全 50 件のコメント

[–]7a11l409b1d3c65 21ポイント22ポイント  (3子コメント)

At least he admits that Lightning for Bitcoin doesn't exist, and might never exist in the forseeable future.

 

We have no business plans today to launch a LN for Bitcoin, and in fact, we are more likely to start experimenting with LNs in sidechains than we are for Bitcoin any time soon.

[–]dgmib 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think that was my favorite part. "Hey we're not building off chain scaling. We're not allowing on chain scaling either if we can stop it."

WTF?!

How is that possibly good for Bitcoin?

[–]nullc -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

No, that is no what he is saying-- he's saying that Blockstream's commercial interest in lightning isn't lightning on Bitcoin; it's lightning in other networks.

Lightning in Bitcoin is a great and long term important thing; and something we're happy to support and contribute to as part of our broad Open Source contributions, along with the half dozen other groups working on it... but our commercial plans for Lightning is as a scaling tool in sidechains-- where it applies no less.

I've previously posted about this on Reddit.

[–]peoplma 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

at least you now admit that sidechains are "other networks" now and not bitcoin.

[–]satoshis_sockpuppet 19ポイント20ポイント  (0子コメント)

  • Our future is in no way dependent on Bitcoin

We know. This is why you are destroying it. Cypherpunks my ass.

[–]paoloaga 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

Is he claiming that investors funded $75M+ without a plan? ROFL!

[–]frappuccinoCoin 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

You don't get $71 million without a plan. The only way for me to have a open mind about Blockstream is if they share the business plan they presented to their investors.

[–]tl121 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Without a plan that he is going to tell you.

It is possible that his investors, or more likely their investors investors, are executing a hidden plan to cause bitcoin to fail. This is a plausible strategy on the part of central bankers for whom $75 million is pocket change, because large scale success of crypto currencies would impact their central banking monopoly.

[–]arnili 31ポイント32ポイント  (6子コメント)

He might have realised after all, that the community won't be tolerating his shit.

[–]Bitcoinopoly 12ポイント13ポイント  (5子コメント)

Thus far they have been. Over 95% of the hashrate still doesn't seem to care at all about changing the blocksize before 2017, and 85% of the miners on Slush haven't bothered to vote even though it takes 5 seconds. The miners have spoken.

[–]hurlga -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

I am one of these miners that hasn't voted. The reason: I created my account back when GPU voting was a thing, and have simply forgotten my password since then. And the mail-account that I registered it on doesn't exist anymore, so I have no way of recovering the password either.

I'm pretty sure a majority of users on the site are the same.

[–]imaginary_username 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wait, in that case how do you change your payout address? Surely you're not re-using the same address from several years ago?

[–]dgmib 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Can't you just create a new account and point your hash power at it?

[–]Nutomic 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It says the stats are only from users active in the last 3 days.

[–]tl121 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you haven't been mining in the past three days, you aren't being counted by user or by hash rate (assuming I read Slush's caption correctly). If you are still actively mining, all you have to do is to open a new account with a new password and email address and change the mining address on your machines. It will take you more than five seconds, but not much more than five minutes.

[–]theonetruesexmachine 16ポイント17ポイント  (1子コメント)

Our future is in no way dependent on Bitcoin

Doesn't this contradict previous statements by Blockstream employees that Blockstream is highly invested in the success of Bitcoin? I'd think the demise of Bitcoin would have a pretty big impact on their future if their previous statements were true?

Also, both /u/nullc and /u/luke-jr have publicly denied the existence of censorship in r/Bitcoin. This is addressed nowhere in the message to you.

Manipulating public opinion is not censorship.

(Source, /u/luke-jr)

[–]hellobitcoinworld[S] 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

If Blockstream isn't planning on releasing LN for Bitcoin and they also aren't going to raise the blocksize, then how the heck are they planning for Bitcoin to scale to reach the masses?

As far as I can tell they aren't.

And the petty gains SegWit might make (if it wasn't bugged code) is not a scaling solution significant enough to matter, even if it did work properly (and even if it did get adopted widely enough).

So basically Blockstream just admitted they are not trying to let Bitcoin grow in any meaningful way. Period.

[–]cryptonaut420 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

You know, I think one of Blockstream's big problems is ironically their lack of control. More specifically, lack of control over their own employees. They seem to all just do whatever they want, constantly contradict eachother and continue to say and reveal things which just dig their holes even deeper. Acting on their own accord for the good of the company, under the guise of being the protectors of bitcoin instead..

[–]BitttBurger 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you for doing this. And thank you for posting this. This thread needs to go to the top of this sub and sit there.

In fact why don't you sticky it?

[–]3h7rt6 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you for keeping the discussion in the public realm.

[–]silver_sean 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

"We want Bitcoin to succeed.

Then fucking prove it. You're nothing without the users, and they are placing the blame on you (for good reason).

[–]Nutomic 10ポイント11ポイント  (4子コメント)

They start to sound rather desperate with their co-founder messaging website owners, and their ceo posting on /r/btc.

Maybe they're starting to realize that they're losing grip of the community (and also the miners?).

[–]Richy_T 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's the old Star Wars quote all over again.

[–]Nutomic 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Which quote?

[–]Richy_T 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

"I am your father"

No, seriously,

"The more you tighten your grip, Tarkin, the more star systems will slip through your fingers."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wntX-a3jSY

[–]Proceed_With_GAWtion 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't like sand. It's coarse and rough and irritating and it gets everywhere.

Anakin Skywalker

[–]Richy_T 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

<style="gmax">I will take down the PSA when Donald Trump releases his tax records!</style>

[–]blockstreamcoin 10ポイント11ポイント  (6子コメント)

My suggestion is that everyone copy/paste nodecounter.com Public Service Announcement everywhere.

[–]Btcmeltdown 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

This.

[–]blockstreamcoin 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Blockchain.info and some other big supporters of Satoshi could put that in their site. It would be mind blowing.

[–]icodeforbitcoin 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, that would be good. Really great if Coinbase did something similar.

[–]icodeforbitcoin 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

One thing to consider is that /u/hellobitcoinworld added more "interactive" information in various parts of the announcement when you cursor over certain words/phrases. So the live document might actually be what should be circulated.

Do you guys think that a dedicated announcement page would be easier to share?

/me works on this..

[–]thezerg1Andrew Stone - Bitcoin Unlimited Lead Dev 6ポイント7ポイント  (4子コメント)

Since the average web page is over 2mb and people don't wait 10 seconds forget 10 minutes per load you are either stupid or have an ulterior motive. Since you are a VC I'm guessing that you are smart.

Meanwhile Microsoft is dropping BTC... you still have a chance to rethink this. Threaten to withdraw your funding if BS does not make a compromise that shows industry that Bitcoin will scale. If we move to 2m or even 8mb and Lightning or sidechains work then great we'll never use that capacity.

But I think you are betting that if you burn Bitcoin down companies will be driven to proprietary solutions and you'll be there with them. But I think you are wrong. If the btc experiment fails other nonblockchain solutions will be deployed based on the negative experience with btc.

[–]zuji1022[🍰] 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Exactly. I'm totally down for LN and all other alternative solutions, so long as they are alternatives to a robust and high capacity on-chain solution

[–]timateoi 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

And as long as they aren't implemented way after it's too late and the crypto world has moved to altcoins. I don't even really mind just having a lot of coinbases around the world, but not even that infrastructure is ready yet.

[–]brg444 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

That a developer would lower the standard of conversation to pitiful web page analogies shows how little intention you have of conducting any kind of argumentation in good faith.

I'm guessing you're just stupid though so no offense taken.

[–]__add__ 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Sounds like Blockstream is about to implode.

[–]usrn 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

one can only hope! :)

[–]todu 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

This is Alex Fowler according to Blockstream's own web page:

"Alex Fowler
SVP, Business Affairs

Alex is responsible for overseeing the company’s external affairs, including business development, communications, public policy and community outreach. With almost twenty-five years of experience, Alex is a dedicated professional focused on open source technologies, data security, Internet policy and user rights, and he advances those interests with technology, business and government leaders around the world. Alex’s past experience includes roles with PwC, Zero-Knowledge Systems, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. Most recently, Alex served as Mozilla’s Chief Privacy Officer and head of public policy, leading strategic and operational initiatives on privacy, trust and security, as well as the independent organization’s public policy activities. Alex holds degrees from Brown University and George Washington University. He’s also a professionally trained cellist and avid surfer, activities he rarely engages in at the same time.

Twitter Linkedin"

Source: https://blockstream.com/team/

I bet his job is as impossibly difficult as that of a cat herder.

[–]LovelyDay 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd recommend:

Stop making Bitcoin play around in the shorebreak, it wants to get out to the line-up and catch some real swell.

[–]zuji1022[🍰] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks for posting this up. I really enjoyed seeing the PSA at NodeCounter and glad you called it out like it is

[–]loveforyouandme 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Dude, you are handling yourself and these situations with integrity, transparency, and direct, simple truths. I respect you and your contributions quite a lot.

[–]bitterschweet 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Too funny that he mentions IRC. They kick you out of the IRC channel too and block your ip address if you go against Blockstream.

[–]ferretinjapan 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I want to share this with the community, because it seems like a behind-the-back way of trying to quiet my message from reaching the community, under the guise of "cypherpunk code of conduct".

Yeah, the second i read that my blood was boiling too. Fucking hiding behind cypherpunks to elevate himself as better and automatically qualifying himself is incredibly underhanded. This guy gives cypherpunks a bad name.

Fuck this back room underhanded BS. If it's wrong then HE can go public with his so-called facts. The message is already public after all, there is zero reason to "settle this in private" as the word is already out about how morally bankrupt they are. No-one's protected by PM's, only Blockstream is "protected" as it protects them from embarrassment if their "getting the facts straight" discussion blows up in their faces.

Underhanded dipshits.

[–]himself_v 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm sorry, I side with Classic, but in this conversation he scores one point and again reminds us why, although being rude makes you feel powerful, they who remain polite are the victors.

There's an upside for all of this, and that is that he states in writing some of the things he would not tolerate. Use this chance to establish positive communication and encourage him to loudly advocate against censorship and one-core ecosystem. If Blockstream encourages people to be open-minded, try different solutions and listen to everyone, this whole landscape of opposition can change.

[–]pekatete 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I concur. That PM clarifies a few conspiracy theories that even I was caught up in, however, since it is un-official it does not carry the authority that it can were those views expressed in an appropriate forum.

Saying that, it may indeed be a trick to quieten the ever increasing and growing disgust of a section of the community with the governance issues arising out of the Core - Blockstream perceived partnership, as such, I still believe we are well within our rights to throw everything including the kitchen sink at "the other side".

[–]superhash 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm curious to know wtf Alex was thinking sending you a direct message.

My only guess is damage control, trying to keep this from blowing up across all the other forums. I'm sure he would love to have Blockstream being trashed on the front of r/technology for the 3rd time in weeks.

[–]blessedbt -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

There are plenty of independent psychos who you can pin most of the strife on. They have precisely zero to do with Blockstream itself.

If this sub can't make that distinction then that doesn't reflect too well on it. He seems pretty reasonable to me despite whatever position he's taking.

[–]Btcmeltdown -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I dont know if i should laugh at your naive or cry because the community is still full of people like you. ..... when its too late the exit door will be too small