全 51 件のコメント

[–]project_a_jackie 13ポイント14ポイント  (5子コメント)

[–]illiberalwogAustralia 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is the best thing I've ever seen

[–]-CcCc 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Extremely broad generalization here. Almost every major bank where I live (central Europe) is ran by "non-Jews". My family has been financially fucked by non-Jews (Raiffeisen).

[–]FaliceerDeutschland 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

All banks globally are in some way tied to the Federal Reserve or another Central Bank.

[–]FaliceerDeutschland 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

And that man said 6% dividends on Federal Reserve stock. Ho-lee-fuck. Compare this to the regular stock market and only 50 companies have a dividend rate over 4.5%.

[–]DNGarbageCanada 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Note to everybody else who liked this video, there's a lot more, this is the 4th installment of a playlist of 6 videos. I encourage everybody to watch them.

They are long videos, but I think they are worth watching.

[–]NoL_ChefoBulgaria 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I would also recommend reading "The Creature from Jekyll Island" by Griffin. It covers a ton of ground: history of central banking, who profits from war, fiat currency, the Federal Reserve (the "creature" from the title), the Mandrake Mechanism, the World Bank, IMF, what determines inflation, socialism for the ultra-rich, etc. etc. Quite the eye-opener and jam-packed with sources, if you have doubts.

[–]FaliceerDeutschland 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Just so everyone knows - (((creatures))) fucked Bretton-Woods to allow this.

[–]900PercentSaltIntakeFührer 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

: ^ )

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

?

[–]900PercentSaltIntakeFührer 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's our greatest ally.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Oh you mean the Pure Coincidence

[–]900PercentSaltIntakeFührer 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

((( Schlomo Wassersteinowitzberg )))

[–]jazzmazz 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

The Jew imposed religion, controls the banking and the media of the Goyim. So in the end, it seems that the Goyim really are quite stupid, no?

I'm just trying to be objective here. If we say the Jew uses ethnic nepotism to advance his interest, the question is - why don't the Goyim do the same?

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

the Goyim really are quite stupid, no?

I think the proper word would be gullible. But yes.

why don't the Goyim do the same?

Because somehow we as a group seem to have some extreme belief in the good in everyone. It's literally what "the white mans burden" really means.

[–]NookuBelgium 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

These things never get enough upvotes on Reddit to gain any attention.

So thx a lot for stickying this.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

They don't because it makes people uncomfortable. It reminds them that they're being played and that each morning that they go to work they're playing into the hands of the current monetary system. They cannot allow themselves to think about the fact that they are working to be more in debt.

[–]NookuBelgium 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yeah, your post reminded me of a cool 30-minute video that summarizes banking history.

So I posted it here too:

https://np.reddit.com/r/european/comments/4d19le/the_american_dream_also_applicable_to_europe/

It's a great video, with tons of information poured into a 30-minute animation / cartoon.

More than 2 million views, with 97.3 % likes versus 2.7 % dislikes

Yet, here on Reddit, just 5 upvotes. 100 % upvoted, but just 5 nevertheless, while it's information that everyone should know imho.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah I've seen that before. It's indeed well made.

[–]mardoleroPoland 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

In 2016 there is a good chance that this system will collapse. In 2008 central banks funded banks, so they won't collapse, but now both central banks and banks have problems, so there won't be anyone to save them. There are some weak spots like Chinese housing market, Deutsche Bank, Japan economy and USA economy (they are in deep depression, but still hide it)

[–]Blood_axeNorway 0ポイント1ポイント  (10子コメント)

Fantastic video. It's time to nationalize the banks and bring back the gold standard. And those responsible for this should be hanged for treason.

[–]NjevilSweden 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

yay more government

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

If there's anything that the government should control it's the money of the country.

[–]NjevilSweden 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yes and the production of goods as well of course

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you're a communist. If you really think that the government controlling money supply is the same as them controlling the production of goods, then you're in urgent need of education. I know the Swedish educational system is bad, but even I know that it's not this bad. Get real.

[–]Blood_axeNorway 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's not ideal but do you got a better suggestion?

[–]NjevilSweden 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yes, a decentralized economy.

[–]Blood_axeNorway 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If by that you mean what we already have in Scandinavia (a centrist economy) then I agree to a certain degree, even though the banks have way too much power here too. Im also thinking about the US where it has spiraled completely out of control. They should do something radical to remove the corruption.

In what way could we have banks with as little power and corruption as possible while at the same time have a small government? I agree with RamblinRambo on this point, if there is one thing the government should have control over it should be the money. Then we can cut back on government control in other places instead.

[–]FaliceerDeutschland 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Going to gold standard would crash the global economy.

I wonder how long a recovery would take.

[–]Blood_axeNorway 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It will crash eventually anyway. Better now than later.

[–]InitiumNovumIreland 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Who are the owners, goy?!"

[–]fucking_white_male 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Maybe someone could clarify that for me.

Banks lowering the interest on loans is a simple tactic to bait more people into taking a loan, therefore creating more money in return?

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The central bank lowers interest rates to stimulate the economy. Which translates to businesses and people taking more loans and spending that currency (creating an increased supply of said currency on the market). This is also where inflation comes in. The more currency in circulation the less value it has which causes prices to rise.

[–]sys_49152Free Market for White People 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

Yes, the banking system is fucked up and need a thorough purge. I give them that.

But wehere those guys make it far too easy for themselves is when they bring up this "if there's only 1 dollar in the world how are you going to pay it back + interest" problem. At first it sounds like "omg mind blown" but they forget to mention that our economy constantly creates value. That not every loan is a consumer loan for a new car/tv.

You borrow that one dollar from a bank, buy a pile of rocks for it and build a house from those rocks. Now no one would dispute that the house has more value than the pile of rubble you built it from. And that's where you pay the "1 dollar + interest" from back.

Reducing the whole economy to consumer loans and government spending is far too simplistic.

[–]KindyreGermany 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not every loan is a consumer loan, but every unit of currency in circulation is from a loan (which ultimately traces back to the central bank).

Copy-paste from a post I made a couple of weeks back on exactly this topic:

Value is not the same thing as money.

People confusing the two is why this scheme is so insidious, I think.

Value can be created independently, yes. Every time you do any kind of productive work, you are creating value. In fact, that's the only way to create real value; every other form derives from that.

But that is not true for money. Money - physical or electronic currency - is created (put into circulation) only by means of taking out a loan. That is the only way, to the best of my knowledge. This wasn't always the case, but it is now in all but a handful of countries (which we tend to keep going to war against, incidentally... In order to spread the blessing of democracy, naturally. We just happen to also set up central banks while we're there cause we're nice like that... but I digress).

Consider this analogy/model, and let me know if you see any flaws or I am overlooking something:

Imagine you are the central bank. In front of you is a bowl. It represents "the economy" of a country. You have a magic marble pouch which never becomes empty, no matter how many marbles you take out. A marble is a unit of currency.

There are certain rules that govern when and how many marbles you can take out. But we won't bother with the details here because they don't have an effect on the point of this model. Regardless, under the right conditions, you can always pull more marbles out on demand.

When you place marbles into the bowl, you are giving out a loan. This adds currency into circulation. Being a loan, you'll want all the marbles back. Plus interest. For simplicity, let's say loans are always 5 marbles and interest is always 1 marble. So, for every 5 marbles you add to the bowl, you'll want to take 6 out eventually. Again, the details don't change anything as long as you want more back than you put in.

We track four numbers:

  • Circulation: How many marbles are in the bowl
  • Owed: How many marbles you want back eventually
  • Deficit: Flat difference between Owed and in Circulation
  • Pressure: Difficulty of repaying a loan, quantified as the percentage by which Owed exceeds Circulation (P = D/C)

Let's kick it off by giving out 3 loans (so 5 marbles each, where you'll want 6 each back):

C = 15; O = 18; D = 3; P = 20.0%

You can stir the bowl, if you like, to simulate people working and currency moving around... but you'll soon realize that doesn't change anything. You can imagine the stirring as adding "value" to each marble, thanks to the work being done. But no matter how much you stir, there's still 15 marbles in the bowl. And you still want 18 back, 3 of which don't exist.

Let's say someone worked hard and one of the loans gets paid back (5 + 1 marbles return to you, C and O go down by 6):

C = 9; O = 12; D = 3; P = 33.3%

The Deficit hasn't changed. But it has gotten much larger compared to Circulation, so Pressure has increased. It will be much harder for someone to make enough to pay back 6.

Let's give out another loan to help them out:

C = 14; O = 18; D = 4; P = 28.6%

Oops, the Deficit went up. They Owe you as much as when we started, but there's less in Circulation so Pressure is still higher than before.

Let's try helping them again:

C = 19; O = 24; D = 5; P = 26.3%

Well, the Deficit is higher than ever... there's also more than ever in Circulation (inflation), but the Pressure still hasn't returned to the starting point. (It never can, by the way. Mathematically, you can only ever approach 20% now... never actually get there)

Still, someone managed to pay back their loan now:

C = 13; O = 18; D = 5; P = 38.5%

Oh dear. Maybe they shouldn't have.

Well, you can play around with this and see if you can ever decrease Deficit. Or even just keep Pressure from perpetually rising every time a loan is paid back. Spoilers: You cannot.

This is, of course, a simplified model. There are a lot of details in the real world system. They make it complicated and easy to lose track of what is going on. But they don't change anything about the core mechanisms that cause the effect you see here:

  • All money in circulation is the principle of a loan
  • The principle must be paid back in full
  • Plus interest
  • The interest is missing from the system because it never existed in it
  • Principle from other loans must be used to cover the interest
  • This causes a deficit that can only ever grow

The bottom line is that you cannot get more out of a closed system than you put into it.

If you try, something will have to give. And so people go broke. And banks "acquire" land, property, goods, valuables. To make up for their "loss"... of something that they have in infinite supply... and can't be gotten anywhere else... and has no inherent value until value is "assigned" to it.

If you're aware of a real-world mechanism that I didn't account for, and that reduces what I call Deficit or Pressure here, without anyone defaulting on loans, I'd love to know.

[–]anti-jihad 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Housing: look at the sub prime crisis / bubble. The house actually has no worth than other than what people put on it, and what people can afford to pay for it if they desire it.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

At first it sounds like "omg mind blown" but they forget to mention that our economy constantly creates value.

They didn't fail to mention that. However you're missing the point that value does not equal currency, it equals money which is the whole point. You're willing to give up that created value in exchange for something liquid (money, currency, rabit hide) and the current system only works as long as you accept that the paper money that's not backed with anything is worth something. This is why people want the gold standard back.

[–]Remodar -1ポイント0ポイント  (11子コメント)

Please don't change this sub in this.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (10子コメント)

Huh?

[–]Remodar -1ポイント0ポイント  (9子コメント)

Isn't this migrant, islam related sub? That's what most people come here for.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

Isn't this migrant, islam related sub?

No. Never been.

[–]Remodar 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

okok

[–]NookuBelgium 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

This is an awareness sub.

[–]Remodar 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I get it now. I just usually don't see this kind of posts here

[–]FaliceerDeutschland 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

This video should be telling you who the real plague are.

Those very nice (((coincidences))) that own the bank.

[–]Remodar 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I know the system. Only surprised to run into that here.

[–]-CcCc -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

Nope. They've made numerous subtle hints that they don't really care about Islam, they just want to use it to turn people against the Jews.

[–]FaliceerDeutschland 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's not even true.