あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]jstolfi 47ポイント48ポイント  (4子コメント)

We included this in our plan to all investors. We pitched them on the idea that healthy bitcoin protocol that could be expanded in functionality via interoperable sidechains and grow in terms of users & an independent application development layer that didn't require changes to the consensus protocol

Thank you for confirming what we have been saying: Blockstream refuses to increase the block size limit because their revenue plans is based on moving traffic off the bitcoin blockchain to offchain solutions which they will develop software for. And, on the other hand, puts into the protocol changes (like SegWit) that will benefit those alternative blockchains.

[–]justusranvier 27ポイント28ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thank you for confirming what we have been saying

It's worst than that - not only have they been lying to Bitcoin users all this time about this very fact, they also lied to their investors.

They are planning to make extremely invasive changes to the consensus protocol. "It's a soft fork so it doesn't count" is completely indefensible, but their viability as a business depends on their investors continuing to believe it.

[–]FormerlyEarlyAdopter 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

A conspiracy theory once again became a conspiracy fact.

[–]TotesMessenger 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm a bot, bleep, bloop. Someone has linked to this thread from another place on reddit:

If you follow any of the above links, please respect the rules of reddit and don't vote in the other threads. (Info / Contact)