be a single mum he wanted to be a father. The court sides with the biological father.
[–]dfskdafhasdf -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 4時間前 (1子コメント)
The credited response is that once the father throws the mother and baby off a cliff he is free from financial burden
Didn't she throw him and the child off a cliff when she cheated?
[+]3058248 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-24ポイント-23ポイント-22ポイント 4時間前 (3子コメント)
No matter how awful the mother was, you don't take restitution if you are abandoning the mother and child.
[–]_Everyones_Grudge_ 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント 4時間前 (1子コメント)
They're just strangers to you though.
[–]AllTheCheesecake -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
Uh, kind of depends on how long you've been around. A child is still a person. If he or she is old enough that you've formed a bond, that person doesn't deserve to be abandoned and unloved because of a deception they had no part in.
[–]Furchfurch 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント 4時間前 (0子コメント)
The father does not have to abandon them. The issue is that the choice is for the wronged man to take and only the mans choice. The woman is at fault. Did she not abandon him when she cheated?
π Rendered by PID 14490 on app-414 at 2016-04-09 01:51:47.958278+00:00 running 2b5c384 country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]Furchfurch 105ポイント106ポイント107ポイント (76子コメント)
[–]FoeHammer7777 49ポイント50ポイント51ポイント (75子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 57ポイント58ポイント59ポイント (68子コメント)
[–]latingamer1 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (12子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]latingamer1 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]Nezaus [スコア非表示] (7子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]GlaxoJohnSmith [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]kiloi [スコア非表示] (4子コメント)
[–]BiggestFloppiestDick [スコア非表示] (3子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]Slinkyfest2005 [スコア非表示] (1子コメント)
[–]Earthborn92 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]CDXXRoman [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]Tripoteur [スコア非表示] (1子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]Kasper-X-Hauser [スコア非表示] (3子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] (2子コメント)
[–]Kasper-X-Hauser [スコア非表示] (1子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]TheAngryGoat [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[+]canteloupy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-41ポイント-40ポイント-39ポイント (46子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 60ポイント61ポイント62ポイント (16子コメント)
[+]canteloupy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-44ポイント-43ポイント-42ポイント (15子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 48ポイント49ポイント50ポイント (14子コメント)
[–]JackalopeSix -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 17ポイント18ポイント19ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]canteloupy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-15ポイント-14ポイント-13ポイント (11子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (9子コメント)
[+]canteloupy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-12ポイント-11ポイント-10ポイント (8子コメント)
[–]CheesewithWhine 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Swayze_Train 30ポイント31ポイント32ポイント (28子コメント)
[+]canteloupy スコアが基準値未満のコメント-27ポイント-26ポイント-25ポイント (27子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 30ポイント31ポイント32ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]ThoseIrishJews 31ポイント32ポイント33ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]APsWhoopinRoom 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Swayze_Train 16ポイント17ポイント18ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]canteloupy -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (18子コメント)
[–]a_lumberjack 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]canteloupy -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]canteloupy 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]sonicthehedgedog 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (5子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]canteloupy -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Swayze_Train 3ポイント4ポイント5ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]APsWhoopinRoom 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]nestabilnost 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]fishbellyblack 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]dfskdafhasdf -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]3058248 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-24ポイント-23ポイント-22ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]_Everyones_Grudge_ 14ポイント15ポイント16ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]AllTheCheesecake -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Furchfurch 8ポイント9ポイント10ポイント (0子コメント)