あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]ssiankyanti-theist 5ポイント6ポイント  (11子コメント)

Because humans have a moral obligation to worship God in the way He wishes,

No God ever told me his/her/its wishes, but even if so, why any God would want that?

which includes attending Mass every Sunday.

Could you show that this is at least a bublical requirement to be considered moral?

To be true, a religion must never change doctrinally.

It changed numerousely times. So by your own test it was falsified.

[–]luke-jrCatholic (admits Francis & co are frauds) 0ポイント1ポイント  (10子コメント)

No God ever told me his/her/its wishes, but even if so, why any God would want that?

God speaks through His Church.

Could you show that this is at least a bublical requirement to be considered moral?

You mean "biblical"? If so, Catholicism isn't protestant Bible-idolatry... The current requirement is documented in the Code of Canon Law.

It changed numerousely times. So by your own test it was falsified.

No, Catholic doctrine has never changed even once.

[–]Hypertension123456DemiMod | atheist 0ポイント1ポイント  (9子コメント)

Do you still believe that it is heresy to think burning people alive is wrong? Because that is one of the charges the Pope brought against Martin Luther.

[–]luke-jrCatholic (admits Francis & co are frauds) 0ポイント1ポイント  (8子コメント)

I think you have that backward? "That heretics be burned is against the will of the Spirit." is a teaching of Luther's, which was condemned by Pope Leo X in Exsurge Domine. In other words, it was not against the will of the Spirit that they are to burned. As a general principle, it is moral for the State to execute criminals with due process, including heretics.

[–]Hypertension123456DemiMod | atheist 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

You think it's ok to burn people alive? The Catholic Church currently disagrees even with the death penalty, just so you know.

[–]luke-jrCatholic (admits Francis & co are frauds) 0ポイント1ポイント  (6子コメント)

You think it's ok to burn people alive?

"Alive" was not in the statement, but it doesn't seem unreasonable to think it would be okay. Of course, if the Church says otherwise, I defer.

The Catholic Church currently disagrees even with the death penalty, just so you know.

No, it doesn't. That's Francis's fraudulent sect.

[–]Hypertension123456DemiMod | atheist 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

"Alive" was not in the statement, but it doesn't seem unreasonable to think it would be okay.

Why do you think that Francis's fraudulent sect has broken with Pope Leo and said it is wrong to burn people alive? What evidence do you have that their views on this matter are fraudulent? Was Pope Leo also a fraud?

[–]luke-jrCatholic (admits Francis & co are frauds) 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

As you said, the Modernists disagree "even with the death penalty", while it is de fide Catholic doctrine that the death penalty is legitimate. And this is frankly merely one of their "borderline" heresies - there are many more straightforward heresies they profess, such as religious liberty, salvation outside the Church, etc.

[–]Hypertension123456DemiMod | atheist 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

What makes Pope Francis less legitimate than Pope Pius XII?

[–]luke-jrCatholic (admits Francis & co are frauds) 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Francis rejects Catholicism.