First... it's delusional. Dillusional isn't a word.

Second, the Atlantic has done two pieces on this very topic.

The first is about how Trumps rhetoric essentially is a mirror of 1920s KKK speeches.

The second is the fact that he won't condemn white supremacists who support him.

The third is the fact that his son is helping the campaign by making appearances with white supremacists.

The fourth is a piece by Slate that basically details how angry, racist, low-education voters support Trump because they want to restore the default where being white automatically makes you better than women and blacks.

I mean the list could basically go on and on. This is a man who describes the African American community in the US as "the blacks". This is a candidate who has said he's going to force Mexico to pay for a wall to keep out all the drug dealers and rapists despite the fact that he can't actually back up any of his claims or explain how he's going to force a sovereign nation to pay for his wall.

This is a candidate that has openly said he will torture people, who has said he could kill someone and it wouldn't affect his popularity, and a candidate who has said he will stop allowing Muslims to come to the US... in a country that has enshrined religious freedom into it's constitution.

Trump also doesn't support LGBT rights or marriage equality.

So for a transgender person to support him... it's like a black voter in Alabama voting to bring back sundown laws.

And his anti-gay views are prominent enough that George Takei had to issue a statement about it.

Trump has consistently made homophobic and transphobic statements throughout his life and his campaign.

So if you actually are sincere and actually are a transgendered black Canadian... there is something genuinely wrong with you if you support a candidate that hates everything you are.

Edit: The Economist has even done two pieces on why Trump is not just a bad candidate but a dangerous one.

Unfit to lead

Finally... a full 77% of all of his campaign statements are mostly or entirely factually inaccurate.

Double Edit:

Wanted to add the fact that a CBS reporter personally talked about the racism he faced from Trump supporters at the most recent (and canceled) Chicago rally.

Final edit: spelling.

Even more edits: Fuck it. I've edited this thing so much.

Here is a New Republic piece detailing why Trump is a fascist. For people that don't know, New Republic has been called the in-flight magazine of Air Force One because it's read by policy wonks in DC and many members of congress and the White House.

Slate takes a more balanced tone and stops short of calling him an outright fascist but says he uses fascist rhetoric and espouses fascist ideals while basically being a simple-minded populist that caters to racists and low-education voters.

Crooks and Liars just outright calls him an neo-fascist

Salon essentially says that his rhetoric and politics more or less make him a fascist

CNN has said that he is a proto-fascist who basically only stops short of full fascism in that he hasn't called for the violent destruction of our current state.

The only organization that doesn't call him a fascist is the Atlantic, which while not calling him a fascist, describes him as a xenophobic populist that uses witch-hunts, racism, repression, and state surveillance promises to cater to low-income and low-education white voters that feel left behind by the economy

And finally finally... since I've written this much. This about sums up how I feel about his shitty comments about immigrants. The whole thing is worth a watch but the main thrust starts around 3:30. If a dehydrated man without shoes that doesn't speak the language is as qualified as you are and can be trained for your job in pantomime. You are a fucking loser.

And I'm out.