1901
1902

Over the shoulder revamp. (i.imgur.com)

h3adph0n3s が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]brdplz 2ポイント3ポイント  (20子コメント)

I'd love to see the Twitter campaign, the Tumblr posts, the petitions, etc from feminists trying to ban the butt. Because all I've seen is redditors mad that Blizzard wanted to make a small change to their game.

[–]jotch -4ポイント-3ポイント  (19子コメント)

You obviously didnt read into anything. The problem people had was that Jeff replied and said they were changing it as a direct response to a guy that had complaints that you hear from the usual SJW types. If they had just posted "Hey we are changing the tracer pose" nothing would have happened. The forum they chose to announce the change had direct correlation as to the reasoning people had to be pissed they were caving in to a socially inept SJW.

[–]drhead 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

So the nature of the change doesn't matter as long as it is requested by someone you don't like?

[–]jotch -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's what you took from the fact that one person complained about social justicey things, then Blizzard responded saying they were going to change things because of those social justicey things, then thousands of people voiced outrage of Blizzard changing things because one person is a retard who used the line "think of the children" ...please.

[–]shaggy1265 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

that had complaints that you hear from the usual SJW types.

Unless you take things out of context from his post this is just complete bullcrap.

[–]brdplz -4ポイント-3ポイント  (15子コメント)

had to be pissed they were caving in to a socially inept SJW.

So people don't know Blizzard and are looking high and low for their personal boogeyman.

Also lol @ calling some fuckin' dad you don't know a "socially inept SJW"... ironically I see the term "SJW" unironically used more often by the socially inept than anyone else.

[–]too_lazy_2_punctuate -3ポイント-2ポイント  (4子コメント)

Dude, this was all over blown bullshit. You can't really tell me you believe a girl can't look up to tracer cause she wears yoga pants? I mean, nevermind the inherent sexist tone of the SJWs complaint; that sexuality is something women should avoid flaunting, because they will damage children. I mean, come on.

[–]brdplz -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

You can't really tell me you believe a girl can't look up to tracer cause she wears yoga pants?

I don't believe that. That's silly.

And that isn't remotely close to the original complaint.

nevermind the inherent sexist tone of the SJWs complaint; that sexuality is something women should avoid flaunting, because they will damage children. I mean, come on.

I see you didn't read the complaint or any other posts by Flipps (like this one), and are just going off the outrage narrative that it's some bluehaired SJW screaming at Blizzard.

[–]too_lazy_2_punctuate 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Then we are going to have to disagree.

Sexuality is part of being human. I didn't see anything overtly sexual about her over the shoulder pose.

Furthermore if a woman having an ass (as in derrier, not like "damn she got ass")is the baseline for female sexuality, then the children sure are gonna be lead astray by every single woman they ever meet.

Everything about this situation comes off as a white knight taking on a fight he doesn't really understand, but thinks removing anything possibly sexual is not only good, but right. I'm amazed anyone could back this type of thing when there's so many more important things in life.

[–]brdplz 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Sexuality is part of being human. I didn't see anything overtly sexual about her over the shoulder pose.

And? How's that relevant to a pose that's supposed to encapsulate the character?

Furthermore if a woman having an ass (as in derrier, not like "damn she got ass")is the baseline for female sexuality, then the children sure are gonna be lead astray by every single woman they ever meet.

Good thing a woman having an ass isn't the baseline for said woman being sexualized lol

Everything about this situation comes off as a white knight taking on a fight he doesn't really understand, but thinks removing anything possibly sexual is not only good,

Again, no he fucking doesn't and you've blatantly ignored the numerous caveats he offered.

[–]luciferisgreat -4ポイント-3ポイント  (3子コメント)

"boogeyman" Is that why every Nintendo RPG is censored? Bravely Second, Fire Emblem, Xenoblade? Boogeymen..yeah ok.

[–]brdplz 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yes, boogeyman.

Especially when it comes to those Nintentdo RPGs.

With the ESRB being a powerful, organized entity with a track record of hating sexual and religious themes, you lot go "It must've been those feminazis!"

[–]luciferisgreat 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Who else could it be? There has been religious themes AND sexual content in video games for YEARS. The ESRB goes after violence, NOT how sexy a woman looks.

Have you been living under a rock or do you just pretend that nothing is happening?

[–]brdplz 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

NOT how sexy a woman looks.

Which is why SFV got T for reasons including "suggestive themes", right?

Have you been living under a rock or do you just pretend that nothing is happening?

I'm just not paranoid.