I will edit the debunking in, piece by piece, so you can't go on with a "huhuh he debunked me but did not respond in a set time limit tough luck friendo" thing.

That's sweet coming from the guy who edited his comment to make sure everyone knew I hadn't responded to his comment in 9 hours. This time it's been 3 days. I'm actually surprised you managed to hold in the snarky edits.

So basically you spent the first 10k characters talking about the liberal bias in my sources and the general media, congratulations. You're so far down the Drumpf rabbit hole you fail to see that it's reality that has a liberal bias. But regardless, since "IT'S WRITTEN BY LIBERALS" is not a valid argument whatsoever I'm going to ignore that part. Also you might wanna cool it with the antisemitism or at least hide it better.

Then you go on to explain how NYC black population was 20% instead of 25% "Look he's only 4/5ths as racist as people say he is!" Your mental gymnastics are strong.

Drumpf Management noted that the agreement did not constitute an admission of guilt. Anything about admitting to be racist here?

That's how settlements usually go, no side admits any guilt even when it is. Everyone knows he's guilty, but they pretended he wasn't so he could save face in public.

Then comes some dubious math.

We can assume that 35% of blacks in those specific NYC boroughs were in poverty in 1974. Of those, we can assume 32.5% were on welfare. Now what's 929,992 times 0.325?

Where did you get the 32.5 figure from? Just take 35% and cut off 2.5%? Can't find anything in your source Your assumptions are getting quite assumptive. But let's go with it.

So of the population of those NYC boroughs, we can assume that only 12-13% of all blacks were not on welfare in 1974!

What the fuck? No. That's not how it works. 4.8 million was the total population of NYC in 1974. What you calculated - if your assumptions are correct - was the percentage of black people who are not on welfare out of the total population. that 12.85% is already 3 times the percentage of black tenants in Drumpf apartments, but if your assumption is correct that Drumpf had a non-racist no-welfare policy, your statistic is skewed down because your calculations completely ignores white people on welfare. Count them out of the total population and you'll end up with an even higher percentage. Since you seem to love basic division and addition so much you do the math, I'm too lazy.

But honestly the fact that you go on to defend that there were at least 3.2 times as many non-welfare blacks in the NYC population as there were in Drumpfs houses speaks volumes. "Those 69% of black applicants were filthy and rowdy looking, you couldn't let them live next to decent law-abiding whites. So your claim is debunked. Drumpf isn't racist and neither am I, nope not at all."

What is racist about this? Is it racist to despise a criminal for doing violent criminal acts, just because they happened to be black? He made no real mention of race in the statement he made, which is below.

Only a racist could not understand how this is racist. The Central Park 5 were innocent and yet they were arrested, intimidated into confessing and sentenced to 10 years in prison until DNA evidence exonerated them. Drumpf wanted 14 and 15 year olds executed for a crime they didn't commit. The police arrested them because they were black, they intimidated them and made them confess under duress because they were black, they illegally released their names to the public because they were black, the media jumped on the case because they were black and because the victim was white. The rape of a black woman on the very same day received almost no attention whatsoever.

Politifact Unreliability

Again, "liberals wrote it" is not a valid argument. Try to actually address the points they make instead of screaming bias and then proceed to link to Steve Moya-whateverthefuck and the heritage foundation.

if they have the genitalia of boys, even though they identify as girls, they are widely considered as boys.

Except most psychiatrists and clinicians in the field of gender dysphoria recommend they be considered girls, especially if they're already dressing and presenting as such.

obvious liberal bias.

LIBRUL BIUS

claim Drumpf's claim on black crime is wrong because anti-black racism/poverty

Drumpf's claim is wrong because it's literally just wrong. The numbers are just wrong. Holy shit.

They say he's wrong, even though they find a source for his claim. obvious bias because they don't like him.

Except this isn't a method of calculating unemployment, only potential full time working hours. It completely ignores part time workers with very valid reasons for not working full time. The source is literally just the ramblings of a washed up Reagan era politician on his blog. No serious economist considers this an accurate measure of unemployment. This is a well-deserved pants-on-fire.

the growth from his cuts, plus the ways we will save by removing immigrants and taxing imports will result in net profit in due time

Except, you know, most economists think that's bullshit at least without any other measures taken. Now you suggest removing illegals to save 54 billion (dubious number but let's take it). Even if we manage to do that and cut 54 billion in spending, it would hardly put a dent in the annual 1 trillion extra deficit Drumpf's tax plan would bring. Taxing imports would also be bad for the economy and hurt federal revenue in the long run. When prices increase, people buy less of it or if it's something essential like food they'll have less money to spend on other things. In any case, demand decreases which means less revenue on the import tax and less revenue for the producers which means less revenue from corporate taxes and worker lay-offs. So probably not worth it.

and the wall is perfectly possible to afford.

I never said it wasn't, still a stupid idea.

or we can threaten mexico to give us the cash, using war as a way to push the threat.

Oh yeah let's spend trillions of dollars on war to save 20 billion. Do you think the Mexican government is that stupid? They'd know it's a bluff, they will ignore Drumpf and laugh their asses off as he pedals back. Sometimes I want him to become president just so I can watch this play out.