28
29

Why Women Destroy Nations / civilisations - and other uncomfortable truths (youtube.com)

RamblinRambo3Finland が 投稿 - stickied post

全 46 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]quickscopeGODPROX420 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

good video

[–]smackdemallBelarus 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

It all started when women were allowed to vote and put into government. Nothing more.

20th century.

They can have freedom, they can have any jobs, etc. etc. They can even have their feminism and other bullshit.

But don't let them make crucial decisions such as fate of the country.

Feelz =/= realz

One of the comments

there were women (usually nobility) who killed themselves rather than be taken and degraded by the enemy.

What do we have now? Now women apologize after they get raped. Because in fact, they like that. They will gladly convert into Islam and breed with them. Because muslims are active, violent and "manlike" - scoundrels that women like.

[–]murzynek_bamboPoland 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ever since women got the right to vote, western civilization has been spiraling down the shitter. People are dumb not to see the correlation. Now, I'm not putting the blame entirely on women, but they're a large part.

[–]jazzmazz 9ポイント10ポイント  (4子コメント)

This is an excellent video, BUT.... the women are not to blame, that's just how the female psyche works. It has always worked like this and it works like this in all species, that have a well-defined social hierarchy. It manifests in the same way for all human groups, including highly conservative peoples. It's the men that create the rules of the tribe, it's the men that have to watch for the rules to be followed. It's the men's job to organize and protect the tribe.

[–]Get_Trumped 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

the women are not to blame, that's just how the female psyche works

Then I suppose the migrant rape epidemic is not to blame on the men doing it, uninhibited sexual prowling is just how the male psyche works.

Responsibility is shared. It's women's job to use the post-monkey part of their brain to override the monkey part and make good decisions. If men go full primal they get chastized all the time. Women need to be held to the same standard. Modern society rejects female responsibility.

[–]jazzmazz 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

uninhibited sexual prowling is just how the male psyche works.

Yes, that's almost how the male psyche should work. But the modern European male psyche is devoid of power, it's oppressed, it's almost non-existent and it doesn't bring about attraction.

And what about the monkey brain? It's actually the monkey brain that makes us tribal. It's what separates my tribe from their tribe. Perfect neo-cortex rationalism would produce a totally different society - full of mathematically-perfect egoists.

edit and P.S. It's not only modern society that rejects female responsibility. It's every society ever. Women are the most precious resource of every tribe and they can and often do get away. It's the men's job to be aware about this. It's also the reason why during 2000 years of so-called "democracy", women got "voting rights" just in the past 100 or even less years.

[–]murzynek_bamboPoland 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're entirely right. Leftist "men" should take just as much blame as women. If you guys ever go onto a news article about something controversial involving women, in the comments you'll see MEN shilling for them and their feminist women's rights. Literally. This happens ever single time.

[–]TheWarHasStarted 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree. At the end of the video he mentions that it's also the fault of the men.

[–]edwooger 5ポイント6ポイント  (6子コメント)

This is depressing. I can't think of a way out of this without going back into the dark ages. Unless we are protected by unmaned robots, how can we possibly keep out culture without giving up our modern values? Michio Kaku is right: these next 100 years are very important.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

how can we possibly keep out culture without giving up our modern values?

You can't both have the cake and eat it. These modern values is what caused this mess. Either you accept it or then your people will die out. Also I do not know what you consider the dark ages. But I consider the time when core family values were at the top of the social pyramid to not be particularly dark. The reason you view what we have now as somehow superior to what we used to have is because you've been bombarded since day one to think that way. But if you sit down and actually think about it, there's nothing bad in it at all. None what so ever.

Michio Kaku is right: these next 100 years are very important.

We don't have 100 years. We have a decade or two at tops.

[–]jazzmazz 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

I can't think of a way out of this without going back into the dark ages.

Dark ages? What do you consider to be the dark ages? When men were men and women were women?

[–]edwooger 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I had this image in my head where there were crusades and which hunting but thinking about it now it's not really realistic. I wouldn't want to become like the invaders. Where we favour the thug and forget about scientific progress.

[–]Argus9xx 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Crusades were only a response to the muslim invasion of Europe and the rise of the caliphates that spread out, they were also extremely limited.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

they were also extremely limited.

This is so important to remember and shove in the faec of anyone using the Crusades as some kind of argument in defending the evil of islam.

Video related: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I_To-cV94Bo

[–]smackdemallBelarus 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

What kind of modern values? The world had modern values since 17th century, when dark ages ended. The values that were enough for western society to exist, to develop, and to be the leading society in the world. The world was a nice place until ~1930s.

20th century brought us so called "progressive" values. The core one is utopian "equality". Women were allowed to participate in politics and since then it went downhill.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 11ポイント12ポイント  (4子コメント)

I think this didn't get enough knickers in a twist the last time around so I decided to post it again.

[–]randombladeThe Netherlands 17ポイント18ポイント  (3子コメント)

Women are naturally loving and caring, thats why they are naive. There is a reason why the Greeks, who invented democracy didn't let women vote.

[–]NiederweitThe Netherlands 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

These women around the same time period beg to differ.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

And look what happened to Sparta. It died the same way as the west is dying.

Spartan women had economic power because they controlled their own properties, and those of their husbands. It is estimated that in later Classical Sparta, when the male population was in serious decline, women were the sole owners of at least 35% of all land and property in Sparta.

Spartan women acquired so much wealth that in Aristotle’s analysis of the laws and history of Sparta he attributed its precipitous fall (which happened during his lifetime) from being the master of Greece to a second rate power in less than 50 years to the fact that Sparta had become a gynecocracy whose intemperate women loved luxury. These tendencies became worse after the huge influx of wealth following the Spartan victory of the Peloponnesian War, leading to the eventual downfall of Sparta.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sparta

[–]NiederweitThe Netherlands 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well all empires come and go... Whether women get involved or not. Don't think the Ottomans cared very much for women's views... Yet they fell.

Just wanted to point out that in the past there were successful societies that included women. The thing is that you're hurting this sub by scaring away 50% of our population... Now I wouldn't care if you were a regular user, but you're a mod pushing his agenda, just like the ones in /r/europe

I think this didn't get enough knickers in a twist the last time around so I decided to post it again.

Maybe it's because most people think it's stupid? If it doesn't get upvoted it must not be very popular...

[–]mcctaggart 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Any Germans know if the results of the election have been analysed and what the break down of the votes were for AfD in terms of demographics, gender, age etc?

Anyway if women are prone to being emotionally influenced by dead baby celebrities to support the invasion of Europe then what we need to do is high-light the other-side, the rapes, the murders, the dead German baby whose father fell through ice trying to escape knife wielding migrants. I mean that's probably why the media tries to hide it all. I'd say what 10% of reddit are female perhaps? so how do we reach them?

Also read this shit from yesterday: Finding love in Germany: a road to integration for refugees
http://www.dw.com/en/finding-love-in-germany-a-road-to-integration-for-refugees/a-19113974

It reads like the sad fantasies of a middle aged Shirley Valentine who spends her days daydreaming of young Jamaican and Moroccan gigolo's who are all dreaming of a European passport from a marriage to some stupid naïve eejit.

Ask yourself, if you were the male equivalent of a lonely middle-aged cat lady and hundreds of thousands of young horny women were pouring across the border, wouldn't you be a but more accepting of them.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

It will take you ten times longer to convince a female to switch sides than a man. Just focus on the men.

[–]doesthrow 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

TL;DR

Europe should adapt a patriarchy, similar to the ones that the most conservative Muslims have, so that the European culture can survive.

[–]lightfire409United States of America 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The TL;DR is 1950s america = ideal.

[–]Get_Trumped 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

The solution to overeating is not starvation, it's moderation. You're presenting a false dichotomy, as if the only options are power balance heavily toward the female side or heavily toward the male side.

[–]NiederweitThe Netherlands 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Not allowing women to vote is pretty close to starvation in your example, and I feel that's what the video is implying.

[–]NiederweitThe Netherlands 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yup makes sense :S

[–]CharlesHipsterSpain 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why Women Destroy Nations

TL;DR Women are more emotional: Feelings > Facts

[–]RenoreiUnited States of America 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

Don't blame women for the problems caused by a hostile elite. In the absence of a hostile elite that wants to replace their own people, we wouldn't be having any problems.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

You need to start understanding that without the female vote they'd not be leading out countries. Rid your brain from this equality nonsense and get into the game.

[–]RenoreiUnited States of America 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, they would. They had already started amassing power before women could vote. Un-checked capitalism has allowed them to make more money and solidify and grow that power.

[–]Lv100_BixNoodGroßdeutsches Reich 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

What point does stickying this video serve other than alienating the already few women browsing this sub? Even if its message was true, there's no point in being vocal about it.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Hello white knight. Your services are required here ---> /r/Cuckold

Even if its message was true, there's no point in being vocal about it.

Oh really. Do you think like that about everything? How do you expect any change ever to happen if people just shut up about what is perceived as controversial by the main stream?

[–]anarquistos 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

The robots of /r9k/ present: "Why Stacy fucking Chad is literally the end of the world."

Save the nation - become a wizard!

[–]bizzybone78 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've been saying this for years. Our society started going down the tubes when women got the right to vote. Women base decisions on feelings, which often run contrary to their own self-interest.

They're the reason that liberals have gained so much power.

[–]kingofthetakeaways94Norway 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think he accidentaly my have come up with a solution on how to return to a more patriarchal society.

He said such a thing might be impossible, but it might in fact happen naturally because of the following:

Islam will grow, women will have to seek to western men for protection. If there is a war, it might be the straw that breaks the camels back when it comes to feminism and womens liberation.

Conclusion: More Islam = Naturally more patriarchal western society because of the threat from Islam.

Just my two cents.

[–]jazzmazz 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23613210

Ovulation led single women to become more liberal, less religious, and more likely to vote for Barack Obama. In contrast, ovulation led women in committed relationships to become more conservative, more religious, and more likely to vote for Mitt Romney.

[–]pressmore 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

He is implying there is something biological in women to do this.

I don't think so, because that would also apply to men but we don't really see that in a lot of ways. There has always been more selective pressure on men to be protectors and warriors. But we don't see that in today's men.

More likely it's just women are more emotional and men are rational. Leftists use emotion to convince people of their bullshit and the right doesn't. Anyone on the left has just as little in group loyalty as these women.

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

See what in men? We see a lot of biological behavior among both genders. Denying that is just plain ignorant. I don't

[–]pressmore -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Both sexes look for the best possible partners within their own group. Only difference is today we are told that groups don't matter so white women don't only look for white men.

There will always be degenerates who mate outside their group but they are an exception not the rule. Just because a few people these days have sex with animals doesn't mean there is some kind of biological programming predisposing people to having sex with anything that moves(or doesn't). It's just sexual deviants(deviant is just deviation from the norm).

[–]niggertron9000 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Reminded me of this prior video by Turd Flinging Monkey

[–]RamblinRambo3Finland[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

That voice.... has to be the same guy who made the Black People Song.

[–]TheWarHasStarted 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

That was also a good video.

[–]urnogerman -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

/u/internet_veteran