Wow, this is a fun thread. In case anyone cares about facts, let's break down the claims of this angry protester, conveniently laid out with supporting "evidence" in the top comment on this thread.

https://news.vice.com/article/fossil-fuel-investors-are-pumping-millions-of-dollars-into-hillary-clintons-campaign

The bulk of fossil fuel industry contributions to Priorities USA Action came from two donors.

Huh, two people. That already starts to make this seem isolated rather than a systemic attempt by oil companies to bribe Hillary. But let's read on.

Donald Sussman, the founder and chairman of Paloma Partners, donated $2.5 million. His hedge fund is invested in energy companies...

Wait, so this guy isn't even some kind of oil tycoon. He's an investor who happens to be invested in energy companies, many of which are also heavily involved in clean energy. And a quick bit of research reveals that he's actually a pretty cool guy, a generous philanthropist who has supported a number of liberal causes as well as just plain human rights efforts.

http://www.pressherald.com/2013/01/01/profiles_of_key_maine_philanthropists/

Okay, so we've got one guy who is an investor in some oil companies donating a bunch of money to Hillary Clinton's campaign. Couldn't be just because he's... you know, a Democrat supporting a Democrat he likes. He must be bribing her.

So who's the other fellow?

David Shaw, chief scientist at D.E. Shaw Research, a computational biochemistry research company, gave some $750,000 to the Clinton-affiliated PAC.

Wait so what's his connection to oil?

Shaw served on the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology (PCAST) under presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama.

Nothing about oil there.

His investment management firm D.E. Shaw & Co., LP has major holdings in Marathon Petroleum Corporation.

Ah. So clearly he wants to crush green energy because of this connection.

Shaw is also an investor in solar energy projects and an ambitious offshore wind project in New England.

Never mind. I guess there's no issue after all, let's pack it up and...

But fossil fuel interests are also sending checks directly to her campaign.

Oh shit. Here we go.

Clinton has taken in nearly $268,000 in contributions from individuals employed in the oil and gas sector this election cycle.

Wait... "employed in the oil and gas sector..." so anyone working for any sort of oil company? Hell, I live in Houston, that's like half the people I know outside my own job. That includes all sorts of scientists, engineers, etc, etc. That's also a ton of people in other states with major oil or gas resources, like Ohio. How in the world is this supposed to matter?

Well, I guess I should still be concerned. After all, despite these seemingly small and unimportant connections, Hillary is obviously acting in the interest of these evil fossil fuel companies.

Throughout her campaign, Clinton has emphasized boosting renewable energy production, rather than waging a full-frontal assault on fossil fuels.

Wow. How radically pro-oil.