A newly-released Hilary Clinton email confirmed that the Obama administration has deliberately provoked the civil war in Syria as the “best way to help Israel.”
In an indication of her murderous and psychopathic nature, Clinton also wrote that it was the “right thing” to personally threaten Bashar Assad’s family with death.
In the email, released by Wikileaks, then Secretary of State Clinton says that the “best way to help Israel” is to “use force” in Syria to overthrow the government.
The document was one of many unclassified by the US Department of State under case number F-2014-20439, Doc No. C05794498, following the uproar over Clinton’s private email server kept at her house while she served as Secretary of State from 2009 to 2013.
Although the Wikileaks transcript dates the email as December 31, 2000, this is an error on their part, as the contents of the email (in particular the reference to May 2012 talks between Iran and the west over its nuclear program in Istanbul) show that the email was in fact sent on December 31, 2012.
The email makes it clear that it has been US policy from the very beginning to violently overthrow the Syrian government—and specifically to do this because it is in Israel’s interests.
“The best way to help Israel deal with Iran’s growing nuclear capability is to help the people of Syria overthrow the regime of Bashar Assad,” Clinton forthrightly starts off by saying.
Even though all US intelligence reports had long dismissed Iran’s “atom bomb” program as a hoax (a conclusion supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency), Clinton continues to use these lies to “justify” destroying Syria in the name of Israel.
She specifically links Iran’s mythical atom bomb program to Syria because, she says, Iran’s “atom bomb” program threatens Israel’s “monopoly” on nuclear weapons in the Middle East.
If Iran were to acquire a nuclear weapon, Clinton asserts, this would allow Syria (and other “adversaries of Israel” such as Saudi Arabia and Egypt) to “go nuclear as well,” all of which would threaten Israel’s interests.
Therefore, Clinton, says, Syria has to be destroyed.
Iran’s nuclear program and Syria’s civil war may seem unconnected, but they are. What Israeli military leaders really worry about — but cannot talk about — is losing their nuclear monopoly.
An Iranian nuclear weapons capability would not only end that nuclear monopoly but could also prompt other adversaries, like Saudi Arabia and Egypt, to go nuclear as well. The result would be a precarious nuclear balance in which Israel could not respond to provocations with conventional military strikes on Syria and Lebanon, as it can today.
If Iran were to reach the threshold of a nuclear weapons state, Tehran would find it much easier to call on its allies in Syria and Hezbollah to strike Israel, knowing that its nuclear weapons would serve as a deterrent to Israel responding against Iran itself.
It is, Clinton continues, the “strategic relationship between Iran and the regime of Bashar Assad in Syria” that makes it possible for Iran to undermine Israel’s security.
This would not come about through a “direct attack,” Clinton admits, because “in the thirty years of hostility between Iran and Israel” this has never occurred, but through its alleged “proxies.”
The end of the Assad regime would end this dangerous alliance. Israel’s leadership understands well why defeating Assad is now in its interests.
Bringing down Assad would not only be a massive boon to Israel’s security, it would also ease Israel’s understandable fear of losing its nuclear monopoly.
Then, Israel and the United States might be able to develop a common view of when the Iranian program is so dangerous that military action could be warranted.
Clinton goes on to asset that directly threatening Bashar Assad “and his family” with violence is the “right thing” to do:
In short, the White House can ease the tension that has developed with Israel over Iran by doing the right thing in Syria.
With his life and his family at risk, only the threat or use of force will change the Syrian dictator Bashar Assad’s mind.
The email proves—as if any more proof was needed—that the US government has been the main sponsor of the growth of terrorism in the Middle East, and all in order to “protect” Israel.
It is also a sobering thought to consider that the “refugee” crisis which currently threatens to destroy Europe, was directly sparked off by this US government action as well, insofar as there are any genuine refugees fleeing the civil war in Syria.
In addition, over 250,000 people have been killed in the Syrian conflict, which has spread to Iraq—all thanks to Clinton and the Obama administration backing the “rebels” and stoking the fires of war in Syria.
The real and disturbing possibility that a psychopath like Clinton—whose policy has inflicted death and misery upon millions of people—could become the next president of America is the most deeply shocking thought of all.
Clinton’s public assertion that, if elected president, she would “take the relationship with Israel to the next level,” would definitively mark her, and Israel, as the enemy of not just some Arab states in the Middle East, but of all peace-loving people on earth.
Related posts:
Russian Attacks in Syria Pay Off
NATO, the UK, and the “War” in Syria
Boston Globe Breaks Ranks over Syria
Truce in Syria Thanks to Russians
US Israel “Aid”: $16m per Day
Syria: Supporting Terrorists Causes “Refugee” Crisis
Terrorism in Syria: Created by America and Supported by Israel, says Syrian President
Clinton Campaign Manager Predicts Trump Win
Jewish Lobby’s Iran Lies Exposed by IAEA
US Intervention in Syria is Illegal—Russia
Trump Loses “Right Wing” Jewish Lobby with Latest Comments on Iraq and Syria
“Right Wing” vs “Left Wing” Jews
Israel gets $3.1 Billion “Aid” from Bankrupt USA
Jews Want “Refugees”—But Not in Israel
Hilary Clinton: The Jewish Lobby’s Candidate
The Jewish Lobby: The Real Reason Why America Seeks War with North Korea
antieu
- Edit
An evil pair, Obama and Clinton. They should be in the Hague!
ll
- Edit
If Clinton and Merkel are typical of women politicos thank heavens females never figured so much before.
We`d have been racing to hell in a handcart years ago.
Andy
- Edit
Never heard of the Oded Yinon Plan?
Probably not, as those three words get you kicked off the comments page on any newspaper but this. Likewise the COUDENHOVE KALERGI Plan.
K Nite
- Edit
Just a small correction on the date of the email, it appears this was probably from late April, not December, of 2012.
Wikileaks has this mistakenly dated as having been from 2000, but the email mentions nuclear talks starting in Istanbul (April 14, 2012), a week-old CNN interview with Ehud Barak (aired April 19, 2012: http://edition.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/1204/19/ampr.01.html), and mentions the rebellion in Syria having been started over a year ago (began April 2011).
So, keep in mind when reading through this – it was written roughly a week and a half after the first “constructive nuclear talk”(http://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-17716241) between Iran and the US, UK, France, China, Russia and Germany in 2012.
Vladdi
- Edit
Way too much actual thinking and plotting going on in that screed to attribute it to Hitlery.
knight owl
- Edit
Well finally a US secretary of state has openly confirmed via email, which everyone has assumed all along……that Israel is in possession of nuclear weapons!
Bardi
- Edit
“Israel is in possession of nuclear weapons!”
That has been known for decades. Where have you been?
Martin
- Edit
@antieu An evil pair, Obama and Clinton. They should be in the Hague!
Along with Sarkozy Cameron for calling for a “no fly zone” over Libya to get rid of Qaddafi for their Zionist pals and not to mention Bush, Blair and half the Labour cabinet who instigated war with Iraq for the same goals, the Western Leaders have a lot to answer for.
Isaac
- Edit
Killery Clinton and Angela Merkel are easy manipulated by the Zionist Criminal Cabal.
Mauricio Massa
- Edit
The truth will set us free. Thank you Killary for being STUPID enough to “write” such atrocities… I thought you guys were WAY smarter…
Anti-neocon
- Edit
Wolfowitz Doctrine
Wolfowitz Doctrine is an unofficial name given to the initial version of the Defense Planning Guidance for the 1994–99 fiscal years (dated February 18, 1992) authored by Under Secretary of Defense for Policy Paul Wolfowitz and his deputy Scooter Libby. Not intended for public release, it was leaked to the New York Times on March 7, 1992,[1] and sparked a public controversy about U.S. foreign and defense policy. The document was widely criticized as imperialist as the document outlined a policy of unilateralism and pre-emptive military action to suppress potential threats from other nations and prevent any other nation from rising to superpower status.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wolfowitz_Doctrine
chris
- Edit
put that bitch in prison where she belongs,or better yet drop her in the middle of the war she likes so much.
Basalat Raja
- Edit
If I was an Israeli official, I would be mad as heck at this. Israel has refused to admit that it has nuclear capability. Now we have the US Secretary of State trying to figure out ways to maintain “Israel’s nuclear monopoly.”
Ryan
- Edit
Again when all the behind the scenes information comes to light we are right again.
The ageing Europhobic babyboomers types you will see involved in anti war groups like the ‘Stop the War coalition’ project that middle east intervention is caused by vague ‘corporations’, ‘military industrial complex’, European xenaphobia and implicitly that national borders are the issue.
Shock and horror the whole Neo-con scheme gains it’s legitimacy and financial support from internationalist jewish politics and jewish businessmen who support one thing in the West then another thing for Israel.
antieu
- Edit
Leave the baby boomers out of it!