User talk:Infinite0694: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 08:55, 10 November 2015

Untitled

help please

@68.32.154.213: Done--Infinite0694 (talk) 14:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Request

@Sakretsu: Hi, Sakretsu! I'm Japanese wikipedian. Of course! You got it. But...it may take time for me to reply to that because I have a lot of stuff to do today.--Infinite0694 (talk) 20:45, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Take your time.--Sakretsu (talk) 20:56, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

@Sakretsu: Completion. Also on; jp:利用者:Infinite0694/sandbox --Infinite0694 (talk) 23:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

@Sakretsu: P.S. //　Sorry, I am not sure what the purpose of this letter is, or who it is addressed to (ie. whether you sent it to the company or sent it as a personal message). I might have a mistake with the translation. For example; "御社", "貴方". Please tell me a little bit more in detail about this. --Infinite0694 (talk) 09:07, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

It's my bad. Actually, we would need a version for both cases: usually we should find a key person to contact (eg 竜騎士07 of 07th Expansion), but most of the time we don't have such information. That's why, in those cases, we would need to address the letter to the company in general. Obviously if you don't have time, it's perfectly fine only the version addressed to the company. Anyway, I can't say anything else than thank you again, you can't even imagine how long I looked for someone extremely kind as you. Thanks--Sakretsu (talk) 13:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

@Sakretsu: Okay, I got it. I'd try as best as I can to match your desires. Next time, please send me an email directly.--Infinite0694 (talk) 19:48, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Sorry Infinite, I didn't understand if I can use your translation for companies or if it is still incomplete. Also, I'd like to know if you prefer to be contacted always by email or just in case of requests.--Sakretsu (talk) 12:28, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

@Sakretsu: Sorry, Sakretsu. I apologize for the delay in replying. I've been to intending to get in touch with "07th Expansion" directly regarding whether or not the images are approved to be used on Italian Wikipedia, but I have yet to receive an email response from you, so I have put this to the side for now. However, it seems that I previously mislead you due to my poor explanation. If you approve, I will begin negotiating directly with 07th Expansion. Also, if you are okay, I would prefer to directly communicate with you through Email(in any situation). Plus, I would like to inquire whether you intend to use the images only on Italian Wikipedia(or Wikimedia Commons?). If you intend to upload it on Wikimedia Commons(including Ja wiki), I will change the negotiations accordingly.--Infinite0694 (talk) 14:56, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Re: Episode summary length

@Juhachi: Hi, Juhachi! Thanks for your advice. I'll be more careful next time, and try to make an effort at writing a summary between 400 and 700 words[1]. Thanks.--Infinite0694 (talk) 10:30, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

400-700 is for feature films, which would be about 4-5 anime episodes in total. Your Saekano episode 7 summary is much more appropriate for a 24 minute episode, which comes to just under 200 words. Episode 6's summary is about 250, but that's still good. So something between 200-300 words is what you should be shooting for, I would recommend.--十八 11:22, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

@Juhachi: I am a big mess right now. Er, This[2]. I think it's on a case by case basis. (I reckon Cross Ange isn't Saekano.) --Infinite0694 (talk) 11:35, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

No matter how intricate a series may or may not be, summaries of that length are absolutely unnecessary since no one would even bother reading it, so it doesn't help anyone. The summaries are not meant to be a replacement for watching the episode. They're meant to give an overview of the important points, which is why film plots are recommended for a 400-700 word length, but that is for feature films that are 2 or more hours in length. Episode 21 of Cross Ange is at a mind-bogglingly 1200 words at this edit for a roughly 24 minute episode (22 or so if you discount the OP/ED). That is roughly 50 words for every minute of the episode, and I know there cannot be so much going on every single minute of each episode to warrant that level of intricate detail.--十八 12:50, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

@KirtZJ: I wish to discuss the validity, if it's good or bad, to write a summary between 400 and 700 words on Cross Ange. I think it varies by the case, but 1200 words is too long to read. At least in the case of "List of School Rumble episodes", a length between 100 and 700 words is approved. I think that the length of the summary of episode 16 is also the most appropriate for Cross Ange.--Infinite0694 (talk) 09:37, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

Based on the history of the School Rumble episodes page, I wouldn't say they were intrinsically "approved". If we are comparing summary lengths you should look at The Flash (2014 TV series). See the summaries of a show that is twice the length of one anime episode? A good summary is meant to be a brief overview of something. It is in no way intended to go into any particular detail. No matter how much plot is packed into a 22 minute anime episode, they should at least 250 words at a minimum. This is not a rule. Merely a guideline which will allow a casual reader some breathing room. With that being said, I'll have to stand by the reduction of episodes 16+. 250 words is a huge amount when you actually look at it. —KirtZ^Message 10:13, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

@KirtZJ: I got it. I sincerely accept your opinion. But just because of that, do you you want me to re-do the whole thing? I don't think it's necessary to forcibly rewrite it as of this moment, but I'll certainly be more careful when I write next time. The reality is that the summary is between 200 and 400 words, like the "List of Shirobako episodes". It is now too late to make a reduction to the length of these summaries. I wish you'd told me a little bit sooner... Thanks.--Infinite0694 (talk) 15:14, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

It is never too late. I assure you, if I was watching Cross Ange and writing these summaries, they would not be anywhere near 1200 words in length. How do you think the first 15 or so episodes managed to be of reasonable length?--十八 22:21, 5 March 2015 (UTC)

@Juhachi: Hi, Juhachi! "1200 words" is in the past. When compared with the contents of episodes 1 through 15, I feel that the complexity of the plot in recent episodes has doubled in volume. Thus, I feel that a summary between 200 and 300 words is not sufficient to convey to the reader what is happening during these episodes. Thanks.--Infinite0694 (talk) 14:53, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Keep watching the Yuudachi article, I'll watch some of the other ones with popular kanmusu equivalents

International Mathematics Union

Not gibberish

@WikiDan61: Thank you for letting me know. For your information, my browsers are the following: chrome, IE and Lunascape (turn into garbled characters).--Infinite0694 (talk) 21:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, you'd have to go through some work to get the Burmese character set support on any browser you'd normally use in English. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Deletion of Marc Schiller

@Optiontrader11: I put a tag on your article to request a speedy deletion.--Infinite0694 (talk) 18:48, 7 April 2015 (UTC)

Grizzly tobacco edit

Rollback

• Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
• Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
• Rollback should never be used to edit war.
• If abused, rollback rights can be revoked.
• Use common sense.

recent sockpuppetry

Thank you very much for your edits[3] in my place. I appreciate your time.--Infinite0694 (talk) 11:31, 20 April 2015 (UTC)

The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For your work dealing with the massive troll raid on Sierra Vista High School (Spring Valley, Nevada) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 07:40, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

SPI discussion

@Sjones23: Hi, Sjones23. I would appreciate your cooperation. By the way, I think that we need to integrate the contents of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HoEuhophonium with Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dragonron because all the suspected sockpuppets have been blocked due to highly similar behavior on the exact same articles.--Infinite0694 (talk) 12:19, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Removal undone

@Addshore:Thank you for pointing that out. It seems that I was mistaken about it.--Infinite0694 (talk) 13:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

No worries :) ·addshore· ^{talk to me!} 13:07, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

ANI discusion about Sonam K Sonam

Sonam's blocked. --Ronz (talk) 22:52, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Sorry that I ended up replying late and that I could not meet your expectations. Anyway, it was so awesome of you. --Infinite0694 (Talk) 05:11, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

No problem whatsoever. I was only expecting that someone would look over the situation and block the editor. Glad to have you looking over such articles. --Ronz (talk) 15:24, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

SPI

• @Checkingfax: I've been a user since the early days. I'm not sure why you'd even think I was a sock. Titanium Dragon (talk) 23:22, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Request your feedback at a GA Review

@Cirt and Juhachi: I left a comment on Talk:Charlotte (anime)/GA1--Infinite0694 (Talk) 05:44, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Thanks very much! — Cirt (talk) 05:45, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Personal tools

• Not logged in
• Talk
• Contributions
• Create account
• Log in

Navigation

Interaction

Tools

Print/export

Languages