27
28

Why are the NRx here? (self.Anarcho_Capitalism)

LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap が 投稿

If you are not voluntary, if you advocate a state, why are you here?

全 175 件のコメント
並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A

[–]MaunaLoonaAnarcho-Librarian 41ポイント42ポイント  (42子コメント)

They're here to recruit ancaps and to infiltrate the movement.

[–]Vagabond21 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

They're immigrants to this sub.

[–]zoink 35ポイント36ポイント  (9子コメント)

In my opinion it is because they are trying to recruit and this is one of the larger communities online other than places like stormfront that won't ban them.

Many will say they used to be ancaps. I won't pull a no true Scotsman but the majority of those I encountered when they held the ancap moniker seemed to look to anarcho-capitalism because it gave them some philosophical heft to legitimize excluding predominantly non-whites. If it came down to anarcho-capitalism or keeping out the undesirables they'd choose the state. When nrx/alt-right came along expressly addressing those fears they jumped ship.

[–]Th3JourneyManEncrypt 25ポイント26ポイント  (0子コメント)

If it came down to anarcho-capitalism or keeping out the undesirables they'd choose the state.

This is so true. These guys don't really believe in rights, especially property rights. I've had several conversations where they refuse to acknowledge the legitimacy of homesteading as the best way to establish original ownership of resources in order to find a way to protect themselves from the migration of Muslims into Europe. They, of course, completely overlook the West's role in turning the Middle East, Libya, and the Balkans into war torn hellholes along with the incentive of the massive welfare state present in Europe. Instead, they insist that such a migration would obviously take place, since it's happening right now under circumstances that would be practically impossible to replicate in an AnCap city/nation.

[–]E7ernalDecline to State 12ポイント13ポイント  (1子コメント)

Nailed it.

[–]AbnormallyAverageGuyAnarcho-Capitalist 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah, the both of you really hit the nail on the head. If I do make a sub or find another good one, I think you guys would be great to have there.

[–]LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

thx for info, will sneak it up them.

[–]CapitalJusticeWariorI discriminate against statists. -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I won't pull a no true Scotsman

A no true scotsman fallacy is when you respond to a criticism of a dubious universal assertion (like "AnCaps are the most badass motherfuckers around") with ad hoc rhetoric to exclude that specific criticism ("but chris cantwell isn't a true ancap" [jk love ya Chris]).

Nothing of what you said was a fallacy.

[–]juslenbanned from /r/darkenlightenment -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

I was an ancap for nearly 6 years. I distanced myself because I don't believe you can have an ancap world with undesireables.

[–]CapitalJusticeWariorI discriminate against statists. -1ポイント0ポイント  (2子コメント)

I don't believe you can have an ancap world with undesireables.

And the answer is simple, kill anyone who violates the NAP. This is entirely consistent with Anarcho-Capitalism.

What were you going to do? - kill anyone who didn't want to build your wall?

[–]cantletthatstand -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

The argument goes, though, that a fully stateless Libertarian society will never exist if people can convince other people to wield sufficient force on their behalf, "initiating" a state, essentially. The NRx position is that race and culture are strong predictors for the "types of people" that don't strongly elevate individual liberty, etc.

I don't know that they're wrong on that, truthfully. I used to think people were all libertarians at heart, and to some extent I still do... but people are also collectivist as fuck.

[–]CapitalJusticeWariorI discriminate against statists. 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

The argument goes, though, that a fully stateless Libertarian society will never exist if people can convince other people to wield sufficient force on their behalf, "initiating" a state

Yea, and we'll just kill these people. We're going to get to the heart of the issue, not beat around the bush by telling people they have to fuck missionary style only and shit like that.

[–]dootyforyouanarcho-pragmatist 8ポイント9ポイント  (22子コメント)

They seem to be here a lot less often now, I think they got bored.

[–]zoink 9ポイント10ポイント  (12子コメント)

I think it's too early to really make a call but I've noticed a similar trend.

I'm not saying it was brigading but I do think they kept tabs on each other. Even though it probably shouldn't karma can affect a person. It can get depressing getting downvoted while your interlocutors get upvoted. I think they are a minority that was able to alter the narrative through sheer force of will, they lose just a few guys and momentum wanes.

/u/darchdolla hasn't been active for some time and deleted his account.

SerialMessiah has slowed down.

Cialis_In_Wonderland appears to be having personal problems.

I haven't seen a quality post out of of_ice_and_rock in a long time.

Even though CabMinerJunket was getting upvotes apparently it wasn't enough to support his ego.

SnakesoverEagles is having trouble staying coherent

[–]Eagle--Anarcho-Rastafarian http://is.gd/vi9DzL -1ポイント0ポイント  (9子コメント)

Cialis_In_Wonderland

What makes you say this?

[–]zoink 2ポイント3ポイント  (8子コメント)

From yesterday

The company is folding up, so I've been burned out for the past few months. According to a therapist, my retreat into vicarious entertainment may have been somewhat of a response to these professional problems. Hopefully something good comes in the next few weeks.

But yeah, we have a factory in China. Staff are down by 2/3, and we barely have the money to pay bills.

[–]apothecary1796Don't tread on me! 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

Ouch, for a guy who loves to talk about cucks, its a bit ironic that he's seeing a therapist lol.

[–]zoink 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

I'm not going to hit a guy when he's down. I hope things works out for him.

[–]LokgarBastiat 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Agreed. I don't agree with A lot of the NRx position, but they spiced things up and a person losing their livelihoods is always a tragedy. I hope it works out for whitey.

-A loving brown man.

[–]cantletthatstand 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're a solid human being.

[–]rottenx51Technology brings freedom - luciddrealm.blogspot.com 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

You're great.

[–]Cialis_In_WonderlandSomebody's doing the schlonging 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

for a guy who loves to talk about cucks

http://www.redditcommentsearch.com/

0 results for "cuck", "cuckservative," and "cuckold." Who were you mistaking me with?

a bit ironic

Does visiting a gym mean someone is weak? How is anything "ironic" about my personal life? You guys didn't "get me;" I volunteered that information of my own volition. The cringeworthy thing is how you interpret it. Merry Christmas.

FYI, I was having a screening for ADD so I can get a script, which I probably won't receive. I'm going back for at least a few more sessions because I find value in it. Yes, I'm in a funk, but I've been interviewing for lucrative positions. Hopefully, something good comes up in the next few weeks.

[–]apothecary1796Don't tread on me! 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, you're right, I was definitely mixing you up with u/oficeandrock, my apologies. While I've found you to more cordial to converse with typically I still tend to disagree with most NRx philosophy. And hey dont mind my snide comments about seeing a therapist, I'm just an anonymous asshole on the internet who doesn't know shit about your life. Merry fucking christmas!

[–]HhturaStalinist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

0 results for "cuck",

That site must not work properly, then.

[–]dootyforyouanarcho-pragmatist -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

The only two of the people you mention that I have an extremely negative opinion of are darchdolla and snakes; and to a lesser extent cabminer based on his most recent post.

[–]dootyforyouanarcho-pragmatist -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't recall who serial messiah is though

[–]LowReadyAttending Praxicologist 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

I assume their tactic was essentially to flood the forum with non sequitur correlative data and shame anyone who disagreed (precisely how anti-capitalists operate) and it didn't go so well so they've moved onto other forums. I don't think they keep it a secret that they communicate outside of reddit and have some sort of strategy

[–]E7ernalDecline to State 3ポイント4ポイント  (3子コメント)

I think the parasites understood they were killing the host and backed off.

[–]PendaOfMerciaA = Gay 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

OY VEY THE IRONY. SHUT IT DOWN.

[–]LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Say, do you come from anarcho-leftists?

[–]dootyforyouanarcho-pragmatist -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

No. Why do you ask?

[–]LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap[S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because they are.

[–]vibes420 12ポイント13ポイント  (16子コメント)

Seeing the overwhelming rejection for NRx in this thread is refreshing. For a moment there their influence on this board was overwhelming and it was getting very discouraging.

[–]LethnVoluntaryist -1ポイント0ポイント  (15子コメント)

These neo-conservative and social conservative douchebags are always trying to hijack the right, just because people aren't 'constantly' telling them to fuck off doesn't mean everybody likes what they have to say, plus you're forgetting any real Anarchist respects the right to free speech.

[–]ImperiumBritanniaTrying to reason with rACs is like farting into a strong wind. -2ポイント-1ポイント  (14子コメント)

Free speech is technically a liberal value. Anarchists aren't quick to embrace, and anarchocapitalism probably has little room for it outside of specific COLAs.

[–]LethnVoluntaryist -1ポイント0ポイント  (13子コメント)

In what universe can a stateless and godless society restrict freedom of speech?

[–]ImperiumBritanniaTrying to reason with rACs is like farting into a strong wind. -1ポイント0ポイント  (11子コメント)

Where are you going to practice this speech if you don't own any land?

[–]rottenx51Technology brings freedom - luciddrealm.blogspot.com 1ポイント2ポイント  (10子コメント)

Let us see, you are walking down the private road or street and arguing with your friend in a civilized manner about a social or political issue. The security guard comes up to you and says that you cannot talk about that. You discuss such a topic with your loved one in the restaurant without disturbing the peace of others. The waiter asks you to change topic or leave. In the café house you are only allowed to talk neutral topics.

Do you think these are profitable business models?

[–]ImperiumBritanniaTrying to reason with rACs is like farting into a strong wind. -1ポイント0ポイント  (9子コメント)

You really can't think of anything one could say or read that would cause them to be evicted from a property?

Your speech is still not free, it's at the discretion of the property owner. Stop being stupid.

[–]rottenx51Technology brings freedom - luciddrealm.blogspot.com 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Stop being stupid

Not an argument. Apart from that, it is not the content but the form of an argument with which people usually have a problem with. The content only matters if it is directly responsible and incites crime, otherwise no, I can't think of anything one could say or read that would cause them to be evicted from a property, as long as that is done in a civilized, non-barbaric, non-violent and verbally abusive manner. It would be ineffective and the display of defeat.

[–]ImperiumBritanniaTrying to reason with rACs is like farting into a strong wind. 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

as long as that is done in a civilized, non-barbaric, non-violent and verbally abusive manner

Right, so at the discretion of the property owner like I said.

[–]rottenx51Technology brings freedom - luciddrealm.blogspot.com 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, but by respecting personal boundaries and ethical norms.

[–]LethnVoluntaryist -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

Someone elses private home or property is different, I'm talking about outside or on the internet for example. Reddit when it tried to do a clamp down is a perfect example really people just went off to voat or fought back.

As for private property itself, sure the owner can threaten you, but they can't physically stop you from saying what you want unless they cut your tongue out which would be violence.

[–]ImperiumBritanniaTrying to reason with rACs is like farting into a strong wind. -1ポイント0ポイント  (4子コメント)

How is that free speech rather than a market meeting the demand for unmoderated areas?

[–]rottenx51Technology brings freedom - luciddrealm.blogspot.com -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

By definition.

[–]ancap47Crypto-Anarchist 8ポイント9ポイント  (21子コメント)

Some kind of shill agenda.

[–]capitalistchemistIt's better to be a planner than to be planned -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

An agenda planned deep in the grand halls of the hollow earth.

[–]vibes420 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

I stumbled upon a neo-reactionary page on facebook, and was astonished that as their headline picture, they had a gadsden snake wrapped around a "Fasces," which is literally the symbol for facism used by nazis during world war 2

https://www.facebook.com/Secular-Neo-Reactionary-Anarcho-Capitalism-317114401756723/?fref=nf

In the about me section, the page says "Secular Neo-Reactionary Anarcho-Capitalism is the belief in free markets, race realism, white nationalism, and the abolition of the state."

Im not sure what "white nationalism" has to do with abolition of the state.

scrolling down on their page there is a post promoting "anarcho-facism"

their words not mine

[–]birdsnap 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

And don't forget the out of context Himmler quotes with no real relevance to anything happening today.

[–]SpanishDukePaleolibertarian 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Not to discredit anything else you said, but the fasces is a widespread symol used in many apolitical organizations throughout Europe.

The Spanish Guardia Civil, for example uses the fasces.

[–]TRVDanteFree Markets are cool but the NAP is stupid 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because I believe that whoever owns land is entitled to a monopoly on force within the limits of his own private property. If you want to be on my property, you should have to abide by my rules and my rules alone. I see the state as an obstacle, an unnecessary outside force that improperly wields the monopoly of power in what should be a landlord-tenant hiearchy.

Why does the mayor of New York City have so much power over New York City if he does not in fact own New York City? Wouldn't it make more sense for one private entity to own all the land within the city limits and have supreme authority to manage it as they see fit?

[–]HuwhyteRenaissance Edge Lord 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm just here for the Hoppe memes.

[–]ThirdHuman 4ポイント5ポイント  (8子コメント)

NRx?

[–]zoink 6ポイント7ポイント  (5子コメント)

NRX stands for Neoreactionary another common term is Dark Enlightenment. /r/DarkEnlightenment links to slate star codex for a rundown but of course people are going to disagree on how accurate that is. It appears some felt it was a fair assessment.

There seems to have been a rift between the individuals you will see in this sub referred to as NRx and /r/darkenlightment. As best I can tell most of the people here align with Curt Doolittle's propitarianism.

I'm sure many would find my personal assessment disingenuous but to me it looks like the beliefs predominantly stem from fears of other cultures.

Here is Cialis_In_Wonderland trying to explain a couple months ago.

[–]rottenx51Technology brings freedom - luciddrealm.blogspot.com 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

I so much laughed when I first saw this dork enlightement subreddit. Never seen people try so hard to seem special.

[–]SnakesoverEaglesAnti-Voluntaryist -3ポイント-2ポイント  (3子コメント)

most of the people here align with Curt Doolittle's propitarianism

Until he fleshes his theories out I can't say that I do. I align with Jared Taylor. And I'm pretty sure none of us on this board participate in that sub you linked, yet it keeps getting brought up as if it is relevant.

[–]SpanishDukePaleolibertarian 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

Is Curt planning on writing a book or something.

I mean, his theories seem interesting, but I can't say I agree with him until he organizes the word salad that is his blog.

[–]SnakesoverEaglesAnti-Voluntaryist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes. For now he has his youtube channel, and his site which is a bit of a work in progress.

[–]juslenbanned from /r/darkenlightenment 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I hear ya.

[–]LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

neo-reactionary / dark enlgihtement

[–]SnakesoverEaglesAnti-Voluntaryist -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's the mislabel that keeps getting applied to the alt-right. Here are some examples of what it refers to.

[–]retorikerDreaming of a huwhite christmas 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's the best forum for discussion that I know of, and we share a common past with ancaps; pretty much all reactionaries in this sub used to post here as ancaps.

[–]robstah 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I enjoy and welcome everyone from every ideology. It's a great way of testing one's position and understanding on these subjects. This place would be even MORE dry if the NRx/socialists/communists/et al. were not here.

[–]SummonerofDoubtReactionary Anarcho-Capitalist 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Some NRx are Ancaps, not all NRx are Ancaps. There ya go.

[–]PendaOfMerciaA = Gay 2ポイント3ポイント  (15子コメント)

So few of us are actually NRX.

I never really put down my bowtie. I am just interested in other things, like the changing demographics of the west, race realism, virtue ethics and my in-group identity. I only consider politicizing these topics when they pose a real threat to the civilization which allows me to exist.

Im also interest in being honest about my social manipulation and I object to the dishonesty and lack of self awareness common to the an-cap population and elsewhere.

People who play dumb about the role of property in ancapistan to cow-tow to leftist universalism make of their ideology a platonic farce and know that they're being deceptive. For example.

People who wield their principles like Trotskyites.

Its dishonest, its not achievable and its only served purpose is to signal.

To talk about real problems bowties have to deal with is not NRX. To point out the leftist spirit of dishonesty in AnCap strategy is not NRX. And to acknowledge that peoples are different, racial groupings are meaningful distinctions, is not NRX. To point out that the state serves functions private industry and property would fill in a world where the institutions are as propertarian as possible -and that this doesn't mot make law, order, courts, roads or even borders and refusal not worth pursuing- is not NRX.

[–]vibes420 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

"race realisim" is just not-so veiled racism

[–]RuskerdaxAgorist -2ポイント-1ポイント  (9子コメント)

It may not be NRx, but it's collectivist faggotry and fundamentally at odds with liberty. In a free society the people who advocate your kind of idiocy will be shot the moment their "suggestions" become credible threats of coercion.

[–]S1r4nBow-Tie Wearing Reactionary 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It may not be NRx, but it's collectivist faggotry

How homophobic.

In a free society the people who advocate your kind of idiocy will be shot the moment their "suggestions" become credible threats of coercion.

If you and your ilk succeed (in opening borders and correlatively nigh immortalizing socialism), then I shall enormously enjoy when you are beaten unto death by savage Blacks and barbarous Arabs whilst ululatingly screaming "Read Rothbard!".

[–]ImperiumBritanniaTrying to reason with rACs is like farting into a strong wind. 0ポイント1ポイント  (7子コメント)

"This ideologically diverse movement that I probably can't define is all a bunch of collectivist faggots, I'm going to shoot them for being so oppressive!"

This is what you sound like.

[–]RuskerdaxAgorist -2ポイント-1ポイント  (6子コメント)

Your stupid interpretation of what I'm saying won't matter when your brains are scattered on the ground because you thought you could get away with threatening the freedom of people who fought to obtain it.

[–]ImperiumBritanniaTrying to reason with rACs is like farting into a strong wind. -1ポイント0ポイント  (5子コメント)

You're too stupid to understand why this is funny, aren't you?

[–]RuskerdaxAgorist -2ポイント-1ポイント  (4子コメント)

I understand why you think it's funny because you don't have a very clear understanding of what I'm talking about. It doesn't really matter.

[–]ImperiumBritanniaTrying to reason with rACs is like farting into a strong wind. 0ポイント1ポイント  (3子コメント)

because you don't have a very clear understanding of what I'm talking about

You post on KotakuInAction and ShitStatistsSay, so if I had to gamble on which one of us wasn't understanding something, I would bet on you.

[–]RuskerdaxAgorist 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I don't post in KotakuInAction, not that it would make you any less of a dumb and wrong faggot.

[–]ImperiumBritanniaTrying to reason with rACs is like farting into a strong wind. 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Ah, TumblrInAction. I'm sure mocking autistic teenaged girls is much more fulfilling.

[–]RuskerdaxAgorist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm sure the white power forums you no doubt post on have much more prestige.

[–]LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap[S] -2ポイント-1ポイント  (3子コメント)

cow-tow

what is cow-tow

[–]juslenbanned from /r/darkenlightenment 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's spelled wrong.

To act in an excessively subservient manner. "she didn't have to kowtow to a boss" synonyms:grovel to, be obsequious to, be servile to, be sycophantic to, fawn over/on, cringe to, bow and scrape to, toady to, truckle to, abase oneself before, humble oneself to; curry favor with, dance attendance on,ingratiate oneself with, suck up to,kiss up to, brown-nose, lick someone's boots "she didn't have to kowtow to a boss"

[–]lochlainn -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

Kowtow.

[–]LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap[S] -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

wow

[–]SnakesoverEaglesAnti-Voluntaryist -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

This sub has no borders. We pretty much all used to be Ancaps anyway.

[–]cantletthatstand 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

You know, these kind of posts upset me, because it implies that they shouldn't be here. What are they doing that's so bad? Disagreeing with us? Are we gonna emulate everyone's favorite authoritarians, the banhammer-addicted Left? Smash ideas and speech we don't like?

Fuck no. I don't agree with the NRxers on their positions on race and culture, but I'm also not going to pretend that they don't make invalid points. And that's what frustrates me about these "omg why nrxers invade my safe space" posts.

We aren't the weenie Left that can't bear to be exposed to contrarian, and even outright offensive ideas. The moment we become that is the moment we sink to the level of all tired ideologies, unable to move past the ideas of 150 years ago, because we are so unable to entertain ideas without accepting them. This is how ideas mature. This is how movements improve. Just because some information is uncomfortable to our Western, liberal sensibilities doesn't automatically make that information false. We're practically all here because we're skeptical of this notion that our Western, liberal sensibilities are the be-all, end-all of human social organization!

Why is it okay for some of us to question the wisdom and legitimacy of government, but not okay for others to question the validity of the statement, "all men are created equal?" Answer: It is okay for them to question it. In our subreddit. Them questioning that does not mean that you must accept their pro-state, racially-divisive political solutions. This is what being open-minded is all about. Homosexuality? Religious freedom? Please, that's playing "Open Minded" on easy mode. It's hard to be open-minded about things that challenge your morals, but it's precisely because we're rational human beings that we aren't afraid to face facts.

We are not required to interpret what those facts tell us the way others do.

[–]LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

not going to pretend that they don't make invalid points

triple negative there. 'the ''but'' doesn't make sense with what it precedes and follows. wanna check? ''I don't agree with them, AND I won't pretend that they don't make invalid points.'' VS ''''I don't agree with them, BUT I won't pretend that they don't make invalid points.''

[–]anon1234anon12444 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

they subconsciously want to be persuaded

[–]TheSpiceMustAirflowNow I am become Rand, destroyer of Roads 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

BECAUSE IMMIGRANTS ALWAYS WANT TO FUCK OTHER PEOPLE'S SHIT, THATS WHY

[–]souldrone 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

We have states and we need to transition away from that model but this cannot be done soon enough for some. It might be a way for them to justify the situation we are in.

[–]moondoggieGS 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

oh looks its this thread again

[–]fretfriendlyCrypto-Anarchist 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

Can someone please define "NXr"? I've seen it referenced here many times, but I can't get a good grasp. My understanding is that it stands for "neoreactionary", but that could be wrong.

What's an example? From what is the movement derived?

[–]LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap[S] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

A reaction to the enlightement. Enlgihtement was too optimistic, dark enlgihtement is a counter balance.

For example enlgihtement came with blank-state theory. This led people to believe that sexuality was a social construct. Nrx adds bio-psychology.

NRx is antithesis of cultural marxism.

[–]-Venator- -3ポイント-2ポイント  (0子コメント)

The people you guys keep calling "NRx" are really mostly part of the Alt-Right, which is more or less a paleoconservative movement. Neoreactionarism is a dead ideology, and it was way too autistic in the first place. Many people on the Alt-Right are former ancaps.

[–]_CapR_Minarchist 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm still not really sure what NRX is but I do consider myself a minarchist and a frequent visitor to this sub.

[–]-Venator- -3ポイント-2ポイント  (1子コメント)

The people you guys keep calling "NRx" are really mostly part of the Alt-Right, which is more or less a paleoconservative movement. Neoreactionarism is a dead ideology, and it was way too autistic in the first place.

[–]LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Neoreactionarism is a dead ideology, and it was way too autistic in the first place.

what does autistic mean?

[–]tedted8888 0ポイント1ポイント  (5子コメント)

What is NRx?

[–]LOST_TALECompassionate Ancap[S] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Neo-Reactionary / Dark enlgihtement

[–]SnakesoverEaglesAnti-Voluntaryist -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

why are you here?

To point out the reflexive identity based herd mentality as demonstrated by the voting patterns of this sub.

No worries though, I have thousand of karma here so I can keep bringing you these quality posts without hitting that ten minute timeout between posts.

[–]GrizmoblustFallout 5: The Real Life Edition -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

Can you stop with "please go away, NRx." Or " Why are you guys still here" threads?!

Just ignore them, jesus christ.

Edited: Mods had a sticky thread a month ago, and recommend everybody to STOP FEEDING, and IGNORE IT!

[–]juslenbanned from /r/darkenlightenment 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not touching you... I'm not touching you!

[–]S1r4nBow-Tie Wearing Reactionary -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

http://mylittlefacewhen.com/media/f/img/mlfw836_JM7J6.png

[–]Libertarian__gamer -2ポイント-1ポイント  (2子コメント)

I blame Chris Cantwell

[–]zoink 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

They were around far before Cantwell started tweeting about the 14 words.

[–]lizard450 -2ポイント-1ポイント  (0子コメント)

What's a NRx?