Instructions
; Lines that start with # or ; are comments and will be ignored by the bot.
; Each quote is separated by a single line of three dashes like ---.
; This supports multi-line quotes and reddit markdown (except headers of course).
;
; Example:
;
; Quote 1
;
; ---
; Quote 2
;
; ---
; Quote 3
Quotes
And I've often wondered, are they better off as slaves, picking cotton and having a family life and doing things, or are they better off under government subsidy?
What have the Romans ever done for us?!
When I take your money, that's theft; when the government does it, that's taxes.
Everything is rape or slavery except rape and slavery, which aren't that bad.
AM I BEING DETAINED?!
Really anyone who needs help from others to get off drugs is weak as dog shit.
I could bust my hump helping people my whole life with the most altruistic intentions and yet in comparisons to "helping" people could not hold a candle to someone like John D Rockerfeller.
No one is ethically obligated to do anything...actually, becoming a millionaire and blowing it on gambling and hookers and blow is one of my pipe dreams.
Fuck you, got mine.
Voluntary transaction not coercion.
I can't seem to find this mythical document called the "social contract" you claim I am party to.
Where can I find cargo shorts in bulk?
This is good news for bitcoin.
Praxx it out
even in my little town of Lake Jackson, Texas, I’ve urged everyone in my family to know how to use a gun in self defense... for the animals are coming
I miss the closet. Homosexuals, not to speak of the rest of society, were far better off when social pressure forced them to hide their activities
Why don't poor people just buy more money?
...the parents-or rather the mother, who is the only certain and visible parent-as the creators of the baby become its owners.
...the parent should have the legal right not to feed the child, i.e., to allow it to die.
...in a libertarian society the existence of a free baby market will bring such ‘neglect’ down to a minimum.
...it seems over the years I've heard quite a number of creepy things about how 'free' [Europe, Australia and New Zealand] actually are(n't).
I played World of Warcraft for nearly three years, and I saw numerous non-successful psychopaths during that time. The psychopaths need inequality psychologically, to the same degree that the non-psychopaths need equality. The reasons why the psychopathic minority rule, despite their tiny population size, is firstly because most non-psychopaths do not want to take responsibility for their lives, and prefer to delegate their sovereignty to psychopaths, as the psychopaths have trained them to do. The second reason is that the non-psychopaths generally refuse to acknowledge the psychopaths' existence, or at least their existence in government. The non-psychopaths are desperate to believe that government is good, because if government was not good, then that would mean that the non-psychopaths would have to become self-responsible, and start looking after themselves.
I am opposed to the concept of world government; and any geo-political entity with a maximum population size of much more than 1,000 people.
I've got no issues helping the poor but that isn't where an income tax is going to go and if anything it would make the poor poorer.
My problem is the fact that I do not want to live in modern Western society. I'm not suicidal in general; I just don't want to live in this specific civilisation.
I believe in the existence of a particular group of individuals who want to kill the vast majority of humanity, and most of the rest of carbon based life in the process. I further believe that virtually all of the economic, cultural, and environmental degradation that currently exists, is the result of the actions of this group, and that literally none of it is either accidental or random.
Given the amount of legislative groundwork for this that is now in place, I am inclined to believe that the situation in Ferguson may be used by the government as pretext, for the activation of the already existing network of FEMA concentration camps.
I no longer feel that women can be trusted sufficiently for me to attempt to obtain a relationship with one of them; or that they would want a relationship with me even if I did. I have seen claims on 4chan that as many as 60% of rape claims are false and are made due to malevolent intent, among other things.
I virtually never see any form of technological progress made now, where it is not used either for the purposes of war, or the reduction of personal freedom. There seems to be very little motivation to create such, other than these two points. I do not want the body that I was born with to be replaced by invasive cybernetic technology, which someone else could potentially control and turn against me remotely. I also do not want this, because I do not want anyone else to be able to hear my own thoughts, or for them to become subject to any other person.
I'm 37 now, and my philosophy since my teens has been that other than for platonic friendship, the only circumstance in which I would bother going near a woman under 35, is if I'm paying her. I would never approach a teenage girl or young woman for a serious relationship. That is only asking for abuse.
I currently know a half English/South African woman who has been staying at the hostel where I'm currently living, and we have been sharing marijuana and talking for several nights. We have achieved a sufficient level of trust at this point that I might be willing to consider sleeping with her if the idea came up. Physically she is barely 5 feet, a very visible ethnic half-breed, to the point where she has complained about being profiled by the police, and is skeletally thin, as well as having numerous other physical problems.
While exceptions again exist, generally speaking, women have virtually no capacity for logic. Not only is she primarily guided by what feels good emotionally, but she is also guided by doing whatever she has to, to reconcile her internal view of herself as a morally decent person, irrespective of whether or not her actions make rational sense.
Even if you are in a relationship, you will always spend money in order to get into a situation where sex is available; and in a relationship, often the amount of money you will spend will be much larger, than if you simply go to a prostitute.
My general rule regarding sex, is that it should ideally be avoided as much as possible.
The issue that I have with Patriarchy theory is mostly that it's non-falsifiable, meaning it can be used to explain either a case in which women are better off than men or a case in which women are worse off than men are. If women are worse off, as in the case of wage inequality, then the men that control the system are oppressing women, and if women are better off, as in the court system, then men are infantilizing women.
Equality is so fucking awesome I wish I could fill an entire pool up with equality and strap cinder blocks to my feet then jump in and flail around until I suffocate to death because all the air in my lungs got replaced by equality.
Actually, I am almost certain the 2nd Amendment was written with loudmouthed limey scumbags like Piers Morgan in mind.
The plebs can't handle freedom so unfortunately the rest of us aren't allowed freedom.
I should be able to deny service for any reason, not just "religious" reasons.
Should a business owner be forced to provide goods and services to a citizen against their will? That is the basic question here. If a government or any entity is forcing you against your will to use your knowledge, resources, energy, and money, to do something you do not want to do. We have a word for that, it's slavery.
And I can go on for hours on hundreds of free market solutions that could solve that problem, The statist can only come up with one solution, Make A LAW!!!
I wouldn't mind if religious groups and businesses had the right to deny services because it might be a burden against their religion. Now, it would have to be a solid burden and a solid religion.
My opinion is that I don't know. I don't care enough even to look at the data. I have seen some things that suggest it exists because of the sun and other that it exists because of CO2. I know that shit has been changing for as long as the earth has been. What I don't like is when people say that most or all scientists agree. This is an appeal to authority and should be disregarded. One thing that makes me skeptical of the claims is that the solution is always more state power in some form. I was all ears, then I was told the governments would need more tax money to forgive my sin fix the problem. Riiiiight. I see whats going on here.
I don’t think I’ve ever used the word gay rights, because I don’t really believe in rights based on your behavior.
Saying government has good bits and bad bits is, to me, like saying Hitler loved his cat. Its true but trivial. To the extent that its good its trivial to the extent that its bad its profound.
The modern state does make an absolute slave out of fathers, unfortunately.
If there is a racist Target, there will be a nonracist Target that springs up to take all its profits from people who don't want to shop at racist Target. You think you can force people to be just like you, and you can't.
Make no mistake, as emperor, Palpatine is a dictator--but a relatively benign one, like Pinochet. It's a dictatorship people can do business with. They collect taxes and patrol the skies. They try to stop organized crime (in the form of the smuggling rings run by the Hutts). The Empire has virtually no effect on the daily life of the average, law-abiding citizen.
None of which is to say that the Empire isn't sometimes brutal. In Episode IV, Imperial stormtroopers kill Luke's aunt and uncle and Grand Moff Tarkin orders the destruction of an entire planet, Alderaan. But viewed in context, these acts are less brutal than they initially appear. Poor Aunt Beru and Uncle Owen reach a grisly end, but only after they aid the rebellion by hiding Luke and harboring two fugitive droids. They aren't given due process, but they are traitors.
In all of the time we spend observing the Rebel Alliance, we never hear of their governing strategy or their plans for a post-Imperial universe. All we see are plots and fighting. Their victory over the Empire doesn't liberate the galaxy--it turns the galaxy into Somalia writ large: dominated by local warlords who are answerable to no one.
Which makes the rebels--Lucas's heroes--an unimpressive crew of anarchic royals who wreck the galaxy so that Princess Leia can have her tiara back.
I'll take the Empire.
What happens when renewable energy runs out?
[The Native Americans] didn't have any rights to the land and there was no reason for anyone to grant them rights which they had not conceived and were not using.... What was it they were fighting for, if they opposed white men on this continent? For their wish to continue a primitive existence, their "right" to keep part of the earth untouched, unused and not even as property, just keep everybody out so that you will live practically like an animal, or maybe a few caves above it. Any white person who brought the element of civilization had the right to take over this continent.
Crush Criminals. And by this I mean, of course, not "white collar criminals" or "inside traders" but violent street criminals – robbers, muggers, rapists, murderers. Cops must be unleashed, and allowed to administer instant punishment, subject of course to liability when they are in error.
Unleash the cops to clear the streets of bums and vagrants. Where will they go? Who cares? Hopefully, they will disappear, that is, move from the ranks of the petted and cosseted bum class to the ranks of the productive members of society.
In a covenant...among proprietor and community tenants for the purpose of protecting their private property, no such thing as a right to free (unlimited) speech exists, not even to unlimited speech on one’s own tenant-property. One may say innumerable things and promote almost any idea under the sun, but naturally no one is permitted to advocate ideas contrary to the very covenant of preserving and protecting private property, such as democracy and communism. There can be no tolerance toward democrats and communists in a libertarian social order. They will have to be physically separated and removed from society.
Exhibit A for the need for a polycentric legal system, right here
You think because you sit up there in that little black robe hiding behind the ignorance of the masses like a little b#tch, that ANYBODY gives a d#mn about you or what you have to say? Well, just in case you haven't noticed---I couldn't give two f#cks about you or what you have to say. F#ck you, old man. Your court's a joke. You take it up the a#s; and you suck nuts.
We can theorize all we want about what a free market justice system would look like, but really, we know about as much about it as we could've known about Bitcoin in the year 1999. The freedom to switch services means innovation in ways we can't presently foresee.
To me it's weird, the way most of Social Justice Warriors act right now is the way the KKK acted, just the opposite group they are bigoted to.
Because ghetto folks, ruined and addicted to state in numerous ways, are not heavy thinkers, or even light ones..
Order was only restored in LA when it came time for the blacks to pick up their welfare checks three days after rioting began…What if the checks had never arrived? No doubt the blacks would have fully privatized the welfare state through continued looting. But they were paid off and the violence subsided.
Why do all academics have an obsession with evidence and statistics? Don't quote that crap at me. I will stick to my own views.
Fire them, if they resist, stike or occupy your premises, buy an M134 Minigun to revolve the dispute, then hire new workers.
One thing is certain: for every revolting worker, there will be 5 scabs waiting to take their position.
That you aren't supporting Rand, instead you're attacking, means you are thereby trying to help keep brown and black men and women who are convicted felons, unable to regain their right to vote. You're the racist.
I mean if Hitler offered "free, unlimited" energy would you trust him? Of course not, but these days the tyrants wear suits and white coats and everybody bows down and relinquishes their freedom.
Also I don't see why right to food is a thing. It's not a thing naturally. You have the right to get yourself food in nature, but you aren't entitled to it. It's survival of the fittest.
We oppose statist quarantines and similar actions carried out by CDC.
People factor in their moral beliefs when making economic decisions. Economics is an expression of moral beliefs. If people reject rape on moral grounds, then it's not going to be economically beneficial to rape because it's been rejected.
Genghis Khan has done more good for society and the world than any Democracy that has ever existed...
“I have a pet theory about where the framers went wrong. First off, I can’t applaud them enough for what they accomplished given the circumstances. It’s easy to critique centuries later, supported by the wealth their system allowed to emerge. But I wonder how things would have happened differently had the constitution been 100% voluntary. As in, here are the rules our members live by and how those rules are amended. If you want to be in the club, you must pay your dues and follow the rules, but if you want to go it alone, or join a different club, we won’t bother you unless you bother us, and you are free to go at any time.”
“If the options available to a person are work or starve, why would you take away the work option? If people are voluntarily choosing to work in a factory under terrible conditions, it means the alternatives available to them are even worse. That work is an opportunity for them to better themselves. Child labour regulations only hampered the development and expansion of the industries that were providing these opportunities.
Free enterprise and private property, when honored, are an environmentalist’s dream.
if you paid a bunch of money for a horse or a mule would you starve it to death? would you beat it to death? do you honestly need me to cite sources where people purchased horses and mules and didn't beat them to death or can we just agree that [Slavery] probably went down that way.
Age of consent laws were basically created and supported by the Christian Woman's Association and feminism in order to decrease the supply of available sex to men in order to make it easier for older ladies to find a mate.
Children who willingly participate in sexual acts have the right to make that decision...When we outlaw child pornography, the prices paid for child performers rise, increasing the incentives for parents to use children against their will.
You're descended from I-group, neo-Puritan genetics. My people trivially conquered your egalitarian people. I've endured more physical pain without breaking than most people could fathom. How many people finish a sports game with internal bleeding? I was built for the battlefield. And my intelligence built me to merge that asceticism with artistic death.
They wouldn't be forced, that would be their choice. Thankfully, we are out of our industrial revolution, so no one has to make make that choice anymore. However, in third world countries sweatshops are a very good choice, and I would never want to take that choice away from them.
Point is that people deify rape as this monumental sin and think nothing of being forced to get a drivers' license, when really the two are equally bad
You're thinking of corporatism. Throw away your computer and cell phone if capitalism disgusts you so much.
I don't have to answer to a bunch of socially retarded leftists because I don't want to live in a society full of niggers and blood-sucking whores.
You would have made the choice yourself. No one is holding a gun to your head and telling you to quit, either. If a boss wants to sexually harass you, that's their right. If you want to quit, that is your right. The market will solve any problems.
My opinions come about from a fundamentally backward view of human nature
Just for the record, thinking Blacks are inferior doesn't make someone a Nazi. I'm libertarian, that's about about the polar opposite of a fascist political stance.
I didn't know that, but I did suspect it when I read a line trying to defend blacks and poverty that started with "the shackles of slavery". I Ctrl-F'ed for "welfare" and the only mention of it was preceded by "not enough access to". So yeah, I agree it's pretty suspect.
"Private prison" is a buzz phrase, theres no such thing.
The thrash band I play in has libertarian-esque views / lyrics (Two libertarians, drummer is more liberal leaning) and we enjoy covering this song during out sets from time to time. Always make it a point to outline what the song is about and what it's saying.
White lives matter! White pride! Stop killing white people just because they're white! nevermind, the rhetoric seems silly and racist on the other foot... but that won't stop me from looting a CVS in her honor.
Already, the outrage over the Charleston shooting and racism are fading from the news headlines, yet the determination to censor the Confederate symbol remains. Before long, we will censor it from our thoughts, sanitize it from our history books, and eradicate it from our monuments without even recalling why.
Why do we have police again? Seriously? When was the last time you got your money's worth from any police interaction?
I'm terrified of leaving my home. I know it's not safe, but hopefully safer than being outside and seen by police.
A group of Constitution loving citizens could round these two officers up and take a video of them being put up against a wall and executed for their crimes against humanity. But then the narrative would be spun that the citizens were vigilantes and domestic terrorists. Hopefully these cops do find themselves on the other end of a bullet or dump truck at some point.
Police jobs attract violent fascists just like Priesthood and school coaching attracts pedophiles. It's about access and opportunity. But just like the priesthood, the cops need to feel like their bosses will cover this up and protect them.
Rape insurance would provide a woman with compensation for services she claims were taken without payment. Of course if she makes too many false claims, the insurance company will drop her.
After you are born, all bets are off.
By the laws of God and Nature the only thing a man need do every day is feed and shelter his family. Time was, a man contributed to his self, family and a bit of folk around him. Not some massive collective.
The African tradition is poverty and endless conflicts. The European tradition has been economic prosperity.
We don't have a "right" to know what others are putting in food they make and selling to us.
Not surprisingly, most of the really hardcore feminists are part of this latter subset. Fat, incompetent, barren, old, unattractive or otherwise psychologically damaged women with no social value. It's no wonder the dregs the market left behind abhor the market.
This is a violation of private property rights. They’re calling it an issue of zoning. Zoning is communism.
aint my fault
Sorry, I don't save citations for everything I read. I read, digest, and discard. All I can tell you is I remember watching an interview with Thomas Sowell and he said something along the lines of how critical thinking is actually an aberration in the human experience and that it actually didn't become relevant until the industrial revolution. That was when the world shifted from a muscle economy to a thinking economy. Evolution is a mystery though, so no one really knows how exactly we took off. Only that there must have been a mutation or aberration at some point that led some genius thinkers to the industrial revolution and then everything took off from there.
How complicated do you think sex is? Even sheep have sex, and they're completely retarded. What's so special and mystical about sex? Why are children allowed to jump on a trampoline, but not have sex?
I'm genuinely amazed by myself, how much do you wish you were me be honest I mean holy shit I'm a god among men, a king destined to rule the inferior!
Is the current trend of what appears to be global warming harmful or beneficial? In the news you hear only the negative side of it. But what about the benefits?
When you're done wanking it to how hilarious you are, maybe consider the fact that one of libertarianism's failings is that it is inherently not racist. It ignores demographic statistics and gives everyone an equal playing-field within economics, and some then (typically minority groups) have a much more difficult time succeeding. Libertarians completely overlook the issue of race playing a role in one's socioeconomic success, which is why it's NOT racist...
I'm a 17 year old male living in Ohio.
If the government doesn't want the union to act violently, it's not because the government doesn't like violence, it's because the government loves violence so much that it is jealous and selfish and greedy about violence and will only tolerate violence from itself. The government does not stop others from being violent because it dislikes violent, the government stops others from being violent because it loves violence so much it cannot tolerate anyone but itself using it.
Economics IS humanitarianism.
These people live in the shadows of liberty, never once having stepped a single foot into the glorious sunlight of free armed liberty. [img]
Feminism is not a reality based ideology.
Lol, the UK doesn't even have a democratically elected head of state. Keep telling yourself you're free, all the most willing slaves do.
The problem with your argument is that you are relying on statistics to support your worldview.
The laws of economics are laws of nature, like the laws of physics. They have been known for at least 500 years and no one has ever defied them and survived.
libertarians are the liberals' worst nightmare, opponents who are actually smart.
He has the best attorney you need and that's the constitution. So he has nothing to worry about.
You know what the bottom 90% can do? Get off their fucking asses and do something about where they are if they don't like it. If your situation is bad, first look in the fucking mirror.
I first learned about Rand Paul in the ‘08 election. One of my friends told me, ‘Hey, this guy is talking about legalizing everything.’ I was like, ‘That’s awesome. I want to check that out.’
I wasn't trained to spray and pray. You'll get two to the torso and one to the head.
Freedom, in a political context, means freedom from government coercion. It does not mean freedom from the landlord, or freedom from the employer, or freedom from the laws of nature which do not provide men with automatic prosperity. It means freedom from the coercive power of the state—and nothing else.
Also I'd like to mention child pornography (the nudie picture kind not the sex kind). I'm not a pedo nor would I engage in the consumption of it, but I think child porn is a great and painless way for poor children to get out of poverty or to be treated a little better by abusive parents because now they can make money off them.
revision by PraiseBeToScience— ソースを見る