全 2 件のコメント

[–]RittermeisterFarbenjaeger 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's just . . . bullshit. I don't exactly know what else to say. Victors don't write history; historians do. Historians use sources to write history, and those sources don't disappear when an army is defeated (though countless historians have suffered cirrhosis due to the Confederate and German Armies burning records). If historians were so biased in favor of the victors, we wouldn't have gotten things like the Lost Cause school of Civil War historiography, or the now-discredited German-dominated narrative of the Ostfront.

Your friend is stupid and he should feel bad.

[–]yellowcedar [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

It's one of those things that sounds nice and you hear so much that it that it's just sort of accepted as being true.

It's a phrase completely devoid of meaning and is pretty much used by people whose side they feel has been discredited by the popular narrative. It's also a way to discredit the popular narrative without actually saying anything of substance.

I think a much more accurate phrase would be "history tends to focus on the victors".

In no way has history writing precedence ever been included in any surrender terms in any war I've heard of.