1010
1011

Posted the same story to /r/politicaldiscussion twice but with the names Trump and Clinton switched, and guess which received gold and which was removed? (i.imgur.com)

MajorRollin が 投稿

全 77 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]flyyyyyyyyy 132ポイント133ポイント  (15子コメント)

haha you cheeky bastard!

[–]tito333 86ポイント87ポイント  (12子コメント)

It's a good thing he did this, I think we need to expose the censorship and tyranny in the larger subs.

[–]flyyyyyyyyy 15ポイント16ポイント  (2子コメント)

for sure. it's still hilarious.

[–]tito333 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's like going up to a girl in a shitty car and seeing how she reacts, then getting into a fancy car. Point out what a gold digger she is.

[–]flyyyyyyyyy 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

hahaha damn straight - and i'll remember that move

[–]Denmark1976 23ポイント24ポイント  (1子コメント)

Censorship

Reddit, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter and Google are already rigging the access to "controversial" issues in relation to the 9-11 Attack, US Intelligence Community, Military Industrial Complex, US Warfare, Financial Sector, Mega Corporations, Key Figureheads and Politics.

  • 1 Example: Some of the articles and research done just a few years ago, after Mr. Snowden made his startling revelations about the US Intelligence Community blatantly illegally spying on all US citizens and the methods they use, has either gone completely missing or has been buried under mountains of government friendly data and lies. The search logarithms, offered by certain private companies, has been modified to "disappear" the "controversial" data.

  • 2 Example: If you search the internet for 9-11 related material, you are much more likely to find scientifically inaccurate material, deliberate misleading material or material planted by the US Intelligence Community, than you are finding useful material for further study. This is especially true if you are unfamiliar with the subject at hand, you simply will end up with a "The Arabs did it in corporation with the evil Reptilians using Alien Weapons" which of cause will scare away any sane person. Sometimes you see the Reddit moderator team blatantly censor new 9-11 articles by rigging the votes, only to allow a blatantly misleading wave articles and posts to flood the r/conspiracy forum.

  • 3 Example: If you post anything on Reddit about the crushing inequality, corporate crimes, financial crimes, financial rigging (LIBOR, FOREX, gold, silver, interest rates) your comments section will be crushed by waves of paid government Shills & Pundits (or smart computer logarithms). If your post made it to the front page, they will immediately remove it and sometimes ban your account. Most "controversial" posts will die a silent death due to rigging of the voting mechanics (their favorite method).

[–]Akareyon 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

logarithms -> algorithms?

[–]CryoSage 79ポイント80ポイント  (2子コメント)

Fantastic experiment. Fuck these people

[–]rmandraque [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

yea, they already banned me a while back for supporting Bernie, the assholes.

[–]Caulibflower [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

fucktheoligarchy

[–]Th3rmal95 51ポイント52ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh my fucking god lmfao reddit is cancer.

[–]MuhWhitePrivilege 53ポイント54ポイント  (0子コメント)

I tried taking part in the discussion in that sub but after reading several threads throughout a few weeks I realized it's a Hillary supporter cesspool. They downvote any opposition to the Clinton narrative ESPECIALLY statements that support Trump/Bernie. Its simply not a place for political discussion and more of an echo chamber for anti-Trump/Bernie redditors.

[–]in_the_airoplane 17ポイント18ポイント  (2子コメント)

I've not visited the sub, but what is /r/politicaldiscussion for if not to, well, discuss politics?

[–]breadislive 41ポイント42ポイント  (0子コメント)

Shilling for shillary.

[–]stealthboy 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're only allowed to discuss one viewpoint.

[–]Merrdank 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

Thanks for doing the work

[–]Raptoroo 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Maybe the second one was taken down because it's the exact same story just with the names switched of a previous post in the same subreddit.

I know reddit is biased as fuck but that makes sense

[–]Trelifaxx1640 21ポイント22ポイント  (1子コメント)

I honestly believe TPTB have already chosen Hillary. Mark my words, it will look like Trump is going to win, throwing America(n media) into peril, but Hillary will come out of left field and appear to steal the primaries out from under his feet, 'saving the day'. Say hello to your first female president, America. Sad but true.

[–]shadowofashadow 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yep. I think they picked Hillary a long time ago. There is too much controversy around her though so they're turning the primaries into a circus to distract. Once she's the nominee she's in and all of that stuff doesn't matter.

[–]erietemperance 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

That sub is so horribly bias.

I do see some comments from time to time getting upvotes calling them out on it.

I think the biggest problem is how they implement the "Your doing that too much, please wait X minutes" tool that Reddit offers.

If you post anything remotely non-liberal you are downvoted, then once that happens you can only post once every (X) minutes, for me it was 15. How are you supposed to have any type of conversation when you can only speak 4 times an hour?

So they basically censor out any non-liberal opinion with a voluntary tool that Reddit offers.

Then you just get frustrated that you cannot defend your position and end up deleting the comment and just never go back again. Which pushes the sub even more left.

Then you have the mods who delete comments and posts all the time and ban users, and I would love to see the mod-log for that shit. What percentage of banned users are right-leaning / left-leaning / pure trolls ? Would be nice to see.

[–]wanderingbilby 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Considering that Trump is a let's say heavily contested candidate, that post was likely seen as trolling and reported so the mods saw it almost immediately. The Clinton post wasn't reported and so wasn't seen until it became popular.

Reddit- hell, the internet- has a liberal bias, big shock.

[–]xsolarprophetx 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

All the political subreddits are a fucking joke. There is more honest debate over ideas here than anywhere else.

[–]harami_number1 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

i went to your Donald Trump post and it has been removed too, and there's no gold.

[–]XeoKnight 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Maybe they removed it after they realized what he did?

[–]daneelr_olivaw 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

I hope you reach /r/all, this is brilliant :D

[–]zenicaone 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

this is /r/bestof material

Lets see if it will end up there.

Or how even that sub works - does someone needs to submit it there or topics and posts are chosen by moderators of /r/bestof

[–]sheasie 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

join /r/politicalchat -- i am trying to cultivate an alternative.

tx

[–]BabyBunt 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ingenious.

[–]Arkhamwitch 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I love you OP can I come over for dinner

[–]iaintyobabydaddy 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Reddit's censorship has already cost them all credibility. Just another shill, sell-out site that could have been great.

[–]Wulfgar_RIP 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I love the idea. For science!

[–]Fatburg 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's because one thread ended in "?" and the other one in "/"

[–]spaghetti_emissary [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

x

[–]toadstyle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

wow

[–]Count_Frackula [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

So edgy

[–]MathW [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Oh, come on. Story 1 with gild and 140 upvotes (posted 10 hours ago). Story 2 with no upvotes (posted 17 minutes ago). At least give them each the courtesy of a day before posting your "findings" to /r/conspiracy.

[–]erbsenbrei [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Well, it was removed two minutes after creation, so having it up for 10 hours may be a troublesome endeavor.

[–]ChimneyMonkey [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Ha this is great! I was just banned from r/The_Donald for underscoring one of the supporting poster's negative ideals, not even commenting on trump himself. The justification was the sub is for Trump supporters only - does that indicate they believe the values of the supporter reflect the candidate? Well done!