全 130 件のコメント

[–]j0be 18ポイント19ポイント  (4子コメント)

Does this factor for RES expandos? You might get slanted data for image submissions

[–]Drunken_Economist 12ポイント13ポイント  (2子コメント)

It doesn't, this is just for actual clicks. We've gotten pretty good at accounting for RES in our analyses, though :)

[–]JonnyRobbie 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

And Imagus and other image-hover extensions?

[–]Drunken_Economist 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Samsies. This iteration is only for actual clicks that take a user outside of reddit, and only from frontpage/all/subreddit listing pages on desktop

[–]NotANestleShill 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

that's what I was thinking. Also videos, tweets, and everything in between.

[–]j0be 68ポイント69ポイント  (57子コメント)

Question

Does this track which user clicks links, or is it anonymized? If it isn't, this could be a privacy concern for some users

[–]DrDuPont 24ポイント25ポイント  (33子コメント)

I would really appreciate this being answered. Will there be a database containing a list of links that my account has clicked?

[–]Drunken_Economist 8ポイント9ポイント  (27子コメント)

The data will be used in various aggregations ("how many people clicked link XYZ?", "What subreddits have the highest click rates for non-image links?", etc). It isn't technically impossible for use to write a query that says "What did DrDuPont click yesterday", but I feel pretty strongly about maintaining users' privacy.

It's similar to how we build the subreddit stats page. A query runs and says "how many users requested an /r/AskReddit page?". Even though it's possible for us to write a "What pages did DrDuPont request" query (like it would be for any website), it's not consistent with out belief about proper handling of user data.

[–]Pastries 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

Will the data be deleted when an account is deleted?

[–]eduardog3000 6ポイント7ポイント  (23子コメント)

but I feel pretty strongly about maintaining users' privacy.

Yet the data isn't anonymous...

[–]Drunken_Economist[A] 7ポイント8ポイント  (22子コメント)

Mostly because there isn't much point — it can only be as anonymous as your account is.

Imagine this scenario. We run the user ids of our events (including clicks) through a one-way hash. Now we have an irreversible user id hash. Awesome.

We want to know how many users click a given link before commenting, and how many comment before clicking. Easy! I use the comment event, which also runs its user id through the same one-way hash to anonymize the data, joining the tables of the two events on the hashed user id.

Well . . . now there's our hole. Because I have a timestamp and some context info (subreddit, thing id, parent) for your comment and I can very easily go find the comment on the site and just look at the username next to it. There's eventually a gap where we have to store your actual username and user id somewhere, since we display it on the site.

Our solution is to treat the data with respect and clamp it down under the privacy policy (which I encourage you to read, it's really accessibly written).

There's always a fine balance between making sure you have enough useful data and protecting the privacy of the users. I think reddit has done a good job of finding the sweet spot over the last year, and I know I'm not alone in that.

[–]evman182 14ポイント15ポイント  (15子コメント)

I think your minimizing how serious a potential privacy issue you're creating. This needs to be opt-in (or at least opt-out). You are going to have a database linking users to what external links they are clicking on. This is potentially tremendously more sensitive than what self-posts someone clicks on.

Then you're asking me to trust you. Then you're also asking me to trust the people who work at reddit in the future. Just because I like the people in charge now doesn't mean I will in 5 years, and there's always the potential for a hack, or a leak. It's better to not have the dataset at all.

This is not a little thing. This should go out to announcements or the blog.

[–]sathoro 5ポイント6ポイント  (14子コメント)

Their server logs already know which pages you are looking at, and the links that are available on those pages. So I don't think it is that much of a privacy concern to track exactly what link you actually click on. If you want that level of anonymity you should browse while not logged in and through a VPN or Tor because with or without this feature they could already guess to some extent whether you have clicked a link or not such as by you having voted on the submission, viewed the comments, etc.

[–]cojoco 3ポイント4ポイント  (11子コメント)

Their server logs already know which pages you are looking at

That is not true. Currently, clicking a link bypasses reddit completely, going directly to the URL of the submission.

[–]sathoro 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I mean that they log which pages on reddit you are looking at. I would have specified, but I thought it was obvious from the rest of the context of my comment

[–]cojoco -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

By "looking at", I assume you mean the headlines, not the webpages.

This change results in reddit logging the links that one clicks, which is a major change.

[–]Drunken_Economist 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

I think he means the server logs know you requested "reddit.com/r/SecretKarmaCabal", and that that page contained links to "BuyFreeUpvotes.com", "CashForKarma.com", etc . . . not necessarily that which of those links you clicked on

[–]cojoco 5ポイント6ポイント  (6子コメント)

This might well create some moral quandries in the future.

Two questions:

It is currently illegal for some US Federal employees to look at WikiLeaks material. If requested by LE, you would have to release IP addresses of people who had clicked links to examine WikiLeaks. In this case, wouldn't it have been better not to know?

How can you be sure that Amazon or some government agency is not looking over your shoulder to collect this information directly from your databases, on a wholesale or case-by-case basis? (this one goes for all of the user information kept by reddit, of course!)

[–]evman182 -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm not sure that you're right that they could easily reconstruct what a user's front page listing would look like at a given time or what they clicked on since logged in front pages are generated at the time of the request based on all the vote counts and age of the posts at the time, and if I go through 2 to 3 pages, it's likely that I've only clicked on a handful of the 75 links.

I'd also posit (and I think the data they collect will show this) that the vast majority of users are clicking on links without actually voting or commenting.

[–]sathoro 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

They don't need to reconstruct it, they can just store the IDs of every post that has been shown to each user. That is incredibly easy to do

[–]localhorst 17ポイント18ポイント  (5子コメント)

Mostly because there isn't much point — it can only be as anonymous as your account is.

That's why one shouldn't collect such information in the first place. The value of privacy is much higher than doing some statistics for fun.

[–]Drunken_Economist 8ポイント9ポイント  (4子コメント)

Although I really do enjoy my job, it's not "doing some statistics for fun". It's more about informing decisions on the site.

I mentioned elsewhere that it will help us gauge the impact of spam (how many people see spam? how many click it?), but it will also drive more traditional product decisions. We can effect changes that encourage users to read linked articles before commenting, we can (as /u/novov mentioned) change vote weights for users who have clicked through instead of voting based on headline . . . we can find the change in rates of clickthrough for different types of content (images vs articles vs self posts) and use that to inform future decisions. We could determine the "reach" of a subreddit — how many people visit + how many click from their frontpage and help mods understand how their changes affect users.

These data will be really valuable in helping build a better experience for our users, moreso than almost any other data point.

We've always been redditors first, and employees second.

[–]localhorst 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

A lot of people use reddit for a lot of different things. And this very private data. Collecting it in one point is very dangerous, e.g. you can link political opinions to porn habits, just to mention one obvious possible misuse. When you balance a human right like privacy against possible slight improvements of a web site, the human right should win.

I mentioned elsewhere that it will help us gauge the impact of spam (how many people see spam? how many click it?),

This information may be of interest to advertisers and other spammers, but not users.

We can effect changes that encourage users to read linked articles before commenting, we can (as /u/novov mentioned) change vote weights for users who have clicked through instead of voting based on headline

This may or may not slightly improve the web site but in my experience low quality content comes almost exclusively from image post and “circle jerk” articles that agree with most readers (e.g. look at /r/politics).

Why not try improving quality w/o violating privacy first? I haven’t noticed any attempts in this direction.

These data will be really valuable in helping build a better experience for our users,

IMHO this assertion needs very good evidence before implementing it. The downside is just too strong.

And we know that the data is not safe. Privacy policies change and spies, governments, corporations, and other criminals are after any data they can get hold on. And this data can be vary valuable.

[–]motrjay 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is a huge privacy concern and I am not seeing a strong enough justification for collecting this data, whats the business justification that requires lowering reddits privacy standards, what payback is going to be seen in order to justify this?

[–]fdagpigj 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

change vote weights for users who have clicked through instead of voting based on headline

But clicking on something doesn't mean you read it. If you implement something like that, people will just end up clicking the links just to make their votes count, and maybe closing the linked article before even viewing it.

[–]kardos 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

We've always been redditors first, and employees second.

If true, then it's not a stretch to add an option in user preferences to disable the redirect layer, that is, make it opt-out.

[–]iamapizza 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

From the previous announcement:

Individually, you have control over what information you share with us and what your browser sends to us automatically.

At the very least, there needs to be an opt out, and this needs to be announced to a wider audience. I feel you're downplaying this a bit much.

[–]TyIzaeL 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

Will there be a database containing a list of links that my account has clicked?

FYI there is something like that already

[–]DrDuPont 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

That's different, though – I can certainly click through to links without up/downvoting them beforehand.

[–]adeadhead 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

Bottom right of your page has the last 5 threads you visited.

[–]motrjay 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Again threads are differnt to links

[–]suudo 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's the last five threads YOU visited.

[–]umbrae[S] 15ポイント16ポイント  (22子コメント)

It does track which user clicks the links. I agree that there could be a privacy concern for some folks, although it's not vastly different from, say, clicking a link that goes to a self post, which we are already able to see in our server logs. We don't share this data with any third parties, so it's pretty similar to our server logs.

[–]j0be 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

Ok. So that brings me to a second question. I know Reddit publishes their DMCA requests, but is there anywhere that has requests for information?

Purely hypothetical, but what if Bahrain (solely as an example) requests all the links a specific dissenter has clicked on reddit which they've linked to an account?

[–]TonyQuark 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

/u/spez answered a somewhat similar question here.

[–]Doctor_McKay 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

This seems to go against Reddit's philosophy from only a few years ago. When the purple-across-computers gold feature was added, it was disabled by default because of privacy concerns.

[–]Pastries 16ポイント17ポイント  (13子コメント)

A per-user option to disable this would be greatly appreciated.

[–]andytuba 18ポイント19ポイント  (9子コメント)

[–]TheEnigmaBlade 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

IIRC, "do not track" applies to the prevention of loading third-party tracking services. As this change seems to be built-in to Reddit, it's likely not covered by DNT. Here's the relevant statement from the privacy policy:

When you have DNT enabled, we may still use information collected for analytics and measurement purposes or to otherwise provide our Services (e.g., reddit.com buttons), but we will not load any third-party trackers.

[–]umbrae[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (7子コメント)

/u/TheEnigmaBlade is pretty spot on. In this case we're the only party, so it's pretty similar to a server log for a self post or the like. That said, we're privacy conscious too (and our CEO especially so, which informs a whole lot), so we'll still be thinking about ways to make reddit more privacy friendly. We already think about this a lot.

[–]localhorst 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

That said, we're privacy conscious too (and our CEO especially so, which informs a whole lot), so we'll still be thinking about ways to make reddit more privacy friendly.

Right now you doing the opposite. You are making reddit less privacy friendly.

[–]localhorst 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

/u/TheEnigmaBlade is pretty spot on

This is your interpretation. From the wikipedia article:

The Do Not Track (DNT) header is the proposed HTTP header field DNT that requests that a web application disable either its tracking or cross-site user tracking (the ambiguity remains unresolved) of an individual user.

I would argue the other way around: Setting DNT clearly states that the user does not wish to be spied on. You are not honoring this wish.

[–]TheEnigmaBlade 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Mozilla considers DNT to cover third-party tracking, and the EFF considers first-party tracking to be a reasonable exception. The DNT website also says this:

Do Not Track is a technology and policy proposal that enables users to opt out of tracking by websites they do not visit...

So while there is no absolute definition, setting DNT seems to state the user does not want to be spied on by third-party tracking services.

[–]localhorst 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The mere fact that we are discussing this shows that there is room for interpretation.

Anyways, /u/Pastries has the solution. Let’s see what /u/umbrae or /u/Drunken_Economist will have to say about it.

[–]NihiloZero -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

This reminds me very much of Hillary Clinton saying "I'll look into it" in regard to releasing the transcripts of speeches to Wall Street.

[–]blueredscreen 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

tl;dr: Should I be worried about this or not?

[–]toomuchtodotoday 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Or a modification to Reddit Enhancement Suite that bypasses this click tracking.

EDIT: I'm not against click tracking. I just want the ability to opt-out. I don't like the idea of Reddit having data on me forever with the constant changing of the guard.

[–]TelicAstraeus 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

"We will never ever do bad things with your data, we promise!"

<change in ownership/management>

"We're rolling out a new improved privacy policy which is complicated but trust us when we say that you have nothing to worry about. :)"

[–]cojoco 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

We don't share this data with any third parties, so it's pretty similar to our server logs.

Would you share this data with law enforcement of any country if requested to do so?

[–]brainmydamage 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

The answer is almost certainly yes.

[–]verdatum 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ya know, It'd be pretty easy to one-way hash the userid. It wouldn't be a complete solution, but it would help to anonymize the storage in the DB in case of a breach.

[–]Ekrof 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

Could this be used for better subreddit stats? Something like referrals from inside reddit would be very useful.

[–]Drunken_Economist[A] 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

Right now, this change only collects outbound clicks (as in clicks that leave reddit), so it wouldn't be able to display referrals from inside reddit.

[–]joke-away 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

you're gonna use this to fix the conveyor belt problem aren't you

[–]TonyQuark 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

That would be great a great tool in detecting incoming brigades.

[–]teraflop 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

TIL Reddit wasn't doing this already.

[–]xfile345 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

Everyone's talking about right-clicking and copying URLs.... But what happens if you right-click > "open in new tab". I do this very often, and this doesn't register an onClick, which is how I assume you're going to be tracking information (as it currently does for the "last viewed" link--right?).

I just don't want to get some kind of flag on my account for never clicking links, but voting on stuff when I am, in fact, clicking links. Not that you're going to be flagging accounts for abuse with this data, but you know... just in case.

[–]Drunken_Economist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're correct, good eye. This doesn't capture right-clicks (which is also how I browse).

Don't worry, we aren't doing anything dumb like ignoring comments and votes from users without click events. It's more for getting baselines to inform product decisions

[–]adipisicing 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Great point that this will affect the stats.

Ignoring the other users who will do this, may I suggest middle-clicking, or Ctrl-clicking (Linux& Windows) or Command-clicking (MacOS)? It will save you a bunch of time.

[–]reslez -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

1) What if javascript is turned off?

2) I read reddit on multiple machines, not always logged in. And I frequently upvote stories I've already read but don't click on them again because... already read it. I don't want some nosy reddit autocrat/moderator making judgments about my upvote because I didn't click in the prescribed way.

3) Data is dumb. It's flawed and doesn't tell people what they think it does. I can't wait for judgy mods to start banning people or make snide comments about people who don't read the articles when they theymselves are too dumb to understand the flaws in the collection method.

[–]adeadhead 38ポイント39ポイント  (15子コメント)

Yay data!

[–]Drunken_Economist 11ポイント12ポイント  (8子コメント)

I'm pretty pumped to be able to build actual insight out of this. I think the biggest quick win will be in gauging user impact of spam — we'll know how many users clicked through on spam links

[–]adeadhead 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

The other day I was looking for a stream of a political debate, using not terribly generic terms and two of the front page google results were reddit SEO spam linking to subreddits with spam css, it might also be worth checking those out(if possible), they're a pretty big part of how spam is starting to work here.

[–]Drunken_Economist 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

Yeah, it's a known tactic. We're coming up with good general solutions instead of playing whack a mole. It takes a bit, but the result is worth it

[–]DublinBen 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

This isn't really on-topic, but in /r/politics we usually have information for each of the debates. If we aren't covering it with a live thread, we at least link to reseources on where to watch it.

[–]adeadhead 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

What if I told you I was one of your Co mods

[–]DublinBen 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Haha, I didn't even read your username. I rarely take that into consideration outside of closed subreddits.

[–]geraldo42 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

we'll know how many users clicked through on spam links

I suspect the answer will be a metric fuckton. It's inexplicable how much traffic obvious spam links manage to generate but I guess if it wasn't effective they wouldn't bother to spam in the first place.

[–]allthefoxes 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Wait this isn't a shitpost

[–]blueredscreen 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

Yay privacy!

Or is it the lack of it?

[–]adeadhead 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

They're collecting data on the differences in timing of events, I don't see how they would have the resources to or the reasons to gather username data along with that.

[–]blueredscreen 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

They're collecting data about what you click from reddit to other websites.

Weren't you the "member of /r/Blackout2015" earlier?

Then a person like you wouldn't support something like this.

[–]adeadhead 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's a spam fighting tool made of numbers describing habits, not identifying users and describing their individual habits.

[–]blueredscreen 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yet the data isn't anonymous...

Admin reply:

Mostly because there isn't much point — it can only be as anonymous as your account is.

tl;dr: The data is not anonymous if I'm understanding correctly.

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/changelog/comments/49jjb7/reddit_change_click_events_on_outbound_links/d0suzk9

[–]localhorst 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

How does this fight spam?

[–]NotANestleShill 11ポイント12ポイント  (5子コメント)

You better make a post on /r/dataisbeautiful when all is said and done.

[–]Drunken_Economist 19ポイント20ポイント  (4子コメント)

Only it's a politically-driven histogram with a Y axis starting at an arbitrary number

[–][削除されました]  (7子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]Drunken_Economist[A] 22ポイント23ポイント  (5子コメント)

    When you right-click and copy, you should get the destination URL (not the outbound click). That copy-paste ability is really important to me too — I hate those ugly google links

    [–]allthefoxes 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I;ve pasted those super long google links in slack way too many times

    [–]kylegetsspam 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Then this is to be tied to Google Analytics or some other JS tracking library? If so it's gonna be blocked by uBlock Origin, Ghostery, etc.

    [–]Drunken_Economist 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

    No, this is fully first-party. We don't want GA/etc or other third parties to have that sort of data

    [–]eduardog3000 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Because it's impossible to track right clicks...

    [–]j0be 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I haven't looked at the changeset yet, but it could be a separate Ajax request so it doesn't manipulate the url at all. (I hope this is how it was done)

    [–]Werner__Herzog 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Answer to 1 and 3: nobody reads the article, it is the reddit way

    [–]andytuba 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    If I only had analytics on how many people click RES's [l+c] button.

    [–]TheGrammarBolshevik 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Specifically, we've added some logic to allow our event tracking to be accessible for only a certain amount of time to combat its possible use for spam.

    I don't follow. Why would spammers have access to this at all?

    [–]umbrae[S] 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Spammers might use the "out.reddit.com" link that is generated for spamming, so we want to make sure that's not a good avenue for them. (This is known as an open redirect vulnerability).

    [–]phyzome 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    So you have a not-valid-after in the link? Or rotating keys, or what?

    [–]umbrae[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    An expiring hmac.

    [–]novov 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Hypothetically, would it be possible to weight votes on links based on how many people actually clicked?

    [–]umbrae[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Sure, it'd be possible. With many API clients that gets more tricky but it could certainly be a signal.

    [–]dowjames 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

    How long before those clicks get associated with accounts, for targeted advertising?

    This is really disappointing..

    [–]localhorst 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    As soon as someone is willing to pay for it.

    [–]qtx -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I'd rather see ads that I am interested in then ads I don't care about at all.

    [–]blebaford 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I'd rather see ads I don't care about at all.

    [–]IceBreak 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Any plans to add traffic data (for mods at least) of Wiki pages and/or general individual posts down the line?

    [–]jimbolla 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I think it would be useful to track how often people go to the comments before and/or after the article as well. Since it was already mentioned that reddit can already track self posts, I expect you already have that data, just needs to be collated with the external site data.

    [–]kardos 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I'm a bit late adding a comment here, but the solution here is simple: make it opt-out so you can appease those who don't want their off-site clicks in your database. Those who don't care won't turn it off, those who do care will, and you won't take a hit on the "creepy" meter.

    [–]dasio123 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Drop that idea guys. All the three reasons are bullshit. You don't need to know the difference between number of visits and votes. You don't need to know how many people click on spam links - and there's nothing you can do about it after it happens either. You don't need to research users' behavior.

    Every single organization, government and site operator introducing mass surveillance always says it's for good. "It's just so we better understand our customers". "It will help us improve the site". "It will allow us to find out how to better deliver our services". No, it won't. No one's buying that bullshit. Stop lying to us.

    [–]phyzome 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Why aren't you using the ping attribute on links? Blocked by too many browser configurations?

    [–]umbrae[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yeah, it's not well supported at all. There are also HTML5 beacons, but they are also not well supported.

    [–]Rangsk 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    When RES is enabled, it's redirecting me to the comments page instead of the link. The redirect also seems to take noticeably longer. I understand that RES is unofficial, but I thought you'd like to know this behavior anyway.

    EDIT: I disabled and re-enabled RES and now it's not happening. Very strange.

    [–]fdagpigj 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Oh, one more thing I just realised. What about subreddits where people regularly post a certain youtuber's (or a certain group of youtubers') videos? I'm subscribed to a few of those subreddits, but I'm also subscribed to their youtube channels, and usually I click on their video straight from youtube and then upvote the post someone made on reddit. So I'll watch the video and upvote the post without the link ever turning purple, because I didn't find it via reddit, but I know it's the exact same video. Are you gonna account for that kind of behaviour?

    [–]JDGumby -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

    I guess it's time to get used to right-clicking links to copy them - and then probably edit them to get rid of the tracking crap, if you alter the URL like Google does for its top results. :/

    [–]andytuba 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    That sounds inefficient and ineffective. If you're paranoid about tracking, there are better methods, like using a third-party app such as redditjs.com

    [–]madlee 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Right-clicking to copy should give you the original URL, so you shouldn't have to do any editing.

    [–]LuciousLisa 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Fuck this. This might actually lead me away from Reddit altogether. Privacy > entertainment.

    [–]localhorst -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Are there already browser extensions removing this privacy invasion?

    [–]BenevolentCheese -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It's pretty remarkable that this wasn't already implemented. Good that it's finally been done now, I guess.

    [–]One_Giant_Nostril -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Please let us know if you see anything odd happening

    TL;DR - small glitch in the video expando button, doesn't work, but now it's OK, never mind. Mac, desktop, Snow Leopard, Safari 9.0.3

    I clicked the expando button to watch a video on my front page (I'm subscribed to r/TombRaider). The rest of the entries shifted down to allow the frame, as expected, but it was just a white space with no video. So, I went to that subreddit, tried the expando button again, still it showed nothing. Then I opened the title-link to youtube itself, it played fine.

    After it played, I went to r/videos to see if any videos played via expando. They did! Tried my r/TombRaider page again - the video showed the preview (it didn't before) so I'm assuming everything is back to normal now.

    I saw something odd happening but now seems OK. Sorry for wasting your eye-time on this post LOL.

    [–]o976906485 -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

    That is not true.