Although, we presented new lab tests which were taken within the city limits (from garden soil, pond sludge and a field), which showed unusually high amounts of aluminum (all three over 10,000 mg/kg), the city council voted 3 to 2, not to proceed ahead and perform their own tests. Many in the audience were appalled at the callous disinterest that Porterfield, Spilliscy and Valenzuela displayed concerning this issue and of their refusal to spend just $100 dollars of the city’s funds to see if there may truly be an aluminum contamination issue.

The public heard the following from the three council members who voted down spending $100 dollars for testing. “Take your own tests and studies.” “Even if there is a problem (which they indicated they didn’t believe there was), its not the city’s responsibility.” Or “why would we want to open that Pandora’s Box?”

Apparently, voting down reports of scientifically tested and verified results and information is as common with redditor's geoengineering deniers and govt paid trolls as it is with down voting Mt. Shasta City council members regarding doing further testing.

The highest reading so far is 4,610 times the maximum contaminate level for drinking water in this state.

What? No smug posts to refute and debunk that alarming test result? Someone is slipping.