全 33 件のコメント

[–]HighQualitySoup 20ポイント21ポイント  (1子コメント)

The correct term is "Tankie" also r/shittankiessay

[–]noir_et_Orr 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Tankie is a little more inclusive. And is usually specific to socialists.

[–]TitusBluthEisenhower Death Camp denier 7ポイント8ポイント  (19子コメント)

"Tankie" was originally a Brit Socialist slur for Khrushchev-era Soviet apologists, supposedly derived from "sending in the tanks" to crush the Hungarian revolt. Since then it has been expanded to include fans of the WW2 Red Army, Stalin apologists, Socialists in general, etc. Compare how "Weeaboo" has gone from "obviously maladjusted Western dude who (badly) appropriates Japanese otaku culture" to "anyone who vaguely likes anything Japanese."

Other widely recognized equivalents:

Leeaboo: For the Confederacy

Teaboo: The British Empire

Prussiaboo/Kaiserboo: Imperial Germany

And so on. The construction ($countryname)boo or ($nationalstereotype)boo doesn't really go with the original "weeaboo" but here we are.

Fans of Imperial-era Japanese forces don't seem to have a specific moniker although I like "Zeroboo." America-boos are usually just called "Americans." >_>

[–]Mafaka322 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

Fans of Imperial-era Japanese forces don't seem to have a specific moniker

They are weaboos too.

[–]TitusBluthEisenhower Death Camp denier 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Not specific enough. If you call someone a weeaboo I'm going to assume they watch animes and occasionally spout some shit meme like "senpai noticed me!," not "Rape of Nanking is a hoax."

[–]osaka_amdAwaiting the nex Kriegsmarine post.. 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

NANJING WAS HUMANITARIAN WORK!

[–]Mafaka322 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

But weaboos justify that shit too. Japan is like religion for them.

[–]ObimaanE tu quoque, brute? [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Well, then I hope that just for liking Anime one isn't a weeb in your book. That would be sorta rude.

[–]M35MakoHorten Hears a 'Boo 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

What about "Freeaboos?"

The real question is, what do we call fans of the Roman Empire? Garumaboos?

[–]TolniVictor Victorievich, professional writer of History 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Byzzieboos if...well, for Byzantium, and, my own making, I'd go with Praetaboos, or Caesarboos.

[–]BrotherToasterDefending the Fatherland in the Motherland [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Just Romaboos.

[–]TolniVictor Victorievich, professional writer of History 3ポイント4ポイント  (9子コメント)

Prussiaboo/Kaiserboo: Imperial Germany

I thought the term was Reichaboo.

Also, there's Ouiaboos, for all our lovely Napoleon fans who think he was about to make the EU 200 years earlier or somesuch.

[–]TitusBluthEisenhower Death Camp denier [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

You're right on both counts.

[–]TolniVictor Victorievich, professional writer of History [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

just following St. Rommel's divine wisdom

[–]Jacques_HebertVICTIM OF TANKIE PURGE [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

there's Ouiaboos

That doesn't count though since Napoleon and the French Revolutionaries actually were gallant heroes devoid of faults.

[–]TolniVictor Victorievich, professional writer of History [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

tyrol was asking for it anyway

what was that guy, Andreas Hofer, even thinking he's doing

[–]Jacques_HebertVICTIM OF TANKIE PURGE [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Andreas Hofer

Hapsburg funded reactionary terrorist, duh.

[–]ObimaanE tu quoque, brute? [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Okay, lets just say that Hofer was/is severely overrated in Tyrol. We Tyroleans tend to forget why he fought and for what.

[–]TolniVictor Victorievich, professional writer of History [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I dunno, it's the closest thing to a national hero who was executed by Napoleon while he was fighting for a non-dickish side.

What I'm saying is, we need more dank Napoleonic memes about how they were following orders.

[–]Friendo_Supreme [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Papa Robespierre could have never harmed a fly.

[–]BrotherToasterDefending the Fatherland in the Motherland 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

Well, I'm not whitewashing any of Stalin's crimes or Red Army war crimes, and I think communism fucking sucks, but I'm a pretty big Red Armyboo.

tfw you'll never ride victoriously into Berlin on top of a T-34

[–]W_I_WaterAber Pluskat, 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

[–]Harbinger147 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Wait what's going on in this particular photo?

[–]W_I_WaterAber Pluskat, 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

USSR 1945 Victory Parade.
Zhukov the magnificent is having his men drag all the captured German military standards across the Red Square in Moscow at the parade celebrating the Russian victory in WW II.
This is from memory, but somebody is BOUND to correct me if I'm wrong.
.
edit: I know a funny story about the picture too; it was supposed to be Stalin on the horse, but the horse threw Stalin off twice and Stalin said "Let Zhukov ride the devil", and so Zhukov was able to (deservedly imo) inspect the troops from horseback at the parade, with Stalin standing on the Kremlin wall. (again, from ancient memory.)

[–]commissar_lubiis amused reading stormfront 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

gets panzerfausted by child soldiers RIP

[–]BrotherToasterDefending the Fatherland in the Motherland 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

In Soviet Russia, children kill you!

[–]Lockjaw7130thinks Dresden looks better now 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

Yeah, they exist on all sides. Extremely active in former Soviet states (hell, in East Germany there's still the "Ostalgie" movement, glorifying life under Soviet rule). Some people just don't learn from history.

They all seem to have the same battlecry: "well it wasn't all bad!"

[–]commissar_lubiis amused reading stormfront 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

A lot of it had to do with selective memory and obviously nostalgia.

The transition period in the 90s for many (Central-)East European countries was rather harsh (so-called shock therapy in Poland) with many social services suffering from critical fund cuts. Many had to experience the societal shock of transitioning towards a market economy that invariably created great wealth disparities . As such many still glorify the communist period if not just for the generous (if not piss poor quality) social services and the minimum life standard and equality ensured under socialism (disregarding clear inequalities for head party members that lived in luxury).

Of course this selective interpretation completely disregards the negative aspects under socialism such as an incredibly oppressive regime and police-state as well as the lack of democratic rights and civil liberties

[–]TheD3rpYou know what's thicker than KRUPPSTAHL? Wehraboo skulls. 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

in East Germany there's still the "Ostalgie" movement, glorifying life under Soviet rule

Except most of the stuff from Ostalgie comes from the post-Stalin USSR, which was actually not that bad of a place to live as some make it out to be.

[–]safarispiff 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wasn't a great place, either, though.

[–]DrunkRobot97 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

TL;DR I defend socialism like a fucking pile of Tankie trash.

I do think socialism and communism deserves at least a little more tolerance than fascism and nazism. True, attempts to form a communist nation have led to one or a few rather terrible people being given far too much power almost every single time, but the ideas of it are less inherently repulsive. Marx is actually a rather decently respected historian and academic who bought forward the very real issues of labour laws in the Mid-19th Century. Most big political parties in Europe either started off based upon the general ideals of socialism, or survived by incorporating parts of it ("Alright, then, here's your limits to the working week, we'll send kids to school instead of the mines." etc. etc.). By most accounts, he seems like a rather swell person (given my rather limited knowledge of him. If he ever advocated genocide of a specific race, then I would have to change my opinion, obviously. The killing of the rich would be a turn off if he didn't admit the potential for peaceful reform, which he saw happen in his life) Compare this to fascism, which has such lovely central tenements as the abolition of democracy (which, albeit, is shared with revolutionary socialism), the fetishisation and worship of the military and the state, and in the case of Nazism, the extermination or enslavement of all inferior forms of humanity. Hitler and Co. followed their ideology to the letter, and the nation they 'built' would've been a very funny joke if it were not for the ridiculous number of innocent people it killed.

Now, ideals aren't everything, Stalin and Mao were 'a bit crazy' in the same way the Sun is 'rather warm', and the ocean is 'a tad wet', and the countries they produced needed destruction or reform just as much as Nazi Germany did, but socialism at its core does embody some rather positive aspects of humanity and has in a way (though not the way Marx intended) made some tangible good change to the world. Fascism's only positive impact on the world has been serving as the honey for the idiots mocked on this subreddit to stick to.

Holodomorneverhappened.

/s

[–]Fostercare_FestusWar of Polish Agression [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

FUCKING TANKIES GET OUT OF MY SUB REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE