全 7 件のコメント

[–]huatry 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

Exactly right. You've also got to think about the weekly wage bill for the squad, which has been drastically cut as older established players have been moved out under Van Gaal.

[–]doesnt_like_pantsHerrera[S] 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think LvG needs to go but I don't think he's done as bad of a job as some people think.

The squad overhaul has been fucking monstrous. Almost everyone from Fergie's era is gone now and that was only 3 years ago (2 considering Moyes didn't really clear any of them out). You look at City and the majority of their starting XI (Aguero, Silva, Toure, Kompany when fit, Zaba, Hart) have been there for 4+ years AND they've been outspending us over that whole time.

He's left the squad a bit thin and managed to incorporate youth. Our injuries have been some of the worst in the Prem and we're only 1 point off City.

I think if you were to ask most United fans who the better manager between LvG and Pellegrini was then most would say Pellegrini. Some have even suggested he take charge of us. Fuck that, City have underperformed way worse than we have.

LvG's transfers haven't even been that bad, I think they've been quite good in all honesty.

My biggest issue is the football is just so dire.

[–]dsbm223Blind 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Agree with you. I have been LVG supporter but eventually gave up after those November - December run of games. Although I still like LVG, part of that roots from how he got mediocre (specially defense) Netherlands team playing as a unit and got to 3rd at WC but do admit, its time for mutual goodbye for better of both the club and for himself (to enjoy retirement). If LVG had not been so old school/stubborn and so rigid, he (and we) could have avoided this mess we have now.

Speaking of that, I love most of his signings and the youth he has given chances to.

I feel he should have tried second half of last season's 4-1-2-3 again this season when we played fairly exciting football (man, that 4-2 win over city was something) and got great run of results.

[–]_redmeScholes 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's a lazy point to complain about money spent.

The more accurate point is LvG (and I'm not a hater) is that he didn't buy all the players he needed in the first place.

We needed a class CB (and this is before Smalling 'stepped up' and Blind 'proved' himself). To be fair, we still do. I don't think Jones cuts it and for all the good Blind has done, he is still a cover player. A CB pairing of Smalling plus whoever, with Rojo/Jones/Blind able to fill in anywhere needed (and our injury record requires them all).

We needed a striker to rival Rooney, someone who will give you 20+ goals no questions asked. Martial landed but isn't stepping up to the goal requirement yet, but is a fantastic purchase nonetheless. He's found another gem with Rashford but are United going to hedge their bets on him over one of Europes established strikers?

Was it too much to ask to buy EVERYONE we wanted in those 2 windows? We'd probably be 3rd at least if we had just one or two extra buys last season, but the haters would say "£300m+ spent and only 3rd? Leceister ahead of United?

[–]manudevil7Beckham 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

First of all, Angel Di Maria was sold for £44.3 million, which is a loss of £15.4 million, not £5 million.

Secondly, since you argue net spend is important, that is a bigger argument for Jose Mourinho. Since June of 2013, Manchester United have a net spend of £168 million, while Mourinho's Chelsea have a net spend of £54 million. Therefore, our net spend is three times more than Chelsea's.

Mourinho was able to add much needed depth, and he also moved deadwood from the squad, while mananging a net spend of only £54 million.

Source: http://www.skysports.com/football/news/11668/9837133/gary-neville-chelsea-are-a-shining-example-to-other-clubs

[–]xtfftcValencia 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The other day we had some discussions on the sub with people suggesting Mourinho didn't get enough financial support at Chelsea.

He spent 100m to improve a squad that finished four points on top, and then the next summer he spent 70m on his PL-dominating team. Yet people tend to think he didn't get enough money at Chelsea and this is one of the reasons he failed so miserably at building long-term.

Yet van Gaal spending 250m on a team that finished 7th and 4th is seen as a gigantic sum.

170m for a team that finished 2nd and 1st = not enough.

250m for a team that finished 7th and 4th = top club spending.

People are willing to believe anything as long as it fits their narrative...

[–]RedDevilAndy -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I dont care how much money we spend on TOP players, yeah here lies the fault we've not signed top quality players in the last 3 years. I dont care if we spend 70mil on James, 80mil on Lewandowski (just examples obviously) just get the fucking TOP quality players in.