jump to content
my subreddits
more »
Want to join? Log in or sign up in seconds.|
[-]
use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
subreddit:subreddit
find submissions in "subreddit"
author:username
find submissions by "username"
site:example.com
find submissions from "example.com"
url:text
search for "text" in url
selftext:text
search for "text" in self post contents
self:yes (or self:no)
include (or exclude) self posts
nsfw:yes (or nsfw:no)
include (or exclude) results marked as NSFW
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
this post was submitted on Submitted on
54 points (94% upvoted)
shortlink:
reset password

welcome tor/european

subscribe to this subredditunsubscribe from this subreddit13,557 EUROPEAN readerssubscribers
169 EUROPEANS users here nowonline
created by [deleted]a community for
You are not a subscribed member of this community. Please respect that by not downvoting.
53
54
55
submitted by FranzoseMitRoseWorking in Germany, enjoying the worst of both countries
loading...
all 52 comments
[–]GiraffeHigh 14 points15 points16 points  (1 child)
It's the elephant in the room no one ever talks about. The more women in politics, journalism, and academia there are, the worse it gets. Too much idealism and fantasy, not enough reality and honesty.
[–]poobearbrekkyIndividual 4 points5 points6 points  (0 children)
This!
[–]neutrolgreekGreece (Hellas) 38 points39 points40 points  (19 children)
There is a reason why Ancient athenians did not allow females to vote. They knew that the charity and natural kindness of females would lead society to hell.
[–][deleted]  (1 child)deleted/removed
[removed]
    [–]AutoModeratorReindeer raper[M] 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
    Your comment has been automatically removed because you either used a redd.it shortlink, or you linked to a thread outside /r/european without using the .np subdomain for no-participation mode.
    Please use full-length URLs only, and repost using http://archive.is.
    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
    [–]Squidwards_Nose22United States of America 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
    Exactly. There's a reason they make good caregivers and not good soldiers.
    [–]ukhoneybee comment score below threshold-8 points-7 points-6 points  (14 children)
    Perhaps if you weren't such complete assholes to women they'd be more inclined to side with you.
    [–]BladeStrikesVlad the Impaler - best Romanian diplomat 36 points37 points38 points  (6 children)
    You got to be joking me? So women don't side with they own men because they are "assholes", instead picking actual fucking invaders who will rape them?
    Sounds to me like the ancients where right, women are absurd.
    [–]ukhoneybee 2 points3 points4 points  (5 children)
    No, because most peoples party choice isn't a one issue matter. Nationalists are notorious assholes on many issues once you get away from migration. As you have proved. This poll was about party support.
    The last poll of women in Germany showed they were really anti migration. More so than the men.
    So in this case the males of Germany are failing to spot the danger.
    [–]Lv100_BixNoodGroßdeutsches Reich 21 points22 points23 points  (4 children)
    I usually like your posts, but this doesn't make much sense. In a time when German women are being hunted like meat on the streets of German cities, this should be their #1 concern when voting, by far.
    [–]ginx2666 1 point2 points3 points  (3 children)
    I imagine pro-Merkele women are the ugly ones (so, like 80% of German women - seriously, their mugs are just savage) that hope for rapefugees to give them some action.
    Too bad muslims don't touch pork.
    [–]Urban_VikingAustralia 5 points6 points7 points  (2 children)
    Muslims will rape anything with two legs.
    [–]fascistphoenixVatican 4 points5 points6 points  (0 children)
    Four legs too
    [–]767676769Remove Kebab 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    Of course they will. Muslims are hairy, brown, dirty and the only thing they got to fuck were their cousins. They get frustrated after a while (no reasonable woman would sleep with these monkeys) and start to hunt women.
    [–]vakerr 12 points13 points14 points  (4 children)
    Then go to the arabs if you like them better. You deserve it.
    [–]IchbinrealpolitikThe Legacy of Bismarck Lives On 15 points16 points17 points  (0 children)
    My sympathy for women who are raped but also happen to support immigration is exactly zero.
    I fucking mean it.
    [–]bh35 -3 points-2 points-1 points  (2 children)
    You're proving him right. The "you're either with us or against us" mentality is only harming the right. I fear that the support may reach it's peak at 30-40% leaving the refugees welcome crowd in power unless the right embraces or at least stops hating some of the modern policies like atheism and egalitarianism.
    [–]ginx2666 3 points4 points5 points  (0 children)
    “
    The "you're either with us or against us" mentality is only harming the right.
    Why should vakerr waste his time and effort trying to convince a clearly lost case? Conserve your effort and help people that can think logically, understand the situation, but are wavering.
    [–]heatdeath 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    Matthew 12:30
    [–]polakfury 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    Well well are we the ones doing the mass raping/ sexual assaults in Europe again? Whos truly the assholes right now? We are trying to reverse this trend thankyou very much.
    [–]TheLazyLinxFuck Carol II 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
    And there comes the proof that women are not rational or logical at least with who they vote.
    Still I don't think removing suffrage will get the right anywhere. Landed vote is our best and really only choice.
    [–]smulilol 14 points15 points16 points  (2 children)
    The number 1 voters against mass immigration should be the very people who benefit least on mass immigration, and who are those?
    1. Women - they are the victims of raping and harassment, their rights are targeted because of sharia.
    2. Immigrants and foreigners who have integrated to western society. They have something to lose; job, family, reputation. Because of mass immigration they will also be seen as subhumans, whether it is fair or not.
    3. Elderly people - They are easily targeted by foreigners who steal or scam them.
    It is absolutely crazy to think that these three groups are actually least likely to vote against immigration when they get DIRECT benefits from reduced immigration
    [–]DivideEtImpera8SPQR 6 points7 points8 points  (1 child)
    1. Women... well, it's a long debate.
    2. The vast majority of immigrants do not integrate to Western society. They see other immigrants as their brothers, not us. In fact. 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants become even more extremist than the ones who came first.
    3. Most elderly people I know are against immigration and are quite conservative.
    [–]CuntM8 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    Do you have a statistic for vast majority of IMMIGRANTS? I think you're interchanging immigrants with Arab and African Muslims, because I've seen nearly a hundred sources with proof they do not, but none for immigrants in general. What other immigrant group becomes "extremists?"
    [–]FranzoseMitRoseWorking in Germany, enjoying the worst of both countries[S] 8 points9 points10 points  (7 children)
    If election would have been this sunday, this would have been the result. Red are women voters, blue are male voters.
    CDU/CSU is the anti-german Merkel party, SPD is the current anti-german coalition partner of the Merkel party, followed by leftists and greens.
    I am sure you can spot the anti-immigration party by yourself, its the AfD which is heavily favored by men, unlike most of the other parties.
    I recently read an article about why Hillary is going to be the next US president. Its not because she is smart, has a plan for the future, has been reliable in her voting patterns, stands for something, no. None of that. Hillary is going to be president because she can secure female voters. Women vote other women for no other reason than their gender.
    When I read that I shrugged it off, I found it very condescending, women cant be seriously considered this stupid. But now it seems to make sense. Women seem to be that stupid.
    Doesnt matter that it was a women that unleashed the muslim rape hordes, doesnt matter that it is a women that destroys the country, she gets the vote because of her gender.
    I have problems figuring out why women would vote for her ever again. Do they not care? Do they not realize?
    [–]Lv100_BixNoodGroßdeutsches Reich 9 points10 points11 points  (3 children)
    It's not that they like Merkel, it's that they absolutely dread being seen as "racist". Many women have low self-esteem and care a lot about what other people think of them. They can't handle social isolation, so they won't admit voting for a party like AfD.
    [–]fuck_da_haes 1 point2 points3 points  (2 children)
    They don't have to, its still your constitutional right to vote for whoever you want without anybody knowing, right? I don't go around trumpeting (like this pun) who I'm voting for because I know that I would become pariah in some circles.
    [–]Lv100_BixNoodGroßdeutsches Reich 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    Yeah, but at least the interviewer would know and that's enough reason for them to lie on a survey like this.
    [–]calvinironfist 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
    Fear of social ostracization can be stronger than the comfort of your constitutional freedom to vote however you choose. And some people can't help but blab
    [–]ukhoneybee 7 points8 points9 points  (0 children)
    Women are probably voting for social benefits, not pro immigration.
    [–]_frog_masteryUnited States of America 2 points3 points4 points  (1 child)
    Hillary is doing pretty terribly with women considering that should be her advantage.
    “
    Men prefer Trump over Clinton by a 41% to 31% margin, while women prefer Clinton by a similar 42% to 31% margin.
    [–]poobearbrekkyIndividual 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
    Women recognise a congenital liar when they see one. It takes one to know one.
    [–]stunningandbrave 5 points6 points7 points  (6 children)
    CDU is conservative.
    You'd think conservatives would NOT want so many refugees in.
    The SPD (liberals) were also FOR refugees, but being the hypocritical cunts that they are, are now AGAINST refugees, in the hopes of winning votes.
    So you see, Germany is fucked.
    AfD is the only answer.
    Hopefully women wake up to reality quickly.
    EDIT: and if they don't, fuck it. They can wear Burkas and live with Ahmed.
    [–]FranzoseMitRoseWorking in Germany, enjoying the worst of both countries[S] 10 points11 points12 points  (1 child)
    “
    CDU is conservative
    People really have to stop calling them conservative. Call them what they are, globalist, neoliberal, anti-german. They do not conserve anything. No values, no morals, nothing. This is globalist scum that has no problem doing whatever it is the green party wants or what die hard leftists want.
    It was the Merkel party that invited these people and wants us to embrace our suicide. It is the Merkel party that does not put an end to this. These are by definition NOT conservative.
    AfD is conservative. No gender mainstreaming, no immigration, etc.
    [–]stunningandbrave 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
    Yes, they should be conservative. But aren't. AfD is the only viable right wing party.
    [–]muskrats_fatSámi 1 point2 points3 points  (2 children)
    “
    CDU is conservative.
    You'd think conservatives would NOT want so many refugees in.
     
    You wouldn't think that if you had actually paid any attention to history and noted that useless "conservatives" have caved in to the "progressive" leftists for the past oh I don't know, 100 years or so. On every single issue. The cons haven't won a single battle, because they've retreated from all of them. We don't need useless conservatives, because conservatives are christians, and christianity breeds men with exceptionally weak characters. We need a revolutonary, nationalist organization.
    [–]stunningandbrave 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
    Hence cuckservatives?
    [–]muskrats_fatSámi 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    Well, yes, but every conservative is a cuckservative.
    [–]UFeindschiffI want a Prussia flag 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    You have obviously no idea.
    CDU is social democrat, SOD is social democrat, just even more fucked up, FDP is liberal, AfD is conservative
    [–]YouHaveCrusAIDSWales 12 points13 points14 points  (5 children)
    Violence is naturally the males role in all animals.
    Women don't understand men.
    Women don't understand violence.
    Women don't understand that these men they are inviting in with dripping pussies are not like the men they grew up with.
    Women don't understand those men will enact violence upon them. But us men do know this.
    [–]manbearbatman 2 points3 points4 points  (4 children)
    “
    Violence is naturally the males role in all animals.
    No it's not...
    [–]YouHaveCrusAIDSWales 0 points1 point2 points  (3 children)
    Really?
    Why do you think we have stronger bones?
    More muscles? More efficient muscles?
    More testosterone? More aggression? Competition?
    Better visual spacial skills?

    Don't be stupid. You look at a lion pride. Male lions, big, hot... lazy... laying around all day doing nothing. BUT. When hyenas turn up, the male lion gets up and rips the fucking shit out of them to protect his pride. THAT is the male role. THAT behaviour is why men have formed all the armies through history. THAT is why men choose to become soldiers and policemen. THAT is why women carry children and not men.
    It's NATURE and mother nature don't give a single shit.
    [–]manbearbatman 0 points1 point2 points  (2 children)
    It has nothing to do with PC. You claim violence is naturally the male's role in ALL animals but in many animals it's the opposite. Some examples include insects, spiders, many kinds of predatory birds, most frogs, and many kinds of fish.
    Males are mostly stronger and more aggressive in mammalian species but you were claiming that ALL animals were this way.
    I'm sorry my knowledge triggered you.
    [–]YouHaveCrusAIDSWales -1 points0 points1 point  (1 child)
    Being a pedantic little shit and being really anal about what a fucking animal is, is a BITCH move and a SJW thing to do.
    Everyone here knew exactly what I was talking about and just because SOME animals don't conform to that standard doesn't mean we dont and i'm not gonna take the time to add extra shit to my comment just to point that out.
    We scientifically conform to that normal standard on all levels, mental and physical.
    And i'll say it again, females don't have the potential for violence that males do, they don't even understand it. And that lack of understanding manifests itself in voting constantly.
    It's really important and our better ancestors who founded the ideals of democracy KNEW this same shit.
    [–]manbearbatman 2 points3 points4 points  (0 children)
    Getting triggered and posting hysterically emotional responses is what SJWs do man.
    That's exactly what you're doing.
    [–]BladeStrikesVlad the Impaler - best Romanian diplomat 2 points3 points4 points  (3 children)
    Are these the actual votes or did they just ask random people who they vote for? I would not trust it in that case.
    [–]bh35 2 points3 points4 points  (2 children)
    “
    actual votes or did they just ask random people
    Unless there's no secret ballot (and I think every modern country has it as one of main principles), it would be impossible to get gender-specific results from actual votes. It will always boil down to asking people.
    [–]BladeStrikesVlad the Impaler - best Romanian diplomat 1 point2 points3 points  (1 child)
    “
    It will always boil down to asking people.
    If this is the case, this information isn't worth shit. Most women would never admit voting for the "racists".
    [–]UFeindschiffI want a Prussia flag 0 points1 point2 points  (0 children)
    no it's not shit. Its the same way the precast is found out on elkection day, people just stand there and ask the voters what they voted for, nothing more, nothing less.And that is usually quite accurate
    [–]ShekelBankerRUBBER DINGHY RAPIDS M8 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    Giving women the vote will prove to be the thing that ends us all
    [–]muskrats_fatSámi 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    Women should not be voting. I don't care if that's "anti-woman". It's the truth.
    [–]seraph85 1 point2 points3 points  (0 children)
    It could just be a coincidence but you can look at the implementation of woman's suffrage in several civilizations and see that soon after they are wiped out or at least fall from power.
    Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy (updated). © 2016 reddit inc. All rights reserved.
    REDDIT and the ALIEN Logo are registered trademarks of reddit inc.
    π Rendered by PID 19261 on app-583 at 2016-01-25 05:31:19.917388+00:00 running 0740420 .
    Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies.  Learn More
    0%
     
    10%
     
    20%
     
    30%
     
    40%
     
    50%
     
    60%
     
    70%
     
    80%
     
    90%
     
    100%