•
•

Transactions are confirming just fine (blockchain.info)

cryptobaseline が 投稿

全 8 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]BillyHodson [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Hey don't spoil it for the guys who are spending so much to spam the network. They want us to believe the sky is falling.

[–]cryptobaseline[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

They are not spending much :D Cheap guys!

[–]hoosier_13 [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

I have done 10 transactions today no issues. There's no free lunch.

[–]vnnkl [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

So just like any other transaction that is paying 38,46 Satoshi per byte? https://bitcoinfees.21.co

[–]the_alias_of_andrea [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Some of them, yes. Mostly ones with high fees.

However, there are ~32k which aren't confirming, and it's been at that number for quite a while now.

A lot of wallets underestimate fees, which makes this a particular problem.

[–]tegknot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

What's funny to me is the lack of thinking.

Okay, we assume that this is a spam attack, and just pay some higher fees until the spammers get board or run out of money.

But this doesn't address the problem that the spammers are highlighting.

Sure, maybe we currently have enough capacity for all the "real" transactions, but what about 6-12 months from now? SegWit isn't going to increase capacity quickly enough to cover a doubling of usage. And that's assuming we have SegWit in April and it gets adopted quickly. Even if everyone adopts it within a month, that will only get us another 6-12 months of capacity.

[–]cryptobaseline[S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Here is a transaction I just made and it was included in the exact next block.

Hint to the guy doing the stress test (because I hate the phrase "spam txs"): Next time use high fees to see how this plays out.