全 9 件のコメント

[–]Gunlord5002alfalfa4me 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

So help out a fellow bloop: does anyone have a general TRP dictionary definition of honor? I'd love to know what they think it means.

Nobody knows. Women are Machiavellian, but Machiavelli was a man! Honor is a male abstraction women are too pragmatic to grasp, but men are rational, logical, pragmatic, etc. God only knows what a term they use means at any given time.

[–]teslaminty[S] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I've noticed that it seems to boil down to: men are inherently honorable, but women don't deserve to be treated with honor because they are inherently dishonorable, so... no honor. No honor for anyone. Because bitches.

[–]Birdsiscool 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Things men do are honorable, things women do are not. Simple!

[–]blehedd"AWALT" is the sound of a hamster wheel squeaking 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Taken from The Table Man's absurd diatribe on "The Red Pill, You & Morality":

Why do men instinctually almost have close to zero trust for women? Because we know they're immoral creatures. We know they don't give a fuck. They must be regulated. If you've read TRP you know these women will do whatever is necessary to ensure their own well-being. They don't have a higher mode of thought, they just run off biological programming and do whatever to "get theirs."

You can call that amoral if there's no malice behind it, but regardless the pain it causes across society is anything but. We used to check female behaviour with man's sense of justice posing as divinely ordained, and then impose this on society as a whole. But now men have lost control; female morality runs the show. And plenty of guys are adopting a feminine view of morality to "get ahead."

If you think morality is a wholly rational process, it isn't. Even in the intellectualism of Nietzcshe's master-slave morality or Ragnar Redbeard's "Might is Right" you can sense a certain hatred and contempt for weakness that inverses traditional morality as we know it. In fact, in a perverse way, I would say it something akin to natural female morality. As it seems all but apparent that hypergamy is the basis of female morality - what enriches her is good, what doesn't, is bad. It ignores other people's need for justice and is entirely self-serving. Sound familiar? In a way one could say TRP is the female strategy applied to male interests.

Vice becomes virtue, and virtue becomes vice. Women are without honour unless they are taught and shamed into having some. They don't possess the natural sense of honour that men do, although, it would seem in this age of emasculation, more and more men are taking on female traits to "adapt" and "win."

I think honour is just some generic word they use to imply men are better than women.

I don't get how people can read this drivel and not understand that this is just a misogynist trying to rationalise his irrational hatred of women! It couldn't be more obvious even if he had a looping video of Oprah doing jazz hands and yelling "MISOGYNY" at the top. The literal only evidence he supplies are his own negative sterotypes, and his negative stereotypes read like just another collection of AWALT field reports off TRP.

[–]teslaminty[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

ahhhhh that rant LOL god, that guy must be a drag irl.

[–]registrationscoflaw 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

honor is playing as a barbarian in diablo 2, communing with nature and dual wielding axes

[–]DevilDwarv 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Back to the sidebar with you. Also lift more. And remember AWALT. Fucking casuals.

[–]LaserFace77 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Outside of fantasy stories, honor is just a term used to excuse horrible acts.

[–]Thoth34000BCE 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Honor in their eyes is being true to your word.

They say women are not honorable because they care more about saving face, avoiding conflict, and protecting feelings than speaking the truth most of the time.