Trump Hasn’t Called For Violence, But He Should.
Watching the coverage of the violence in Chicago inside and outside of a Donald Trump rally, I am reassured of a thing I’ve known for a long time. There is no hope for peace in America.
It’s so obvious I almost feel stupid mentioning it. Strangely though, there are still people in this world who think there is some hope for a hyperinclusive mass democracy in which hundreds of millions of people with diverse interests, philosophies, religious, racial, and ethnic backgrounds live under a singular system of government. A system of government which rules over every aspect of their lives, projects its power over the entire planet, recognizes no restrictions on its powers, and bankrupts, imprisons, or murders anyone who dares to defy it.
Even more absurdly – and perhaps they aren’t even worth mentioning, but given the audience of this blog I should briefly note – there are actually people in this world who think we’ll all undergo some mass awakening or “paradigm shift” where we peacefully shrug off the chains of democracy and live in a stateless utopia. To their credit, they are no crazier than your average Democrat, but that’s far from a ringing endorsement of their ideology.
Here is the simple reality we are met with, and it is perhaps the one and only thing left and right should be able to agree on. We cannot peacefully coexist under the same system of government. There may be some legitimate debate about whether any people can live together in peace under any system of government, but there is no room for debate about the American left and the American right living together in peace any longer. We have worldviews that are violently at odds with one another, and for one to compel the other to live under their rule is so inhumane we can expect nothing other than violence as a result.
For the right, the implication is even more startling. We can surely live without the left, but the left surely cannot live without us. Reality detached, welfare dependent criminal apologists cannot form a functioning society. They need a productive host for their parasitism, and to deny them that host is the equivalent of denying them oxygen. They will do as they have always done – resort to violence for their very survival – and you frankly have to be an idiot to believe anything else. They will never let us separate from them peacefully, because they would all die in our absence.
This is why you see the violent reaction to Donald Trump. When one looks at the overall picture, he’s not even all that extreme on the issues. He is a moderate in all but his tone, but that tone is stirring the growing realization on the right that we are being weakened by an increasing number of parasitic elements in our society, and that those elements need to be stopped by force if we are to survive. That realization is a threat to the survival of the left, and it is the height of folly to expect anything other than violence from them in response.
While not inaccurate to say that Donald Trump has hinted toward violence, he hasn’t actually called for it. “I’d like to punch him in the face” or “In the good old days” is not an instruction or order to attack. It is simply pointing out the fact that, yes, people used to use violence to stop communists from destroying their civilizations, and that we no longer do that. If we want to stop communists from destroying our civilizations, then yes, we are going to have to use violence to stop them. If Donald Trump really wants to “make America great again” he should begin dealing with the reality that his rivals are sending violent criminals to attack his supporters, and instruct his supporters (by proxy if politics necessitate) to stop them by force.
He is right when he says that police can no longer use the force necessary to accomplish this, because dishonest “police accountability activism” – which I am ashamed to say I used to participate in – has tied their hands. Now, enforcing the law, keeping order, and containing threats to society from violent criminals, turns them into social outcasts, brands them as violent racists, ruins their careers, and even sees them imprisoned for doing their jobs.
If violent criminals are going to assault people at a rally for the frontrunner of the Republican presidential primary, and police aren’t going to stop them, then who is? If nobody is going to stop them, then how are we supposed to participate meaningfully in the political process? If we cannot participate meaningfully in the political process, then what recourse are we left with to address our grievances?
There are only two possible answers;
1. We have no recourse. We are to suffer an eternity with no political voice whatsoever while bums and criminals force us to labor for their sustenance. We are to accept an ever increasing burden on our labor, as foreigners are invited in to join in the bounty of our efforts. We are to reduce our own breeding, while we subsidize the breeding of our parasites. We are to endure this – silently – or suffer assault, imprisonment, and death for the heinous crime of supporting a political candidate who would stop it.
2. We stop them by force.
Please, I beg of you, tell me a third scenario. I submit to you that one does not exist, but I genuinely hope to be proven wrong.
This production is made possible by donors like you, you can also help by shopping through my Amazon, or other affiliate links. Without that support, this site will cease to exist.
Subscribe via email and never miss another post!