2
3

ELI5: Obama's new gun plan (self.explainlikeimfive)

Xyklon-B が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]keystroker007 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's wrong and an outright lie. I do not trust the media on anything. Every firearm purchased (via gun trust) at a gun shop has to go through an FFL..there is no way around it. Private sales to individuals regarding long guns can be sold without a background check and I have no problem getting that changed. I do know that there have been numerous private sales of long guns that did end up coming in to a gun shop to do the right thing and had the firearm transferred over to the gun shop-conduct a background check on the buyer...then transfer the firearm over to the buyer after it clears. It is also not true that a person can purchase a firearm over the internet without a background check. The firearm has to be transferred to an FFL who then conducts the background check on the buyer.

[–]Opheltes 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Here is the actual ATF order. Here is the first sentence of the executive summary:

The current regulations at 27 CFR 479.63 and 479.85, which require fingerprints, photographs, and a law enforcement certification for individual applicants to make or transfer National Firearms Act (NFA) firearms, do not apply to trusts or legal entities.

The first sentence of the second paragraph of that section:

The goal of this final rule is to ensure that the identification and background check requirements apply equally to individuals, trusts, and legal entities.

So thanks for your opinion, but I'll take what the ATF and media say other some random joe on the internet who thinks he knows better than them.

[–]_corwin 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

27 CFR 479.63 and 479.85

While those particular CFRs may not require the background check, the GCA does. Any "hole" in the regs was "plugged" by the GCA.

This is admittedly a bit confusing, which is why the ATF had to clarify it in the letter in 2014 that I linked to in another comment.