303
304

Soup Peddler knows. (imgur.com)

Peechiz が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]OtterInAustin -2ポイント-1ポイント  (8子コメント)

ah, ad hominem. you never fail to be the quick and easy path.

[–]luckykobold 9ポイント10ポイント  (7子コメント)

I love how so many redditors think that reciting the name of a logical fallacy is somehow wise and impressive.

[–]OtterInAustin -4ポイント-3ポイント  (6子コメント)

Probably almost as much as I hate that other redditors think that sign is somehow valid or witty or anything other than childishly impotent flailing.

[–]luckykobold 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

Hahaha! The man who cries "ad hominem" now calls the sign-makers impotent flailing children. I think my work here is done.

[–]OtterInAustin [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

I described an action and/or a message, the signmakers described people who have a certain belief or affiliation.

If you can't tell the difference, then I'm not surprised you think your work is done, much less even began.

[–]luckykobold [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

Oh, I see. Good call, Mr. Logicpants. Inanimate objects like signs are so often objectively childish, so you've clearly struck the right target. If you really think you can argue that you didn't attack the sign-makers, I'd love to hear that explanation. You want to keep digging that hole?

[–]OtterInAustin [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

message, dipshit. that was the key of the statement. god damn.

[–]luckykobold [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Hahaha! So the message but not the author is childish? Nice dither. Trump isn't racist, just his words are.

[–]demodious [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

dipshit.

You know what that's called? An ad hominem.