You don't need people. People don't just appear out of nowhere. People are made, if you have a society where a lot of people are starving and not working, you have a problem called "making more people than you need" and you should stop making new people. Ironically, population growth is always fueled by marxist welfare thinking. If you look at Jews in Europe in the past, only rich and capable men had big families while those who weren't capable didn't make any children because they knew no one will pay for them. So by allowing welfare you're just perpetuating poverty and death. So what communism is, is just marxism trying to solve a problem that only exists because of marxism.

Also, why should anyone just get what they need? Why is your need a claim on anyone's existence? How can you justify that "morality" ? Because someone will have to work for you. Someone will have to do the job you're not capable of so you won't starve. Someone will need to be your slave so everyone gets what they need to survive.

We already established that neither you or I or really anyone else needs to exists, so why are you so entitled to think that just by existing you own something you had no part in creating? All of modern society is created by capable men, capitalists. You being poor as shit and saying "I want my part!!1!" aside from being entitled this also doesn't make any sense. Your part of what exactly? Do we split the planet and all the resources on it by the number of people alive and then everyone owns their part just by the virtue of being born? Even if you were to do that and even if society gave you your part you would probably starve just the same because resources are nothing without capable men who make wealth from them.

I know it's a bit of an overkill because of the way your comment is written I can tell you literally were never in your life in the same room with anything Marx wrote. Communism is communal ownership of the means of production. There is no money, there is no private property. There isn't some technological utopia either though, no, the goal is stagnation and death. The goal according to Marx is to disperse the cities and spread people around and make whole of human society into an agricultural society that only works as much as they need to produce food and that's about it. That's Marx's vision of the future of human society, our past. Not progress, but regress. And in fact, it is our past where he draws most of his idiotic ideas from as in how humans behaved before language or any understanding of the world, how we lived in small communes and shared almost nothing that was everything back then. Marx was a product of his time and even for that time he was an idiot. Any economist today will laugh in your face if you say that you take Marxist ideas seriously. So he's a joke in two ways, both as a social philosopher and as an economist. Only parasites on reddit like Marx. Also fuckin kys commie scum.