2610
2611

New allegations raised that Bernie Sanders campaign is being sabotaged from within by high level staff with ties to Hillary Clinton. (self.politics)

turd-polish が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]AntiPrompt [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Are you serious? He linked to Sanders campaign directors openly supporting Clinton on Twitter on election days. If anything, it's unusually obvious. Credibility definitely isn't an issue here.

[–]NDubbaYa [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

https://twitter.com/AishaDew/status/662815125846536192

@HillaryClinton enters the room. It's electric! #FirstInTheSouth

https://www.instagram.com/p/9xDe4tIv_K/

aishadewIt's always great to see @dwstweets. She remembers me.

I'm sorry, but that doesn't justify some kind of massive conspiracy or even suggest support. This whole argument is resting on the videos of one guy and some tweets.

That's too much of a stretch to make.

edit: You need to look at the OP's history because even he/she doesn't know if the accusations are true.

He's/She's just "reporting" it.

[–]turd-polish[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

edit: You need to look at the OP's history

I back up my posts with supporting detailed arguments whenever and wherever I can.

This whole argument is resting on the videos of one guy and some tweets.

I agree. Niko needs to provide actionable proof. Videos are fine if they are accompanied with concise written documentation and supporting arguments that include times, dates, locations and or secondary sources that include first hand witness accounts.

The links (along with others tweets not posted) confirm Aisha was supportive of Hillary up until late November.

I have no clue if she scrubbed her Facebook and Twitter accounts beyond that. By no means does the information presented prove any sort of malfeasance.

Niko House made the allegations, if he has something more concrete he needs to show it, otherwise he should probably take down his vids.

[–]AntiPrompt [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Really? You don't that think tweeting about how Hillary Clinton electrifies a room even suggests support? I can see being a little skeptical about a broad conspiracy, but it's pretty clear that this particular staffer is pro-Clinton.

[–]NDubbaYa [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

We're talking about a sentence and a hug. There is so little information that you can't just make that assumption.

And no. Not a little. Very skeptical. The basis of the argument hinges solely on tweets and the perspective of one man. Now if that expanded, I'd probably back off the whole "calling this a load of bs" thing.

Right now?

We're pulling at strings here.

[–]AntiPrompt [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

So what if it's one sentence? The meaning isn't ambiguous at all.

As far as being "a little skeptical": I said it because that would be a reasonable response. What isn't reasonable is calling the whole thing fabricated, or bullshit, or just from one guy, when there are multiple sources, that show Sanders staffers backing Clinton, including some from the staffers themselves. Some doubt is reasonable; throwing the whole thing out the window isn't.

[–]NDubbaYa [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

We're gonna have to agree to disagree. I just don't think there's enough to validate these claims.

[–]turd-polish[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

That wasn't the only tweet or like Aisha made that was Hillary related, there were others that Niko didn't account for as recent as late Nov 2015.

But as you indicated, support of an opposing candidate while unusual doesn't automatically equate to malfeasance.