全 6 件のコメント

[–]DEATH_2_TAIGSUnited Kingdom 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're misusing the word fascist

And yes it is being orchestrated by a certain 🇮🇱Tribe🇮🇱 that SCHWARTZ GYORGY (George Soros) happens to be a member of

[–]wholenFrance 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Humans often see patterns where there are none, like the constellations in the stars. There is no orchestration happening. There is no global jewish conspiracy, no master plan, and no secret organization controlling everything from behind the curtains.

People with money will do whatever they can to keep and increase their wealth, and people with power will do whatever they can to keep and increase their power. Few people will stray from this line of thinking, and those who do tend to be the unsuccessful types.

If you want to see "the big picture", stop thinking about global politics in terms of us versus them, think about it in terms of everyone versus everyone. Any loyalty to a nation or an ethnicity will always take a back seat to the individual.

[–]NiederweitThe Netherlands 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

This, the world is way more chaotic than people realize, or want to admit to themselves.

Having some sort of order comforts people, even if such an order is against their interests. It's comforting to think that once that 'order' is gone a new one can take over to make everything right again...

But reality, like you say, is at the same time simpler and more complex. It's simpler in the way that most actions of individuals can be explained by ego, power and pride.. But more complex in the way that there are no big entities orchestrating this world.

But maybe I'm wrong and there is some big masterplan... I just think there would be simpler ways to go about it if that were the case.

[–]Phantomchrism[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not saying there's a "master plan" or "jewish conspiracy", but ruling elites, coercion and corruption are common themes in history and it's naive to think that we have a fully functioning free democracy today when we at best have a post-democracy. It's funny how you have to be funded by millionaires and go through established elites like the GOP in the US to even run a presidential campaign, then the GOP tries to undermine the voters and thus the people. Vile people like Soros spent 15 million USD on anti-trump ads and even paying "activists" aka disruptors to "protest" and pays Hillary Clinton's campaign 8 million USD. Also, why would George Soros fund someone like Anita Sarkeesian and the likes to attack gaming culture and repress free speech? It seems to me that guys like this are driven by agenda.

Politics are full of agendas and destabilization and deceit is often used in politics to protect interests.

I'm not saying there is one organization with a master plan to take over, but rather there is a pattern of global organizations that are taking over and gaining too much power, protecting their interests and undermining national sovereignty. I wouldn't be surprised if people are being manipulated to accept a world that is less defined by national borders.

I think the everybody vs everybody mentality doesn't work when it comes to corruption in establishment, then it's all about comrades protecting each other's interests and scheming to stay in top, gain more power and make sure everyone else is kept outside. Just take a look at all the corruption in Fifa, and how everyone was watching each others back with their hands deep in their pockets and trying to get the Qatar deal going.

[–]AngelaMerkelFan 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think the real enemies are racists. I think we should be accepting of all racists and religions.

[–]192873982 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, some people try to make the peoples in Europe more equal, s.t. they can unite it in one country. In this process they don't seem to care about our cultures and our people at all, that's why they flood us with muslims. So this is at least true for Europe.

If it's actually an even bigger thing, and they (whoever they are) try to make the whole world more equal to unite it in one country, I don't really know that. I also think it's not really important.

Any merging of countries or cultures must be prevented. Smaller countries would be better. The reason is, that the countries compete on a market of systems, where the best system makes the countries adopting it more successful and by that the system spreads. With a decreasing number of countries, the market stops working (just as any market without enough players), because there will be cartels and monopoles. We already have cartels (sanctions towards Russia have proven that), but we're marching towards monopoles. The problem is: Even a perfect system would be bad as a monopole, because it could never be overturned again, because bigger systems are harder to topple. Therefore a perfect monopole system could be abused and developped into any system that doesn't benefit you anymore.