あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Artyomic 42ポイント43ポイント  (26子コメント)

It depends when Stalin dies. Stalin was the Soviet government. If he died and there was no clear successor virtually every part of the Soviet war machine would be thrown in chaos.

[–]CaseH1984 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

And even if Stalin had a contingency plan he wouldn't have made it public even to his cabinate because Stalin was paranoid (possibly rightly so given how much murder was on his hands.) Anyone who knew of any possible 'what do we do when stalin dies' would suddenly have incentive to hasten the process.

What I found astounding is that Russia had that much fight in them after stalin's purges, the starvation due to the farming practices enforced on the masses, the ukranian starvation/genocide, brain drain as many of the old minds in the millitary were put away for fear they might become a rival.

I wonder what would happen if Trotsky had taken power instead of stalin.

[–]isliterallyalobster 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The two main contenders at that stage for the Soviet throne were Zhadanov, or Beria, who hated each other. Kruschev, might have tried to make a play for leadership mainly through his friendship with Soviet Generals. Zhukov was certainly the most apt and popular Soviet General but had no political aspirations. If Stalin had died there would have been chaos at the upper echelons, but one of these magnates would have feasibly been able to take control. It would not have been smooth though.

[–]Sangajango [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Beria was pretty much second after Stalin- it was originally assumed he would succeed Stalin in 1953. If Stalin had died during WWII, Beria almost certainly replaced him. Either way, Stalin was incredibly powerful, but he wasn't the entire government, there were a number of prominent leaders, Khrushchev, Molotov, Kaganovich.

[–]Cheng_Pu_the_Golden -3ポイント-2ポイント  (3子コメント)

With the Germans invading the Mother Land there is no chance the Russians just stop fighting when Stalin dies. (idk what u actually think would happen?)

[–]Artyomic 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

The RKKA relied on Stalin to make decisions. If all of a sudden there is a lot of confusion as to whose job it is to be making decisions, the situation is not good.

[–]Cheng_Pu_the_Golden -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I think you are way overestimating the role Stalin played in the actual fighting on the ground. He might have been central to the Soviet's Grand Strategy, but in an organization as large as the Red Army most Decisions are going to have to be made lower down the chain. With or without Stalin, Russians still struggle and fight against the Nazi invasion of their beloved Motherland.

[–]Artyomic 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is undeniably true. However, there were times where the chain of command's (intentional) dependence on Stalin was disastrous. The massive encirclements of 1941 were caused in no small part because Soviet generals refused to retreat without Stalin's order. The best example is Kiev, where more than a million troops were encircled.