全 28 件のコメント

[–]Renevat 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

Either Rashford gets dropped and Rooney becomes the striker, or Mata gets dropped and Rooney becomes the 10 (more likely in my opinion).

[–]thecricketnerdYoung 1ポイント2ポイント  (3子コメント)

Or Lingard's out (which I'd rather not happen) and Mata moves to the right again.

[–]RedDevil_BAMFManchester United -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

You'd rather not drop Lingard?! Especially for Rooney? Interesting.

It has to be Lingard for me. Honestly, is like to see Depay (or Herrera) get a run out even before Rooney returns at Lingard's expense.

[–]thecricketnerdYoung 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

More pace and consistency and helps out defensively, while with Mata the right wing can be a vacuum at times.

[–]SonnyisKing 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

------------Schneiderlin----------Schweinstieger-----------

---------Lingard-----------Rooney-------Martial--------------

---------------------------Rashford-----------------------------

[–]Launch_a_poo 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't want to be state the obvious but are we forgetting that we don't have to have a fixed starting XI. We can change from Mata and Schweinsteiger one game to Carrick and Rashford with Rooney #10 the next. No player is getting frozen out

[–]TudoorsYoung 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Van Gaal will most likely not drop Rashford, as he's playing well. Meaning, either Mata or Lingard get's the axe. I can see Lingard being dropped for games where it's going to be harder to break down the defense, and Lingard playing against Spurs, and Leicester.

[–]Idislikemyroommate 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree with how Lingard will be used. Against teams at the top he does well, provides us balance.

I do feel though that Van Gaal will use Rashford on the bench a number of times when Wayne is back to fitness. Rashford has done well but before his derby goal he was looking a bit non existent. I can imagine Van Gaal will want to protect him to an extent and use him a little more sparingly and not to let the hype overcome his true talent.

[–]KeKaRoNiJanuzaj 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The fact that people are having dilemmas over such a thing brings tears of joy to my eyes, as it proves that we have good players in our attacking side.

[–]unusually_typicalFergie 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think it depends on how well Rashford plays between now and Rooney's return. If he has a dip in form he'll probably sit on the bench most games and Wayne will be the main striker. If he keeps banging them in from a central position then LVG has a much harder decision to make. I'd love to see Rashford and Rooney up front, with Rooney as a target man and Rashford playing off him. Martial could then play as a winger from the midfield, but my 442 mentality is dated, so that ain't gonna happen. Can't possibly have fewer than 5 midfielders, or the dogma police will come and shut down the club.

Seriously, though, I think a 442 with wide players would help us break down those teams that just park the bus, as we'd be able to stretch them more and would create room for the forward men. It's why we do so well against the top 6, and suck huge donkey balls versus everyone else. We can't cycle the ball fast enough out on the 25 yard line to create spaces against teams who pack the edge of their penalty box, but put the likes of Martial out on the wing and have them drop bombs into Rooney and Rashford and we'd fucking destroy them. They couldn't just sit back and counterattack once we become frustrated and lose our shape. We can always save our weak sauce variety of tika taka for teams that want to actually contest the midfield.

Whatever. I'll just go back to my armchair and cover my old knees with a blanket.

[–]alustgarten93Martial 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hopefully it'd let us rotate a little more so that our guys aren't totally gassed during the last run of the season where every game is more significant than the last.

[–]BrendonAG92 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Mata most likely should, and will get dropped. In all honesty he's not a bad player, but I also am not sure he has a real future at the club. If the team's built around him, he is a very good player, and he could do pretty well for us, but he routinely disappears in games where we're down and out.

Rooney should in theory play quite well with a front three of Rashford, Memphis, Martial, or Lingard (any of those 4 in any of those three positions). He's much more positive in a counter attacking team as well.

[–]azt95 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Best case scenario, a front 3 of Rooney (ST), Martial (LW), and Rashford (RW) with Mata/Lingard as 10. I believe this attack has enough pace and penetration to cause some serious damage against the opposition.

BUT it all depends on how Rooney is after his injury. If he continues his form before the injury, then we have a good chance of getting Top 4. If it's 2015 Rooney, then we're fucked cause knowing Van Gaal, he'll play Rooney ahead of Rashford anyway as "the captain shall always play" rule apply. Don't forget that it always takes Wayne sometime to hit his stride after an injury, something we can't afford at the moment.

[–]BigbuckyballRonaldo 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I would like to see Wayne used as a sub for Rashford or Mata but I feel since he is the captain, he will probably stroll into the XI. If that's the case I want to see Rooney up top with Martial on the left and Rashford on the right. Mata as a no.10. Lingard looked good on no.10 the other day so maybe we could sub Lingard in for Mata if things aren't working.

If Memphis impresses LVG on the training ground then I can see Memphis on the left, Rashford on the right with Martial up top and Wayne as a no.10.

I don't think either Martial or Rashford deserve to be dropped and I don't think LVG wants to drop Rashford either.

[–]elneebreMata 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Rooney will take Rashford's place and we'll be shit again

[–]Launch_a_poo 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Before the 1-0 City game we were still crap though

[–]elneebreMata -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

We'll probably be crap after too, we've only really played good games against poor opposition

[–]yiyiyiyiHerrera 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

What will happen: Rashford gets dropped like a stone for Rooney

What should happen: Rooney should ride the bench until Rashford is tired/injured/out of form.

[–]FURyannnnScholes 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Nah, what should happen is that Rooney should take over for Mata at the 10, which keeps Rashford in the squad.

[–]Zvcx 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

There is no chance rashford starts ahead of Rooney.

[–]CalabriaStuCazzo 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

LVG should plop his arse on the bench. That's what should happen.

[–]Launch_a_poo -1ポイント0ポイント  (6子コメント)

Rooney's probably our best attacking player along with Martial and Mata. Rashford has been great in Rooney's absence but I saw people were calling for him to be dropped when they saw the line up vs City. Thankfully he scored and extended his run.

He's our captain and still our top goalscorer this year, should definitely be a fairly regular feature in our XI.

[–]danskzwag -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

Hes not our best attacking player and has had a poor season

[–]Launch_a_poo 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

Poor by his standards but he's still our top goalscorer and still one of our best players. I'd say only Martial is a better attacking player

[–]danskzwag 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

rooney scored 5 goals in the whole of 2015 the fact that martial while confined to left wing prison , has the equal amount tells you everything you need to know

[–]Launch_a_poo 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I'm not saying Martial should be dropped for him though. Just one of Rashford, Mata, Lingard. How do you justify any of those players starting over Wayne Rooney? Even on an off season he is still going to out score and out play all of them.

[–]danskzwag 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Rashford is in the right positions in the right time, rooney is nearly always dropping deep and disrupting attacking play , mata creates more and Lingard has a high workrate and good positional play