11
12

/u/BeardedDragonFire argues that sex with children should be 'part of the liberty movement.' I can't even right now. Children cannot give informed consent. Child sex will never be part of a liberty movement which is primarily concerned with consent. (reddit.com)

Anen-o-meConcurrent-Nomocracy: "Rule of the self by the self." が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]TheSlicemanCometh 2ポイント3ポイント  (7子コメント)

Age of consent at 18 is wrong.

Age of consent at 8 is wrong.

In a free market, I would personally put my money toward the system that has the age of consent around 13, 14, or 15.

I go as low as 13 because when I was 16/17 there was a really hot girl on my nuts who was doing everything in her power to fuck me and I totally would have in the absence of the state.

Some girls bodies mature faster than others. Sorry if that offends you.

[–]BeardedDragonFireRawr 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

That's why I refuse to work in a middle school. I am of athletic build, attractive, and I have heard the health teacher in the middle school gets harassed by the female students (he too is attractive and athletic). I really don't need that, people are quick to throw accusations these days, regardless of if you do nothing.

[–]ancap47Crypto-Anarchist 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

The PRACTICAL standard is that a man should be able to provide for a wife and family before he can consent to sex. 15yo boys, if they must, should limit it to old ladies past child bearing age since they cannot provide for themselves, let alone a family.

For women, since they are not the role of providers, they should not be allowed to consent at all - it should be left up to whoever they depend on for survival. In a statist world, women depend on daddy government. In an ancap world, women would go back to depending on their fathers and other men in their families.

[–]TheSlicemanCometh 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

So, to this logic, places with more freedom have less underage girls trying to fuck?

Your theory is so bad that it's irredeemable.

[–]ancap47Crypto-Anarchist 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

So, to this logic, places with more freedom have less underage girls trying to fuck?

What logic did you use to come to that conclusion?

If you want a world without a state, you have to think in terms of what makes for strong families. OF course, all women want to have sex, its how the human race reproduces. In the absence of the state, though, women aren't getting government handouts and govt jobs, so they will go back to relying on a man - in general, either their father or husband.

[–]TheSlicemanCometh 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Yes, so there is no problem with a 13 fucking a 17yo man.

When I was 17 I was making more money than like 25% of grown men.

[–]ancap47Crypto-Anarchist -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

If you were supporting yourself at 17, then you were an adult man - not a rarity in days before our leviathan state.

As long as the woman's father, who would be providing for and responsible for her up to that point, didn't object, you would have every right to have sex with and marry a 13yo. Now, if she was prepubescent, it would be seen by most men - myself included - as a twisted perversion, but not necessarily reason to string you from the rafters.

[–]TheSlicemanCometh 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Boy would you be in for a big surprise when you move to AnCapistan under the assumption that only working adults have sex. You are crazy naive.

With your idea of "going back" to the good old days, you also have to accept that most of the time the kids (working as they may be) are still living with the parents on their settlement and the grandmother is doing half the caretaking of the babies. The husband DOESN'T NEED TO BE SUPPORTING HIMSELF. That's not how families work. All he needs is access to resources. That may mean making money, that may mean coming from money.

Girls are naturally more attracted to men that are or can provide resources. You don't need any regulatory organization at all to aid in that natural mechanism for family building.

"only family makers can have sex" is beyond stupid and absolutely delusional. Seriously, just dump that theory and start from scratch. It's irredeemable.