上位 200 件のコメント全て表示する 275

[–]ayePALINDROMEeyeConservative Purist[M] [スコア非表示] stickied comment (1子コメント)

*if you are interested in applying to be one of the 2-3 mod's we select to help us sift through the applications, please send us a message via Modmail.

[–]SirPounceTheThirdConstitutionalist/Libertarian 30ポイント31ポイント  (6子コメント)

The decision to build a virtual wall around our subreddit...

But will you be able to make /r/politics pay for this wall?

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

You need me on that wall.

[–]SirPounceTheThirdConstitutionalist/Libertarian 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

You need me on that wall.

Man... I just can't handle the truth you're dealing.

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm ordering that code red.

[–]BrewCrewKevin [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Please limit the discussion to conservative policies, not Trumpisms.

/s

[–]perceptionate 63ポイント64ポイント  (38子コメント)

I think this is a terrible idea. r/conservative is currently one of the only places on reddit where people can come find a conservative perspective on politics. I embrace moderates and even liberals coming to engage in discussion. Trolls are easily dismissed through downvotes.

I get that there has been a surge in populism surrounding Trump, but I think it strengthens conservative principles to be able to engage with populists to find differences and better articulate why true conservatism is the best option.

This sounds eerily similar to liberal cupcake "safe spaces". I urge you to reconsider.

[–]lewlkewl [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

As a liberal, I agree. I get enough of liberal/leftist views in /r/politics, and i come here to see the conservative perspective and occasionally discuss certain ideas i find debatable. It's important to see all sides of a coin to be a well rounded person, and i think /r/conservative is one side of the coin people should see.

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] -9ポイント-8ポイント  (29子コメント)

We cater only to Conservatives... it is in our mission statement:

We provide a place on Reddit for conservatives, both fiscal and social, to read and discuss political and cultural issues from a distinctly conservative point of view.

Since we are not given the tools to properly carry out this mission we have few choices left.

If one wants to interact with non-Conservatives one can go to places like /r/politics or /r/The_Donald.

[–]perceptionate 27ポイント28ポイント  (13子コメント)

You honestly think that r/politics is a place where conservatives can discuss substantive ideas with liberals? Not even moderates can go on that sub. It's Bernie Bro or bust...

I get the annoyance with Trumpites. But, honestly, when someone defends Trump based on sound reasoning (even though it's rare), I appreciate their input.

As conservatives, I though we were better than falling for the hyper-sensitive "safe space" liberal fetish.

[–]9enis [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

I agree fully. But this subreddit, and this seems championed by u/chabanais, is now just r/CruzforPresident. If you disagree with him in the slightest you are banned.

[–]ayePALINDROMEeyeConservative Purist[M] [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

this is funny because chab is probably the most even-handed mod.

[–]9enis [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

My mistake then. Just the fact he posted this message and that he comes down hard on those going against Cruz made me think otherwise. Well, I still think this will just end this subreddit. Even the approved that still come around will eventually tire of hearing the same thoughts nonstop and will likely go to a similar subreddit.

[–]ayePALINDROMEeyeConservative Purist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I know who every mod voted for - except chab. He's as hard in the Cruz supporters as he is on the trump supporters.

[–]spartanburger91Reagan Conservative [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

we have few choices left

Try moderating. Try that one. Use 72 hour bans to deal with the trolls and Trump activists. Most of them have short attention spans.

[–]TeaPartyOverlordCruz Conservative [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

One of the things about being a mod here is that people don't realize that because conservatives are so vastly outnumbered on reddit, the only reason we don't look exactly like /r/politics is because a few people take on essentially an unpaid full-time job of pulling the weeds out of this sub. Chab, who you replied to, is one of the very hardest-working mods. We literally deal with hundreds of trolls every day, and thousands of shit-posts/off-topic/tantrums. It's crazy.

Folks don't get a grasp on the sheer scope of the effort. It's staggering and cumbersome, and it's not sustainable. I'm trying to take the sarcastic suggestion of "try moderating" as naive rather than hostile, but maybe, just maybe, the mods know a little more about what it's like moderating this sub than you do.

[–]baldyloxSocial Libertarian [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Can confirm. She sheer number of trolls, brigading from other subs, abusive posts and PM's, comically immature behavior not just from the left, but also now from Trumpbots, etc. make this a very difficult sub for even a dozen people to mod.

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S] [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

We've tried thanks for your advice.

[–]Trumpisawinner2 [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

I can convince you that Donald Trump is more conservative than Cruz. You wanna debate?

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Do I need to stick my hand in boiling water to know it's hot?

[–]Trumpisawinner2 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I am not going to troll you. We can talk in this thread. If you feel like I am trolling, you can ban me. I will prove to you that Trump is a better option politically and a truer conservative than Cruz.

[–]posidonius_of_rhodes [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

Please explain how we are to change minds if people who aren't explicitly conservative can't get in?

[–]truthrevolt [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Won't this move do a disservice to people who need to hear the conservative viewpoint on issues? As much as I'm irritated when I see Trumpkins blindly defending their emperor, I'd want those who maybe considering Trump to see some facts and maybe come to their senses. Especially with the primaries that are remaining - which may be a long shot, but as long as there is a fighting chance, I don't see why give in.

[–]TreadNotOnMeConstitutional Conservative 29ポイント30ポイント  (24子コメント)

Can we also have the mods conduct seizures and deletions of any member's posts across Reddit? I feel this is best for the public. I'd hate to be triggered by a RINO who expresses a view that isn't sufficiently conservative.

[–]perceptionate 14ポイント15ポイント  (23子コメント)

Let's not get carried away. We just need a safe space to avoid RINO/Trumpite microagressions.

[–][削除されました]  (11子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]Thrawn011 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Yea, I don't know that I support this. I want liberals to be able to hear real conservative points of view.

    [–]0ttervonBismarckCruz 2016 15ポイント16ポイント  (3子コメント)

    It's my personal opinion that respectful leftists that actually want to hear our opinions should be let in.

    [–]Cunfuse 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I agree. Rational political discussion should be important for conservatives who are opposed to censorship and agree with the free exchange of ideas. Let's not become an echo chamber like r/politics.

    [–]9enis [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    They should, all this does is make this an echo chamber. I wonder if this is all moderators that want this or just Chabanais? It clearly seems to be aimed at anyone that is ok with Trump being the GOP nomination.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    They can buy a Bork book.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

    I wouldn't visit /r/The_Donald to know what Conservatives are thinking. There was a recent post there showing how a plurality of their commenters also post on /r/SandersforPresident.

    [–]ayePALINDROMEeyeConservative Purist[M] 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Facts don't care about the_donald's feelings.

    [–]00Chubby [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Do you think Ben Shapiro would support this after his big speech about leftists shutting people down? His speeches are private conservative events but he still engages in debate with those who disagree with him in his audience and doesnt kick any one out if they dont.

    [–]Thrawn011 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Couldn't you limit posters to only conservatives, but still let others read the content?

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Reddit doesn't give us many options really. 4 years ago when we went private on weekends we went through this exact thing.

    [–]CountStitchula [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

    I'm fairly new to Reddit so I suppose I don't understand why this might be a necessity. Are the moderator tools that inadequate for handling trolls?

    [–]DevonWeeksModerate Conservative [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    I mod for a sub with 70k+ subscribers. It's not that the mod tools are not adequate. It's that at a certain point mass behaviors become unmanageable. In a sub like this where you face very large, organized efforts to troll the subscribers and stifle dissent, it becomes a slog for even a team of 30 mod to manage. Plus, you have no tools to address things like vote manipulation. Different mod teams address it in different ways. Going private is one way to do it, and in the case of a conservative sub in a hyperliberal environment compromised mostly of children, it's about the only option side from enduring the abuse.

    [–]CountStitchula [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Thanks for the explanation, I appreciate it.

    I ended up here because my usual conservative haunts have become cesspools of vulgarities, insults, lame memes, etc.

    It's a shame that the sheer volume has overwhelmed the mods. I imagine many others are looking for alternative hangouts as well and going private will probably make people shy away.

    [–]CountStitchula [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Also, what is vote manipulation? Up/down voting submissions?

    [–]ScootusBuckeye [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Pretty much. Subs that link to other threads on Reddit (either the shit_says subs, drama subs, or organized trollish subs like the_Donald) are supposed to link to threads with Non-Participation links. But you can easily just type the URL and replace NP with www and you can vote again. Some users say "Hey look at this thread, go "express your opinion." Most subs ban users for encouraging brigading but not all of them. I think the Donald (either on purpose or through their sheer obsession with Trump) brigades threads here a decent amount. Like that thread about the National Enquirer story, anyone who questioned it's validity was in the negatives while circlejerky posts about Lyin Ted were double digits. I don't envy the job of the mods.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    The tools Reddit provides are very few.

    [–]CarolinaPunk#NEVERTRUMP[M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Incredibly useless. we have to go through individual comment history manually just to hunt the liberals down to ban. Not to mention the trump supporters.

    [–]MrSparkle86Moderate Conservative 17ポイント18ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I for one welcome our conservative overlords.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S] 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I voted for Kodos.

    [–]beer_n_gunsMillennial Constitutionalist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Since we used to go private on weekends there will be a substantial number of older accounts that will find themselves able to access our sub and, if you are among the lucky ones, no action will be required by you.

    Why not try this again before going completely private?

    [–]DevonWeeksModerate Conservative 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

    We will leave this notice stickied for the forseeable future in order to get feedback from those who have any questions or to review comments from people not Conservative enough to make the cut.

    Uh oh... my days may be numbered.

    [–]CynicalBastard3118Goldwater Conservative 8ポイント9ポイント  (11子コメント)

    If you don't mind me asking a question;

    How large is the legroom for diversity of opinion in the private subreddit? Among conservatives in this sub, I know we are home to paleoconservatives, libertarian leaning conservatives, reaganites, centre right moderates, and religious conservatives. The question is, will there be room for all of us, all of us who can claim to adhere to the free market and American values we hold so dear? Or will the private subreddit be more selective?

    Of course, I don't expect us to accept any "Alt righters" or "centrists who are fine with Bernie."

    [–]MUH_PC_ACCOUNT 6ポイント7ポイント  (6子コメント)

    This sub is generally not ok with paleoconservatism, judging by reactions I have seen in the past to paleo opinions. It's why I lurk and don't talk.

    I guess I won't be making it to the private forum since they're wanting to clamp down on whose allowed in.

    [–]CynicalBastard3118Goldwater Conservative -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Eh, I suppose it depends from my point of view. I've seen some paloecons who are accepted, because they're not foaming at the mouth with support for protectionism and nationalism. I've also seen paleocons of the Pat Buchanan stripes, who are just an older extension of the alt-right, which many of us are skeptical towards.

    [–]MUH_PC_ACCOUNT 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

    There is literally nothing wrong with Pat Buchanan.

    I fully believe we would all be better off today if his branch of conservatism had beat out Bush's. I guess that's neither here nor there though. You'll probably want a mod to weigh in, if you don't think you'll fit their orthodoxy well enough. I probably don't, so I'm not going to bother applying.

    [–]0ttervonBismarckCruz 2016 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (3子コメント)

    There is literally nothing wrong with Pat Buchanan.

    He's a Fascist.

    [–]MUH_PC_ACCOUNT 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

    I'm just going to LOL and move on, man.

    I'd recommend going to /r/DebateFascism and making that claim if you're feeling confident, though.

    [–]0ttervonBismarckCruz 2016 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I don't need to debate anyone. Buchanan is a known Nazi sympathizer & revisionist.

    [–]MUH_PC_ACCOUNT 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yea, sure, ok. Literally Hitler.

    [–]EllesarisEllendil [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I'm basically a centrist who's only conservative on foreign policy, law and order but in favour of a strong state. I think I'm doomed.

    [–]Satan_Is_Win [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    This is ridiculous.. I'm British and come here to get updates on American politics and post interesting pieces that I find on the web. I have no idea what the southern strategy is and unsurprisingly I don't hall a full understanding of your constitution so I can't answer question 8 either.

    [–]Jcpowers3 [スコア非表示]  (8子コメント)

    So wait... Just because people were commenting about trump or more moderate/progressive candidates your turning the sun into a safe space. We should be able to have discussions from all views and win disagreements with substantial arguments hiding doesn't help.It's a very liberal thing to do

    [–]9enis [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Right. They are the ultimate hypocrisy, bashing and making fun of others' nee for "safe space" all the time, but now they will only let in those that agree with them; so they won't have to deal with other ideas of conservatism.

    [–]furless 16ポイント17ポイント  (5子コメント)

    You're certainly free to do what you want, of course, but this bears hallmarks of cultism. If you have a discussion on X, the only input you will get is the party line. Given that, you might as well make the subreddit 'read only', with the mods, and a very select few whose loyalties are unquestionable, being granted write access. Such philosophical inbreeding can only be a weakness.

    [–]HiDart31 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    I must say, this disappoints me. How can we bash Safe Spaces on campuses, and then build one on the Internet? Are we that scared of discussion? Are we that unsure of our values? Being challenged intellectually is the best way to grow in one's knowledge of values and ideas. And being the largest Conservative forum on Reddit, we have the opportunity to spread our beliefs to those who seek us out. Sure, we have a bit of a troll problem, but so does every sub. If this is the direction r/Conservative is going, I will not be a part of it.

    [–]brettpilkington07 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Donald Trump supporters will be held to the same standards as other non-conservatives, such as Bernie Sanders supporters.

    So does this mean that anyone who supports Trump will be banned? What if the person doesn't even like Trump, but knows Kasich can't win and isn't a Cruz fan, so they are one of the ones thinking that Trump has the best chance of winning and possibly nominating acceptable SC justices? I haven't seen your questionaire yet or anything, but it almost seems like it is going to be "do you agree with every single position of Ted Cruz? No? Then you can't come in." Why would you want to wall it off that much where you are ONLY discussing with people who have the exact same views as you? Why not have a little bit of variety? I understand not wanting to have to deal with liberal trolls and stuff, but what is the point of sitting around discussing stuff with pre-qualified people that you agree with? It seems to render this just a place to whine about liberals-- I thought that the more important function of this sub was to possibly expose a few people to some viewpoints that aren't prevalent on reddit.

    [–]YosoffNatural Rights Conservative[M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    We don't ban all non-conservatives. Just the ones who are rude to conservatives or continuously parrot talking points they don't understand.

    [–]0ttervonBismarckCruz 2016 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

    I support this decision, although I would say that I do value the fact that there are open minded leftists & moderates who enjoy participating here, asking questions, etc. I hope that we can allow non Conservatives to have access provided they aren't trolls and or shills. I want other people to be exposed to rationally thought out Conservative opinions.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

    We are trying to minimize distractions.

    [–]0ttervonBismarckCruz 2016 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yeah I support that, there are too many trolls brigading this sub & lying about basic facts.

    [–]OnOrderConservative [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

    Our very own safe space

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

    You will not be accepted.

    [–]Yesiamconservative [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    For that comment? Seriously? This is ridiculous. you are being crazy sensitive and intolerant. Kind of like some other people I know...

    Edit: okay, I took out the f-word. Let me guess, you still have no interest in the opinion of one of your most loyal posters?

    [–]Litnire [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Sooo... /r/conservative is basically going to build a massive safe space? And you guys wonder where college age progressives are coming from? This is that same EXACT sentiment, what a joke. You guys are the pale shadows of your masculine predecessors.

    What a sad state for conservatism. These kinds of gestures, symbolical, shows people how far we've fallen.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    The National Review is for Conservatives, the Nation is for Liberals. They each have their own audience and we have ours.

    [–]PaganRaccoon [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Is this new private subreddit going to remove the score hidden feature? It's very annoying, and currently the duration of the score is so long to the point that a thread is buried before you can see the comment scores.

    [–]xray606 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I guess I'll be out. This sounds a bit too close-minded and culty for me. I understand there are annoying people. But this is the kind of stuff the chronically angry people on the other side do... 'Unless you think exactly like us, and agree with every single thing we say, then you're the enemy'.

    How can anybody point a finger at them, if we do the exact same thing? The main reason I identify with conservatives, is the fact that they typically do NOT have that sort of angry cultist mentality.

    I talked to a guy in Pakistan on here the other day. I found it very interesting, and he actually made me check myself on a couple things. I think that's a good thing. It's not healthy to only surround yourself with people who agree with every single thing you say. That's what creates all the morons in Hollywood.

    I haven't seen anything that seems like significant trolling at all. I could understand if lib-tard kids were just drowning the whole sub, but I haven't seen that. But... Whatever.

    [–]JexInfiniteCruz Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I support a barrier for entry. If people want to join our conservative ranks, they should put in the 3 minutes of effort. The people who go to that minimal effort are the ones worth allowing in.

    [–]Willingmess [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Well, ya forced me out of lurking. I don't want to lose this breath of fresh air. Crossing my fingers I get accepted.

    [–]IronPathologistSowellian Buckleyite 6ポイント7ポイント  (9子コメント)

    I support these decisions. Just a quick question...If someone accidentally presses Alt-Right on their keyboard, will they also be banned, due to the association of that movement with Trump and its authoritarian founder Richard Spencer?

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Just hit Crtl-W to correct yourself.

    [–]ayePALINDROMEeyeConservative Purist[M] -5ポイント-4ポイント  (7子コメント)

    Look, everyone! Downvotes! That means our favorite sub is visiting! Enjoy it for the next 30 days, because the brigading ends 5/1/16.

    [–]forbin1992 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You don't think any conservatives are down voting?

    [–]dy--dx [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Um, it's conservatives that are downvoting you right now.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] -5ポイント-4ポイント  (4子コメント)

    When we were private downvotes never happened.

    [–]ailurus1 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    I guess this is the best place to ask a question about your quiz.

    Just went through it, and I can only provide a yes/no answer to one of your yes/no questions. If I submit it with non yes-no answers, is it just a waste of my time and yours, or will you read through longer answers? Being a teacher, I fully understand why you have the yes/no questions on there but most of the issues you're trying to address in those questions are too complex for just a yes/no answer in my opinion.

    (For example, gov't jobs. Yes, the government provides jobs - I'm a teacher, I have a government job. And so do soldiers, cops, etc. But, if I want to spur economic growth I'll go to private sector instead of the government since I feel private industry tends to be much more efficient and is also less likely to make the new jobs bureaucratic positions which will hinder further economic growth)

    [–]BubbaMetzia#NeverTrump [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    Is there a way you could make the sub have Approved Submitter status instead of going fully private? A lot of people read Reddit at work but don't like to sign into it on an office computer.

    [–]00Chubby [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    http://imgur.com/awMuvAZ

    I was denied for disagreeing with the mods, despite being about as conservative as it gets.

    I feel like that speaks for itself.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S] [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    Perhaps you're both an editorial at the end of your application affected things?

    [–]00Chubby [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Yeah, I did.

    does that make me not a "true conservative"?

    [–]ScootusBuckeye [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    If the sub is going to go private, why not shorten the timeframe a bit? Maybe until the primaries are over? I imagine the hate and vitorol will die down a bit at that point.

    Having the sub go private until the end of the entire election cycle just seems a bit heavy handed. And I myself have waffled on the issue. I agree that we get brigaded and trolled (moreso by /r/the_donald AKA /r/coontown than any of the more liberal subreddits) but I also criticize subs like /r/The_Donald for banning anyone who goes against the jerk (their reasons for banning are pretty outrageous though) and the hypocrisy on criticizing safe spaces while making a safe space.

    How will you allow civil non-conservatives into the sub for actual discussion and debate? Not every Bernie supporter is a Sanderista and not every Trump supporter is a Trumpbot (just a lot of them).

    [–]Conservitard_FundieBiblical Social Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Bravo bravo is all I can say! The airspace above a lot of people's heads must be pretty crowded today lol!

    [–]moralguardian [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Yikes, do you want to drive your sub into the ground? It may make it easier for you mods, but the membership is gonna sink like a stone.

    [–]Science_MonsterAnti-federalist [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    This is a bad move, 'Taking our ball and going home' has never won an argument.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S] [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    On the contrary this is our home.

    [–]Science_MonsterAnti-federalist [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    I agree, but building an impenetrable wall around our home will only serve to simultaneously remove us from the greater reddit community, and turn this community into a suffocating echo chamber to rival /r/politics.

    [–]disevident [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    ok, so i don't really understand conservative politics all that well, but I'm starting to see that building walls around things seems like a central piece of the philosophy.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Good fences make good neighbors... especially since Liberals can't help stick their noses into other peoples' business, with your sarcastic snide remark being a prime example.

    [–]DevonWeeksModerate Conservative [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Considering the only contribution you've ever made to this sub is this snarky remark, I'm pretty sure you didn't need our help becoming less informed about conservatism.

    [–]TreadNotOnMeConstitutional Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    FINALLY. We also need to reform this absurd system of upvoting. I propose we redistribute upvotes so it's fair for everyone. This upvote inequality is simply evil - why should some people get a bunch of upvotes and other people get left in the dust? It's time for an r/Conservative revolution against Big Commenters!

    [–]pearlofsandwichMARCOMENTUM 1ポイント2ポイント  (7子コメント)

    I don't understand. Is the questionnaire required for existing subscribers or just new ones? There 50k+ subscribers here. Why not just keep all subscribers in the private sub and kick people out as needed?

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] 3ポイント4ポイント  (6子コメント)

    In order to access a private sub each person must be added one by one.

    [–]D_angeloRussell [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    You guys are a bunch of faggots. Getting butthurt Get the fuck over yourselves it's the internet you guys take this shit way too seriously fucking pussies it's the Internet I mean seriously? Checking one by one?! That's how much you guys feel threatened lmao I can't wait till Trump is elected or unless you retards make it so that either that commie or Hilary get elected and watch your party destroy itself by putting in a brokered convention because you guys can't do anything else to stop someone whom the people vote for

    [–]DevonWeeksModerate Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Hmmm... I suspect you're right there on the verge of getting accepted. I just can't put my finger on why you can't cross the line, though.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    You will not be accepted.

    [–]thatrightwingerUltimate Conservative 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    There are already so many applications, and so many of them are failures. Its as if everything that we've been trying to spread has been completely ignored.

    It's better this way.

    [–]thatrightwingerUltimate Conservative 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I support the rest of the mods, but if you look back, I predicted this about a week ago. I would much prefer to have this only on the weekends, as previously done, but I stand with the decision, there are just too many non-Conservatives clogging up the system to make actual discussion possible

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Unfortunately Trump has attracted a ton of non-Conservatives and they are polluting discussions trying to derail the GOP.

    [–]E-rockComment 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

    What a great day!

    [–]ayePALINDROMEeyeConservative Purist -5ポイント-4ポイント  (6子コメント)

    We were worried people might not support this. I'm glad to hear you say that.

    [–]E-rockComment 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    The timing couldn't be more perfect in my opinion. You and the rest of the team are doing a wonderful job!

    [–]Altosxk -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

    I don't see why not. Depending on how strict the criteria is I can see how it would be necessary to weed out certain crowds. Trump supporters have The Donald to go to, and more often than not they don't provide meaningful comments to the sub because they think it should be a Trump safe space or something and end up being downvoted regardless.

    I say this hoping that I'm deemed worthy. This sub has become a go-to sub for me to find like-minded folks to engage in civil discussion with.

    [–]perceptionate 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

    I say this hoping that I'm deemed worthy.

    Don't you think there's something eerie in even having to say that?

    [–]Altosxk 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    It was mostly satire, admittedly. That statement, not the latter half. I do enjoy this sub, but if they were to consider me "not conservative enough" then it wouldn't change anything lol

    [–]perceptionate [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Well I've actually already been deemed "not worthy" of joining the private sub b/c of my vigorous defense of a public forum on this thread. Fitting to what my worry of this idea was to begin with, I suppose.

    [–]00Chubby [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Me too, even though I subscribe to conservatism heavily. Read through my post history, Im as comservative as it gets and I got denied bc i disagree with the decision.

    [–]caribou16Moderate Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    This is good, for a start. You should also restrict membership to the new /r/Conservative to people with Reddit Gold. 47% of redditors don't have jobs and can't afford it, so this will go a long ways to keeping the new space ideologically pure.

    [–]dy--dx [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Liberals ... Trump supporters ... disrupting conversations.

    Donald Trump supporters ... same standards as other non-conservatives

    ... for those who are not True Conservatives and have gained admittance to the private sub.

    Does this not make anyone sick?

    [–]CarolinaPunk#NEVERTRUMP[M] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    It fills me with joy and relief.

    [–]MaladroitClock [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Finally. I haven't seen a thread since I subbed that hasn't been inundated with RINO viewpoints or brigaded by Trumpbots. Good move.

    [–]Theguy634 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Be careful using that word "trumpbot" they will ban you for it.

    [–]TheSaintSeth -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Taking a stand as conservatives, I love this. I'm all for dialogue between conservatives and populists, but there must be a delineation, they can't be seen as the same, as it damages the conservative movement.

    [–]TrueDoomsday [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Applied. I'm hoping for some intellectual conversations on the issues and not a circlejerk. We'll see how things work out.

    [–]5MC -2ポイント-1ポイント  (16子コメント)

    the largest Conservative forum on Reddit

    I'm pretty sure 86,400 is bigger than 57,282. You must be using common core math.

    [–]TeaPartyOverlordCruz Conservative [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Pfft. Trump is the Rachel Dolezal of conservatives.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Satire subs don't count.

    [–]thatrightwingerUltimate Conservative 4ポイント5ポイント  (7子コメント)

    This is exactly why we're taking it private: RINOs for Trump don't even know that they and he aren't conservative.

    [–]D_angeloRussell [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

    Can you explain how he isn't since you're so adamant on your stance?

    [–]MUH_PC_ACCOUNT [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    Sure, Trump doesn't jerk off to corporate and capital gains tax cuts and an aggressive foreign policy for Israel, and he'd rather society help a sick person in need than to let them die on the street. As you can see, he clearly isn't Conservative.

    [–]EllesarisEllendil [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

    he'd rather society help a sick person in need than to let them die on the street.

    Wrong, he'd rather force society to save the person. It should be a free choice. Given that choice most people won't let people die on the street.

    [–]YosoffNatural Rights Conservative[M] [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    That's a nationalist sub, not a conservative sub. Nationalists can be either liberal or conservative and tend to be the former.

    [–]ayePALINDROMEeyeConservative Purist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    That's a great observation. If trump were a conservative nationalist I would like him a lot more.

    [–]ultimisConstitutionalist -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Good luck mods! It's unfortunate that it has come down to this.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S,M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    We have had several incidents over the past few weeks - the admins stepped in - but it is for the best.

    [–]VonVoltaire [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Is there any chance you'll elaborate? I am innocently curious.

    [–]gameoverman1983 [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    Rumor has it that the "True Conservatives" are pooling their money together to build a spiritual commune in South America, where only the most Principled Consistent Constitutional Conservatives will be allowed to congregate and discuss the benefits of Free Market principles and mass third-world immigration.

    [–]chabanaisStronger than derp[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Don't drink the Kool Aid.

    [–]legalizehazing [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Good good. I wasn't around for the last time but I approve. Although I think preTrump the moderating was excellent. But I think I get it