54
55

Women might be ... the problem? (pbs.twimg.com)

FranzoseMitRoseWorking in Germany, enjoying the worst of both countries が 投稿

全 52 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]GiraffeHigh 14ポイント15ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's the elephant in the room no one ever talks about. The more women in politics, journalism, and academia there are, the worse it gets. Too much idealism and fantasy, not enough reality and honesty.

[–]neutrolgreekGreece (Hellas) 36ポイント37ポイント  (19子コメント)

There is a reason why Ancient athenians did not allow females to vote. They knew that the charity and natural kindness of females would lead society to hell.

[–]vakerr 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

relevant

[–][削除されました]  (1子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]AutoModeratorReindeer raper[M] 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Your comment has been automatically removed because you either used a redd.it shortlink, or you linked to a thread outside /r/european without using the .np subdomain for no-participation mode.

    Please use full-length URLs only, and repost using http://archive.is.

    I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

    [–]Squidwards_Nose22United States of America 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Exactly. There's a reason they make good caregivers and not good soldiers.

    [–]smulilol 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

    The number 1 voters against mass immigration should be the very people who benefit least on mass immigration, and who are those?

    1. Women - they are the victims of raping and harassment, their rights are targeted because of sharia.

    2. Immigrants and foreigners who have integrated to western society. They have something to lose; job, family, reputation. Because of mass immigration they will also be seen as subhumans, whether it is fair or not.

    3. Elderly people - They are easily targeted by foreigners who steal or scam them.

    It is absolutely crazy to think that these three groups are actually least likely to vote against immigration when they get DIRECT benefits from reduced immigration

    [–]DivideEtImpera8SPQR 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

    1. Women... well, it's a long debate.

    2. The vast majority of immigrants do not integrate to Western society. They see other immigrants as their brothers, not us. In fact. 2nd and 3rd generation immigrants become even more extremist than the ones who came first.

    3. Most elderly people I know are against immigration and are quite conservative.

    [–]CuntM8 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Do you have a statistic for vast majority of IMMIGRANTS? I think you're interchanging immigrants with Arab and African Muslims, because I've seen nearly a hundred sources with proof they do not, but none for immigrants in general. What other immigrant group becomes "extremists?"

    [–]FranzoseMitRoseWorking in Germany, enjoying the worst of both countries[S] 7ポイント8ポイント  (7子コメント)

    If election would have been this sunday, this would have been the result. Red are women voters, blue are male voters.

    CDU/CSU is the anti-german Merkel party, SPD is the current anti-german coalition partner of the Merkel party, followed by leftists and greens.

    I am sure you can spot the anti-immigration party by yourself, its the AfD which is heavily favored by men, unlike most of the other parties.

    I recently read an article about why Hillary is going to be the next US president. Its not because she is smart, has a plan for the future, has been reliable in her voting patterns, stands for something, no. None of that. Hillary is going to be president because she can secure female voters. Women vote other women for no other reason than their gender.

    When I read that I shrugged it off, I found it very condescending, women cant be seriously considered this stupid. But now it seems to make sense. Women seem to be that stupid.

    Doesnt matter that it was a women that unleashed the muslim rape hordes, doesnt matter that it is a women that destroys the country, she gets the vote because of her gender.

    I have problems figuring out why women would vote for her ever again. Do they not care? Do they not realize?

    [–]Lv100_BixNoodGroßdeutsches Reich 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

    It's not that they like Merkel, it's that they absolutely dread being seen as "racist". Many women have low self-esteem and care a lot about what other people think of them. They can't handle social isolation, so they won't admit voting for a party like AfD.

    [–]fuck_da_haes 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    They don't have to, its still your constitutional right to vote for whoever you want without anybody knowing, right? I don't go around trumpeting (like this pun) who I'm voting for because I know that I would become pariah in some circles.

    [–]Lv100_BixNoodGroßdeutsches Reich 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yeah, but at least the interviewer would know and that's enough reason for them to lie on a survey like this.

    [–]calvinironfist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Fear of social ostracization can be stronger than the comfort of your constitutional freedom to vote however you choose. And some people can't help but blab

    [–]ukhoneybee 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Women are probably voting for social benefits, not pro immigration.

    [–]_frog_masteryUnited States of America 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Hillary is doing pretty terribly with women considering that should be her advantage.

    Men prefer Trump over Clinton by a 41% to 31% margin, while women prefer Clinton by a similar 42% to 31% margin.

    http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2016/clinton_vs_trump_still_a_dead_heat

    [–]poobearbrekkyIndividual 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Women recognise a congenital liar when they see one. It takes one to know one.

    [–]stunningandbrave 8ポイント9ポイント  (6子コメント)

    CDU is conservative.

    You'd think conservatives would NOT want so many refugees in.

    The SPD (liberals) were also FOR refugees, but being the hypocritical cunts that they are, are now AGAINST refugees, in the hopes of winning votes.

    So you see, Germany is fucked.

    AfD is the only answer.

    Hopefully women wake up to reality quickly.

    EDIT: and if they don't, fuck it. They can wear Burkas and live with Ahmed.

    [–]FranzoseMitRoseWorking in Germany, enjoying the worst of both countries[S] 10ポイント11ポイント  (1子コメント)

    CDU is conservative

    People really have to stop calling them conservative. Call them what they are, globalist, neoliberal, anti-german. They do not conserve anything. No values, no morals, nothing. This is globalist scum that has no problem doing whatever it is the green party wants or what die hard leftists want.

    It was the Merkel party that invited these people and wants us to embrace our suicide. It is the Merkel party that does not put an end to this. These are by definition NOT conservative.

    AfD is conservative. No gender mainstreaming, no immigration, etc.

    [–]stunningandbrave 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yes, they should be conservative. But aren't. AfD is the only viable right wing party.

    [–]muskrats_fatSámi 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    CDU is conservative.

    You'd think conservatives would NOT want so many refugees in.

     
    You wouldn't think that if you had actually paid any attention to history and noted that useless "conservatives" have caved in to the "progressive" leftists for the past oh I don't know, 100 years or so. On every single issue. The cons haven't won a single battle, because they've retreated from all of them. We don't need useless conservatives, because conservatives are christians, and christianity breeds men with exceptionally weak characters. We need a revolutonary, nationalist organization.

    [–]stunningandbrave 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Hence cuckservatives?

    [–]muskrats_fatSámi 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Well, yes, but every conservative is a cuckservative.

    [–]UFeindschiffI want a Prussia flag 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You have obviously no idea.

    CDU is social democrat, SOD is social democrat, just even more fucked up, FDP is liberal, AfD is conservative

    [–]YouHaveCrusAIDSWales 13ポイント14ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Violence is naturally the males role in all animals.

    Women don't understand men.

    Women don't understand violence.

    Women don't understand that these men they are inviting in with dripping pussies are not like the men they grew up with.

    Women don't understand those men will enact violence upon them. But us men do know this.

    [–]manbearbatman 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Violence is naturally the males role in all animals.

    No it's not...

    [–]YouHaveCrusAIDSWales 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Really?

    Why do you think we have stronger bones?

    More muscles? More efficient muscles?

    More testosterone? More aggression? Competition?

    Better visual spacial skills?

    Don't be stupid. You look at a lion pride. Male lions, big, hot... lazy... laying around all day doing nothing. BUT. When hyenas turn up, the male lion gets up and rips the fucking shit out of them to protect his pride. THAT is the male role. THAT behaviour is why men have formed all the armies through history. THAT is why men choose to become soldiers and policemen. THAT is why women carry children and not men.

    It's NATURE and mother nature don't give a single shit.

    [–]manbearbatman 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    It has nothing to do with PC. You claim violence is naturally the male's role in ALL animals but in many animals it's the opposite. Some examples include insects, spiders, many kinds of predatory birds, most frogs, and many kinds of fish.

    Males are mostly stronger and more aggressive in mammalian species but you were claiming that ALL animals were this way.

    I'm sorry my knowledge triggered you.

    [–]YouHaveCrusAIDSWales -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Being a pedantic little shit and being really anal about what a fucking animal is, is a BITCH move and a SJW thing to do.

    Everyone here knew exactly what I was talking about and just because SOME animals don't conform to that standard doesn't mean we dont and i'm not gonna take the time to add extra shit to my comment just to point that out.

    We scientifically conform to that normal standard on all levels, mental and physical.

    And i'll say it again, females don't have the potential for violence that males do, they don't even understand it. And that lack of understanding manifests itself in voting constantly.

    It's really important and our better ancestors who founded the ideals of democracy KNEW this same shit.

    [–]manbearbatman 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Getting triggered and posting hysterically emotional responses is what SJWs do man.

    That's exactly what you're doing.

    [–]BladeStrikesVlad the Impaler - best Romanian diplomat 2ポイント3ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Are these the actual votes or did they just ask random people who they vote for? I would not trust it in that case.

    [–]bh35 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

    actual votes or did they just ask random people

    Unless there's no secret ballot (and I think every modern country has it as one of main principles), it would be impossible to get gender-specific results from actual votes. It will always boil down to asking people.

    [–]BladeStrikesVlad the Impaler - best Romanian diplomat 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

    It will always boil down to asking people.

    If this is the case, this information isn't worth shit. Most women would never admit voting for the "racists".

    [–]UFeindschiffI want a Prussia flag 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    no it's not shit. Its the same way the precast is found out on elkection day, people just stand there and ask the voters what they voted for, nothing more, nothing less.And that is usually quite accurate

    [–]ShekelBankerRUBBER DINGHY RAPIDS M8 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Giving women the vote will prove to be the thing that ends us all

    [–]muskrats_fatSámi 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Women should not be voting. I don't care if that's "anti-woman". It's the truth.

    [–]seraph85 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It could just be a coincidence but you can look at the implementation of woman's suffrage in several civilizations and see that soon after they are wiped out or at least fall from power.