全 3 件のコメント

[–]Magnavoxx [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Yeah, that's like his opinion, man...

Don't know why he's bringing up the 85mm as superior, though. They were pretty much on par with each other when it came to penetration.

My opinion is that there is more to a gun/tank combo than just penetration figures, and I think the T23 turret w/ M1 gun mount is superior to most others. Not that surprising that it was a balanced, thought through option, as they took their sweet time to perfect it.

The Panther's gun mount was especially imbalanced with the excessively long barrel and lack of bustle. It had pneumatic assistance for the elevation and if that broke it became pretty difficult to hand crank (see the French reports), also traverse was impossible on very uneven ground which also points to a very imbalanced turret in the turn axis orientation.

One can also note the lack of post-war designs with the long barrels that the Germans were so fond of. 70 and 71 calibers for the KwK 42 and 43 respectively hasn't been on a tank since that I can think of. Nobody seems to want that, so I don't know what the complaint is, really.

[–]MaxRavenclawIn reality, most tank battles took place at ranges over 2km![S] [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Yeah... I was kind of taken aback when I read it.