3
4

Ancapistan (self.CapitalismVSocialism)

TheWaterTemple が 投稿

Let's get out of our homo sapien brains for a moment and enter into the mind of a fox.

Does a fox have a concept of government? No.

Does a fox have a concept of private property? Yes.

A fox is free to wander into the territory of the porcupine or a large cat, but it will find out quickly if something is laying claim to the land. No paperwork is necessary, the fox will know through intuition and wisdom.

Ancapistan is what we call nature. It has been here the whole time and will never go away. No government, and property rights defendable by the owner laying claim to said property.

全 7 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]ImpacatusGeolibertarian 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

A fox may have some vague sense of territoriality, but that's pretty different from private property. If anything, it's more similar to what the leftists call "personal property".

I can't see the "appeal to nature" path doing much for anarcho-capitalism.

[–]subsidiarityAnarcho-Capitalist [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

I think of property, of any kind, as requiring 'claim without possession'. I have never seen evidence that any animal but humans making this kind of distinction. Other animals do not fight for ownership then forego possession.

[–]JobDestroyerCrypto-capitalist [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Bears leave their hidey holes then return for winter.

[–]ruffmadmanrosa luxemburg is bae [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

literally every animal does that. they establish a territory for a set amount of time and then abandon it to look for places with more resources.

[–]MoreLikeAnCrap [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Do ants have a concept of Government? Yes.

Do ants have a concept of Private Property? No.

Who cares what is "natural"? We're humans. By definition, we are not "natural".

Do foxes have a sense of fallacious arguments? No.

Do foxes have a sense of economics? No.

Do 3/4 foxes die before ever having sex? Yes.

Actually, Foxes are a pretty good metaphor for AnCaps.

[–]duggabbooMixed Economy Progressive [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

This is why people think you guys are nuts.

[–]SaloLTu ne cede malis [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

Nature isn't the best place to go to form an argument imo. It's full of contradictions and examples that could fit almost any ideology.

For example: you could argue that ants or bees form a sort of commune and have no hierarchy (different types of workers but the queen or other types have no power over the others; the workers also kill the queen that doesn't do her job iirc) and manage to strive together.

It's best