TL;DR Sexual strategy of a feminist. A look into their intrinsic motivators to understand the 'logic' behind their decision making.
Body
Feminism is a Cult with every action leading from said person through this lens of life. It’s a malicious piece of code that’s been installed in a virus, trying to manipulate its hosts to perform a certain action, an action that always benefits the virus and never the host.
People have layers of identity which they rank in importance. For example Americans (generically) identify as “Christians” first. “As a Christian my point of view is this…”. They’d identify as an American second (sometimes first) “As an American, my point of view is that…”. Then by Sex, state, home town, hobbies , sports teams etc. This forms their layers of identity.
These layers don’t apply to Feminists; they have one lens and only one reference point “As a Feminist – some solipsistic drivel”.
This is a feminists frame of mind, their only frame of mind. They operate from the strongest confirmation bias out of any sub-group, with everything confirming their beliefs and any action they take to reaffirm their ideology. Whereas other groups have many identities, ranking some higher than others allowing them to empathise with a magnitude of people. Feminists have the one lens, allowing them to only empathise with those that will reaffirm and operate in their bias.
It infects the weakest women, the women that need to feel valued in this world and I can empathise with that. As other women (hotter) secure their value by association to the men they date, through the social groups they create and the likes they draw in on social media. They’re left in the corner, dying as no one has fed them validation.
They’re the women born to a weak family structure, those that are ugly, boring and value-less. How sad is that? It gives them hope and direction, it allows them to lower barriers by whining and gives them a pass in life. They lose as Women aren't naturally competitive and feel entitled to a top tier man without putting in the groundwork to be desirable to said Men. Feminism is what tells them they have value, no matter how unconventional and lazy they are. The fact of the matter is they don’t love themselves for whom they are and can’t accept being mediocre, so they bend the laws of nature to get any value/acceptance. How dare you try and take this away from them? It’s a sexual strategy for the 5s> of the world. It was never about “the greater cause” as they’re running geo-political girl game on you – clever bastards!
Nothing you say or do will ever rid them of this disease. To raise a valid argument or deny them their “perceived right” causes them to act to protect their ego, which is fully entwined with feminism. They see it as a personal attack and will act to rid you, as you’re the source of this conflict on their identity. To deny Feminism is to deny the individual personally. This affects them to a larger degree in the dating world, naturally leading to my arguments for their sexual strategy.
As I've established they operate from the one lens. They subscribe to this one belief as it gives them delusional value and any action against this results in an egotistical defensive attack. Any rejection is a form of an attack on them personally, depleting their value and forcing them to subscribe harder to the one ideology that offers them their one source of acceptance and value.
A vicious cycle is formed, offering them understanding of why they were rejected so they can brush it off that “Society is the problem” and they themselves are fine. The further they go down this route, the more unattractive they become, the lower their choices. The other angle is they choose partners to secure a larger chunk of acceptance and “you go girl” fuel from their social groups. From an economic point of view the more “weird and wonderful” you are, the more you’re rewarded for “expressing yourself”, their sexual choices are reflected in this.
Being unsuccessful in the dating world takes its toll on them, when the wall rapidly approaches they realise that their value is based off their sexual capabilities. Society constantly prods them with a stick saying “prove yourself”, whilst they also seek to defend themselves from rejection. They take what they can and fight as it’s never enough.
Dating Men from other continents is a common choice, as they too share the same lower value that these women have. Often due to the fact they have a lot of work to prove themselves, but often it’s preference of who society sees as valuable from media selection. Naturally the two make a great pair. The Man lowers his preferences and gains value by dating a Native. The feminist is granted the acceptance and love she has always been looking for; it also gives her +10 SJW points as she now has evidence of her open mindedness. The relationship attains a high compact interest with the Feminist having another source of brag-plaining points - the plight of her partner in this wicked world. She also holds the cards in the relationship, whilst the Man may exude masculinity having been raised in an un feminized country. She can safely dump him, as she is more valuable than he is in her sovereign country. Therefore she feels empowered to be dating "who she wants" and empowered to hold the most power in the relationship, something she could never achieve before.
The un-threatening “Billy the feminized Beta” is also on the cards. With Oxytocin being a distant memory for both of them, they form strong bonds with each other, insufferable for the normal functional couple. He’s supportive of her life choices and is just happy that someone will spend their time with him, sex is an additional bonus but not necessary. She loses out on SJW points but finally feels accepted. She took the route of least resistance, the low hanging fruit. It’s not enough and she feels cheated at life. With her Beta validating her acceptance and protecting her worth in life, Hypergamy takes its unprecedented course with an awakened risk taking appetite. Rejection isn't nearly as bad before, with her worth being protected by Billy. She will cheat a lot with little remorse. Deep down she dislikes herself and therefore dislikes Billy, as something must be wrong with him to like her, he simply deserves it.
Those that are unsuccessful in the previous two categories, subscribe harder and harder to this ideology. Biology accompanied with the need of acceptance takes over. The unsuccessful feminists pair off with one another attaining the ultimate SJW jackpot, exceeding levels that are unknown to any mortal. Society also takes a win when two ugly women enjoy each others company. As long as they focus their energy on yoga to make scissoring do-able, they tend to stay away from poor desperate suckers.
Should a couple become divorced or break away, they invest their energy into their children, pimping them for likes on social media. The rest become druids of their tribe, they have the mileage to speak from “experience” and gain value by living vicariously through the advice they offer to the younger generation of feminists. The circle of dykes.
Conclusion
The lessons learned from this are known already among many of this community. This piece offer the micro reasoning for said choices, the takeaways from this include :
Feminism is a sexual strategy for ugly (read unvaluable) women
It’s primary use is to act as a support group
Through this support group they blame society (try to bend natures rules) rather than “going with it” and accepting themselves.
To attack feminism, is an extremely personal attack on themselves as a person. To bring this idea home, should someone attack TRP, you'd simply shrug it off “meh”
Feminism has incentives like a game that they work to gobble up dem golden coins
3 groups of people they date. Migrants, Betas, Each other
ここには何もないようです