96
97

Peter Todd: "Whomever is DoS attacking f2pool please stop. You're only making it harder to come to consensus - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=700411.msg14010227" (twitter.com)

eragmus が 投稿

全 24 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]dumptrucks [スコア非表示]  (4子コメント)

Third party trying to divide the community.

[–]handsomechandler [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

Most likely culprit is Mircea Popescu, or some equally militant extremist.

[–]pyalot [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Wait, I'm confused, I thought you had consensus? You met up in person and everything. Even with miners, which I'm told do not matter (why'd you meet up with them anyway?). You did the whole central planning committee rain dance to procure the future of the peer to peer decentralized money of the future. How can some DDOS by some troll now take that away?

[–][削除されました]  (8子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]optimists [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

    What do you mean could be the false flag. Peter Todd coordinating the ddos and publicly asking to stop it or classic supporters ddossing f2pool to advance the tale that they are getting attacked?

    Think about it for a second. Both are equally stupid. Or can you make out which one is more stupid? Stop with conspiracies already!

    [–]BillyHodson [スコア非表示]  (5子コメント)

    It's not hard to figure out that if there was a group that's spent the last six months trying take to control, a group that didn't get their own way and who wanted to make Core look bad, then they would probably do exactly what is being done at this time. For all that I know they might even come up with posts on medium to say something like "bitcoin is dead".

    [–]cparen [スコア非表示]  (3子コメント)

    Everyone knows that there are unreasonable extremists on both sides. A DoS attack reduces profitability, which is the primary motive of a miner. Making one faction of bitcoin unprofitable isn't a viable way for conspirators of that faction to make their proposal more appealing through sympathy.

    Perhaps they'd do it anyway, but that's the realm of conspiracy theorizing, and not the realm of fact or observation.

    [–]LovelyDay [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    A DoS attack reduces profitability,

    It should be in the interest of all honest parties to find the culprit and weed them out.

    [–]cparen [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Agreed. Just speaking to the immediate effect.

    [–]GratefulTony [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    I don't think a short-term attack on a factionmember, who's profit you don't share, to bolster a strong reaction from those who might be swayed to your cause, is out of the question from a strategic standpoint.

    [–]itsgremlin [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    A picture of one of him wasn't enough for his Twitter profile.

    [–]no_face [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

    Any info on the DDOS? Is it NTP/DNS/Layer 7?

    We may have to think of DDOS protection in general for bitcoin

    [–]PCAddiction [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

    There is no way to protect the whole Bitcoin network from DDoS attacks.

    [–]chriswheeler [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    There is also no way to DDoS the whole network, the beauty of decentralisation :)

    [–]themerkle [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Oh yea politely asking for ddos to stop will surely make it stop....