全 27 件のコメント

[–]Startoverdarling 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Worked for a production company once; the producer (on an adderall binge) told me "people think it's a joke but the Jews own Hollywood. No one is famous without their permission."

[–]Cult_of_BBW 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Jews, Jews everywhere

[–]buymymeth 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

Can anyone link me to an article, or give me a brief explanation of the conspiracy surrounding the Jews?

I always see the topic pop up, but in research I never find anything besides Holocaust propaganda.

Why do people believe that Jews run the world?

[–]Sweet_Sound 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's not really a conspiracy. It's history. It would take you reading much more than an article or a brief explanation to understand the how who what why where and when of Jewish supremacy.

And it is that. Jews have been extremely successful in so many different areas of expertise for so long that most Jews can't even come close to understanding the vastness of it all. From the rise and fall of Rome and Christianity, Capitalism, Communism, Nationalism, Zionism. Check out the book from Eden to exile. Also Check out Capitalism and the Jews. Those are some non anti-Semitic sources where you may scratch the surface.

[–]jacks1000 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's ok to talk about "White men" running everything. That's just evidence of "White privilege" and "systematic racism."

But you can't talk about "Jewish men" running everything, or "Jewish privilege."

Because that would be "anti-semitic."

[–]CaucasianEagle 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

you nailed it. I guess it comes down to their better at this sick game we are all playing.

[–]Veritas__Aequitas [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's ok to talk about "White men" running everything.

And who is going on about that?

If you Google "who runs media" two of the first results are a Rense.com article about Jews and one from David Duke's website.

So don't say you can't talk about Jews and don't say that people are accusing white gentiles of running the media (which they do).

[–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]IanPhlegming 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Is it "When You Wish Upon a Weinstein"? It ultimately aired on Cartoon Network and even in Fox syndication and was put on the Season 3 DVD.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/When_You_Wish_Upon_a_Weinstein

    Moreover, the episode where Lois gets an abortion "Partial Terms of Endearment," has NEVER been shown on American TV, and only seen in the UK on BBC. Even cartoon network does not air this episode. It was included on the DVD set. Nothing particularly Jewish about this censored episode.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partial_Terms_of_Endearment

    Or is there another you're talking about? I'm interested.

    [–]curiosity36 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Jew - CBS - William S. Paley

    Paley's been dead for 26 years. I haven't looked at the rest of the list, but that was the first one and one I recognize bc he was a CIA asset.

    [–]Veritas__Aequitas -3ポイント-2ポイント  (16子コメント)

    "Think again" because most of these people can be traced to far more powerful Roman Catholic Jesuit coadjutors. Rupert Murdoch for example owns News Corp and Fox and he is a Pontifical Knight of St. Gregory. This is a knighthood bestowed on the recipient directly by the Pope, and it is a fact that the person being knighted is subservient to the person(s) granting the knighthood. Jacob Rothschild is a mere Knight Bachelor of the British Empire, being a servant to the Queen of England who in turn is controlled by the far more powerful Bourbons of Spain via the Order of the Golden Fleece; the most prestigious chivalric Order in all of Europe. Funny how a lot of these Jews are educated by Jesuits like Viacom owner Sumner Redstone who was trained by Jesuits at Georgetown University.

    http://jesuits.webs.com/media-control

    [–]jacks1000 1ポイント2ポイント  (15子コメント)

    Wait, someone is discussing Jewish power? Quick, look over there - CATHOLICS!

    [–]PetililPuff [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I still feel like the Catholic church is the snakey creep henchman of Judaism..

    [–]Veritas__Aequitas -1ポイント0ポイント  (13子コメント)

    Wait someone is giving an explanation on positioning of how Jews fit into the hierarchical power structure based on their inclusion in exclusive knighthoods while acknowledging that there are many of them in the media? Let me, without a counter-argument, place squarely the blame on Jews because...Jews!

    FTFY

    [–]jacks1000 1ポイント2ポイント  (12子コメント)

    most of these people can be traced to far more powerful Roman Catholic Jesuit coadjutors.

    You see what you posted there? That is nothing but 100% Grade-A bullshit. NONE of the people listed can be "traced to a far more powerful Roman Catholic Jesuit coadjutors."

    You are literally posting transparent garbage in a blatant attempt to distract from the subject at hand, Jewish power in the media.

    [–]Veritas__Aequitas -4ポイント-3ポイント  (11子コメント)

    They mostly are traceable to Jesuit coadjutors. Like the two I listed. And those in the link which you didn't look at.

    [–]jacks1000 1ポイント2ポイント  (7子コメント)

    None of them are traceable to "Jesuit coadjutors." You are simply trying to distract from Jewish power by posting weird bullshit.

    [–]Veritas__Aequitas -2ポイント-1ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Ignoring what has been posted which is naming names and groups and dismissing it as "weird bs," is, until you make a counter argument, null and void.

    [–]jacks1000 1ポイント2ポイント  (5子コメント)

    I read the link - it's 100% complete bullshit. It actually ignores the Jewish heads of these media outlets and points to second or third level people - then makes unsubstantiated and mostly false claims about their supposed ties to "Jesuits."

    It's all bullshit - the link you posted is complete and utter bullshit, without a shred of documentation.

    It's clearly and obviously meant to do nothing more than distract from Jewish ownership of the media. Which is why you posted it.

    [–]Veritas__Aequitas 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

    If we talk about Jesuits versus Jews overall, it is painfully obvious that the Jesuits are more powerful, which is why having a powerful Jesuit-influenced Catholic at the upper tiers of these media companies is important since in many cases these are the main policy makers.

    [–]jacks1000 -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

    So, again, you have provided ZERO evidence of your ridiculous nonsense about "Jesuits."

    You are obviously doing nothing but trying to distract from the reality of Jewish media power.

    [–]modelofintolerance [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Whatever you say, Alex Jones. This is the cheapest deflection ever. So now you want to look beyond the fact they're Jewish in order to blame something far more nebulous?

    As for how they fit into the power structure: Just fine, once it's NEVER at the top. Not ever. Put anyone else at the top but NEVER them. Right?

    The J-Complex programming is rampant in your brain; you are diseased.

    [–]Veritas__Aequitas [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    J-complex? You know, some people say racism is a disease.

    [–]zeropoint357 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Which race is that? I thought it was a religion.

    [–]PetililPuff [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Let's start calling modern day "Israel" what it truly is, yes?

    False Israel, the beast!

    Luke 21:12 But before all these, they shall lay their hands on you, and persecute you, delivering you up to the synagogues, and into prisons, being brought before kings and rulers for my name's sake.

    2 Thess 2:3-4 Let no man deceive you by any means: for that day shall not come, except there come a falling away first, and that man of sin be revealed, the son of perdition; Who opposeth and exalteth himself above all that is called God, or that is worshipped; so that he as God sitteth in the temple of God, shewing himself that he is God.

    Jesus to the Jews:

    John 5:43 I am come in my Father's name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.

    And most importantly, (speaking to you Christian Zionism!!):

    1 John 2:23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.

    Need more? 'Cause I've got it.