This is Google's cache of https://www.reddit.com/r/worldnews/comments/4bgfx5/reports_of_explosions_at_brussels_airport/d18wzyp. It is a snapshot of the page as it appeared on 22 Mar 2016 15:24:26 GMT.
The current page could have changed in the meantime. Learn more
Full versionText-only versionView sourceTip: To quickly find your search term on this page, press Ctrl+F or ⌘-F (Mac) and use the find bar.
jump to content
my subreddits
more »
Want to join? Log in or sign up in seconds.|
[-][-]
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
subreddit:subreddit
find submissions in "subreddit"
author:username
find submissions by "username"
site:example.com
find submissions from "example.com"
url:text
search for "text" in url
selftext:text
search for "text" in self post contents
self:yes (or self:no)
include (or exclude) self posts
nsfw:yes (or nsfw:no)
include (or exclude) results marked as NSFW
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
this post was submitted on
7,088 points (90% upvoted)
shortlink:
reset password

worldnews

unsubscribesubscribe10,461,610 readers
23,727 users here now

Filter out dominant topics:

Welcome!

/r/worldnews is for major news from around the world except US-internal news / US politics

Worldnews Rules

Disallowed submissions

  • US internal news/US politics
  • Editorialized titles
  • Misleading titles
  • Editorials, opinion, analysis
  • Feature stories
  • Non-English articles
  • Images, videos or audio clips
  • Petitions, advocacy, surveys
  • All caps words in titles
  • Blogspam (if stolen content/direct copy)
  • Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr
  • Old news (≥1 week old) articles
See the wiki for details on each rule

Disallowed comments

  • Bigotry / Other offensive content
  • Personal attacks on other users
  • Memes/GIFs
  • Unlabeled NSFW images/videos
  • URL shorteners
See the wiki for details on each rule
Continued or outstandingly blatant violation of the submission or commenting rules will result in your being temporarily banned from the subreddit without a warning.

Please don't ever feed the trolls.
Downvote, report and move on.

Sticky Posts

a community for
No problem. We won't show you that ad again. Why didn't you like it?
Oops! I didn't mean to do this.
discuss this ad on reddit
No problem. We won't show you that ad again. Why didn't you like it?
Oops! I didn't mean to do this.
discuss this ad on reddit
7087
7088
7089
submitted by hasangetinya - stickied post
loading...
you are viewing a single comment's thread.
[–]Sabrewylf 2589 points2590 points2591 points x3 (596 children)
Belgian here, I've been pretty leftist my entire life. Communist sympathies as a teenager and a socialist supporter as soon as I sobered up.
Enough is enough. I'm all for integration and tolerance but something is rotten to the core when it comes to muslim culture within Europe. Djihadis, fundamentalists, whatever you want to call them are either too plentiful or have too much influence. Whether that was our fault due to not giving them the tools to integrate or theirs for refusing to take advantage of those tools is besides the point.
I am done defending this culture. I am done playing devil's advocate when I go out for drinks with my friends.
Ever since WW2 ended Europe has tried its damnedest to avoid conflict. We banded together under these principles in both the European Union and the United Nations. Perhaps it's time we showed the world again that when we stand as one force, we will not bend. It's time to show that dogs without bark can still bite.
[–]aimeetea88 418 points419 points420 points  (40 children)
Brit here. I completely agree. I've been a liberal since my teens, but as I'm getting older (28 now) my viewpoint is changing and I'm having opinions I never thought I would.
Europe is a gloriously civilised part of our world, and our values need to be upheld and protected. We got through WW1 & WW2, and we were United.
Enough is enough.
My condolences to the people of your country.
[–]EmperorKira 33 points34 points35 points  (2 children)
From UK, I have a muslim last name and muslim parents. I also identify as liberal. But fuck these guys. Their brand of Islam is a cult that brainwashes and commits mass murder. I am all for integration but 'tolerance' is bullshit in my opinion. You don't fucking come to this country to 'tolerate' our way of life. You integrate or GTFO.
[–]123choji [score hidden]  (0 children)
We can have liberal values and we can also be against immigration.
[–]6StringAddict [score hidden]  (0 children)
You don't fucking come to this country to 'tolerate' our way of life. You integrate or GTFO.
Belgian here. That's where the problems lies. Integration. We have to respect their views, their methods, their lifestyle, whilst they're constantly condemning our own.
[–]chuckDontSurf 14 points15 points16 points  (0 children)
Europe is a gloriously civilised part of our world, and our values need to be upheld and protected.
Even though I'm American, this sentiment rings true the older I get. Sure, European countries have done some bad shit throughout history. But if you look @ all of the advancements and contributions that have come out of Western civilization (not saying other civilizations weren't as advanced, usual disclaimers, etc), it's really quite staggering.
[–]Pytheastic 16 points17 points18 points  (10 children)
Please don't leave us Britain ;_;
[–]TakenByVultures 6 points7 points8 points  (0 children)
I'll be voting to stay in, as will all my friends. I'll be absolutely devastated if we go out.
[–]I_done_a_plop-plop 7 points8 points9 points  (0 children)
I will be voting to stay in Europe.
[–]aimeetea88 14 points15 points16 points  (2 children)
Oh I intend to stay in, don't worry :]
We Brits don't run away from strife. I'd be disappointed in my fellow countrymen who believe this is the way forward.
Now is the time to stand together, to stand united. 🇪🇺🇬🇧
[–]librarydreamer 3 points4 points5 points  (2 children)
I wouldn't be surprised in 'OUT' supporters start adding this to their list of reasons to leave the EU. I hope not; tragedy shouldn't be used for political point-scoring.
[–]TheGreatHooD 4 points5 points6 points  (1 child)
Please do. It's time that this EU failure is coming to an end. Yes there are good things about Europe, free travel and work and goods, but you do not, ever, force laws upon these countries. I really don't know where it went wrong, and why all said countries traded in their own control over their country to that criminal organisation but it's time it's put to an end. Starting with Britain, it could be the start of something amazing. I hope everything just falls apart, a couple of right-wing leaders will bring back order and control over this continent.
[–]AcidRam [score hidden]  (0 children)
What you're talking about is woefully simplified and in cases down right false.
I hope everything just falls apart>
So you're supporting our NHS potentially disintegrating due to even more cuts to initially stabilize UK economy after Britain leaving EU? Perhaps you're condoning our ex-pats having to pay for their own medical treatment - especially in a time like this.
Maybe you're even supporting the abolition of the EWTD ensuring our doctors and other medical workers get ample rest in order to do their job properly. All for your jaded childish view of ''everything falling apart''. Brexit would be devastating.
Grow up.
[–]Ekudar 2 points3 points4 points  (2 children)
It is not about becoming old, issues like this attacks make you realize that no matter how hard we try , some people refuses to take a GREAT chance to make something better for themselves.
It is sad that good people will have to pay for the rotten ones, but I believe the immigration has to stop for a while, and Muslims should be monitored in a strict way (no tattoos, or concentration camps pls)
[–]oshawasucks [score hidden]  (1 child)
Your preaching that I should get monitored in a strict way? What did I ever do to you? My rights are tossed out simply because a few shit stains did something that is WIDELY considered terrible by Muslims too?
[–]Ekudar [score hidden]  (0 children)
Just for sinners my friend. The problem with some people that follow the same religion as you do , is that they will always advocate for violence against us "infidels" now, I know Christians were like that(fuck, some still are ) But why should western countries deal with violence and death because of some people that is unwilling to change and adapt?
How could countries know who is good willed and who wants to get in to perpetrate attacks?
[–]CUNT_NIGGER_HITLER 615 points616 points617 points  (53 children)
In my opinion being leftist is mostly about things like - high taxes for high wage earners, business regulations, capital gains taxes, minimum wage, public education & health care, environmental policies and other stuff like that.
I think you can still call yourself leftist by supporting these issues and at the same time be against immigration (or at least skeptical about it) and critical of Islam.
People don't need to put all their ideologies in a box and switch the entire box if they change their opinion on one thing about it.
[–]amorpheus 979 points980 points981 points  (25 children)
Why do perfectly rational people taint their comments with absurd user names, CUNT_NIGGER_HITLER?
[–]trilobitemk7 167 points168 points169 points  (0 children)
The name was first, so perfectly absurd people taint their user names with rational comments.
[–]lord_dunsany 12 points13 points14 points  (0 children)
"Rational" and "mature" are two different things.
[–]CuntbagMCdicks 14 points15 points16 points  (3 children)
he's a karma whore.
[–]CUNT_NIGGER_HITLER 14 points15 points16 points  (2 children)
Not really, I only have like 90 :(
[–]ahump 10 points11 points12 points  (1 child)
I think he is making a joke. His name is cuntbackmcdicks. Meta.
[–]BlizzardOfDicks 20 points21 points22 points  (0 children)
Karma is no joke, sir.
[–]CUNT_NIGGER_HITLER 21 points22 points23 points  (0 children)
I want to spread my message of love and friendship around the world!
[–]seign 5 points6 points7 points  (1 child)
I never even look at user names and wouldn't have noticed until you pointed it out. Either way, a name doesn't make a point any more or less valid.
[–]godisacunt 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
Agreed. How uncool.
[–]Imightbeflirting 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
We really, really like free speech.
[–]fockface 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
Stupid username checking in. I've been using my username for over 10 years now. I was young and stupid when I made it, but it's a small part of my youth that I don't want to let go. Although when my daughter starts asking me why all of my video game characters are named 'fockface', I'll probably need to let it go.
[–]HowNew 3 points4 points5 points  (0 children)
According to US politics you can't call yourself a leftist and be critical about Islam and against illegal immigration or immigration without nationalization.
I think the term people like to use is "Hitler."
[–]TechnocraticTurk 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
I'm a leftist Turkish person and to this day I don't understand how European "leftists" are so tolerant of Islamists. Being left for us has always been associated with being critical about any and all religions...
[–]Alpha100f [score hidden]  (0 children)
critical about any and all religions
a) Islam has more "oppression points"
b) Muslims can kick your face for your "activism". Roughly saying, these are the reasons, if we don't venture into the "SJW specifically target white man" territory.
[–]cromagnum_android [score hidden]  (0 children)
Leftism used to mean those things, apparently now it means PC thought policing. You end up with society not being able to make sane decisions anymore.
[–]zucchini1822 [score hidden]  (0 children)
Sound political advice from CUNT_NIGGER_HITLER
[–]seign 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
This. I consider myself pretty far to the left but I'm as conservative as can be when it comes to immigration issues.
[–]Sabrewylf 5 points6 points7 points  (5 children)
In my opinion being leftist is mostly about things like - high taxes for high wage earners, business regulations, capital gains taxes, minimum wage, public education & health care, environmental policies and other stuff like that.
Yes, /u/CUNT_NIGGER_HITLER, my opinions on that are still the same. And yes, I still think that those issues are more important than flexing our muscles at the Middle East.
People don't need to put all their ideologies in a box and switch the entire box if they change their opinion on one thing about it.
I don't ever generalize, but I'm not going to sit here and pretend like it's only small issue caused by a minority like I used to.
[–]BeefsteakTomato 2 points3 points4 points  (1 child)
I don't ever generalize, but I'm not going to sit here and pretend like it's only small issue caused by a minority like I used to.
[–]shoestringcycle 2 points3 points4 points  (2 children)
but it is only a small issue caused by a vanishingly small minority.
It sounds like you're principles weren't strongly held and you gave them up at the smallest challenge, that doesn't make you strong or brave, just weak and scared.
[–]jay212127 7 points8 points9 points  (1 child)
There is something to be said about accepting and changing views when evidence is provided.
The idea of freedom of mobility and accepting of everyone is a good and noble thing at its core, however over the last couple decades have been consistently showing cultural ghettos growing in European communities, this is bad nearly any way you slice it. Looking at a more moderate solution (vetting process), more integration support, teaching cultural values, has potential to be a much better solution.
maintaining an ineffective stance isn't strong or brave, but naive.
[–]HodortheGreat 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
Yes there is a bottom and top of it as well based on value/tolerance. High tolerance on top low tolerance on bottom. Can't remember the English word for it.
[–]karadan100 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
Conscientious objectors were some of the most badass of badasses in the war. Imagine going into the centre of a war zone with no weapon to help those fallen from the same guns actively trying to shoot you.
Metal as fuck and yet morally obliged to help their colleagues in any way possible. They certainly didn't stay at home protesting the war. Everyone got stuck in.
[–]jeannuel 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
you're correct.
[–]ElagabalusRex 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
Unfortunately, people need to have their stupid labels.
[–]ketters 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
Well, easiest way of saying it is dividing the issues up.
You can have left wing economic and social opinions and right wing immigration views.
[–]Vytautas__ 14 points15 points16 points  (2 children)
You can blame Saudi Arabia for spreading Wahhabist/Salafist ideology all over Europe.
Imams generally travel to Saudi Arabia to study Islam. There they are taught Wahhibism or Salafism and later payed to spread the religion abroad. Saudi Arabia is one of the biggest funder of these ideologies worldwide and specifically build Mosques for people who spread it.
Consequently it's also the religion/ideology that groups like ISIS, Abhrar Al Sham, Al Nusra and AQ follow.
[–]FiestaTortuga 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
More like "consequently".
[–]Vytautas__ 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
You're right. Thanks.
[–]mylord420 24 points25 points26 points  (9 children)
The biggest issue with the left is too much tolerance. This coming from a lefty too.
[–]abrasionshack 11 points12 points13 points  (3 children)
Yep, lefty here. Nothing has driven me further from the left in the past 18 months, than the extreme 'feels' left. They are fucking loopy and accusatory bunch. (I best watch out, this post is probably racist!)
[–]sweetleef 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
LOL, tolerance as long as the person agrees with them.
Try going onto a campus and saying something non-PC, then watch the tolerance flow.
[–]svdimr 12 points13 points14 points  (1 child)
Im from germany. I don't think of myself as german, but as a european. I could care less about the german state. What I do care about is europe, it's values and culture.
I love to travel, and I've seen much of europe. It's beautiful, with incredibly educated and tolerant people. Western culture is greatest culture in the world, it provides the biggest liberty and the highest standart of living. It's time to openly state this without the fear of being called supremacist.
We must protect our heritage. We must unite. We are one.
[–]976692e3005e1a7cfc41 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
Est Europa nunc unita
et unita maneat;
una in diversitate
pacem mundi augeat.
Semper regant in Europa
fides et iustitia
et libertas populorum
in maiore patria.
Cives, floreat Europa,
opus magnum vocat vos.
Stellae signa sunt in caelo
aureae, quae iungant nos.
[–]TheMediumPanda 18 points19 points20 points  (0 children)
You can still be centre or leftist while being critical of totalitarian, Bronze Age religions and their followers.
[–]Ecorin 259 points260 points261 points  (202 children)
This is exactly what the terrorists want.
They want the Western world to start hating ALL muslims so that the extermists and jihadists have cause to brainwash more and more regular muslims to join them in the war against West. US & co. wars in the Middle East over the past 30 years have also helped with this.
But you have to keep in mind that we are seeing a small portion of extremists out of the millions of muslims currently in Europe. We just have to eradicate the small portion off this planet, it's really the only option.
(Comment deleted or removed) [+][deleted]  (1 child)
[removed]
    [–]Merco64 32 points33 points34 points  (9 children)
    Do 'extremists' have different holy books than the rest of them? I know the version I read went on and on several hundred times about what unpleasant things should happen to nonbelievers. Was I reading a different book? I'd hate to lump all adherents together as lunatics if it was unwarranted.
    [–]seestheirrelevant 9 points10 points11 points  (5 children)
    That's true of most Abrahamic religions.
    [–]Merco64 5 points6 points7 points  (0 children)
    I'm certainly not defending any of them.
    [–]Curt04 9 points10 points11 points  (1 child)
    There may be plenty of Jewish and Christian bigots but there aren't hundreds of thousands of them that blow themselves up or murder over it. They have moved on since The Crusades.
    [–]Sjoerdb93 5 points6 points7 points  (0 children)
    I'm with you on in this issue, but the point is that it's not the book itself that's the problem.
    It's absolutely possible to be religious without following the abhorrent parts of your holy book. As is evident from the Jews for example.
    [–]Wrastlins [score hidden]  (1 child)
    Christianity and Judaism have gone through huge reformations which is why they aren't blowing themselves up over some line in the Old Testament. Islam has not gone through a reformation, which is why they are extremely prone to go blow themselves up over a few lines from the Quran. Sam Harris does a pretty good job of explaining this on Rubin Report.
    [–]blowf1sh 228 points229 points230 points  (88 children)
    This is exactly what the terrorists want.
    And that doesn't make him wrong or absolve the muslim community in Belgium of their wrong doing. No muslims somewhere no islamic terrorism the equation is simple and you cannot deny that truth. However I can guarantee you there will be some muslim terrorism everywhere there is muslim people.
    [–]8bitAwesomeness 13 points14 points15 points  (3 children)
    Still there are a lot of criminals among black people, just eradicate black people and we won't have them anymore.
    Also, fuck all those white man bankers in wall street. Eradicate all white men and we won't be fucked over by the 1%ers anymore.
    And fuck all those indian serial children rapists, eradicate all indians and we won't have more child rapists.
    The equation is simple. Just eradicate all humans.
    [–]QUEENROLLINS [score hidden]  (0 children)
    I suppose the difference is that none of those groups believe their God is telling them to do commit these crimes.
    [–]Wrastlins [score hidden]  (0 children)
    Still there are a lot of criminals among black people, just eradicate black people and we won't have them anymore.
    Black people are a race, not an ideology. This is a horrible analogy that leftists always go to but it just doesn't stand up. Please go look up Sam Harris and listen to some of his talks, especially the one on Rubin Report.
    The equation is simple. Just eradicate all humans.
    This is exactly what people in this thread are talking about when it comes to radical leftist rhetoric. No one is fucking saying we should be killing anyone. People are saying, "Hey, maybe we should rethink how open we are with our borders". Banning a whole religion is extreme, but a proper vetting process seems to be a good alternative.
    So let me ask you, is asking for a proper vetting process the same as "eradicating humans"? Good lord, you are one delusional person.
    [–]Cadavertiser 29 points30 points31 points  (13 children)
    The muslim community??
    [–]purple_ombudsman 24 points25 points26 points  (12 children)
    Yeah, didn't you hear? Literally all Muslims are responsible for what happened in Brussels. /s
    [–]seestheirrelevant 8 points9 points10 points  (8 children)
    Hey man, if they weren't all shitty they would have stopped the secretly planned and executed terrorist attack. Hell, I didn't see any Muslims throwing themselves on the bombs either, so that's all the proof you need that they hate Westerners.
    /s
    [–]Burgovski 9 points10 points11 points  (7 children)
    I don't know why I keep coming here to see all these esentially racist and anti-muslim comments. There's about 2 billion muslims in the world, if you want to tell me most of them think like that you are a retard, period. People forget about the IRA or others like them and like to believe they live in this bubble of happiness that is the west, with the muslims being the only ones to disturb it. This lack of empathy just makes me so fucking mad.
    [–]trumptookadump [score hidden]  (0 children)
    You must be new here. /r/worldnews is very reactionary (search it up).
    [–]seestheirrelevant 6 points7 points8 points  (3 children)
    I honestly think it's really interesting. So many people learn about terrorism and history and recite these morals and facts up until they get scared. Then, suddenly, it's tribal insticts all the way, no memory of the past, and rabid denial of anything that doesn't fit their narrative.
    [–]purple_ombudsman 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
    Yeah, terrorism is effective that way. That's why it's being used.
    It'll be really hard for these people to cobble together a narrative when Trump becomes the leader of the free world, and the attacks increase.
    [–]Namingway [score hidden]  (2 children)
    They aren't. That said, recent history has shown us that 'average Muslims' (while not condoning the attacks) understand and even sympathize with their cause.
    In Christianity, it would be similar to a group that believes they will bring about the final chapters of revelation. Most Christians would call bullshit and demand they are stopped, but the less intelligent among them would be hoping for their success.
    [–]purple_ombudsman [score hidden]  (1 child)
    The "average Muslim"--is that a composite for all Muslims who come from strikingly different cultural backgrounds? Because if anything, those numbers tell me if that if you took a random sample of Muslims worldwide, the majority (72% in a global survey by Pew, if you keep reading) would say it's never justified.
    Your comment illustrates one of many issues that prevents us from a more sophisticated understanding--the ecological fallacy. What is the "average Muslim?" How do we take an extremely diverse group, boil it down to a composite, and then generalize that composite back to all Muslims? I'm not saying the other 28% are off the hook, but oversimplifying the issue is not going to help anyone.
    [–]AidanSmeaton 27 points28 points29 points  (46 children)
    Assuming all terrorists are men, you could apply the same logic. Get rid of all the men and we get rid of all the terrorism. Who cares if 99% of men are peaceful and innocent? Get rid of all of them and we get rid of the bad 1%.
    Despite being an atheist, I'm still reluctant to demonise all muslims for the acts of a few extremists.
    Edit: Downvoted for suggesting that the "muslim community" is not responsible for the acts of a few men. Crazy.
    [–]_BITCHES_LOVE_ME_ 20 points21 points22 points  (17 children)
    That's not exactly the same thing. You can't stop being a man, but you can stop being a Muslim. You don't need to kill all Muslims to eradicate Islam, they can simply denounce their faith and lead secular lives. Religion is by its very nature anti-scientific and misleading, and it causes suffering and violence. Its directly harmful to the advancement of civilisation and has no place in a rational society. I have nothing against Muslims but I strongly oppose most organized religion, particularly Islam. Buddhism is cool though.
    [–]Morthis 30 points31 points32 points  (8 children)
    People always say stuff like this. Heck virtually any discussion on the Internet about religion tends to go down the "religions only cause harm" path. Even if we accept this as complete truth, what's the solution exactly? Force people to give up their religion? Effectively impossible, people will believe what they want to believe. Even if you could somehow eradicate all religions that doesn't stop new ones from being created or old ones from making a return. What do you do to followers who refuse to renounce their religion? Throw them in jail? Isolate them in camps? Execute them?
    That's what I don't understand about all these arguments on Reddit about how "All of Islam is evil" or whatever and these calls for people to "pull their heads out of the sand". Even if we were accept this as 100% truth, that every single Muslim is a potential danger, what exactly would you do about it?
    [–]ulmon 3 points4 points5 points  (2 children)
    It's not an either we have an open door migration or all muslims are evil and need to be gotten rid of situation.
    The middleground is to put super strict standards for anyone migrating to europe. Not that they can't be religious, but that they hold western liberal values at their core.
    The idea that accepting that Islam, as a whole, is currently a religion that hasn't gone through an enlightenment means that one wants to exterminate or get rid of all muslims is what people mean by "putting your head in the sand".
    [–]I_comment_on_GW 5 points6 points7 points  (1 child)
    Yeah I don't understand the logic. Especially since one of the things that makes secular society better is that we don't judge people differently for their religion.
    [–]veryreasonable 4 points5 points6 points  (7 children)
    Hate to break it to you, buddy, but... there are Buddhist terrorists who actively bomb things too. If you don't think that the actions of some extremists proves that Buddhism is fundamentally rotten, then, well... that was /u/AidanSmeaton's point.
    EDIT: downvotes? Are y'all just uncomfortable with that fact or what?
    [–]TheShitHoldingKid 7 points8 points9 points  (3 children)
    Yeah that may have been the case a handful of times but if you can't see the difference between the two ideologies you should look harder.
    [–]veryreasonable 3 points4 points5 points  (2 children)
    No, honestly, I can't really tell the difference between one religious leader preaching that it is fundamentally okay to kill a certain race/creed/religion of people, and another religious leader preaching that it is fundamentally okay to kill a different certain race/creed/religion of people.
    Both Islamist and Buddhist leaders have, at times, said exactly that. Japanese Buddhists overwhelmingly supported Japan's role in WWII, calling it "benevolent killing" and deeming it necessary. Some prominent south Asian Buddhists monks have said that killing political opponents does not violence any religious tenets, and South Asia has had few large bombings from such Buddhists. Going back into history, nearer to the origins of Buddhism, the Emperor Ashoka just straight up executed as many as fifteen thousand people for not being Buddhist, if records are to be believed.
    But it is quite a stretch to assert that such examples tarnish all Buddhists, or even all Buddhist religious leaders (and I've met a few, all who strongly opposed violence and terrorism). But I also don't think that tarnishes all Muslims, or even all Muslim leaders (I've also met a few, each and every one of whom strongly opposed violence and terrorism).
    What exactly is different about Islam that extremist actions tarnish all of its adherents?
    It is entirely legitimate to suggest that moderates should be doing all they can to curb extremism... however, I've never seem anyone suggest to a Buddhist person that they or their family are in any way responsible for curbing violence in Malaysia. Yet that is exactly how people talk to Muslims about Islamic terrorism.
    You tell me what the difference is.
    [–]olfactory_hues [score hidden]  (0 children)
    It's obviously false that all terrorists are men. But, to continue analyzing your poor analogy, it only works if their gender is central to their impetus for committing the atrocities.
    I'm not trying to run with an extreme reaction against all Muslim people, but what is missing from these responses is the recognition that there are many more Muslims who do share some degree of responsibility. The people who live in these communities know where radical elements persist. Some tacitly support their goals. Most just don't want to get involved. Either way, they are harboring and creating the breeding ground for terrorists.
    [–]niv85 7 points8 points9 points  (19 children)
    One of the san bernardino shooters was a women. Stop pretending there's not a serious problem with that religion.
    [–]jmalbo35 10 points11 points12 points  (15 children)
    And some terrorist attacks are done by Christians and others by Buddhists. The fact remains that the vast majority are done by men, so by the same logic that people use to condemn all Muslims regardless of their support of terrorism you could also condemn all men.
    [–]niv85 5 points6 points7 points  (2 children)
    I don't condemn all muslims, in fact I have never talked to a sane human who has ever thought EVERY muslim is a terrorist. That's become some strange argument that is supposed to fit some left narrative. The fact remains that these attacks keep happening, and they are being carried out by muslims. Common sense tells me that this is the group to focus on in order to stop innocent people from getting blown up at an airport.
    [–]jmalbo35 11 points12 points13 points  (1 child)
    When someone blames "the Muslim community", as was done in this comment chain, they're blaming all Muslims, not those responsible.
    [–]AidanSmeaton 0 points1 point2 points  (1 child)
    That's why I said "assuming". I'm just pointing out the logical fallacy. I think there's a problem with all organised religions, but I don't believe it's right to condemn a massive group of diverse people because of the acts of a few. Peaceful muslims should be treated no differently than peaceful atheists or christians. Have we not learned any lessons from history?
    [–]TerryOhl 2 points3 points4 points  (2 children)
    Letting in the women but keeping out the men is a good idea.
    [–]efffyuuu 185 points186 points187 points  (20 children)
    This is exactly what the terrorists want.
    Nope. Islamists are pretty clear that they want a world ruled by Sharia law. Stop using stupid slogans like this.
    [–]Fouroh [score hidden]  (0 children)
    Those things aren't mutually exclusive. One of the Islamic State's most powerful tools towards establishing the caliphate is inciting bigotry -- stoke the fire of "Islam vs. the West" and see recruitment numbers rise.
    Criticizing and fighting back against antisocial and backwards ideas, particularly violent/extremist ideas and the people who perpetuate them, will help us in the long run. Buying wholesale into this idea of the "other" won't.
    [–]bandalooper [score hidden]  (0 children)
    You're just confirming what they said. The actions of a few Islamists stoke fear, anger and resentment towards Muslims in general.
    [–]ThumbMuscles [score hidden]  (0 children)
    He never said that it was their end game. He simply pointed out that if everyone started hating all Muslims, those hated Muslims would be easier to convert because of they already feel persecuted and hated. Of course they want this. Can they not want multiple things? No need to get combative.
    [–]None-Of-You-Are-Real [score hidden]  (0 children)
    It's not a "stupid slogan", it's 100% correct. They want the West to start hating all Muslims, so it becomes easier for them to radicalize people for their war against the West, in the hopes of eventually bringing about Sharia law.
    [–]Dinduks 6 points7 points8 points  (0 children)
    /u/Ecorin is right, lookup "isis gray zone".
    While it's not their final goal, it's a way to reach it.
    That being said, I personally don't believe the final goal of ISIS's leaders is religious; sounds pretty naive me.
    [–]wile_E_coyote_genius 22 points23 points24 points  (0 children)
    So? Give them what they want. Stop all immigration, and deport all Muslims (I know this isn't realistic). We don't need immigration as bad as current thinking dictates. And if we do, just invent people from countries that aren't full of people who blow themselves up.
    [–]FiestaTortuga 3 points4 points5 points  (0 children)
    As is shown by surveys of Muslims in Europe and the Middle East, many "mainstream" Muslims agree or are at least do not reject opinions that are in line with Islamic fundamentalism.
    Every time people like Sam Harris and others point this out, however, they are demonized as racists.
    [–]Perpetualjoke 12 points13 points14 points  (1 child)
    So what?
    Why should we care about what the terrorists want, if there wasn't this attempt at multiculturalism we wouldn't have to care about middle eastern terrorists in the first place.
    By saying things like "this is exactly what the terrorists want" you are indirectly letting THEM make the rules.
    [–]TheJtimes 4 points5 points6 points  (3 children)
    No. What the terrorists want are people to be so afraid of speaking about the reality of the issue for fear of being labels hateful or racist that they continue to let in droves of immigrants without stricter background checks.
    You are exactly what they want. This need to be PC, the fear of speaking out about the problem, allows them to continue to infiltrate Europe.
    [–]nllanki 4 points5 points6 points  (0 children)
    Millions of Muslims support their actions. Even more support oppressive actions against women, the stoning of homosexuals. Islam is a bad influence to the core. You cannot believe in Western ideals and be a practising Muslim. They're opposites.
    [–]LowPiasa 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    You've already jumped too far forward in this conversation. First, we have to talk about if there is something to this apparent correlation of violence and people that love this Quran book and the other closely tied books.
    This is where the debate really is. If we were to assign two people to each individual religious holy texts and one person takes the texts literally on the other person, which group would you least want to be in?
    [–]Djbroan 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    "We just have to..." How? How? How can you tell which is which? That is why some people are yelling to kill them all, because you can't tell! (Not me, btw, but I can understand the mind frame) How would you propose to "just" eliminate the extremists?
    [–]Thenewme23 11 points12 points13 points  (5 children)
    Lol, not the "small portion of the population" argument again. Have you seen the polls they've done over there dude? Most Muslims support this shit.
    [–]Hurrah_for_Karamazov 4 points5 points6 points  (2 children)
    One, how do you know this? Two, what is with this group of people that allows them to get so easily brainwashed and violent?
    [–]StevefromRetail 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
    I guess we should be glad here didn't say he hates all Muslims now. Look, if our fear is that criticizing Islam is going to radicalize more Muslims, we need to admit one of two things: either it's true, or we're being paranoid. If it's true, then that should tell us something extremely worrying about Muslims that being criticized causes them to become jihadists.
    [–]tigernmas 32 points33 points34 points  (36 children)
    It's sad seeing the kind of attitudes that prolonged and worsened the Troubles in Northern Ireland develop in real time right in front of you.
    What we need to do it be accurate and isolate the very small sub groups of people that cause violence on all sides. Don't become fearful because of the chance of terror attacks. Don't be stupid but don't be afraid. Don't destroy europe for the sake of "saving" it and do our best to understand all the underlying factors behind it, not just those that blame the other side.
    If you lose your head and start advocating a clash of cultures with no end in sight you are just marching to the nasheed of ISIS.
    [–]Hoobacious 17 points18 points19 points  (2 children)
    If you lose your head and start advocating a clash of cultures with no end in sight you are just marching to the nasheed of ISIS.
    But it is a clash of cultures and there is no end in sight. In 1000 years what will humanity be? If we are secular and largely irreligious then radical Islam and religion as a whole has lost the battle of minds and culture. Equally true is the reverse.
    There cannot not be a clash. It may be hard to notice day to day but I refuse to believe humanity has reached its terminal state in terms of cultural developments and spread. Ultimately schools of thought, religious sects and nations will rise and fall. There is an unavoidable, inherent and continuous clash of cultures.
    History is all the proof you need to see this.
    [–]tigernmas 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
    But it is a clash of cultures and there is no end in sight.
    It can look like that from a far back and abstracted point of view but when you start to look closer to each of the elements which construct that grand narrative the whole thing starts to become a lot more complex than a clash of cultures. There are so many historical, political, geopolitical, economic and even environmental factors at play in different ways in different parts of the world where the clash of cultures appears to be taking place. To buy into the clash of cultures narrative requires ignoring far too many important factors that we need to understand to work our way towards a solution.
    [–]withoutanesthetic 3 points4 points5 points  (11 children)
    islam is a 100% oppressive religion, just ask all the women wearing veils and the control the mosques have over it's members. its not just an issue because a minority are blowing everyone up, its culturally backwards and regressive.
    even with out the threat of terrorism, the spread of islam is a threat to western society and values
    [–]freevantage 2 points3 points4 points  (6 children)
    "I have nothing against the veil. And I think that, wrongly, many in the West look at the veil as a symbol of oppression. Now, as long as a woman chooses to wear the veil, because that's her belief and because of her own - that's a personal relationship with God, so she should be free to dress in whichever way she wants." - Queen Rania of Jordan.
    In every religion, there are radicalized cults. These radicals make up a small subset of people and cannot speak for the entire religion. What about the radical Buddhist monks in Sri Lanka for one?
    The vast majority of Muslims live peacefully with their neighbors. They are our doctors, our fellow students, and fellow human beings. They don't deserve the hate that are directed their way and feel just as pained about everything as we feel. Heck, even more so. This is a corruption of the religion, the way that that they raised to believe in.
    [–]withoutanesthetic 6 points7 points8 points  (5 children)
    The vast majority of Scientologists live peacefully with their neighbours too. That doesn't mean Scientology is a religion that should be encouraged and it doesn't mean Islam is a religion that should be allowed to spread. The fundamental tenants of Islam go against Western society and values regardless of how the practitioners feel.
    Radicalisation isn't the only issue with Islam, or religions in general.
    [–]Shqipe1 12 points13 points14 points  (0 children)
    Finally Westerners need to wake up you have been importing these people in
    (Comment deleted or removed) [+][deleted]  (2 children)
    [removed]
      [–]Vivalayeo 3 points4 points5 points  (1 child)
      Wow, this subreddit is incredible that bullshit like this gets upvoted. Lets all throw our toys out of the pram, declare everything to be black and white, and feel oppressed when people trying to show you a bit of rationality. Unbelievable stupidity, it isnt even worth arguing with you because you've made up your mind and abandoned any semblance of thought
      [–]nastyrealitycheck 7 points8 points9 points  (18 children)
      People like you(ultra left wing) fought so hard to bring these people into their country to replace your future demographics. It's just too late, hell Brussels is set to become a Muslim majority In about 15 years.
      Truly sad what's happening, but for all those times you ultra lefts shouted down anti immigration conservatives as 'racist' and 'xenophobic', guess what? We told you so
      [–]tompalainan 9 points10 points11 points  (0 children)
      I've been pretty leftist
      So...
      People like you(ultra left wing)
      [–]LordWalderFrey1 23 points24 points25 points  (10 children)
      Don't act smug, the right wing conservatives are the biggest supporters of disastrous foreign policy ideas in the Middle East which has contributed to the rise of terrorism worldwide.
      [–]madcaesar 2 points3 points4 points  (3 children)
      Yep.. All the shit Bush started is coming back to us and our allies. This is absolutely to blame on the right wing policies of the last 30 years.
      The problem is, the liberals in this country are about to elect either the more stupid Bush mach II or the female Bush. And round and round we go....
      [–]LordWalderFrey1 1 point2 points3 points  (2 children)
      Foreign policy wise, there isn't any difference between the Republicans and Democrats, at least in the mainstream of the parties and this is also there in most western countries. Hillary is a war hawk through and through. Most of the Republicans are as well. Trump says one thing and then says the opposite.
      [–]madcaesar 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
      That's my point. Liberals pointing at Republicans and vice versa is absurd because both parties have kept us in perpetuatal war for the last 50 years.
      [–]LordWalderFrey1 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
      Yes that is true, and who benefits? Not the populace.
      [–]clockingbird 3 points4 points5 points  (1 child)
      Classic right wing policy; throw rocks at the hornet's nest then tell the hornets not to sting you because you might throw more.
      [–]dv_ 4 points5 points6 points  (2 children)
      Brussels is set to become a Muslim majority In about 15 years
      citation needed
      [–]thebrainless 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
      i am not OP and I dont have source but its not a secret? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muslim_population_growth#Europe
      afaik only 40% of people in paris are native french
      [–]abrasionshack 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
      Muslim birth rates, immigration rates vs traditional birth rates. It's occurring everywhere. Use the internet, it's right in front of you.
      [–]NorthVilla 5 points6 points7 points  (2 children)
      Hahaha look at this guy, sitting on his high horse. How about so called "conservative" policies like getting involved in disastrous wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (which many European nations were so willing to take part in!) And how about the -actual- racism and bigotry that comes from conservatives, rather than simply anti-immigration sentiment.
      I suggest if you want people to take you seriously, you stop acting like a smug prick.
      [–]23colon00 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
      Well said! I'm in exactly the same boat.
      [+]Marnir comment score below threshold-17 points-16 points-15 points  (72 children)
      Well then i guess the terrorists win. Their goal is to pit cultures against each other. When you start blaming all muslims for this, the muslim community feel vicimized (just like you would if someone called you violent for being Belgian) and it becomes easier for the terrorists to recruit.
      [–]Foshazzle 37 points38 points39 points  (6 children)
      Their goal is to put cultures against each other
      The cultures are already against each other.
      The head covering on women is, I'm sorry, completely embarrassing to see in the modern world. It signifies everything that is completely irrelevant in any society that understands human beauty and sees women as social equals.
      This is irregardless of any terror attack, there are fundamental differences in culture that lead to social confrontation.
      People should have every right to practice what they want, but they should also have to confront the realities that believing in certain things entails in their day to day existence with people who think they're wrong.
      For example, if you believe in a supreme being, and that the single most important thing in life is to be subservient to it/him/her, that's going to shape the interactions you have every day with people who don't think about that at all, or flat don't believe in it. You're liable to start feeling like you understand something about the Universe that everyone else outside of your belief system isn't privy to. When that happens, there can be a massive rift in the culture, polarizing people into their own respective groups of believers.
      The problem is both with the people involved and the belief systems they ascribe to in their everyday life. It can completely guide someones behaviour, whether that behaviour is peaceful or beheading people on camera in the name of god. Both sets of behaviour can be explained from the common text and the interpretation of the text.
      And if the interpretation of a supposed 'perfect revelation' from god is interpreted so terribly, you have to begin to question the authenticity of the claims of it being directly from god in the first place.
      All of it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
      [–]MightyGreenPanda 3 points4 points5 points  (0 children)
      All of it makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.
      Winner winner chicken dinner. You just defined Islam.
      [–]Miserable_Fuck 31 points32 points33 points  (9 children)
      Well then i guess the terrorists win.
      Where has this idea come from? Why do people think that the terrorists' goal is to make everyone hate them? Or to pick fights? Or something?
      No. They want to kill those who don't align with their beliefs. That's how they win. "Tolerance" will never work. By preaching love and forgiveness, you're making their job a whole lot easier.
      [–]Sell200AprilAt142 7 points8 points9 points  (1 child)
      Where has this idea come from? Why do people think that the terrorists' goal is to make everyone hate them? Or to pick fights?
      Can't speak for the current nutjobs but it was Al Qaeda's publicly stated strategy to provoke the West into expensive foreign wars that would destabilise the domestic economy and lead to the breakdown of society. They had a plan beyond "killing as many Westerners as possible".
      [–]Yagibozan 5 points6 points7 points  (0 children)
      It's not expensive to fight.
      It's expensive to do it humanely.
      Think about that.
      [–]huxtiblejones 10 points11 points12 points  (1 child)
      Groups like ISIS want their extremism to be matched by western extremism, legitimizing their propaganda by drawing Europe and the US into open conflict with Islam as a whole. It allows them to sell the 'us versus the world' shtick a lot better when 'civilized' westerners become racist, war-hungry, and intolerant. It's not only a recruiting method, but it's a way to enlarge the conflict on a global scale. Don't forget that ISIS is an apocalyptic cult that believes their ultimate purpose is to draw western powers into massive conflicts in line with their own prophecies: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2015/03/what-isis-really-wants/384980/
      [–]jacobmarleysmith 12 points13 points14 points  (0 children)
      exactly right.
      the way you defeat isis is by education. we will not be able to solve terrorism in a couple months. even if we 'kill all the muslims' we will not prevent terrorism as the more the west demonizes the muslims the more victimized muslims will feel and thus more willing to be radicalized to commit desperate acts of terrorism. this is true of any oppressed cultures.
      refugees =/= terrorism most of the time. terrorism is a byproduct of extremist fundamentalists and you aren't going to curtail that much through only strict immigration laws. fully determined terrorists will succeed no matter the immigration policy in your country. it's extremely easy to commit terrorism.... i mean, just google search "homemade explosive"
      best solution imo is hardcore brainwashing/education in these high-risk nations such as syria, oman, libya, etc.... in order to make them pro-western. doesn't take much, just a higher standard of living and freedom of expression etc. once you give some poor oppressed bastard the taste of the good life they will NEVER forget it. you don't know what it's like living in these shit countries run by orthodox evangelicals who believe in shit like the second-coming... give those people a bit of western lifestyle at an early age and they will never turn extremist.
      [–]sonicthehedgedog 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
      They've been playing too much CS.
      [–]Why_Hello_Reddit 3 points4 points5 points  (10 children)
      This way of thinking is so asinine.
      "Allow terrorists in your country or...the terrorists win"
      No, fuck that. Start profiling. Young, unmarried muslim men to start. Women, children and the elderly aren't really a threat.
      And if worse comes to worse, let them stay in the middle east. Europe and the rest of the western world do not need to turn into a violent shit hole like the middle east all in the name of compassion or some other PC nonsense. We don't need those problems. And if in your twisted world view that means the terrorists win, so be it. Frankly I think keeping these Islamists from spreading across the world geographically means we're winning, not them.
      [–]Stalgondo 31 points32 points33 points  (20 children)
      Bullshit. Their goal is to kill people in a holy war declared by their sacred book. They are radicalized by a book that literally tells them to kill apostates, kill homosexuals, and conquer everything they can.
      You apologists need to wake up and smell the ashes. You refuse to believe there's a problem until its your neck the sabre is against.
      [–]tigernmas 4 points5 points6 points  (16 children)
      They didn't just read the Koran and think "yeah exactly I should blow up a boots chemist ". Studies into these kinds of people show more religious illiteracy than anything. Most of the Taliban in Afghanistan were completely illiterate even. It's all far more complex than Koran -> terrorism.
      I despise reactionary bigots of any religion, race or gender but let's be accurate for god's sake. If you pinpoint the wrong factor or give overdue important to a factor then your solutions to the problem are going to be seriously flawed.
      We're dealing with angry, alienated people dumb enough to fall for extremist ideas to give their lives some meaning but with still enough between their ears to be dangerous.
      [–]IndonesianGuy 6 points7 points8 points  (9 children)
      But you can't deny stuff like killing non-belivers, killing homosexuals, and opressing women isn't in the qu'ran.
      The book is very contradictory. It preaches peace and tolerance, but it also preach killing non believers and gays, with an added bonus of demonizing jews. A holy book cannot be a real holy book if it's not perfect. No, it's just badly written bullshit.
      Note: I'm an ex-Muslim
      [–]tigernmas 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
      Oh of course it's still a load of bullshit and the sooner people give up religion the better and I will support any Muslim who does. Any religious fundamentalists are going to be right wing bigots of a vicious order.
      [–]ComradVladimir -1 points0 points1 point  (3 children)
      I have not yet heard of a Holy Book that is morally sound or "perfect" and non-contradictory. The Bible (mostly the Old Testament) is full of horrible morality tales and ridiculous laws.
      [–]IndonesianGuy 1 point2 points3 points  (2 children)
      Not a christian nor american. Sorry bruh you argument fail.
      [–]ComradVladimir 0 points1 point2 points  (1 child)
      I'm Dutch and agnostic actually so I don't know what being American or Christian has to do with it. I'm just saying that pretty much all of organized religion is centered around inherently flawed and backwards books.
      [–]IndonesianGuy 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      Ah, it's just most people assumes that only Christian Americans can hates muslims. Also Christianity being bad does not change anything but the fact that Abrahamic religions are awful.
      [–]rasmorak 1 point2 points3 points  (5 children)
      Studies into these kinds of people show more religious illiteracy than anything. Most of the Taliban in Afghanistan were completely illiterate even.
      If you're going to make a ridiculous claim like that, you should probably include the source.
      edit: sources provided, I stand corrected.
      [–]tigernmas 5 points6 points7 points  (4 children)
      Far from being religious zealots, a large number of those involved in terrorism do not practise their faith regularly. Many lack religious literacy and could actually be regarded as religious novices. Very few have been brought up in strongly religious households, and there is a higher than average proportion of converts. Some are involved in drug-taking, drinking alcohol and visiting prostitutes. MI5 says there is evidence that a well-established religious identity actually protects against violent radicalisation.
      [–]rasmorak 0 points1 point2 points  (3 children)
      The main findings include:
      • The majority are British nationals and the remainder, with a few exceptions, are here legally. Around half were born in the UK, with others migrating here later in life. Some of these fled traumatic experiences and oppressive regimes and claimed UK asylum, but more came to Britain to study or for family or economic reasons and became radicalised many years after arriving.
      Right on. Now what about the Muslims literally everywhere else? Not just British Muslims.
      [–]tigernmas 1 point2 points3 points  (2 children)
      You may find this article very interesting. It's by some researchers who interviewed captured ISIS fighters in Iraq about their motivations.
      You'll often find it's these angry zealous converts that go off to ISIS and become the fanatical face of the group but a lot of their locally based fighters are in it for different reasons. Of course they go along with the whole fanaticism because you have little choice but some are simply there because they're stuck in ISIS territory with no job and a starving family and ISIS are offering them money to do it. It's by and large fanatical westerners who do the suicide attacks rather than the local fighters.
      [–]rasmorak 0 points1 point2 points  (1 child)
      This is the kind of shit I was looking for. I no longer consider your claim ridiculous.
      [–]tigernmas 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      Thank you. You have been curt but reasonable.
      [–]dv_ 8 points9 points10 points  (0 children)
      It is true that blaming and attacking all muslims for this will just create more extremists. However, it is my impression that until recently, it was considered widely taboo to even attempt to criticize anything about Islam. You did that, you were quickly labeled a racist. This resulted in a left wing that has been completely unable to do anything about radical, fundamentalist views, and a right wing that is growing in Europe at an alarming rate. It must be permitted to criticize Islam openly without automatically get branded as intolerant. It must be possible to put any religion and any ideology under scrutiny.
      [–]talentedasshole 7 points8 points9 points  (2 children)
      One thing most people don't realize is that the immigrants are running away from the same thing. They want to avoid the same terrorists.
      [–]BakGikHung 19 points20 points21 points  (1 child)
      They need to run away from their toxic religion instead and stop letting their sons and daughters radicalize.
      [–]jihad_dildo 1 point2 points3 points  (2 children)
      Why would they want to cause more hatred towards themselves when the hatred already exists? I always found that explanation to be outright nonsense. These people are social rejects who think it is their ancestral duty to uphold their incompatible beliefs in a country that they should be thankful for letting them settle in the first place.
      If the muslim immigrants become so easy to recruit doesn't that clearly show that there is a major problem in letting them in?
      [–]Canz1 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
      They're trying to get muslims and middle eastern who were born in western countries to feel unwelcome in their own country. Once they start getting alienated in their nation they'll start developing hate for their fellow citizens and easier to recruit.
      I'm arab american and was 5 when 9/11 happened. I didn't understand what happened but growing up made me hate myself. I was bullied and made fun getting called a terrorist. I remember when going out with my dad and he was talking on the phone with his brother in arabic and everyone around us staring with disgust and one guy yelling at us to gtfo of America.
      I never felt like an American even tho I was born here. Even now since this whole ISIS shit I get treated differently. I ain;t even religious
      [–]freevantage 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
      Almost every genocide in history is committed as a form of retaliation or revenge. WWII was directly sparked by the unfair conditions imposed on Germany in the Treaty of Versailles. The same can be said about the genocides that occurred in Rwanda, Cambodia, Sri Lanka, and Armenia, among other countries.
      Alienation is a powerful tool; think of the Columbine Massacre and all recent high school shootings. What was the root cause? The suspects/attackers all felt alienated and bullied. Now, put yourself in the common Muslim's position.
      You're a 16 year old boy who feels like you don't belong anywhere. People look at you with hate, call you a monster, and condemn your entire family and culture because of the actions of a few, even if you've done nothing wrong. Then, a group of people show up who make you feel like you belong, like you have a purpose in life. Why support, protect the people who alienated you, attacked you when you can be strong and seek revenge for how you were treated? They speak the same language, include you and make you feel important, and treat you as if you are their brother. Suddenly, at 16, you're given fancy new guns and women; both of which, were out of your gasps earlier on.
      Imagine coming home to your family after a long flight, only to find out about 9/11 shortly after landing. Your heart breaks for your fellow Americans but because you are Muslim and was born in a Middle Eastern country, you are escorted to the back of the airport and interrogated for hours on end You are not allowed to contact your family and when it's time for meals, your detainers give you only pork, which you can't eat. Imagine how proud you are of you son, who worked hard and was given the chance to interview at one of the best medical schools in the country. Except, when he goes to one of the interviews, the interviewer's face immediately drops as soon as he sees your son and focuses the entire interview on the Middle East instead of his qualifications. These are things that have actually happened to actual American citizens. Can you imagine how hurt they feel? Imagine being in a class full of students, except people would rather sit on the ground then sit in the two seats next to you because you are wearing a veil. All eyes are on you because the Paris attacks had just happened.
      We human beings are remarkably susceptible to manipulation. The Stanford Prison Experiment and the Milgram Experiment demonstrate just how easily we can commit terrible acts against another human being if we feel forced into it or if given power.
      [–]holomorphological -1 points0 points1 point  (12 children)
      Immigrants from the middle east in general need to be sent home.
      [–]_matty-ice_ -1 points0 points1 point  (9 children)
      Yeah. Trump doesn't sound so crazy now eh?
      [–]holomorphological 6 points7 points8 points  (8 children)
      Trump is a fucking idiot. Fucking Americans should stop trying to make everything about them.
      [–]Jet20 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      What, like Europe does every time they need a scape goat for the clusterfuck that is the middle east?
      [–]Juffin 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      Well, you can be both leftist and mild nationalist, as well as leftist and against the insane refugee policy.
      [–]ristorilsm 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      I support equality and social programs, but say that we shouldn't take in 5 million refugees and you get called a stormfag.
      [–]Speech500 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      It's fine to feel the need to change ideologically, but keep in mind that these attacks serve in part to fuel extremism and fear in the west. The more extreme the reaction, the more successful the attack, the more other potential terrorists are incentivised to attack. Plus, the more westerners turn against European muslims, the more likely they are to turn against us. It's obviously hard to approach a terrorist attack with a level head, but remember that level headedness is exactly what the terrorists don't want.
      [–]NickDK 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      As a fellow Belgian, I'm in the same boat. I'm tired of being rational, trying to offer some perspective to friends and family. Anger is taking over, I don't believe it will help but it's the only emotion left.
      [–]double2 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      Would you have had the same attitudes towards protestants during the height of the IRA?
      [–]Awotwe_Knows_Best 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      This is why I keep saying these radicals are not doing islam any favours.
      [–]ElagabalusRex 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      What if told you that persecuting people for their religion has never, ever made people safer?
      [–]Roseking 0 points1 point2 points  (3 children)
      I don't have a solution for you. I don't think anyone does.
      But realize doing what you want would be the largest genocide in the history.
      You are proposing to wipe out a culture. Over a billion people would have to die. Women, children, the elderly. Would you want to declare war on Muslims living in the US? Or any other 1st world country? The Holocaust killed over 6 million Jewish people. Your suggestion is over a billion people.
      [–]Sabrewylf 0 points1 point2 points  (2 children)
      I never suggested anything. You are the one believing I'm implying genocide.
      [–]Roseking 0 points1 point2 points  (1 child)
      something is rotten to the core when it comes to muslim culture within Europe
      I am done defending this culture.
      Perhaps it's time we showed the world again that when we stand as one force, we will not bend.
      It's time to show that dogs without bark can still bite.
      If these are not suggestions could you clarify what you mean?
      [–]Sabrewylf 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      Whatever suggestion you might be able to deduce from that is still a long way off from genocide.
      [–]TerryOhl 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      The massive 'we told you so' is beginning to roll in. What a shocker!
      A lot of people really need to reconsider their abilities in critical thinking.
      So many believed it was THEY who had the superior foresight, when in reality, those who were supposedly wrong were right all along.
      [–]xAsianZombie 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      You do realize that more Muslims are killed by terrorists than anyone else right
      [–]Gr0ode 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      Why does no one talk about the support they get from saudi arabia (money, weapons, etc.)? Politicans don't talk about this because they want that sweet oil and these attacks seem like the price they are willing to pay.
      [–]LegendsLiveForever 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      I'm a leftist who supports stricter immigration laws, I think it's allowed
      [–]LegendsLiveForever 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      I'm a leftist who supports stricter immigration laws, I think it's allowed
      [–]_arkar_ 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      I think it's important though to not go from one extreme to the other.
      Arguing that ISIS is 'foreign' to Islam, or that there are no views prevalent among Muslims are in conflict with the laws of liberal democracies, is rosy-eyed thinking that enables evil to flourish.
      But automatically classifying all human beings that consider themselves Muslims as terrorists is obviously wrong - there is only a tiny tiny tiny percentage of them involved with terrorist organizations. Not only that, it has the evil consequence of making non-terrorist Muslims feel our enemy - and they're the very same people who can help against Islamic terrorism the most, and who worldwide actually suffer most from it.
      [–]canadian_bakin 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      On her way to work one morning Down the path along side the lake A tender hearted woman saw a poor half frozen snake His pretty colored skin had been all frosted with the dew "Poor thing," she cried, "I'll take you in and I'll take care of you" "Take me in tender woman Take me in, for heaven's sake Take me in, tender woman," sighed the snake
      She wrapped him up all cozy in a comforter of silk And laid him by her fireside with some honey and some milk She hurried home from work that night and soon as she arrived She found that pretty snake she'd taken to had been revived "Take me in, tender woman Take me in, for heaven's sake Take me in, tender woman," sighed the snake
      She clutched him to her bosom, "You're so beautiful," she cried "But if I hadn't brought you in by now you might have died" She stroked his pretty skin again and kissed and held him tight Instead of saying thanks, the snake gave her a vicious bite "Take me in, tender woman Take me in, for heaven's sake Take me in, tender woman," sighed the snake "I saved you," cried the woman "And you've bitten me, but why? You know your bite is poisonous and now I'm going to die" "Oh shut up, silly woman," said the reptile with a grin "You knew damn well I was a snake before you took me in "Take me in, tender woman Take me in, for heaven's sake Take me in, tender woman," sighed the snake
      [–]jamjerky 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      Muslim people need to stand up against theses terrorist acts and people..seriously. They are the only ones, who can do anything, or some kind of deportation of muslims will happen soon in europe.
      [–]VoxGens 0 points1 point2 points  (2 children)
      In the EU, less than two percent of terrorist attacks were religiously motivated in the years 2008-2013.
      I have to echo /u/Ecorin here. I'm very sorry for what you and others are going through at this terrible time. The goal of terrorists is to strike fear, cause disruption, and spread hate.
      I'm all for striking down terrorists, but don't blame all Muslims. The majority of Muslims are peaceful people. When you ostracize and discriminate against them, you only serve the terrorist minority.
      [–]failmicro 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      Serbian here, I couldn't fucking agree more. I moved to The Netherlands a few years ago, this country offered me much much more than I would ever expect. In return, I did my best to fit in here, to learn the language and local customs, to learn whats okay and whats frowned upon, and to behave accordingly (which really doesnt require big effort).
      Problem with arabs is that they mostly immigrate here in groups, they stick to other arabs, they speak arabic language, they bring their religion here along with their customs and their rules. And islam doesnt tolerate other religions or atheism.
      It is not that they can't fit in here, they DON'T WANT to fit in. No, its not your fault for not giving them the tools to integrate, it is your fault for not ENFORCING the integration. You don't want to integrate? Then fuck off back to whatever shithole you came from. Nothing gives you the right to disturb people who offered you a new life. Instead, show gratitude and say THANK YOU .
      p.s. 2 of my friends are muslim, very nice and mannered people, and I like them a lot. Everything I said above still holds.
      [–]gonzoplease 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      It's not about culture- ISIS is a terrorist group with political aims. They want to evoke a reaction and that is what these attacks are about.
      [–]nero_burning_rome 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      You have just proven how vulnerable you are for any kind suggestion.
      [–]tabernumse 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      I'm telling you, if you try to blame all Muslims for this it's gonna have the exact opposite effect of what you intend. Don't make it a European vs. Muslim thing.
      Blame the fundementalists, and consider modern moderate Muslims your allies. They are the ones with most of the power to change minds and confront the fundementalism and extreme conservatives in the Islamic communities throughout Europe.
      [–]C-Kerim 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
      You perfectly described the aim and success of these kind of attacks. Spreading hate, scaring and dividing the people. Isis changed your mind, by letting this Happen you actually give them more power. Think twice
      Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy (updated). © 2016 reddit inc. All rights reserved.
      REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
      π Rendered by PID 21009 on app-84 at 2016-03-22 15:24:22.842944+00:00 running 51e0011 country code: US.
      0%
      10%
      20%
      30%
      40%
      50%
      60%
      70%
      80%
      90%
      100%