509
510

Things you'll never see... (imgur.com)

Recovering_Ratfink が 投稿

全 115 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]cactusjack- 83ポイント84ポイント  (28子コメント)

You won't see a push for multiculturalism anywhere but in historically white countries.

[–]FeelWhatIFeelUndecided Conservative 68ポイント69ポイント  (7子コメント)

Ironically, the push for multiculturalism typically means "less white people."

[–]Hammerhart 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow. It's so obvious that I missed it. I hate multiculturalism even more now.

[–]gizayabasu 29ポイント30ポイント  (4子コメント)

Multiculturalism is a product of white guilt.

[–]chakrakhanRonin 33ポイント34ポイント  (2子コメント)

Well, historically speaking, it is a product of the late-nineteenth century American Pragmatist school of philosophy. The idea was that allowing for pluralism encouraged social cohesion, leading to a more unified nation.

Unfortunately, multiculturalism nowadays is built around the notion that we live in a white supremacist society and so therefore nonwhite cultures have to be separated and protected them from appropriation and destruction. So instead of being a melting pot, we should be a tossed salad. As a consequence, people are antagonistic to the idea that we all might share a culture, and we just end up more divided.

[–]s0v3r1gn 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow, this is the best put definition of multiculturalism and its issues I have ever read! I wish I had gold to give you.

[–]goal-icho 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wow I didn't know multiculturalism had ties with pragmatist philosophy. Pragmatism died after 9/11 but multiculturalism has not.

[–]NewtMcGingrich 6ポイント7ポイント  (5子コメント)

But no cultures are better than others... right???

[–]mtndewaddict [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Best argument against that notion I learned in my intro to philosophy class. It's a simple question, has our culture improved over the last centenary? If yes that means cultures are unequal because one is better than another. If no, just respond nice to know they think segregation is just as right as our culture is today.

[–]Cemlub 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

A country culture that can put a man on the moon is better than one that puts a bone in their nose.

[–]say_or_do 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Microagression! Triggered! You've been preprogrammed to think that!

Now a conservative would say:

"Right."

[–]Mixxy92 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

Now a conservative would say: "Right."

Well, I wouldn't say all cultures are equal. Most are fine. Some, however, are inherently oppressive. And I'm not talking about pretend "a white man hurt my feelings!" oppression, but actual, legitimate, stoning women in the streets - level oppression.

[–]Juswantedtono 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

Anti-racism is a code word for anti-white.

[–]tme001 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

According to the sign I pass every time I drive through Harrison, "Diversity is a code word for #whitegenocide."

[–]scandiumflightFree Trade FTW 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

First counter example that comes to mind is Taiwan. Seems the most salient, their constitution grants ethnic natives permanent parliament seats, they have decent immigration, there is a pretty strong embrace of foreigners there with no push for assimilation.

India, too... I dunno, how many non-white countries are you actually familiar with?

[–]StabbyDMcStabberson [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Do either of those examples apologise for their own culture and glamourize foreign ones like how we do?

[–]scandiumflightFree Trade FTW [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

"We" do not have a uniform approach to our own culture. If anything, the US is so big and multicultural that most of the criticisms you hear from the US are reflective. We mostly talk to ourselves. Globalization complicates this a bit, but holding the opinion that Americans are largely culturally ashamed misses a large swathe of contrary evidence.

[–]prince4 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

I hope you're not including the U.S and Canada in your "historically white countries" category.

[–]Watch_Closely 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

The United States and Canada are both historically white countries.

[–]AngryYoungWhiteMan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

One could make a rather good argument that America specifically was founded as a White Nationalist country.

[–]prince4 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They became "white countries" after the non-white natives were either ethnically cleansed or herded into ghettoes by violence. Everything you fear the Muslims will do to you, you did, and in a much more gruesome and large-scale way, to the natives of the land.

[–]conspiracy_nut_ 53ポイント54ポイント  (33子コメント)

Of course we'd never see it, but that's because western values are better than middle east theocracies.

I personally don't decide my behavior and what's acceptable based on what middle eastern countries think. Jesus commanded me to take care of those in need, and that's one of the many things that make Jesus better than Mohammad.

[–]cth1ic_warrior 11ポイント12ポイント  (7子コメント)

Jesus was so nice and cordial to his enemies that they crucified him.

Being Jesus-like doesn't mean being stupid, nor does it mean always being nice.

Islam is incompatible with western Christian values. Always has been, always will be.

[–]StabbyDMcStabberson 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Jesus was so nice and cordial to his enemies that they crucified him.

Well, except for the moneychangers in the temple. He kicked all of their asses pretty thoroughly. Also let the mob at Gethsemane know it was in his power to destroy them, but that wasn't what he was there for

[–]cth1ic_warrior 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

He wasn't nice at all when it came to proclaiming the truth. It is WHY he was killed.

[–]KillaMemesOnThaSwarm -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

"You're not wrong Jesus, you're just an asshole!"

[–]jogarz -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

Is this really a good argument though? We already have put up with a lot of things in western society that are incompatible with what we typically think of as "western Christian values": communism, fascism, anarchism, racial supremacy, to a lesser extent progressivism, etc.

I'm not saying western Christian values aren't worth protecting. I am a very strong social conservative. I just think we need to re-evaluate where we draw the line here. What can coexist and what can't?

[–]Drmadanthonywayne 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

What benefit do,we get from accepting Muslim refugees/immigrants? Some vague sense of moral superiority? Trump is right, let's stop any further Muslim immigration to Western nations until and unless the Muslim extremists stop killing people and blowing shit up.

[–]cth1ic_warrior 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Christians shouldn't put up with a lot of the stuff they put up with today and have in the past.

[–]pipechapLibertarian Conservative 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Western society is far too large of a basket to put both Europe and the United States in.

We've helped destroy and stave off "communism, fascism, anarchism, racial supremacy, to a lesser extent progressivism, etc." As a nation, while Europe has openly partaken in these.

We don't bear a scarlet letter for any of those ideologies.

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp. 7ポイント8ポイント  (3子コメント)

I personally don't decide my behavior and what's acceptable based on what middle eastern countries think.

Good because that's not what the cartoon is about.

[–]conspiracy_nut_ 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's certainly drawing a comparison between Islamic countries attitudes towards Christian refugees, and Christian countries attitudes toward Muslim refugees.

[–]chabanaisStronger than derp. -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yup but I don't see anywhere is it telling you how to act.

[–]beer_n_gunsMillennial Constitutionalist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Of course we'd never see it, but that's because western values are better than middle east theocracies.

That's exactly the point of the comic.

[–]yourselfiegotleaked 2ポイント3ポイント  (6子コメント)

I don't mean to play the devil's advocate, but I will anyway.

Jesus commanded me to take care of those in need, and that's one of the many things that make Jesus better than Mohammad.

Actually, the Quran does state that Muslims should help those in need.

"Those needy ones who are wholly wrapped up in the cause of Allah, and who are hindered from moving about the earth in search of their livelihood especially deserve help."

Source

The Quran also speaks about Jesus being a prophet of Allah (allah is just the Arabic word for God, don't forget that).

Christ the son of Mary was no more than a messenger

Source

Just added the last part because I feel like not a lot of people realize that Jesus is actually apart of Islam. I personally am against Islam, but I'm also against false information. I hope you see where I'm coming from.

[–]StabbyDMcStabberson [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Actually, the Quran does state that Muslims should help those in need. "Those needy ones who are wholly wrapped up in the cause of Allah,

That sounds more like a command to help only Muslims in need.

Just added the last part because I feel like not a lot of people realize that Jesus is actually apart of Islam.

From a Christian perspective, that's more like Islam mocking Christ.

[–]yourselfiegotleaked [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah I see where you're coming from. It's not that they're trying to mock him. In fact, Islam evolved from Judaism and Christianity. It's completely in line with their beliefs to assume that Christ was a profit and not the son of God. They also believe the same about Mohammad. They just believe he was a profit of Allah, nothing more, nothing less.

[–]conspiracy_nut_ [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

As I mentioned in another comment, I was just being flippant.

[–]Recovering_Ratfink[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (11子コメント)

"I personally don't decide my behavior and what's acceptable based on what middle eastern countries think." No one is telling you to do so. This comic only criticizes Saudi Ariabia.

Since you mention Jesus, is is safe to conclude that you are a Christian? Let's assume so. Jesus did in fact command you (presumably a Christian) to take care of those in need.

Forgive me for pointing out the obvious but, nowhere do I see Jesus also commanding you to take care of those in need by requiring you to take them into your home to sleep under the same roof where your wife, children, perhaps even your parents reside. Nowhere does Jesus command you to feed them from the food in your refrigerator. Nowhere does Jesus command you to give them a portion of your paycheck which you separated for your family. Jesus also does not command you to keep doing this while they reside in your home, even if they refuse to help with any chores. If the children of "those in need" start a fight with yours inside your own house, are you obligated to blindly continue to help them?

Yes, He did say to help those in need but, I'd like to think, He purposely did not specify what I mentioned above as He probably imagined someone who hearkened to His command would not help "those in need" at the cost of his own family.

Remember also something that Paul wrote in 1Timothy 5:8: “But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.” Are we to continue to blindly provide for "those in need" when some of "those in need" want us dead while living in our house and helping themselves to our resources while refusing to help out with chores?

Regarding whether or not Jesus is better than Muhammad based solely on Jesus commanding you to help those in need is, in my opinion, not the best way to make that distinction. From what I understand, Muhammad also commanded his followers to help those in need. At least in that specific regard, he may not be distinguished much from Jesus. For further, more compelling distinctions you only need look here.

[–]carlenderNew Keynesian Social Liberal 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

You are also missing the most important part of all...Jesus didn't command anyone to take from another to feed the hungry.

Religious beliefs shouldn't underlie our social motivations. Our social morals should underlie our social motivations.

[–]AngelicBread 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

God bless you. People seem to convince themselves that being a Christian requires masochism and blatant disregard for the safety of their families.

[–]slickrick0133 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

Matthew 25:35-40 "For I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you clothed me, I was sick and you visited me, I was in prison and you came to me.’ Then the righteous will answer him, saying, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you drink? And when did we see you a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you? And when did we see you sick or in prison and visit you?’ And the King will answer them, ‘Truly, I say to you, as you did it to one of the least of these my brothers, you did it to me.’

[–]chillenchillada [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

I'm Christian, and Jesus didn't say "for I was hungry and you had the government feed me."

[–]StabbyDMcStabberson [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Or, "For I was hungry and you had the government take food from someone else and redistribute it to me."

[–]Recovering_Ratfink[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Tagged as /u/hoyasaxophone

[–]politicize-me -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I am not expert on Christianity (if such a thing really exists) but I do know many churches across the country have been taking in refugees from the middle east recently. Christian and muslim, churches have been using their funds (which are out donation money's) to shelter, feed, etc these families. Are they incorrect in what they are doing? Just want some of you prospective.

Also, I think there are better non-partisan sources on the differences and merits between Christianity and Islam. It literally says on the side bar :

"TheReligionofPeaceTROP is a non-partisan, fact-based site that examines the ideological threat that Islam poses to human dignity and freedom."

That isn't really trying to be unbiased if that is their mission statement.

[–]Sharkictus 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Jesus is God who incarnated not only as man, but was born into a poor family. The three years he ministered he was practically homeless.

Jesus Christ life is suffering and sacrifice for those who don't appreciate it, want it, and in fact harms Him.

And Christians ought to live like that, a life of self-sacrifice to such an extreme that we have to love our enemies and feed the destitute, even if they are driving down property values, dirty, unpleasant, sick, rapey, assaulters, or destroyers of culture.

The love Christ showed us we are to show the our neighbors and lessers. We are to love Christ more than family, ourselves, our job, our nation, our ethnicity, our culture, our lives and if showing that love ends up destroying and of the above, so be it. To die in Christ is gain.

[–]conspiracy_nut_ -4ポイント-3ポイント  (0子コメント)

"I personally don't decide my behavior and what's acceptable based on what middle eastern countries think." No one is telling you to do so. This comic only criticizes Saudi Ariabia.

I don't think it's unrealistic to believe it's also meant as commentary about US refugee policies.

Since you mention Jesus, is is safe to conclude that you are a Christian? Let's assume so. Jesus did in fact command you (presumably a Christian) to take care of those in need.

No, I'm an atheist. I just said that because it resonates better with the audience. And because despite being an atheist, I think modern Christianity isn't as bad as modern Islam.

Forgive me for pointing out the obvious but, nowhere do I see Jesus also commanding you to take care of those in need by requiring you to take them into your home to sleep under the same roof where your wife, children, perhaps even your parents reside. Nowhere does Jesus command you to feed them from the food in your refrigerator. Nowhere does Jesus command you to give them a portion of your paycheck which you separated for your family. Jesus also does not command you to keep doing this while they reside in your home, even if they refuse to help with any chores. If the children of "those in need" start a fight with yours inside your own house, are you obligated to blindly continue to help them?

Well... yes.... if you want to follow the teachings of Jesus. Matthew 5:39-40: "That ye resist not evil: but whosoever shall smite thee on thy right cheek, turn to him the other also. And if any man will sue thee at the law, and take away thy coat, let him have thy cloke also." and Matthew 19:21: "Jesus answered, "If you want to be perfect, go, sell your possessions and give to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven. Then come, follow me."".

And lastly, the parable the widow's mite. Mark 12:44: "They all gave out of their wealth; but she, out of her poverty, put in everything--all she had to live on.""

Quite literally, you're commanded to help those in need, at your own expense, and even if they wrong you, you're not to do anything about it. You are supposed to give them from what you have. But either way, I think that's sort of a silly argument.

Remember also something that Paul wrote in 1Timothy 5:8: “But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel.”

Right, you shouldn't walk out on your family. That's a sin. That doesn't contradict the other passages though. Providing for isn't at odds with giving to others. You should provide for your family first and foremost.

Regarding whether or not Jesus is better than Muhammad based solely on Jesus commanding you to help those in need is, in my opinion, not the best way to make that distinction.

I was just being flippant.

[–]NedStarch 6ポイント7ポイント  (6子コメント)

Well duh, Saudi Arabia is actually a pretty backwards place, they didn't abolish slavery till the 1960s.

[–]KillaMemesOnThaSwarm 1ポイント2ポイント  (5子コメント)

Qatar is using slaves to build the World Cup stadiums

[–]beavs808 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Qatar, but yea same principle. I'm not condoning what the Qatari's are doing but most of the migrant labor shows up voluntarily, it's not like they are buying them from slavers. Keeping their passports until their contract is done and not providing adequate safety measures is fucked up for sure though.

[–]scandiumflightFree Trade FTW 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Not sure if you're saying the wrong country on purpose, but it's Qatar.

[–]-dudeomfgstfux- 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

No just "harsh labouring conditions".

[–]dontmindmeohno 33ポイント34ポイント  (6子コメント)

They usually teach this in kindergarten, but I'll remind you: When the other kids behave badly, that doesn't give you an excuse to behave badly yourself.

k?

[–]Rosssauced 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

My thoughts exactly. Saudi Arabia isn't exactly who we should be emulating.

[–]AngelicBread 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Beheading, burning, and drowning people is just "behaving badly"?

[–]Day_C_Metrollin 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

You missed the point. The cartoon points out the hypocrisy of Muslim nations like Saudi Arabia

[–]NeoConnie -5ポイント-4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm obviously not the artist, but I don't think it's pointing out Saudi hypocrisy, I think it's trying to point out our own short sightedness in being so welcoming to a people who wouldn't ever consider returning the favor. That being said, I don't think their selfishness is about religion either, they aren't even letting in refugees from their own religion.

[–]Recovering_Ratfink[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Although I'm grateful for the reminder, when "the other kids" behave "badly", it also does not compel us to behave in the extremely opposite way.

I'd like to ask you to consider other actions that may be considered as "the other kids behaving badly". For example, can the "bad" behaviour of some of "the other kids" in your hypothetical kindergarten include gunning down kids who disagree with them then blowing themselves up when the teachers arrive to stop them?

Did the "other kids" come from a different classroom and decide to "behave badly" in someone else's classroom?

[–]CaptainPaintball 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you need further proof that this is a planned invasion, saudi arabia has pledged to build 200 mosques in Germany underscoring the fact that this is a war being fought with people, and that they plan on establishing permanent residences there, and eventually establishing dominance over their suicidal host countries.

[–]Cemlub 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hmmm... Perhaps the mid-east has found a solution to our immigration problem.

[–]PPP_Your_Boat 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Doesn't even need to be Christian migrants. They won't even take their fellow muslim Arabs as refugees!

[–]RUoffended 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

The look on the Saudi Arabian guy's face is priceless.

[–]poseidonofteaAustrian Economics & Liberty 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Let's make some badass solar or fission technology that makes their oil worth obselete. I doubt they last very long when they can't pick Lamborghinis out of their boogers.

[–]imalwaysthinking 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

And thats one of the reasons why we have a better society.

[–]uniquecannon2nd Amendment Activist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The Emirates?

[–]Hyabusa2 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Saudi Arabia should take in the Christians ISIS is slaughtering if there are any left to take in.

[–]gunnyguy121 3ポイント4ポイント  (8子コメント)

Christians were a little more forceful

[–]Tylerbrn 4ポイント5ポイント  (7子コメント)

The crusades amirite!!?! Booyah! But modern day this would never happen.

[–]StabbyDMcStabberson 13ポイント14ポイント  (3子コメント)

The Crusades started as a defense of the Byzantines, who had been under attack by the Muslims for centuries.

[–]Spidertech500 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yea, most people don't realize crusades were most definitely not an unprovoked attack. For some reason we're brownwashing history

[–]poseidonofteaAustrian Economics & Liberty 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Literally all we're taught in history these days is "white man bad". Pick a time period, any time period.

[–]Cardiff_Electric 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

#crusadersdidnothingwrong

[–]Baikanor -3ポイント-2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Except for in Africa where Christian are violent and kill gays in particular

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/africa/tens-of-thousands-of-muslims-flee-christian-militias-in-central-african-republic/2014/02/07/5a1adbb2-9032-11e3-84e1-27626c5ef5fb_story.html

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uganda_Anti-Homosexuality_Act,_2014

Known as "kill the gays" bill which was pushed by the Family Life Network

Any organization that becomes big enough, will attract extremist. Most religions have parts that aren't compatible with modern society.

[–]AngryYoungWhiteMan [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Lol, as if Africa's problem stems from Christianity

[–]-dudeomfgstfux- 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

But Africa isn't modern 21 century Christian.

[–]weaver787 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

This is correct. Too many push factors and not enough (or any) pull factors. But I'm assuming this cartoon isn't about how Westerners aren't really dying to get into third world countries... That's obvious. This is about how Islamic countries aren't as welcoming to other religions as we are.

That is also true. The point is that we're supposed to be better than that. We do it on purpose because it makes us a better and more free society. Arguing to do the same as others do to us is not how we should conduct business.

[–]Recovering_Ratfink[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

The point is that we're supposed to be better than that.

Interesting, I didn't see that as the point at all. I saw the point of the comic as being critical to Saudi Arabia. Any further points come from your mind. Even so, we're supposed to be better than an Islamist theocracy? No argument there.

We do it on purpose because it makes us a better and more free society.

"We" do what on purpose? You didn't define your pronoun. If you mean by "we do it" that we choose to not make sensible, wise distinctions between categories of potential migrants because we don't take into account individual merit and likelihood of integration, then yes that is largely what we're doing. As to whether it makes us a more free and open society, I'm not certain I want the kind of freedom and openness you're selling.

Arguing to do the same as others do to us is not how we should conduct business.

It's a comic criticizing Saudi Arabia. Any further argument being made here is sourced from what you're projecting.

[–]weaver787 -4ポイント-3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I do believe that saying this comic only applies to Saudi Arabia is a bit disingenuous. The conclusions that I came to are not just "from my own projections" and moreso an analysis of the very obvious broader message of the cartoon.

As for the rest of what you said, we could argue all day about immigration restrictions and the pros/cons of it, but we probably look at these issues from different angles. I will say, however, that the title of the article "ISIS Takes the Capital of the EU" is hilariously alarmist and not even close to what the actual situation is.

[–]Recovering_Ratfink[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

"The conclusions that I came to are not just "from my own projections" and more so an analysis of the very obvious broader message of the cartoon."

What is "obvious" is that the comic criticizes Saudi Arabia. Anything further is a matter of opinion and personal reflection and interpretation. You'd do well as a professor of literature.

"the title of the article "ISIS Takes the Capital of the EU" is hilariously alarmist and not even close to what the actual situation is."

Sometimes an alarm going off is necessary to alert those in the building of a fire. Alarmist title or not, you'd do well to read the article. It mentions things such as how it’s estimated that Muslims will become the majority of the population of the capital of the EU in 14 years. Elections in Brussels and proposed amendments to current laws will surely be interesting in 20 years' time. How silly of me, I'm projecting.

[–]prince4 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why do conservatives like pointing to the example of Saudi Arabia all the time? Are you guy trying to get the U.S and other Western countries to adjust their behavior to be more like those wackos?

[–]weetchexLibertarian Conservative 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

. . . an unaltered Ben Garrison comic?

[–]salacio 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is obviously the altered version.

[–]AutoModerator[M] -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

Posts from the 'imgur.com' domain require moderation. Please be patient as we review. Thank you.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[–]douchebag_investor 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sounds like a stupid rule freedom hating liberal would come up with.

What ever happened to democracy?

[–]RedLanceVeritas 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, you -are- on Reddit.

[–]Nitroxsage -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good thing we aren't them then! I am glad we hold ourselves to a higher standard and rise above gender, race, and religion segregation and discrimination!

[–]jogarz -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Those are some awfully white looking Arab Christians...

[–]lopegbg -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

southern strategy

[–]Hafitze -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

It is the church of capitalism we build

[–]MoonCrumpets -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah we should be more like the Saudi's!

[–]Maxables -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Good ol' Ben "Unload My Nine Into the Welfare Line" Garrison.

[–]resoner [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

.... So?

[–]p4ts0 -4ポイント-3ポイント  (2子コメント)

That's too bad it'd be nice to get a few of them out of the U.S. particularly the the Xian politicians

[–]DranoshSoCon, FinCon, antistatist, anti"equality" 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Either you're sarcastic or the edge is strong

[–]Recovering_Ratfink[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Some say that when /r/atheism accumulates enough edge, it must leak else reddit will explode. Pay no mind.