7
8

Momentary telekinesis (self.Thetruthishere)

whosmav が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]silverence -1ポイント0ポイント  (47子コメント)

Yeah, but... That's you just saying that. The big bang didn't violate any of Newton's laws of thermodynamics, and that fact is how we're able to extrapolate information about the creation of, and current state of, the universe. So, no, the big bang was not stranger than the violation of newton's laws.

However, over all, you show up and insult me, twice, and then you want to debate the actual substance of what I was talking about? You know what I meant: the other guy supplied the scientific reason why OP's made up story couldn't have happened, and the other guy said, in effect "science isn't real!." Now you want to go in to it? No thank you.

[–]Tf2McRsWow -1ポイント0ポイント  (46子コメント)

based on your post history, you're usually the one doing the insulting.

you're saying the idea and concept behind newton's laws existed before the big bang. you're tipping your fedora so hard you're half-blind. How do you even know it didn't violate those laws?

remember the big bang is a theory and very little is known of it. you have no idea whether it violated those laws or not.

[–]silverence -1ポイント0ポイント  (45子コメント)

Actually, all of astronomy is based off of the assumptions that it DIDN'T violate newtons laws, and that assumption is upheld thought empirical and observable evidence. You know, science.

And you took the time to look through my post history? And you're saying I'M wearing the fedora? Hahaha. You, sir, are fucking pathetic.

[–]Tf2McRsWow -1ポイント0ポイント  (44子コメント)

You said they are assumptions but stated it as fact. I don't make a habit of checking post histories and comparing self to others unlike yourself. Those are the actions of somebody with crippling self esteem.

[–]silverence -1ポイント0ポイント  (43子コメント)

They are fact. You can assume facts are true. Those aren't contradictory terms. In fact, that's what facts are, able to be assumed to be true. Not exactly sure where you got the notion that assumptions aren't facts, but hey, you're just pulling shit outa your ass left and right, I can't keep up.

You say you don't make a habit of doing that, yet... you did exactly that...

And it's a 'crippling lack of self esteem.' "Crippling self esteem" doesn't make any sense.

But we should really just leave this here, as this is only going to get worse. I don't know you from Adam, and we could very well get along about any issue. Even this one, if you weren't deliberately trying (and failing) to be a contrarian. You just decided to, you know, be an asshole here. That's ok! I choose to be an asshole to people on the internet sometimes too. You should just try to be better at it, and you've really missed the mark this time.

[–]Tf2McRsWow -1ポイント0ポイント  (42子コメント)

I don't make a habit. I did it once. To you. Since you checked my post history you'd know this.

I'm amazed you know so much about something the rest of the scientific community are still actively engaged in researching and learning about. You should inform them of your undeniable and irrefutable proof that the big bang followed to a T the newtonian laws.

Since that is most definitely true There's no way the big bang theory should still be a theory. Perhaps you should take your heightened intellect somewhere where it can actually achieve something. Instead of fearing being proven wrong you should embrace the fact that you and everyone else should learn at any given opportunity. After all... it's the student mindsets that prove to be the strongest.

To me. The very idea that there's a set of rules that even the big bang can't break is much LESS impressive than the idea that the big bang MADE the rules. What if other universes don't follow the same rules? Are there other universes?

I can see you're an atheist. Tell me then Mr. Smarty pants.

If God isn't real, how come it's called a praying mantis and not an atheist mantis?

[–]silverence 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ah. With your edit, the facade drops. I should have smelled a troll. Return to your bridge.

[–]silverence -1ポイント0ポイント  (40子コメント)

Ha, you think I checked your post history? Fuck that, I couldn't give less of a fuck what you have to say.

And no, the rest of the scientific community is NOT actively engaged in a debate about the big bang breaking the laws of thermodynamics. That debate is settled. You cranked out a whole comment about that, and you're just wrong about it. Pretty funny. More idiotic dribble you're just pulling out of your ass.

In addition to not knowing what a fact is nor what an assumption is, you also don't know what a theory is.

You're saying I should take "any given opportunity to learn?" Uh, are you trying to say that I should open my mind to the possibility that Newton's laws were ever violated? Because they weren't. Ever. You should open your mind to understand what a law is, and how science works.

Finally, you really just don't want to let this go huh? You want to just keep digging and making your self look more and more ignorant. Well, enjoy it. Go ahead and continue to respond with more ignorance of the big bang, the laws of thermodynamics, and what a law is in the first place. All you've done is demonstrated exactly what I said in the first place: You received a shit science education, and it's worrisome. So thanks for that!

[–]Tf2McRsWow -1ポイント0ポイント  (39子コメント)

I mean With how little we know about the universe. You sure it's not even slightly possible? Knowing how much you know. Which is everything clearly.

[–]silverence -1ポイント0ポイント  (38子コメント)

It really boggles my mind that you keep saying that I'm saying I know everything. First, that's the first defense of the ignorant, so keep it up, ape. Second, I've said no such thing. What I've said is that we KNOW that none of Newton's three laws of thermodynamics have ever been violated. That's what a law is. The rest of ever field of science is based upon them being unbreakable. That's the whole point. When we see a new phenomenon, like a unique quasar or something, we look at it and say "wow, how does that work without violating the conservation of energy?" and then all the research goes into answering that question. Knowing that it doesn't violate a law of thermodynamics is the basis for the math. If it WERE possible to violate them, then our understanding of everything would evaporate. You don't have to know everything to understand that, you just have had to pay attention in middle school science, which clearly you didn't.

But please, keep pretending this very simple concept is so amazing of a statement that not only do you not get it, but anyone who does must be some omniscient being. It only serves to point out just how fucking stupid you are. Which is very, very stupid. And not just that, but pig ignorant.

[–]Tf2McRsWow -1ポイント0ポイント  (37子コメント)

Instead of attacking my character and education, why not address the possibility of something violating that law?

Does the law only apply to our universe oh great one?