Feeds:
Posts
Comments

One Glaring Difference Between Alpha Males And Beta Males

February 28, 2016 by CH
Alpha males are DEMANDING of their women.
They bark orders, issue commands, set expectations, and aren’t afraid to show disappointment if their expectations aren’t met. They will correct their women’s mistakes and rebuke errors of judgment firmly, sometimes fiercely, and without hesitation.
I was reminded of this everlasting reality of sexual market male hierarchy while overhearing a shitlord-esque man instruct his pretty girlfriend in proper dog-training technique. The two of them were at a park, working with their rambunctious mutt. It was her turn to extract obedience from the dog, and it wasn’t going well. At every misstep, her boyfriend would quickly intervene to tell her what she was doing wrong, and how she should do it right.
He wasn’t shy about chastising and correcting her, either. He came off like a drill sergeant, and an impatient know-it-all. I would say his demeanor was borderline asshole. Which means that she adored him. When they left, she playfully slapped his backside and giggled, presumably in anticipation of a later retribution.
Women WANT to work for a man’s interest. A man’s respect. A man’s LOVE. A man who challenges women is a man who is rewarded with women’s zeal to please. This is the nature of women.
And it is the nature of beta males to misunderstand the nature of women. Or, when they do understand it, to fear it and therefore fail to tame it. You will never see a beta male confidently, even impudently, demand anything — a norm of behavior, preferred treatment, effort towards a task — from a woman he is dating. He will never LEAD a woman. He will typically appease, and only make passive-aggressive demands of a woman when his fuse is short and his (self-)anger bubbling over.
Beta males don’t like to demand anything of anyone, but especially not of women. Strangers, acquaintances, girlfriends, wives; none will ever experience the distinctly female pleasure of deferring and submitting to a man if that man is a fearful, non-confrontational beta male. And over time resentment and contempt will find a home in these women, and their sexual desire will find a home elsewhere.
I hope that a beta male reading these words is saved today.
Posted in Alpha, Beta, Game, Rules of Manhood | 105 Comments

105 Responses

  1. […] One Glaring Difference Between Alpha Males And Beta Males […]

  2. on February 28, 2016 at 1:00 am | Reply Laguna Beach Fogey
    Betas are too giving of interest, respect, and love. This emotional wantonness (for lack of a better word) is correctly construed by women as an indicator of low SMV. Be sparing with your affection and respect; make her work for it.

    • Iow: don’t wear your heart on your sleeve.

      • on February 28, 2016 at 2:42 am Captain Obvious
        I’d like to think that this hyper-meekness, really a su!cidal meekness, of the modern Beta, is a very new phenomenon. In my childhood, I can think of only one kid with an extremely quiet meek father – that father was a barber, and, in retrospect, possibly a closted s0d0mite? All of the other boys had exceptionally masculine fathers [by contrast with what I’m seeing out there now].

      • on February 28, 2016 at 2:51 am Captain Obvious
        I honestly feel like the modern “Beta” is largely a product of the relentless “War Against Boys” and the ubiquitous cultural conditioning towards effeminacy in men. Even just the political talk about “good jobs” tends to persuade men to take up lives of Beta wage slavery, rather than starting their own businesses [which is what Alphas do].

      • “starting their own businesses [which is what Alphas do]”
        more words of wisdom from the Captain
        men, work for yourselves. decide for yourself the value of your life and your time. don’t blindly hand yourself over to some company’s mission statement. create your own mission statement. the system is designed to devalue your human life to the lowest possible level. signing up for (most) jobs is like suckling on an old woman’s tit. the security it offers is an illusion. the best security you can get is to be your own boss. and watch your nads grow as a result
        if America ain’t workin for you it’s because it the constitution was written to help the go-getters. Let’s keep it that way dammit!

      • the life of a beta depicted in the shortest film ever:

      • ” take up lives of Beta wage slavery”
        Hence the abundance of college loan debt available, to ensure a life of wage slavery and docility.
        free men are dangerous men. always been that way.
        And TRUMP is the best current example on a large scale… Free and dangerous!

      • plumpjack has the best gifs… lozozolzozlozlozlozlozlozlozlozl

      • thanks GE, muh rayciss

  4. This post is timely AF.

  5. I was not saved by these words today. But I was saved by your words, and those of others, long ago. I am now the proud owner of a woman, and should she sometime prove unworthy of such ownership, I will find a more suitable one. Keep on teaching!

  6. The problem with betas is that they live of life of a self-fulfilling prophecy. They believe that by demanding things from women that they’ll lose her attraction from doing so, but due to that they DO lose her attraction.

  7. on February 28, 2016 at 1:47 am | Reply ShitlordStation
    Feminism wept.

  8. “While still hopeful that Mr. Rubio might prevail, Mr. McConnell has begun preparing senators for the prospect of a Trump nomination, assuring them that, if it threatened to harm them in the general election, they could run negative ads about Mr. Trump to create space between him and Republican senators seeking re-election. Mr. McConnell has raised the possibility of treating Mr. Trump’s loss as a given and describing a Republican Senate to voters as a necessary check on a President Hillary Clinton, according to senators at the lunches.”
    More like a necessary accomplice.
    Again, Trump presidency or no, Congress needs to be de-cucked as well.

  9. I know the current post just reflects fundamental CH teachings. But its conclusions are so true. I have seen it apply time and time again. I make this comment to highlight the win-win implications as both men AND women will be happier and more fulfilled.

  10. I’m very bad at doing this. Funnily enough I’m also a construction foreman.
    I’ve made a conscious effort to demand things, “bring me X” “hold this” with out making eye contact/having tunnel vision for the task at hand, the way I would one of the boys on my crew.
    Things have improved. Drastically.

  11. So true…
    Typical scene with the gf:
    “I’ll man the grill. You do the kitchen stuff.”
    “Ha! Ordering me around are you?” (big smile, girlish tone = arousal).
    “Yeah, hop to it, babe.” (I snap my fingers, smack her on the ass).
    Answer with wisecracks and A&A. Don’t lapse into reason.
    You want to set this tone early. It keeps a relationship hot, let me tellya.

    • “Answer with wisecracks and A&A. Don’t lapse into reason.”
      This can’t be overemphasized. This entire mode of thought is one of the huge differences between alphas and betas. Betas are constantly trying to explain their thinking to women using logic. They always get heated when shit-tested or confronted by women, as though men were confronting them. They routinely treat women as cognitive equals in all arenas, but particularly psychologically. And that’s what fucks them up the worst.
      My exact red pill moment was when I realized that I’d been treating young women as though they had an overly sensitive version of my male thought process, one that allowed them to follow a train of thought and respond favorably to a reasoned explanation of anything. This is a major fucking error. It is THE major error of every beta male. Assuming a woman thinks in more or less the same way you think. Once you learn that this is absolute bullshit, *everything* opens up because you’re suddenly able to actually hear the realtalk and can subsequently incorporate zfg theory into your approach. Everything makes sense if you’re guided by that as a first principle.
      It’s better to think of a woman as a child or even a dog than as a more sensitive version of a grown man. Never take what they say seriously. Never defend yourself or your actions. Never explain yourself in detail. When a man explains himself logically to a woman there isn’t some moment in the woman’s mind where his explanation “clicks” and everything makes sense. He’s just fucking up his frame every time. Keeping shit light and fun and not taking a woman seriously will pay dividends in every aspect of the dating/relationship world.

  12. It takes alpha males to correct women. If they don’t do it nobody will. Someone has to set up limits for the females, otherwise they run wild and spread a lot of devestating influence in the world.

    • on February 28, 2016 at 6:13 am | Reply Aspiring Asshole
      I’ve been interested in a 6,7ish woman at work, 20 years my junior. I don’t usually have to deal with her so we don’t get to talk much. Had a crisis the other day where I screwed up and mixed a bad part in with about 300 others (small parts) and had to leave. I dumped them on the table, tersely explaned the situation and told her to find it, and left.
      She messaged me that night via fb (I know, I know..) and asked for my number…

  13. When I first started doing this after learning game it felt awkward. That meant I was so used to doing things for girls that asking things…demanding things felt strange.
    Now key phrases/texts:
    “Let’s met up” instead of “Are you free to meet up”
    “I’m going to be at xxx tonight, join me/come out”
    “Let’s meet up…what’s your schedule?”
    “Dress nice.”
    “Let’s go for drinks this week”.
    Any response that doesn’t meet these demands or result in a counter-offer doesn’t get a response.

    • Yes, absolutely. Always assume the sale.

    • ^dat
      At this late stage, one bit of pleading ends it. They play along or you bail.

    • on February 28, 2016 at 8:04 am | Reply Captain Obvious
      Betas ask questions. Alphas issue commands.

    • Start with “I want”, then add the connection “you to meet me at xxx”. Leadership and engagement. Setting expectations.
      Be confident to express your wants explicitly.
      “Let’s” is weaker than “I want”.
      “I want to dance with you” is stronger than “Let’s dance.” “Will you dance with me” is implied. “Will you dance with me” is a compliance test.
      Women want to be desired by hot men. Women perceive “I want” as an expression of desire and confidence. It’s a strong pull.
      Compliance tests are the man’s version of shit tests. Compliance tests are a way to calibrate a woman’s investment and submission. If she fails too many compliance tests, she gets a lot less attention.

      • Nicely summed, asd. Those are two strong words they cannot deny and want to hear.
        Great post and great comments on the matter. BON!

      • Mendo, that’s high praise from you. Thanks!
        Lol, I crashed and burned a lot last night, but I learned an important lesson. I went to a bar that I normally hit on Friday. Sat. ain’t Fri. I went late and didn’t establish social proof by chatting up lots of people. The bouncers recognize me, but other people don’t know that. They have to be shown by chatting. I eventually danced with some semi-competent followers and established preselection and value, but it was too little, too late.
        I left at midnight after being at the bar a couple of hours. I’m sure there were girls sorry to see me leave, but it was too late for me. I danced maybe five dances with high-value girls during that time. Meh, that’s a low point for me. The night before last, it was more like 20 dances with high-value girls and they gave IOIs all the time and low-value girls I danced with gave blatant IOIs like dancing very close with me. Massive contrast between Fri. and Sat. all because I didn’t allow enough time and I didn’t take the time to establish social proof.

      • Careful. “I want” comes off as needy in most contexts. Women don’t want to be desired by hot men as much as they want to work for and gradually win the desire of a hot man who has a lot of other hot women vying for his attention.
        “We’re throwing down at club xxx tonight. Come thru” is how an alpha invites a woman to dance. He’s going clubbing and if you don’t join him he doesn’t give a fuck because there are other hot women there. At the same time he’s issuing a command, not asking. And by using “we’re” he lets in a subtle social proof. ‘I am popular. My friends and I have a good time. If you come out you’ll have a good time too.’
        Overall your thinking is more or less on point. Having confidence and issuing strong statements is all to the good, but don’t prematurely give a woman the impression that you want her. Lots of guys want to do stuff with hot women, what’s different about you?
        A caveat I’ll add is that if you’re actually in the club gaming a chick and say that with a cocky smile while taking her hand and leading her to the dance floor, that’s a solid move in the field. Wouldn’t text it tho.

  14. Has one man moved the Overton Window so far, so fast, ever before in history?
    I am worrying about Il Trumpe more and more. I hope his security is airtight.

    • Woh. That’s mega.
      My favorite Musso quote was always – “Chi hanno dimenticato la terra sono destinati all’inferno.”
      Those who have forgotten the soil are bound for hell.

    • Trump refuses to disavow David Duke/KKK
      Adobe Flash Player or an HTML5 supported browser is required for video playback.
      Get the latest Flash Player
      Learn more about upgrading to an HTML5 browser
      It looks like what we were suspecting is now official.
      Although my instinct would be to say, “just denounce them, what’s the downside?” I’m not going to second-guess the judgment of a man sent by God to save us.

      • I have to say, this “I don’t know him” playing possum by Trump, while a far cry better than knee-jerk condemnation of the White Supremacist bogeyman, struck me as weak-sister avoidance.
        I would have been more impressed if he told the interviewer that these sort of questions are old-hat inanity and immaterial, given the actual number of voters who might identify as so-called “White Supremacists”… ergo, “I kowtow to no MSM demands on who I should or shouldn’t disavow, because they’re merely brought up as PC distractions and rob air time from the real issues that have to be addressed.”

      • According to reliable MSM sources, Hitler has risen from the grave and endorses Donald Trump…
        … Sarah Palin refudiates the implication. ;-)

      • Well, according to his twitter, he did disavow last Friday.
        Meh… looks like in many ways it’s still BAU for the Cathedral, and The Donald isn’t some big, bad ZFG savior that some of you are making him out to be.
        The correct response was as I stated above, to wit: not kowtowing to silly demands for disavowal, rather, reframe and make the MSM qualify THEMSELVES for wasting time on this nonsense and/or call them on the many individuals and groups they don’t ask the Dems to disavow.
        As I mentioned on earlier threads, I don’t expect him to be a full-bore WN… but I do expect him to live up to the vaunted uber-alpha shitlord you fellows paint him to be.

      • I think you miss the subtlety in TRUMP maneuvering… first he issues a half hearted “sure right” disavowal Friday, then refuses to acknowledge again, under a slew of “TRUMP refuses to disavow” interviews and headlines.
        Net net is a non-disavowal… And the dog whistle is heard loud and clear…

      • Well, I say calling it “subtlety” is hamstering.
        When he’s balls-to-the-wall… his modus operandi and trademark… you guys say it’s shitlord alphadom…
        When he misses an opportunity to throw a devastating haymaker, or when he doesn’t make a stand as powerfully as he should, you guys rationalize it.
        Can’t have it both ways, mate…
        Granted, he’s still the best thing out there… but I’m seeing a lot of chinks in that armor, if he’s to be the Great White Hope that many here think he’ll be.

      • ummm… A guy “disavowing” duke is tweeting Mussolini.
        TRUMP knows when to throw what, and his success speaks of that.
        #notworriedabouthowTRUMPishandlinghisshit

      • I still say the alpha way to handle it is NOT with a bunch of “I don’t know him” and “send me a list” hemming and hawing…
        He should have said what I stated previously… tell the MSM these types of neener-neeners are a puerile waste of time and a deliberate smokescreen tactic, so in the most polite meaning of the term, let’s move the fuck on and talk about the issues that are more pressing.
        And if he then threw in a “You fairy”, well… I’d be tempted to register. ;-)

      • I disavow the KKK. I also disavow CBS, NBC, ABC, CNN, and the New York Times. lol

      • Interesting take from this guy, he’s written a few almost pro Trump pieces.
        I think TRUMP is in a league of his own on this stuff… The NLP stuff, the game, the general psychological dominance “low energy” etc…
        “It’s worth noting that Trump’s comments came one day after another Klan brawl, this time in Anaheim, Calif. Thirteen people were arrested and three were stabbed after a Klan rally turned violent. And it’s worth noting, too, as did Jonathan Chait at New York magazine, that Trump’s claim to “know nothing” about white supremacists echoes the language of the 19th-century “Know Nothing” party — a nativist group that supported only Protestants for public office.”

      • on February 28, 2016 at 2:20 pm Captain Obvious
        I wouldn’t disavow the KKK unless I were perfectly cool with greeting half-human half-ch!mpanzee grandch!ldren out of my daughters. And then there’s the whole question of getting your throat s1it…

      • It was a bunch of blacks wearing robes that were in the video endorsing Trump – not real KKK members. The liberal media will stop at nothing to destroy the man they fear. It will get a lot dirtier before the establishment admits defeat. Let them try to smear him with their non-sense all they want – why should he care who supports him.
        The blacks that support the slave traders of old (the Democrats) are the real Uncle Tom’s the ones that support Republicans are the ones that know history. And there are a lot of hard working Americans that are sick and tired of the establishment selling them out with their words – time to give a man that is action oriented the reins.

    • What I’m more afraid of is the first minute of this:
      Adobe Flash Player or an HTML5 supported browser is required for video playback.
      Get the latest Flash Player
      Learn more about upgrading to an HTML5 browser

  15. I live in a residence with a two hundred American kids and every single one I asked prefers Sanders. Can someone explain youth’s love for socialism? I had a leftist episode in my life, but it took me a quick read on USSR history and Scandinavian countries to conclude that it just can’t work and abandon the idea.
    Sure, “free college” are the words that get their attention but someone needs to PAY for it. How hard is to understand that nothing on this planet is free?

    • It’s the old maxim: whoever isn’t liberal at 20 suffers from lack of heart.
      These are boys and girls who never had to scratch for a dollar themselves, so they don’t understand that there’s a world beyond dad’s checkbook… until it’s too late.
      Every father smiles and sighs on that day when he sees his kids, out on their own in their domiciles, turning down thermostats of their own accord.

      • The father is the fucking castrato. He ought to have taught these losers to stand on their own feet by the time they were 14. I know I will.
        My son’s 2 months old, and in no more than 4 years from now, he’ll be buying his own toys and ice creams with his own hard earned money. He’ll earn it from me, of course, by doing household chores and learning stuff. But earn it, he will.
        By the time he’s 15, he’ll be smarter and richer than a whole batch of these libtard morons put together.

      • Oh, and being a liberal at 20 means nothing more than being an idiot at 20.

      • I’m 21. Heart is for women, and only for their kids, not to men. People who is not able to feed themselves must die. If they push you, then you must kill them. Just wait to see what happens when police is even incapable of defend the thief state and the rape association state, the matriarchal monkeys are going to paid all their crimes .

      • Oh, and being a liberal at 20 means nothing more than being an idiot at 20.
        Yes, but 20-year olds at least have an excuse. As they say, there’s no fool like an old fool.

      • The rest of that maxim goes: Anyone who is still liberal at 40 suffers from lack of head… eh, lack o’ haid. lzlzozlozlozlozl

    • on February 28, 2016 at 8:11 am | Reply Captain Obvious
      > “two hundred American kids… How hard is to understand that nothing on this planet is free?” ——— How many of the 200 were Humanit!tties majors or Scr0tial Science majors? Versus how many were STEM or professional school majors?

    • it took me a quick read on…Scandinavian countries to conclude that it just can’t work
      Not true:

      • Scandinavian countries have their last days. A society that doesn’t promote the reproductive succes of its intelligent men is Africa. Scandinavians are going to evolve into monkeys.
        Welfare mimics African jungle lifestyle.

      • on February 28, 2016 at 10:01 am Wrong Side of History
        High IQ countries (Singapore)/Low IQ countries = mostly resistant to miscegenation.
        Middling IQ countries (US, Sweden) = mostly open to miscegenation.
        Seems like the key to homogeneity is to be either stupid/backwards or intelligent enough to see the benefits of homogeneity.

    • They all could use a beating and a trip to the gulag. Who knows, maybe a few would learn something…

    • They understand it’s not free. But they’re convinced that the people who pay taxes – the white male Republican business owners who by the way aren’t paying them enough at their dead-end barista jobs – owe it to them.
      The problem isn’t ignorance. The problem is entitlement.

    • First reply got et… grrrrrr :mad:
      My prediction: any acts of mayhem stemming from the ISIS gangs will be spun as self-defense… and they will be the first to use firearms.
      If any White “soldier” even talks mean, he will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.

      • You are, unfortunately, 100% correct. European countries are allying their security services with the invaders and against the native European population. We’ve already seen how the governments and (((media))) work together to promote Islam in Europe. How Merkel is still in office and not swinging from a lamp post baffles me.

      • It will be interesting see what happens. If a “extremist right wing group” is pursued with more severity than ISIS(as the newspaper discourse points towards), it will be a new milestone of doublethink and race suicide.
        Note that ISIS is an invasion force and Odin is a defensive. Can you imagine the inverse? What would be the newspaper discourse? From violations of human rights to genocide

      • on February 28, 2016 at 2:22 pm Captain Obvious
        Come January 20, 2017, we simply have to start arming the Freedom Fighters, just like we armed the Contras in Nicaragua & El Salvador.

  17. on February 28, 2016 at 9:43 am | Reply Wrong Side of History
    NAXALT is the great beta/shitlib psychological trap. It’s the inability to see the world coldly and analytically.
    The patience-for-beta-behavior threshold varies, but every woman will inevitably move on emotionally if you become boring. Every.

    • “The patience-for-beta-behavior threshold varies, but every woman will inevitably move on emotionally if you become boring. Every.”
      Maybe not physically but emotionally. Wise words.

    • “NAXALT is the great beta/shitlib psychological trap. It’s the inability to see the world coldly and analytically.”
      So they are like women, and must not vote, in few words.
      NAXALT is the fallacy of said that maybe there is one dog that doesn’t bark or a chimpanzee with and IQ of 100, just because you only don’t know each fucking chimpanzee or dog. And the false premise that behaviour is comparable to blood, they’re still monkeys and dogs.

  18. Truths
    1. The neocons along with the media have launched an all out attack on Trump. Funny how so many so called conservatives are duped into believing the so called left, which is honest about their intentions, is the enemy. Dumb and dumber.
    2. Mitch McConnell: “Republicans will drop Trump ‘like a hot rock’ if he wins the nomination” Get off the fucking GMO’s people, it just supports big Pharma, big healthcare as well as the neocons.
    3. Cruz sold himself to Monsanto and the MIC. He won Iowa with the GMO corn support.
    4. Ash Carter, Philip Breedlove and Robert O. Work along with the men and women who serve them should be in jail for war crimes and trying to escalate a nuclear war.
    5. This election is important. Figure out who the good guys are.

  19. Meanwhile… TRUMP tweeting Mussolini quotes… Respect.
    "@ilduce2016: “It is better to live one day as a lion than 100 years as a sheep.” – @realDonaldTrump #MakeAmericaGreatAgain"
    — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) February 28, 2016

  20. CH, you forgot the mask women always wear. They are compulsive liars and manipulators. It is not simply beta male stupidity. They key insight is how women stack up on the continuum between civilized men and dogs. Hint: With all that equipment women are not man’s best friend. I’ll cut more slack for a dog. They are more civilized.

    • “They are compulsive liars ”
      No they can’t be liars,because their only truth is their emotion. so they are always right, in the moment…

      • Hundo P brother

      • @Sentient, I used to think women had a wealth of emotions too. Except for sadistic pleasure that might involve intrinsic emotion, women are vapid role players following a brain stem script. Women want men to express their ‘feelings’ to get to their true emotions, but feelings are messages of emotion, in a woman emotional pretence. The players’ game is played in shared feelings of communication but not shared emotions. I.e. women empathize but not sympathize. Any or almost any real emotions (an intrinsic eternal state) would impair a woman’s ability to role play with the responsive conviction of her total being, and so per evo psych it is clear she has few if any actual emotions. They have moods or modes of instinct, like the birds and pussy cats they are. DGAF does wonders with nexting female ’emotions’, sometimes with out leaving set.

      • @Sentient, I get you were being sarcastic. I am probably not telling you anything new, so I retract that part. I’m trying to let go of the bitterness from my late-in-life realization, but I just failed. Some guys will get as far as your joke indicates but not let go of pedestalizing women as the fairer sex. There are layers to peel with each ah-hah. I’m ‘preaching’ to save the ‘souls’ of whosoever can benefit. The young guys who need only search online have it so damn easy to see this con of feminism now more brazen than ever.

    • Hell, most dogs will run to whoever shows them the biggest piece of meat as well.

  21. Lord Chesterfield to his son, circa 1748:
    “Women, then, are only children of a larger growth; they have an entertaining tattle, and sometimes wit; but for solid reasoning, and good sense, I never knew in my life one that had it, or who reasoned or acted consequentially for four-and-twenty hours together. Some little passion or
    humor always breaks upon their best resolutions.
    “Their beauty neglected or controverted,
    their age increased, or their supposed understandings depreciated, instantly kindles their
    little passions, and overturns any system of consequential conduct, that in their most
    reasonable moments they might have been capable of forming.
    “A man of sense only trifles with them, plays with them, humors and flatters them, as he does
    with a sprightly forward child; but he neither consults them about, nor trusts them with
    serious matters; though he often makes them believe that he does both; which is the thing in
    the world that they are proud of; for they love mightily to be dabbling in business (which by
    the way they always spoil); and being justly distrustful that men in general look upon them
    in a trifling light, they almost adore that man who talks more seriously to them, and who
    seems to consult and trust them; I say, who seems; for weak men really do, but wise ones only
    seem to do it.”

  23. “Glad to hear you’re scared you should be maggot. But no we can’t restrict competition just because you’re inadequate”
    Let me guess, another trust fund kiddy who sees Hank Rearden in the mirror?

  24. A great red pill article confirming the 80/20 rule and much more (who pointed it out? can’t remember): http://www.girlsaskguys.com/sexual-behavior/a22977-girls-on-tinder-do-smash-a-lot
    I am a student in sexology and we did a research in sexual behavior on Tinder.
    It’s something we can’t deny that it has a big impact on many people’s sex lives. We asked questions to 300 guys and 300 girls who use tinder about their sexual experiences. They were easy to find since it seems to be extremely popular with people from ages 18 to 35! Here are some results that surprised me.
    – Unlike I thought, 240 of the 300 girls actually had sex through tinder! Only less than 50 of the 300 men, which is remarkable.
    – When we asked for numbers to the people that did have sex: Girls did it on average less than the few guys that did. That means that a couple guys score with almost al the women.
    – These men do however show a lot of similarities: Muscular, well-endowed relaxed and (surprise!) a little beerbelly? The girls described the men’s attractive personal traids as “they know what they want and don’t hold back to take it.”
    – The opening lines that worked, were often extremely flat but to the point. One that seemed to work was just “wanna smash”.
    – It appears that these dates where sex was involved were mostly not related with hopes for relationships, just casual sex. The sex in most cases happened on a first date or even just immediately at someones place.
    – The terms that came up most to describe the sex were: emotionless, hard, wild, fast, fun, physical and although that wasn’t our question, doggystyle (lol). They rated their sexual encounters almost always as very good (other options were bad, mediocre, good). Many even said their best sexual experience is through tinder.
    – Neither girls nor guys regretted the sex afterwards, but almost all girls like to keep it a secret, or with very close friends. Many guys liked to share their stories in detail. (not so surprising maybe)
    – Something negative: Around 50 women admitted to have cheated through Tinder. Very few guys have. In almost all cases, the partner doesn’t have a clue.
    – Something positive: Almost everyone agreed that Tinder is a very positive influence on their sex lives.

    • This just brings me down. I know it’s the way of things now, but free female libido has turned us into rutting dogs. So sick of it.

  25. Girlfriend rented this horrible movie: http://m.imdb.com/title/tt2361509/
    The husband of the femcunt lead character has to win beta of the year.

  26. Pet store looking for flea stuff for animal. Wave down a slender young ginger with excellent hip sway. Pretty but not enough to be full of herself. She says over here, I follow, automatically opening.
    We’re over at the shelf and chatting.
    – I have four cats. (She’s 23 btw.)
    – Well, we’re not going back to your place.
    Giggles, blushes, twirls and hides behind her hair.
    I get in her line to check out. One of those stores where they ask for your number, she does, naturally I say “You should be writing this down.”
    She does, and writes hers down, hands it to me. Overall this interaction was 10/10.
    Alas, I’m already being crossed off the list via text. We’re all fuckboys now.

  28. Media/establishment in last-gasp desperation mode pulling out the OMG-KKK card to try to stop Trump.
    We all know Trump is not a WN (alas) but at least he had the presence of mind not to fall for the media’s demand for an on-the-spot denunciation of David a Duke or anyone else.
    He could have spun it better. Imagine Clinton being confronted about violent black mobs, the Nation of Islam, or any other black hate group — she’d just say something like “our campaign is about blah blah blah and we want to improve the lives of blacks and blah blah blah … I want every vote because I want to make a positive difference in black lives blah blah blah”. Trump can do the same “I don’t have any idea what you’re talking about but it doesn’t matter – we need every vote to make this country great again … people are tired of seeing getting screwed over and this campaign is all about positive change and making this country great again blah blah blah …”
    I fully expect tonight’s oscars to include some anti-Trump grandstanding.
    Tuesday is the day — if Trump wins big (i.e. every state except Cruz’s home state of Texas) the nomination is all but certain. It will be an ugly two weeks until March 15 though.

  29. Trump just picked up another high-profile endorsement: Senator Jeff Sesssions from Alabama. Sessions is one of the few congress-critters worthy of respect on the immigration issue.

  30. h/t Saucer Lord over at MPC.
    “Two of my favorite television shows are about what I think it’s fair to call the “New America.” In Master of None, on Netflix, Indian-American comedian Aziz Ansari plays a struggling actor in a very real and diverse New York. His best friend is the son of Chinese immigrants. His girlfriend is white.”
    Bet you didn’t see that one coming!
    “And the plots have revolved, pointedly but never heavy-handedly, around the portrayal of minorities in mainstream media, and the struggles of immigrants chasing the American dream.”
    Now that’s smart: two layers of delusional propaganda for the price of one. Muh Diversity in the foreground and Muh White Supremacy in the background.


Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:
WordPress.com Logo
You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. ( Log Out / Change )
Twitter picture
You are commenting using your Twitter account. ( Log Out / Change )
Facebook photo
You are commenting using your Facebook account. ( Log Out / Change )
Google+ photo
You are commenting using your Google+ account. ( Log Out / Change )
Connecting to %s
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.
Join 2,483 other followers
%d bloggers like this:
    loading Cancel
    Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
    Email check failed, please try again
    Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
    0%
     
    10%
     
    20%
     
    30%
     
    40%
     
    50%
     
    60%
     
    70%
     
    80%
     
    90%
     
    100%