あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]xcsler [スコア非表示]  (7子コメント)

Democracy is basically one group of people trying to force their way of thinking upon others. It doesn't seem inherently civil or just when you think about it for more than a second. This shortcoming has become more apparent recently and is reflected in the polarization of political groups in countries dealing with financial crises. An alternative system such as Anarcho-capitalism where private property rights, the non-aggression principle and tolerance are upheld is likely a more just system and one that will lead to greater global prosperity.

[–]reifenstag [スコア非表示]  (6子コメント)

can you explain some more?

[–]Mr_Evil_MSc [スコア非表示]  (1子コメント)

No, he can't because none of that actually works. In a true anarchy-capitalist society, the people with the most money will crush the fuck out of you, because why not? What's to stop them? The delusion is that the proponents of anarchy-capitalism will have the most money; the big lie is that they're secretly fantasizing about crushing the fuck out of you.

[–]xcsler [スコア非表示]  (2子コメント)

Anarchy in the Anarcho-capitalist sense means 'without rulers' not 'without rules' as many would have you believe such as u/Mr_Evil_MSc.

An Anarcho-capitalist framework allows for the peaceful co-existence of whatever type of society you wish to live in; it simply does not allow one group of people to impose and force their views of how society should run on another group. Essentially, you can have communities of Communists, Socialists, and Libertarians all co-existing and living as they choose.

Private property rights and disputes in an AnCap society are handled via competing private free market based firms such as defense and legal firms. There is no monopoly power over security or law like we have today with governments assuming that role over a given geographic territory. This monopoly power of governments has enabled them to violate individual rights and commit atrocities such as countless genocides.

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]xcsler [スコア非表示]  (0子コメント)

    Lol all you want, it's not so funny...http://www.wsj.com/articles/book-review-the-killing-compartments-by-abram-de-swann-1420841846

    In nearly every case he reviews, he finds a prior period of social indoctrination in which the state that instigated the murders—and it is almost always a state—presents itself as the aggrieved victim of historical injustice. That is followed by a growing demarcation of the target population socially, legally and physically. Then, in the immediate run-up to the massacres, propaganda campaigns relentlessly paint the victims as the real aggressors, threats to the very existence of the state and its people, an alien “other.”