あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]Moleculartony -54ポイント-53ポイント  (31子コメント)

They didn't deny gay people the right to use their facility. They denied using their facility to celebrate a civil union between two men. It had nothing to do with their sexual orientation. The owner indeed said he had no problem marrying two gay people as long as one was a man and the other a woman.

Traditional marriage is a celebration of the universal natural order of human biological reproduction by presiding chastity over progenitive sexual intercourse. A gay marriage is an entirely different ritual.

[–]Opheltes 13ポイント14ポイント  (15子コメント)

They didn't deny gay people the right to use their facility. They denied using their facility to celebrate a civil union between two men.

Like I said above, denying gay people the right to use your facility on the basis of their sexual orientation (which is exactly what happened here) is illegal in many states, including IL. You can turn away a gay customer because you don't like him, or the fact that he's got long hair, or because of his eye color. But in most states, you cannot turn him away because he's gay.

It had nothing to do with their sexual orientation.

as long as one was a man and the other a woman.

Do you not see the obvious contradiction here?

[–]diefree85 12ポイント13ポイント  (10子コメント)

Actually if you want traditional marriage in the original you consider women no more than property. This is no different than if it was an interracial couple. He could of just said no to the event but he did more than that.

[–]dannoffs1 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

People that think like you do are the exact reason we have to have these laws in the first place. This is the same quality of logic you get out of sovcit crowd.

[–]Moleculartony -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

People who believe when two gay men or two gay women are genuinely in love with eachother, it is holy?

[–]dannoffs1 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Something being "holy" isn't a legal defense in a secular country.

[–]abyss6 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

oh god. 1990s wants their retarded argument back.