上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]AwesomeLove 203ポイント204ポイント  (84子コメント)

On the side of this horrible crime is one of the worst things in the history of journalism where a journalist Walter Duranty just plainly lied about there being oodles of food for his ideological reasons and got a Pulizer Prize for his effots.

[–]PortugalBugaTuga 51ポイント52ポイント  (8子コメント)

where a journalist Walter Duranty

Here's the wikipedia article on Walter Durantly.

Nasty character.

[–]Wallachiadngrs 21ポイント22ポイント  (5子コメント)

wtf he didnt lose the pulitzer!

[–]IrelandSoaringChickenNugget 13ポイント14ポイント  (0子コメント)

The concern over Duranty's reporting on the famine in Soviet Ukraine led to a move to posthumously and symbolically strip him of the Pulitzer prize he received in 1932, although the Pulitzer was awarded for articles written the year before the famine started.

Wikipedia

[–]stonekiller 42ポイント43ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's been called 'Stalins apologist' for the manner in which he venerated him and for the justification Stalin's atrocities as a means to an end. Also, I think (not 100% on this) he coined the term 'stalinism'.

[–]Estoniakalleluuja 86ポイント87ポイント  (66子コメント)

Till this day in the minds of people Stalin gets away with a lot for ideological reasons - especially in Europe. For some reason having agenda of eliminating a class of people is not such a big of an issue.

There are lots of progressives who still believe Stalin was communist, while actually quite the opposite he ruined the project and the notion of communism.

[–]arqoi 72ポイント73ポイント  (41子コメント)

Stalin was most assuredly a communist, just his brand of communism.

Everyone else could get fucked as far as he was concerned.

[–]Estoniakalleluuja 30ポイント31ポイント  (40子コメント)

Communism main characteristics is that property or production is owned by the workers/community.

USSR was a state capitalism. What Stalin contributed to the world is that people call state capitalism a communism or a "brand of communism".

[–]leuropean 27ポイント28ポイント  (10子コメント)

State and party control of the economy was seen by Stalin and others as a necessary modernizing in-between-point for Russia to comply with Marxist theory.

[–]Eplore 19ポイント20ポイント  (6子コメント)

That was just marketing for the peasants. The whole party hoarded benefits from the start.

[–]United KingdomTheWorldCrimeLeague 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

That was just marketing for the peasants. The whole party hoarded benefits from the start.

That's still happening, of course. Just now Putin has scribbled out "communism" and penciled in "nationalism."

[–]Eplore 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

The only difference across history is the excuse it's sold with. We started out with "god wills it" and laugh today about the people who still use that one while eating up the new excuses.

[–]United KingdomTheWorldCrimeLeague 5ポイント6ポイント  (3子コメント)

It's not nearly as bad as it once was though. Widespread education to a university level and the rise of the internet and information age has led to an age of questioning authority that the world hasn't seen before.

Except in areas with massive information control.

[–]ItalyHJonGoldrake 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

an age of questioning authority that the world hasn't seen before

Not entirely sure what you are referencing. The 60s and 70s saw student protests, anti-war movements and labour agitation that brought to the Western world the civil rights and welfare programs that have come to define it, at least by contrast with other nations.

Today there is nothing like that. Student are a politically marginal demographic; anti-war movements are without teeth; labour organization has mostly been tamed or dismantled, with labour rights receding all over the Western world.

[–]Eplore 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Whether it's better or worse i can't judge but what is certain is that it is still effective and in use. A recently relevant example: The current excuse "terrorism" sells increasing surveillance and errosion of rights. Look how they went all out with their laws in paris. And every time we get told the terrorists where known before the attack, so it is not a issue with lack of surveillance, it's an issue of action but yet we see it everytime used to push new surveillance on the public. Critics exist, maybe more than before but it is still working.

[–]Estoniakalleluuja 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

And you believe he was planning to go ahead to next stage at some point? Marx said religion is opium of the people. I think it applies here very well.

[–]leuropean 28ポイント29ポイント  (0子コメント)

No. He became a paranoid authoritarian leader with a persona cult, hiding behind the ideology.

Still it is important to note that the early path of the USSR was intellectually well supported, a thick branch of Marxism, mainly by Lenin.

[–]gangstacompgod 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

And you believe he was planning to go ahead to next stage at some point?

That's not how it works. The proletarian state withers away when all the contradictions of class society are resolved. You can't just will yourself into communism.

Marx said religion is opium of the people. I think it applies here very well.

Lol, how is that?

[–]Russian_Spring 15ポイント16ポイント  (10子コメント)

State capitalism is just a term Marxist made up whenever communist attempts failed. It wasnt communism it was Capitalism.

[–]Greeceshamrockathens 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

State capitalism is just a term Marxist made up whenever communist attempts failed. It wasnt communism it was Capitalism.

No. AFAIK only a certain Trotskyist group supports the analysis that SU was a state capitalism society.

[–]ItalyHJonGoldrake 6ポイント7ポイント  (1子コメント)

State capitalism is just a term Marxist made up whenever communist attempts failed.

The term state capitalism was invented before any communist attempt was made and entered Leninist literature specifically in the early years of the Russian Civil war, with Lenin using the concept to describe a phase of accelerated industrialization and modernization of the economy through capitalist means. Not sure why you think it was invented or popularized post-facto, it's just plain not true. It was an openly-declared Soviet policy to use state capitalism to bring Russia up to the level of the Western industrial power.

[–]PortugalAimingWineSnailz 6ポイント7ポイント  (6子コメント)

It fails to fulfill the definition of the communist means of production. It is not communist. I should also add that no regime has ever claimed to achieve communism - and referred to themselves as "Socialist". Of course you'll have to use Marxist definitions when discussing Marxism.

[–]VanDoodah 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

This is such a tedious argument. The USSR was ruled by a Communist Party which nationalised industry, collectivised agriculture, and instituted a centrally planned economy. OK, so they didn't managed to create the sort of society that ultra-left adventurists like to fantasise about, but, in the common vernacular, the USSR was a communist society, and from a more "intellectual" viewpoint, they were some sort of socialist society.

[–]Russian_Spring 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

The communist definition can never be achieved in real life. What Marxist refer to as communism is a theoretical concept similar to transcending into energy through whipping yourself. Every time you whip yourself and it fails other people who believe this can say you didnt whip yourself right but the issue is the whole idea is flawed.

Communism and Marxism is basically a religion at this point.

So what the USSR was the actual results of communism. Fine we can say it wasnt true communism since it is impossible. That involves admitting the whole idea is stupid to implement since the USSR is the end result so we must admit it never works.

Let me save some Marxist some time before they pull the second big argument for marxism. But but in the future maybe it will work. Yes maybe it will. And maybe Allah will come down and side with IS and destroy us infidels. PM me when either of these things happen.

[–]Greeceshamrockathens 6ポイント7ポイント  (3子コメント)

What's more naive is to believe capitalism is the final form of human social evolution. Human societies with a certain degree of organisation exist for thousands of years, capitalism as a global system is only ~300 years old.

[–]Russian_Spring 5ポイント6ポイント  (2子コメント)

I never said capitalism was.

It gets annoying with Marxist when their argument is refuted that they need to make up arguments.

You guys have this black and white mentality where you assume that anyone who points out the obvious flaws that makes communism impossible must be some hardcore supporter of capitalism and assume it will always exist as it does now.

It is very naive and ignorant.

[–]sanderudam 5ポイント6ポイント  (16子コメント)

USSR was not state capitalism. There was nothing to do with capitalism at all. State capitalism is a system where private sector is heavily controlled by the state and state probably has shares of a lot of companies. But there still exists private ownership and investments. USSR was full state owned planned economy with absolutely no (legal) private sector.

[–]Estoniakalleluuja 9ポイント10ポイント  (15子コメント)

wiki.

State capitalism is usually described as an economic system in which commercial (i.e. for-profit) economic activity is undertaken by the state, where the means of production are organized and managed as state-owned business enterprises (including the processes of capital accumulation, wage labor, and centralized management), or where there is otherwise a dominance of publicly listed corporations of which the state has controlling shares.[1] Marxist literature defines state capitalism as a social system combining capitalism—the wage system of producing and appropriating surplus value—with ownership or control by a state; by this definition, a state capitalist country is one where the government controls the economy and essentially acts like a single huge corporation, extracting the surplus value from the workforce in order to invest it in further production.

[–]TheSelfGoverned 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

People around the world advocate for exactly that - state capitalism. And they call themselves "communists"

[–]GermanyAfirejar 28ポイント29ポイント  (1子コメント)

There are lots of progressives who still believe Stalin was communist, while actually quite the opposite he ruined the project and the notion of communism.

Quite frankly, calling systems that are the result of people advocating for communism "communism" seems like a lesser mistake than completely ignoring that those systems are what happened every single time a group overhauled a country in the name of establishing "communism". I also highly doubt that it was Stalin who ruined the notion of communism single-handedly - that has more to do with the abject failure and general crappiness of every "communist" country in history, not just "Soviet Russia 1927-1953". What ruined the notion of communism isn't Stalin, it's that the best thing anyone can say about any "communist" government is that they're a step up from the even worse dictatorship that preceded it, which some people chose to tout as a success for some unfathomable reason.

[–]Rule Brittania15243asd1 45ポイント46ポイント  (16子コメント)

Stop looking at communism in ideological purity while looking at systems like capitalism with all the imperfections of reality. That is sort of regime that always comes about when people (useful idiots) who advocate communism get in charge.

[–]Greeceshamrockathens 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

It's not a matter of ideological purity. The very definition of communism is the absence of classes and more importantly the state. Both of these didn't remotely hold true for the Eastern Bloc societies.

[–]JayK1 8ポイント9ポイント  (14子コメント)

All the faults of capitalism also exist in it's ideological form.

[–]KarzanGilgriksson 6ポイント7ポイント  (13子コメント)

As do all the faults of communism, like lack of competition/motivation and a lack of individual Liberty and true ownership of private property.

[–]2nd Spanish RepublicDragnoxTheKid 1ポイント2ポイント  (4子コメント)

The lack of competition has no basis to stand on. It's a mere supposition based on another false supposition of human nature.

And why is lack of private property bad? There is a clear distinction made even in the manifesto about the difference between personal property(your stuff) and private property.

[–]5MC 1ポイント2ポイント  (7子コメント)

Don't forget the mass killings. Seriously, 85-100 million people killed, and naive little shits on Reddit still want to give it another go.

[–]Banat/Банат/BánságGreyko 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

It could be argued that capitalism killed more people. It's stupid and wrong to attribute any deaths caused by USSR, China and so on to communism while not attributing the deaths caused by any other capitalism state to capitalism.

[–]tbqhfamsmh 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Something tells me competition isn't poplar with the average redditor...

[–]Greeceshamrockathens 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

For some reason having agenda of eliminating a class of people is not such a big of an issue.

You probably are aware of this, but just for conversation's sake: When Marx, Engels and Lenin in their theoretical works talk about eliminating a class they don't mean physically eliminating the members of this class. They mean stripping them of economic and political power.

There are lots of progressives who still believe Stalin was communist, while actually quite the opposite he ruined the project and the notion of communism.

He declared in the 1937 (I think?) Soviet Constitution that all class differences had ceased to exist in the Soviet Union and that it had reached the communist stage of society, which is laughable. So yeah, he even contributed to the West wrongly calling these societies communist, when in fact they were problematic, authoritarian socialist societies with a lot of capitalist elements in them.

[–]5MC 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

Stalin not a communist? No true Scotsman.

[–]Russian_Spring 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

He could argue he was the world's most successful communist. He took an unstable and a broken Russia and ended up spreading communism to Eastern Europe and China. Even India flirted with it.

There is intellectual communist who sit around coffee shops talking about the theoretic of communism, the type that call everyone else false communist, and they get NOTHING done. The most they can hope for is a position at a university. Then there is people like communism who dont sit around and debate theocratics but actually go to implement communism.

[–]r_e_k_r_u_l 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

Don't kid yourself into thinking communism wasn't ultimately the problem

[–]The Netherlandssavois-faire 17ポイント18ポイント  (2子コメント)

Speaking as a journalist, you won't find many people who are more despised in this business than Walter Duranty. Incredibly fowl man.

[–]radickulous 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

He wasn't the only one. Let's also not forget the Westerners who were toured through Potemkin villages and reported back that everything was fine.

[–]Romaniacelibidaque 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

This is like a president being awarded with the Nobel Prize for peace, whilst being engaged in a war.

[–]Estoniasweetbacker 21ポイント22ポイント  (0子コメント)

Regarding how this looked like for an Ukrainian peasant, check out the Wikipedia article

  • If you had extra grain after meeting your quota, you had to give it up.
  • If you could not meet your quota, you had to give up all your livestock.
  • If you were a part of collective farm and couldn't meet the quota, then the farm was placed on a blacklist and had to give up 15 times the quota. To make sure you did that, activists relieved you of all food.
  • The quotas you were supposed to meet were then raised impossibly high.
  • You were not allowed to trade for food.
  • You were not allowed to receive deliveries of food.
  • You were not allowed to leave; the borders were sealed.
  • You were not even allowed not to help relieve other people of their food if so ordered, under penalty of death.
  • The policies still continued even when after the larger scale requisition targets were met.

[–]Slavoniaskodarap 147ポイント148ポイント  (63子コメント)

Hmm...where did you come up with 8 million? I mean even the article on wiki you linked puts estimation to 2,5-7,5 mil, not to say that most estimations for the entire USSR don't go higher than 7-8 mil (it's true though that Ukr got the biggest share).

It was a terrible crime, but if you inflate the numbers it'll just increase the number of skeptics.

[–]United States of America--Danger-- 22ポイント23ポイント  (1子コメント)

The article actually states 3.9 million. The birth deficit thing sounds iffy. Why is 3.9 million somehow a number that has to be inflated? It's horrific.

[–]Western Europeamsterdam_pro 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Why is 3.9 million somehow a number that has to be inflated?

The more the merrier more sympathy you can attract.

[–]ClashOfTheAsh 91ポイント92ポイント  (20子コメント)

This is the same /u/walt_ua whose balcony in Ukraine apparently got hit by a Russian mortar/missile 2 years ago while he coincidentally was posting copy and paste comments across Reddit about Russian atrocities against Ukrainians. Take everything he says about Russia or Ukraine with a large grain of salt.

[–]Slavoniaskodarap 37ポイント38ポイント  (2子コメント)

He's no better or worse than most east-european nationalists I've encountered so far and being from the region I know how these things work. Especially those that use the name of their country in their usernames. That's why I called him out only based on the thing he actually posted, anything else would just stir up more sh't.

[–]MontenegroGlideer 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's no better or worse than most east-european nationalists I've encountered so far

That is a dreadfully low baseline.

[–]ClashOfTheAsh -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ya you were dead right. That's the same reason you were the comment I said that to. Everyone else is just getting sucked in.

[–]_ferz 10ポイント11ポイント  (0子コメント)

Surprised to see this here and upvoted. Much respect. This guy is not an honest dude. He pretty much organized a few 'raids' in several threads back in the day to support his claims. He is a moderator for Lviv city (sub) which is interesting because according to him he was in Eastern Ukraine when his apartment got shelled, but most videos from that day that I found has people claiming that it wasn't the rebels that bombed them but the National Guard, based on where the shells came from. And speaking of Lviv and the most vocal people about Holodomor... Western Ukraine was hardly effected, if at all, because it wasn't even part of USSR at the time, but for some reason they keep on inflating the numbers. This whole famine is being used for politics, nothing more, the most vocal people weren't even affected by it to begin with. It was South-East, primarily, that got affected, which is pro-Russian today, ironically. I am not even talking about Kazakhstan and parts of Russia that were hit as well. It wasn't targeted at Ukraine, kulaks were the target because they resisted collectivization and it's the most fertile lands that got screwed, including Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan. All these Ukrainian nationalists from the West using this famine for political support, nothing more, which is disgusting if you understand the history and geography of it.

[–]FinlandLICK__MY__TAINT 8ポイント9ポイント  (8子コメント)

[–]ClashOfTheAsh 10ポイント11ポイント  (6子コメント)

Yup I was around when all of this happened. I'm of the opinion that it wasn't /u/walt_ua's balcony because it's just way too coincidental that it happened to the biggest supplier of anti-Russian/pro-Ukraine content. Anyway even if it did happen to him (it happened to somebody) it doesn't excuse all of his shitposting and copy and paste comments.

[–]AMASlyRatchet 4ポイント5ポイント  (5子コメント)

I remember seeing this balcony post at the time. Would /u/walt_ua or somebody else be able to provide a counter perspective?

[–]Imperium Europanumm8stro 4ポイント5ポイント  (3子コメント)

. . . that's quite a disingenuous question, considering how the moderation team killed the discussion when people started calling him out on his shit.

walt_ua doesn't do anything else than agendapushing. https://www.reddit.com/r/HumanPorn/comments/2w6wwn/ukrainian_woman_reacts_to_her_house_getting_hit/ Look at the title of his submission. Now here's the actual origins of the picture; a woman from Donetsk who had her house shelled by ukrainian artillery. http://www.trust.org/item/20150209100510-wcm08?view=print http://blogs.ft.com/photo-diary/tag/donetsk/

The above is yet another of find of former user /u/right-in-the-pussy, a contributor of this subreddit who was forced to delete his account because the moderation team censured his rebuttal of walt_ua's propaganda, under the pretense of 'preventing a witchhunt', while allowing walt_ua to spew his drivel, which led to a witchhunt directed at right-in-the-pussy instead, causing literally every single post of his, even unrelated to the topic at hand, to be downvoted into the negatives.

[–]Spainraminus 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Oh I remember that. Did that turn out to be false/propagandistic?

[–]United KingdomTheWorldCrimeLeague 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

For anyone playing along, /u/ClashOfTheAsh was the guy who hounded /u/walt_ua's threads calling him a liar and generally trolling the shit out of his threads when the war was still going on.

It's fine if you want to call somebody out, but don't try and take off your jersey and pretend you weren't the instigator in those threads.

[–]FinlandLuckyio 26ポイント27ポイント  (9子コメント)

It also hit three nationalities, not one. Russians, Ukrainians and Kazakhs were all hit. To a smaller degree, Moldova also got impacted.

Ukrainian ultranationalists like to pretend many things, one of them being that holodomor just impacted them and was a creation of Russians, rather than a massive crop failure that hit all nationalities in the region involved. At the same time Stalin's komissariat had to meet a quota of selling grain to foreign clients to raise hard currency for national projects such as electrification of USSR, so they started squeezing peasants of the "bread basket region", that being eastern Ukraine, southern Russia and western Kazakhstan. Which were the regions where most of the holodomor deaths occurred.

Hence the deaths.

[–]SloveniaHalofit 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Seriously. It's not like famines were uncommon in Russia at the time.

Famine still occurred in Eastern Europe during the 20th century. Droughts and famines in Imperial Russia are known to have happened every 10 to 13 years, with average droughts happening every 5 to 7 years. Russia experienced eleven major famines between 1845 and 1922, one of the worst being the famine of 1891–2.

Famines continued in the Soviet era, the most notorious being the Holodomor in various parts of the country, especially the Volga, and the Ukrainian and northern Kazakh SSR's during the winter of 1932–1933. The Soviet famine of 1932–1933 is nowadays reckoned to have cost an estimated 6 million lives. The last major famine in the USSR happened in 1947 due to the severe drought and the mismanagement of grain reserves by the Soviet government.

From most of what I read the famine of 1932-33 seems like it was a disastrous combination of a total crop failure, collectivization (and the resistance to it), and a complete and utter incompetence of the Soviet leadership and its bureaucracy (such as exporting grain to meet their quotas, instead of redirecting it towards their populations).

I'm yet to see any actual proof that the Holodomor was an actual genocide, since most of the proof is politcal guessing about the intentions of the Soviet leadership. The actions of NKVD against the Polish 1937-38 fit the (UN) description of a genocide much better, since people were executed for simply having polish sounding names.

To finish: The Holodomor was a horrible event, that should be remembered, but OPs post is pure propaganda by our resident Ukrainian propagandist and liar walt_ua.

[–]United KingdomTheWorldCrimeLeague 7ポイント8ポイント  (21子コメント)

Here's the two paragraphs in the header that refer to numbers:

The Holodomor (Ukrainian: Голодомо́р, "Extermination by hunger" or "Hunger-extermination";[2] derived from морити голодом, "to kill by starvation")[3][4][5] was a man-made famine in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic in 1932 and 1933 that killed an estimated 2.5–7.5 million Ukrainians, with millions more counted in demographic estimates. It was part of the wider disaster, the Soviet famine of 1932–33, which affected the major grain-producing areas of the country.

Early estimates of the death toll by scholars and government officials varied greatly; anywhere from 1.8[12] to 12 million[13] ethnic Ukrainians were said to have perished as a result of the famine. Recent research has since narrowed the estimates to between 2.4[14] and 7.5[15] million. The exact number of deaths is hard to determine, due to a lack of records,[16][17] but the number increases significantly when the deaths inside heavily Ukrainian-populated Kuban are included.[18] Older estimates are still often cited in political commentary.[19] According to the findings of the Court of Appeal of Kiev in 2010, the demographic losses due to the famine amounted to 10 million, with 3.9 million direct famine deaths, and a further 6.1 million birth deficit.[16]

It goes under 8 million and it also goes much higher. I don't feel like 8 million is outside the wheelhouse.

[–]Slavoniaskodarap 14ポイント15ポイント  (2子コメント)

Let me just point out 2 things which you obviously misread in the upper wiki quote.

Early estimates of the death toll by scholars and government officials varied greatly; anywhere from 1.8[12] to 12 million[13] ethnic Ukrainians were said to have perished as a result of the famine. Recent research has since narrowed the estimates to between 2.4[14] and 7.5[15] million.

According to the findings of the Court of Appeal of Kiev in 2010, the demographic losses due to the famine amounted to 10 million, with 3.9 million direct famine deaths, and a further 6.1 million birth deficit.[16]

I don't want unnecessary arguments over this tragic event, but if you're using this source just read what it actually says...please?

[–]Yerpbutthenigotbetter 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

You know, I never understood this need to have some specific amount of millions of victims.

If it's well past, say, 10.000 completely attributable murders, can't we just stick a label of "Enemy of All Humankind" on the perpetrators and stop dickwaving about it?

Okay, maybe historians want to make an estimate because that's the sort of thing historians do. But leave them to it and never mind what they come up with, once you're into the thousands of murders, it's already kind of clear you're dealing with a heinous criminal organization, be it a crime syndicate or a national government.

Even before the "debate" about whether it was six million Jews or more/less, people seem to have always focused a lot on the exact amount of victims for every mass murder. Who cares anymore? Just the fact that it's a large-scale atrocity should be plenty to form an opinion about it.

[–]radickulous 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Most scholars settle at about 5mil but numbers are very difficult to attain and some have claimed as high as 10.

Source: I researched, wrote, edited a documentary where we interviewed the highest esteemed experts on the Holodomor.

[–]IrelandPM_me_ur_fricatives 43ポイント44ポイント  (14子コメント)

Ireland remained a net exporter of food during the Great Famine. That says it all, but further details below.

The British were reluctant to supply aid, as they believed that the Irish were inferior to the British and many believed the famine was God's will.

"The famine has been sent by God to teach the Irish a lesson. The real evil with which we have to contend is not the physical evil of the famine, but the moral evil of the selfish, perverse and turbulent character of the Irish people." - Charles Edward Trevelyan (in charge of relief for the famine)

The system of food production and land ownership was heavily in favour of the British. The Penal Laws of 1695 meant Catholics couldn't own land, and that the British government could forcibly seize any land they did possess and 'redistribute' it to those deemed more loyal.

Most of the victims of the famine were tenant farmers who rented tiny plots of land, barely large enough to allow subsistence farming. Plots so small that the only crop which was calorie-dense enough to allow survival was the potato. These farmers were the descendants of the original owners who had had their land confiscated during the British conquest and handed over to government officials as rewards for service. This land was carved up into the smallest possible plots to maximize profits, and re-rented back to the original owners at extortionate rates.

Now living in squalor, the Irish were to give a large percentage of their harvest to their landlord, and what remained was allowed for themselves. Once the famine hit, that obviously meant less potatoes. But the landowners continued to require their allotment of their tenants' harvests, so the police and security forces were used to seize these crops from starving families, before being evicted and left to die.

At one point, a sultan attempted to send monetary aid to the Irish, but was asked to reduce the amount he was sending - the amount was more than Queen Victoria had sent and it would have embarrassed her.

The tenant farmers were also the heart of the population who spoke Irish. As they were the population most impacted by the famine, the Irish language was driven to near-extermination.

Some illustrative quotes from British public officials of the time:

Ireland is like a half-starved rat that crosses the path of an elephant. What must the elephant do? Squelch it - by heavens - squelch it. - Thomas Carlyle, British essayist, 1840s

Being altogether beyond the power of man, the cure had been applied by the direct stroke of an all-wise Providence in a manner as unexpected and as unthought of as it is likely to be effectual. - Charles Trevelyan

[existing policies] will not kill more than one million Irish in 1848 and that will scarcely be enough to do much good. - Queen Victoria's economist, Nassau Senior

[–]United KingdomTheWorldCrimeLeague 18ポイント19ポイント  (0子コメント)

At one point, a sultan attempted to send monetary aid to the Irish, but was asked to reduce the amount he was sending - the amount was more than Queen Victoria had sent and it would have embarrassed her.

That was Abdulmecid I of the Ottoman Empire, who was generally speaking a reformer and tried to forge alliances with western Europe. Irish notables even sent a thank you note.

Thanks, Turkey!

[–]MiscegenatorMan 13ポイント14ポイント  (7子コメント)

Dude, let the Ukrainians have their moment. Even it it was more correctly the Soviets, and Stalin was a Georgian, and op is a mad fanatic.

[–]Serbiaanirdnas 26ポイント27ポイント  (0子コメント)

I read survivor stories some time ago, and they were bone-chilling. What a horrible event.

[–]Paradosi 73ポイント74ポイント  (60子コメント)

by Russian communists

The Bolsheviks/Communists came from many ethnicites that were part of Russian Empire when it fell into civil war.

There were Russian, Ukrainian, Jewish, etc Bolsheviks, there were probably even some Chechen Bolsheviks.

[–]Chechen (Ichkeria)seska-solsa 24ポイント25ポイント  (0子コメント)

There were Chechen Bolsheviks, and it wasn't an "even" case.

[–]Russian Federationjinx155555 56ポイント57ポイント  (57子コメント)

This post is meant to demonize us. Hence the wording.

[–]xKempesx 16ポイント17ポイント  (0子コメント)

Exactly. I'm not even Russian and I'm apalled at the low level of posts that have been coming out of r/Europe recently with the sole intent of demonizing Russians.

[–]das_hansl 14ポイント15ポイント  (4子コメント)

It is not even certain that the holodomor was intentional. Here is a thread on askhistorians.

I find it totally OK to remember tragic events of the past. I understand that many tragic events happened in Eastern-Europe, much more than in Western-Europe, so I respect that you remember them and mourn the dead, but this hijacking for political purposes I don't like. Poles, Russians, Ukrainians. You are all the same.

[–]United KingdomTheWorldCrimeLeague 3ポイント4ポイント  (49子コメント)

There's a reason the Irish don't blame the Welsh for the famine.

[–]Russian Federationjinx155555 34ポイント35ポイント  (34子コメント)

My great grandparents had to migrate north from the Saratov region due to the famine. They were Russians in Russia suffering from the same famine that affected Ukraine. Wanna try blame them for trying to starve out the Ukrainians? This was not a Ukraine-only crisis.

[–]OlDer 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

And if your grandparents were Ukrainians they wouldn't migrate north because they were not allowed to.

[–]arqoi 105ポイント106ポイント  (56子コメント)

The famine hit parts of Southern Russia and Kazakhstan as well.

How come the millions of Kazakh and Russian farmers who starved are rarely mentioned?

There was also another famine in 1921 which killed an estimated 6 million people in Russia. Communists didn't give two shits about whether you were Ukrainian or Russian or a Kazakh, the USSR was the playground for their ideological theories, all they cared about was whether you followed the dogma(Trotsky and Stalin were Ukrainian and Georgian respectively, while Lenin was half-Chuvash half-Jewish). None of them really gave two shits about their ethnicity, it was all about ideology. To them you were either a Bolshevik or counterrevolutionary/bourgeoisie scum.

[–]Latvianeonzzzzz 32ポイント33ポイント  (3子コメント)

Trotsky was also Jewish, not Ukrainian.

[–]arqoi 17ポイント18ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yeah I should have clarified that, he was born in the Kherson G.(nowadays Ukraine), but he was ethnically Jewish.

[–]GermanyVERTIKAL19 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

How are being Jewish and being Ukrainian mutually exclusive?

[–]Latvianeonzzzzz 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Word "Ukrainian" here was meant as ethnic group not place of origin.

[–]Artess 48ポイント49ポイント  (7子コメント)

How come the millions of Kazakh and Russian farmers who starved are rarely mentioned?

Because the Ukrainians made a huge fuss about how this was an ethnic cleansing and genocide, and if you bring up the famine in other regions, their argument is weakened.

[–]Norwayfourredfruitstea 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

It's very normal for a country to care first about itself, and not others. For example, I bet whatever country your from is more concerned with [previous large catastrophe] than it is with the crisis in Congo, which killed ~3 million people quite recently. That doesn't make the concern invalid.

[–]Artess 3ポイント4ポイント  (4子コメント)

Ironically, I'm from Ukraine. My point is that it is wrong to portray it as a genocide specifically aimed at Ukrainian people, because it happened to lots of people in other parts of the USSR as well.

[–]United States of Americaucstruct 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ukraine had widespread requisitioning of grain, including seed grain vital for the next years harvest, and troikas committed to killing anyone who complained. Moscow was very suspicious of foreign and Kulak influence in Ukraine and came down especially hard on them.

[–]PolandO5KAR 50ポイント51ポイント  (31子コメント)

Communists didn't give two shits about whether you were...

Really? Why then they ordered to kill every Polish person (or suspected) in 1937 and why did they expelled about 1.7M of them from eastern Poland, after they took it over with Hitler? I know i'm being selfish, but this is just a one example of their etchnic policies, so yes... they did cared about nationality. In case of collectivisation and the other femines, it's disputed.

[–]arqoi 57ポイント58ポイント  (8子コメント)

For the same reason they murdered millions of ethnic Russians who were pro-Tsar pro-Russian Orthodoxy or anti-Communist. They didn't want any opposition to their policies.

I mean, you know what the Russian Civil War was right? Millions were slaughtered for being "counterrevolutionaries" or bourgeoisie. Look at who the founder of the NKVD/Cheka was, Felix Dzerzhinsky.

His aristocratic family belonged to the former Polish szlachta (nobility), of the Sulima coat of arms

EDIT: To add some extra detail, what the NKVD did in Poland the Cheka did in Russia and across the USSR many years before. The systematic mass murder of intellectuals, priests, monarchists, "counterrevolutionary" socialists, practically everyone who was against them. They specifically targeted the Russian Orthodox Church because they believed that they could ruin the morale of the White movement(Tsarists, Capitalists, Russian Nationalists) by demolishing the very foundation of Russian culture and faith. These practices continued even after the end of the Russian Civil War, where the Cheka morphed into the NKVD.

[–]rizzzeh 24ポイント25ポイント  (0子コメント)

When founding NKVD Derzinsky (a pole) appointed Latvian Red riflemen to key high positions of the department and they were used heavily against counter-revolutionaries to put downs riots in Moscow and Yaroslavl.

[–]PolandO5KAR 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

No, there's a difference when you take a phone book and search for people with some "wrong" names becouse every one of them is suspected "traitor". That was a classic etchnic cleansing, no matter their excuses.

Yea i know, most of these "counterrevolutionaries" were in fact SRs or mensheviks. I've said it already in another comment, internationalists have no nationality. The Polish socialists were also divided, the internationalist faction tried to take over the power with the red army in 1919, you know how it ended up.

[–]arqoi 16ポイント17ポイント  (3子コメント)

The Bolsheviks were pretty much as extreme as you can get, they attacked the tsarists, the mensheviks, socialists, pretty much everyone that didn't agree with them.

It's depressing really, if the mensheviks or some other more mild socialists won the Russian Civil War perhaps all that madness and insanity could have been avoided. The Russian Civil War and the rise of the Bolsheviks is one of the worst events to happen in the 20th century, right up there with the rise of the NSDAP.

[–]Automatisering 10ポイント11ポイント  (6子コメント)

Because Polish people wanted their own country. They didn't give a shit if you were ethnically Polish. They cared about people not wanting to create a great socalist utopia.

They had Latvians and Estonians butcher Russians opposed to communisim. When the Cossacks were becoming a threat to the great socalist state by racistly targetting Caucasians, they got butchered and ethnically cleansed. When Muslims resisted and wanted to keep their faith, they got butchered. So did Buddhists.

Nationalists in Eastern Europe create a false narrative about the USSR of being specifically targetted by Russians because of their ethnicity/identity when that isn't true. It's just propaganda and a case of twisted history. It ignores the fact that a Georgian was in charge of the USSR for decades and was responsible for the deaths of millions of Russians and non-Russians. That a Polish man was in charge of the biggest death squad that put the fear of God in the heart of millions of Russians.

[–]INGERLANDZaltPS2 -1ポイント0ポイント  (14子コメント)

Why did the Soviet Union even invade Poland along with Germany anyway, bitterness over the Polish-Soviet War or like Germany did they feel like the Treaty of Versatile gave too much of their territory to Poland?

[–]PolandBotan_TM 9ポイント10ポイント  (1子コメント)

Simple geopolitical play. Stalin expected a long war between Germany and France & UK, a repeat of WWI. Those countries being exhausted would be a easy target. Well, Fall of France in 1940 surprised everybody.

[–]Argueforthesakeofit 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

The people that deeply cared about the famine in 1921 were the foreign soldiers attacking the coutry and the czar supporters who couldn't live without a god-appointed master.

Surely.

[–]Russiasolz1 30ポイント31ポイント  (10子コメント)

This thing killed a lot of Russians too. So calling it genocide against Ukrainians means forgetting about everybody else.

[–]SoWoWMate 55ポイント56ポイント  (76子コメント)

Why don't we learn about this genocide btw? In Germany we only hear about the Holocaust, but literally never about the Holodomor. Nearly no one ever heard of it here. Thats kinda sad if you ask me...

[–]Remove Kebabkinmix 67ポイント68ポイント  (14子コメント)

Because genocide is something which targets particular ethnic group. If you read more about the Holodomor, you'll see that it wasn't targeting Ukrainians, they just happen to be a nation worst affected by it.

[–]Dinkelbert 18ポイント19ポイント  (2子コメント)

Because genocide is something which targets particular ethnic group.

The definition is broader, though:

Genocide is the intent to systematically eliminate a racial, ethnic, religious, cultural or national group.

Now I am not sure whether the Holodomor can be classified due to the extermination of a cultural or national group, but ethnicity, as I pointed out above, is not the limiting factor.

[–]modada 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

It was not aimed at one cultural, religious, national or ethnic group. Ukraine was one of the most affected though, but same laws were pretty much applied to every other soviet nation. Kazakhstan lost more people in terms of percentage for instance.

[–]Earthujorge 23ポイント24ポイント  (0子コメント)

Because the communist have better P.R. than the nazis....

[–]SwedenFramfall 29ポイント30ポイント  (7子コメント)

Because its a debated subject. There are countless of evidence that it was the intention of the nazis to exterminate different groups. This isn't the same, the intention to exterminate Ukrainians isn't there. Therefore most countries doesn't recognize it as a genocide. Most of the few countries that do call it a genocide have a history with Russia/USSR and a political interest in painting them in a worse light.

[–]EnglandDovahMetal 17ポイント18ポイント  (3子コメント)

So, when you have a population of Ukrainians refusing to be collectivised into a new serfdom by the Soviet state, and the state begins cutting off all supplies of food, actively confiscating food stores, refusing foreign aid, continuing to export grain while 30,000 a day are dying of starvation - there is no intention?

Give me a break.

(Edit for clarity)

[–]PoliticalPrisonGuard 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

The Soviets confiscated food because the famine affected more than just Ukraine, and they needed to help feed people in the areas more drastically affected. Not to mention how the kulaks would burn their grain rather than hand it over to the Soviets. The famine may have been partly a result of bad planning, but it was also affected by deliberate sabotage. But the USSR definitely didn't purposely starve their own citizens. There were famines under the Tzar every ten years or so, and the famine that took place during the "Holodomor" was the last of the great famines to impact the USSR.

[–]dracony 10ポイント11ポイント  (12子コメント)

Moved to Germany from Ukraine a year ago, was really surprised how USSR is not demonized here at all after all kinds of stuff they did here.

Even at checkpoint Charlie the general tone about USSR is like "its a part of history that we have to accept"

[–]ClashOfTheAsh 23ポイント24ポイント  (8子コメント)

"its a part of history that we have to accept"

This seems like the best attitude to have. You want people to not approach history reasonably? 'Demonizing' something is pretty pointless. How are we to ever learn from history if we act like the people who did bad things weren't human like me and you?

[–]dracony 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

Well sure, but then you can also buy a USSR themed hat right there at the spot. Which seems strange

[–]Dinkelbert 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

Especially since all hell would break loose if you were able to buy anything Nazi related.

[–]United States of Americathewimsey 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

That's no really the actual German attitude. The actual German attitude is that they did so much bad during that time period that they don't feel comfortable criticizing what others did, lest it look like they are trying to minimize what they did.

Which is completely understandable, but it's not something that should necessarily be applauded as a laudable way of looking at history. It's clearly not how Germans look at their own history (which is laudable).

[–][削除されました]  (2子コメント)

[deleted]

    [–]ClashOfTheAsh 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    What attitude are you talking about?

    I'm Irish and people often joke about the Famine. Something a lot of people argue should be called a genocide and our population still is lower than it was before it happened. But I don't expect people who aren't Irish or British to know anything about it, let alone have any sort of emotional attachment.

    Countless genocides have happened in world history but only one is as recognised as the Holocaust. I don't know exactly why that is but Holodomor certainly isn't the only other genocide in its shadow.

    [–][deleted] 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Love that about Germany. They don't play vicitm

    [–]Suid-Afrika 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Because their hands aren't clean either. Germans weren't helpless victims.

    [–]biased_milk_hotel 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Within the currently hyper-charged political milieu, the Holodomor has become a source of great controversy. On the one hand, Ukrainians argue that the famine constitutes genocide since the Holodomor targeted ethnic Ukrainians and was a direct result of Stalin's forced collectivization and massive grain exports. According to historians, the famine reflected Stalin's drive to stamp out Ukrainian nationalism which had earlier come to the fore during the country's civil war. Experts believe that Stalin could have spared Ukraine if had he re-directed grain exports to feed the peasants. On the other hand, the Kremlin claims the famine was not organized along strictly ethnic lines. In this version, the Holodomor wasn't deliberate genocide but rather the simple result of a poor crop season and Soviet inability to harvest grain.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nikolas-kozloff/ukraine-in-the-midst-of-w_b_7984618.html

    I wrote a research paper on this a few years ago. Some of the reasons its suspected to be a genocide are 1) Ukraine wanted to break free of Russia and 2) Stalin would not let Ukrainians leave their country while they starved. They were kicked off trains and sent back. A lot of people believe this was a deliberate attempt to stamp out Ukrainian nationalism and ethnic pride. Russia is not too excited to admit it committed genocide.

    [–]watnuts 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Did you learn about Irish famine?

    There's just too much stuff in history to teach everything in school. So (usually) you learn just things relevant to your country. So in Germany you don't learn about chinese/korean/ukrainian famines, but do learn about Holocaust.

    IMHO it's really reasonable and if you're that curious - study history more thorough.

    [–]Turkeydelbosforo 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

    We have two popular genocides, the Holocaust and the Armenian genocide. We even forget other people than the Jewish were killed in Holocaust, while the history is full of many genocides, carried out by various entities, among which European colonists, various empires... Even the Bible has one genocide in it, the extermination of Midianites. The colonisation of Africa and America has resulted in a series of genocides for centuries. Some Turco-Mongols has destroyed entire nations. But as always, people are short-sighted and/or want to know about genocides that are useful to them.

    [–]East Midlands of EnglandMardyBastard 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Very true. Every country has committed atrocities and made nasty decisions in their history. People always want to paint things in a certain light.

    [–]Franconiatop_logger 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Because Soviet Russia aggressively denied the genocide(and famine). Also in those times Soviet Russia was not part of civilized world.

    [–]arqoi 39ポイント40ポイント  (3子コメント)

    What is Soviet Russia? The RSFSR only constituted about half of the population of the USSR.

    [–]_ferz 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Because it's a famine and not a genocide.

    [–]Minas Morgulzurfer75 21ポイント22ポイント  (6子コメント)

    A quote from the Kiev city court decision on Holodomor (GTed):


    Judge of the Chamber of Criminal Cases of the Appeal Court of Kyiv Skavronik VM, the Secretary Bondarenko MS, with the participation of Attorney Department of the Prosecutor's Office of Kyiv Dotsenko AN undertook a preliminary review of the criminal case number 1-33 / 2010 instituted the Service Safety of Ukraine the fact of committing genocide in Ukraine in 1932-1933 for the crime under Part. 1, Art. 442 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine regarding

    • Stalin (Dzhugashvili) Stalin, December 21, 1879 born native of the city. Gori, Georgian, since 1903 a member of the Bolshevik Party in April 1922 - Secretary of the CPSU (b);

    • Molotov (Scriabin) Vyacheslav Mikhailovich, March 9/25 February / 1890 born native of the city. Nolinska Vyatka Governorate (now city. Sovetsk Kirov region of Russia), Russian, since 1906 a member of the Bolshevik Party, from December 1930 to May 1941 - Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR and the Council of Labor and Defense;

    • Kaganovich Lazar Moiseyevich, 22 November 1893 born, born with. Boar (now the village. Poliske Kyiv region), Jewish, a member of the Bolshevik Party of 1911, which since 1921 has worked in the office of the RCP (b) in the years 1924-1925 - Secretary of the CPSU (b) in 1925-1928 - General Secretary of the CC CP (B), during the years 1928-1930 - in leadership positions in the All, Secretary of the CPSU (b) since 1930 - the first secretary of the Moscow City Committee and Regional Party Committee, head of the agricultural and transport departments of the CPSU (b), and since 1937 - Vice-President of SNK excluded from the ranks of the Communist Party in 1961 for participating in mass repression;

    • Postysheva Paul Petrovich, 18 September 1887 born native of the city. Ivanovo Ascension, Russian, since 1904 a member of the Bolshevik Party, from 1930 to 1933 - Secretary of the CPSU (b) from 29 January 1933 to 17 March 1937 - the second secretary of the CC CP (B) U and First Secretary of the Kharkiv Regional Committee of the CP (B);

    • Kosior Stanislav Vikentievich, November 18, 1889 birth, born in the city. Venhruv Venhruvskoho County siedlecki province (now the Warsaw Province of Poland), Polish, from July 1907 member of the Bolshevik Party, from 14 July 1928 until December 1937 - Secretary of the CC CP (B) U repressed in 1938, shot 26 February 1939, rehabilitated in 1956;

    • Vlas Chubar, 22/10 / February 1891 born native village. Fedorivka Alexander County Ekaterinoslav province, Ukrainian, from July 1907 member of the Bolshevik Party, in the period from July 1923 to April 1934 - Chairman of the Council of People's Commissars of the USSR;

    • Khatayevych Mendel Markovich, March 22, 1893 birth, born in the city. Gomel, Jewish, from July 1913 member of the Bolshevik Party, from October 1932 to January 1933 - the second secretary of the CC CP (B) U, 29 January 1933 - the first secretary of the Dnipropetrovsk regional committee of the Communist Party (Bolshevik).

    [–]ditchmydismay 33ポイント34ポイント  (56子コメント)

    I thought most of the Soviet was experiencing famine and it was largely due to a combination of natural events and human errors on both sides.

    I could well be wrong so feel free to correct me but I don't want to see any silly response from OP like r/RussiaDenies

    I am not a Putin bot. :P Just a Brit who's looking at the undecisice evidence or lack thereof to support the title's claim.

    [–]Artess 16ポイント17ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I think you're right. I'm from the former USSR, and the stories that are told in my family make it seem pretty much like you described. At the very least, there was severe hunger in large parts of Russia, so making it seem like a genocide targeted specifically at Ukrainians feels wrong to me.

    [–]Russian in NLiplie 33ポイント34ポイント  (17子コメント)

    You're right, except there weren't errors, that was the plan.

    Ukrainians tend to call it a genocide, but there were hardly any national or ethnical reasons. As you said, populations of other Soviet states (including Russians) experienced famine as well and died in huge numbers. I'm also not denying the whole thing, but it's important to note, because there's a difference in perception between the "Soviet government starving its citizens to death" and "Russians starving Ukrainians to death" points of view.

    [–]Opppressed heterosexual conservative Russian minorityParavin 3ポイント4ポイント  (9子コメント)

    We call the population movement (Balts out, Russians, Ukrainians, Belorussians in) what happened to us ''Genocide'' in some regards as well. It's a politically strong word, which can be used as a tool, y'know. It's a reason why the Armenian genocide is now a semantics pissing match.

    We'd love if Russians would be willing to admit that these were genocides (which we perceive), because it would give legitimacy for us further on opposing whitewashing of the USSR and their crimes.

    [–]Russian in NLiplie 24ポイント25ポイント  (7子コメント)

    It's a very strong word, because it implies ethnical or national hate and takes the whole situation on another level. You can see in this very thread how important it is for many people to consider Stalin a Russian (and all communists as well). It makes a huge difference in their minds.

    I have no problems in admitting crimes of the USSR, but I'm not gonna agree with "Evil Russians oppressed innocent Ukrainians" kind of bullshit. We were in that shit together.

    [–]Opppressed heterosexual conservative Russian minorityParavin 3ポイント4ポイント  (5子コメント)

    The issue lies in the language. There is a reason why we consider the Soviet occupation years the ''Russian'' years - Russian was forced on us, Russian-speakers were imported and without Russian you could not really do anything. When the KGB took you in and forced you to sign those death papers, they were all in Russian. The current Russian posturing of making the USSR better than it was, rehabilitating Stalin or considering the collapse of the USSR as something bad (taking into account the trauma of the 90ies might I say) makes it just a lot worse.

    If Russians really want to show that we were in that shit together, there needs to be more of a push from Russians themselves to show that they hated the USSR and that it was a shitty deal for everyone. Not ''oh we built factories and superpower''.

    [–]Russian in NLiplie 11ポイント12ポイント  (1子コメント)

    What I'm saying is that the Soviet times shouldn't be scaled down to what happened to certain nations and used as a fuel for nationalism. If we agree someting was a crime, we also need to agree on who commited it, who were the victims, how it happened and what were the reasons. Yeah, current Russian state went nuts and won't admit shit, but meanwhile there's also some work to be done from your side. Like, start paying attention to Russian victims of said crimes.

    [–]arqoi 5ポイント6ポイント  (1子コメント)

    taking into account the trauma of the 90ies might I say

    The collapse of the USSR was handled pretty badly though.

    Economic shock therapy ruined the demographics of post-Soviet states for decades to come.

    [–]Eestitoreon 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Yeah, it's not like our demographics were better during Soviet era either when the popuation growth was almost only due to mass immigration from the East which caused huge social tensions in the society. Demographics is not only about population increase, you know.

    [–]gooddude73 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    You guys are ridiculous. So, when 30 000 Latvian riflemen were helping Lenin, terrorizing and killing Russians it is okay, but when later you got attacked by the monster that was created with your help as well it is "duh russians genocide us". I don't believe in god, but it feels like it was some punishment from above for supporting Lenin. Karma, if you want. Also, it was Latvian riflemen, who suppressed anti-Bolshevik rebellion in Saratov and Kazan. It was Latvian riflemen who fought against the Whites in North-West.

    Genocide is a legal term and you just use it wrong.

    [–]FranceLow_discrepancy 19ポイント20ポイント  (18子コメント)

    Just a Brit who's looking at the undecisice evidence or lack thereof to support the title's claim

    Do you also want a letter from Bush saying he lied about WMDs? And one from Nixon saying he's a crook?

    History is written by victors and Stalin was undoubtedly victorious. He had enough time to hide and trails. His reign lasted 20 years more after this famine. He had full control of archives, news papers etc.

    And people who followed weren't exactly keen on admitting fault, were they?

    [–]Argueforthesakeofit 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

    History is written by victors and Stalin was undoubtedly victorious. He had enough time to hide and trails. His reign lasted 20 years more after this famine. He had full control of archives, news papers etc.

    So historic research doesn't matter and you'll believe whatever fits your predetermined views.

    [–]FranceLow_discrepancy 10ポイント11ポイント  (3子コメント)

    Exactly. That's how those people that want irrefutable proof act. They set the bar impossibly high without analysing all the available information.

    They want a silver bullet. A video of Stalin saying: "We did it!" and anything short of that is worthless.

    Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence!

    [–]Argueforthesakeofit 1ポイント2ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Why did they do it? And why didn't they do it all the way if they wanted to do it? No allied army stopped them.

    You have no proof, no motive, not anything really other than a need to have them be the bad guys. I don't know, maybe that makes you feel a bit better for all the messed up things you indirectly -or directly- support?

    [–]Swedenhelm 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

    It's well known why they did it. They wanted to collectivize the agriculture in Ukraine. Unfortunately for Ukrainians, this meant that well-functioning farms were forced out of the farmers' hands and that harvests were put under Bolshevik control. To break the farmers who resisted this change, they took the harvest and gave them nothing in return. Millions of people had no food and no money, and had to steal in order to survive. Those in the Bolshevik party who noticed the effect of the famine were called into question and had to pretend that everything was fine or expect being sent off to a work camp.

    [–]PolandO5KAR 14ポイント15ポイント  (12子コメント)

    human errors

    Nicely said. This is what happends when you enforce insane ideology despite every reason and when it fails... you push even harder and blame the people, farmers in this case.

    Poland wasn't the nicest place for Ukrainians then, but noone was killing them or stealing their food so they'd just starve to death.

    [–]ditchmydismay -1ポイント0ポイント  (1子コメント)

    I'm not denying it wasn't man engineered, I just would like to see some evidence.

    Many people like to believe Mao purposely created a famine to commit genocide on his people, and refuse to read the facts that it was because of poor policies, failure of the state to deliver resources and terrible management between provincial states. No one blames the Chinese farmers for the famine and rightly so; I never blamed the farmers for the Soviet famine either.

    Edit: Just would like to say I'm not a Mao apologist. His reign was awful for China and its people.

    [–]PolandO5KAR 15ポイント16ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Read about collectivisation, kolhoz, "kulaks" and so on...

    I don't really care if communists were plain massmurderers or idiots, i'd say they were both. The effect was horrible, whatever the reason or excuses. The soviets blamed the farmers.

    [–]irish_smithwick 9ポイント10ポイント  (2子コメント)

    Soviet Communists.

    And Stalin was Georgian, if I recall.

    Stop trying to hijack this subreddit into Ukraine's cause.

    [–]LightOfDendi 11ポイント12ポイント  (0子コメント)

    How convenient that you left out a couple of millions of ethnic Russians who died in the famine as well, but let's just call it a genocide by evil Russians when half of USSR's ruling party of that time period wasn't even Russian like Stalin and Trotsky and call it a day.

    [–]anonimski 25ポイント26ポイント  (31子コメント)

    Stalin was Russian?

    [–]Latviaangryteabag 15ポイント16ポイント  (19子コメント)

    he was actually a Georgian, but that doesn't really matter in this situation.....just like Hitler was not really German, but a Austrian.

    [–]Libertariantrenescese 22ポイント23ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Well, there's a much bigger difference between a Georgian and a Russian than between German and Austrian

    [–]anonimski 26ポイント27ポイント  (12子コメント)

    The history of Communist persecution against Ukrainians, Russians, Balts and others gets narrated as Russian persecution against Ukrainians.

    Don't you see the problem here?

    [–]GermanyTimaeGer 29ポイント30ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Austrian - German

    Vs

    Russian - Georgian

    Yeaaaah ... He wasn't Russian.

    [–]PolandO5KAR 6ポイント7ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Internationalists have no nationality. Stalin, as every communist was homeless.

    [–]AwesomeLove 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    No. Stalin was a giant Georgian robot. He shot lasers out of his eyes and he had the power of mind control. That is how one men bended the wills of millions to become mass murderers.

    [–]Banana Republic of Northern Cypruscametosaybla 11ポイント12ポイント  (5子コメント)

    I wonder if we can use the same phrase for the other genocides and man-made famines, with the words like "capitalists" or even something like maybe "anti-monarchists", or I don't know "conservatives"? Why not go with Stalinist regime or Stalin's rule or something, instead of general terms; I really can't see the logic though I can see the intention.

    [–]Slavoniaskodarap 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I agree with you on that one. It seems that at this day and age oversimplifications and generalizations are the name of the game.

    [–]Polandajuc 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Yeah. And stop saying nazis were responsible for Holocaust.

    [–]blackstonebite 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

    have no sympathies to any communists, but truth have to be said - there were not only russian communists, but any kind of them - jewish , german and ukrainians as well. and the victims were not exclusively ukrainians. my grandmother told how entire villages along volga and don were wiped out in 32-33. the kazakhs, by the way suffered most of all. more than 1/4 were dead because this hunger

    [–]stevejazzx 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I found this fascinating so looked into it and found this on talk wiki - it seems much more complex

    Character Assassination[edit] In his New York Times articles (including one published on March 31, 1933), Duranty repeatedly denied the existence of a Ukrainian famine in 1932–33. In an article in NYT, August 24 1933, he claimed "any report of a famine is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda", This is a pure distortion of his reporting. For one, the quotation is selective. This is what Duranty really wrote on 23 August 1933: The excellent harvest about to be gathered shows that any report of a famine in Russia is today an exaggeration or malignant propaganda Duranty was entirely correct on this. Demographic reports from the archives show that by September, death rates in Ukraine had largely returned to normal. In June, the crude death rate in Ukraine was 196/1000. By September, however, it dropped to 23/1000. Duranty was therefore correct with his assertion that at the time of his writing, famine in USSR had ceased. As Duranty wrote, the splendid harvest of 1933 had ended by the start of autumn. Duranty, in the very same article, wrote the following:

    The food shortage which has affected almost the whole population in the last year, and particularly in the grain-producing provinces--that is, the Ukraine, North Caucasus, the Lower Volga region--has, however, caused heavy loss of life. Although it is pure guesswork to attempt any estimate of the loss of life so far, not so much from actual starvation as from manifold diseases due to lowered resistance and to general disease in the last year, approximations are now possible. Among peasants and others receiving bread rations conditions were certainly not better. So with a total population in the Ukraine, North Caucasus and Lower Volga of upward of 40,000,000 the normal death rate would have been about 1,000,000. Lacking official figures, it is a conservative to suppose that this was at least trebled last year in those provinces and considerably increased for the Soviet Union as a whole. Above, Duranty acknowledged severe economic hardships among the population. Duranty was correct in saying that deaths resulted from manifold diseases rather than actual starvation. Soviet data showed 800,000 cases of typhus in 1933. In the famine-stricken regions of Ukraine, North Caucasus, and Lower Volga, Duranty estimated that there were perhaps 2 million excess deaths. Guess what--Duranty was correct nearly 60 years before the exposure of declassified Soviet data. For 1933 declassified Soviet data showed a total of 1.73 million excess deaths in Ukraine, Lower Volga, and North Caucasus. Therefore, not only did Duranty acknowledge the occurrence of famine which he correctly called a food shortage, he also proved remarkably accurate in his estimations of the demographic consequences.

    [–]Ukrainewalt_ua[S] 7ポイント8ポイント  (66子コメント)

    It was a long term plan of Russian communists and Joseph Stalin, an attempt to eliminate the Ukrainian independence movement.

    Ukrainians were prohibited to harvest and store any food for personal use, while ripened grain was abundant.

    Any kind of edible product was expropriated.

    Communist squads swept through Ukrainian countryside searching for food stashes and punishing by death those, who dared to keep anything hidden.

    Uprisings in rural areas were brutally suppressed.

    Huge parts of the country had been cordoned and roadblocks established; those trying to flee were either shot or turned back to starve to death.

    Rural Ukraine was starved to death. The death toll is still not known, while estimates vary from 5 to 10 million. To survive, people were forced to resort to cannibalism. Women eating their children and going mad - a common occurrence during early and mid 1933.

    During 1932-1933 Soviet Union sold abroad a record-breaking amount of grain.

    To this day Russian government denies any involvement, promoting notion of ''wide-spread drought that affected all of Soviet Union''.

    [–]gooddude73 33ポイント34ポイント  (47子コメント)

    It was a long term plan of Russian communists and Joseph Stalin, an attempt to eliminate the Ukrainian independence movement.

    Communists were not "Russians", they were internationalists, and at that time, "Russians" were making up less than 30% of the party of Bolsheviks. Joseph Stalin had nothing to do with the Russians, he was a huge russophobe. Just read his thoughts on ethnic-territorial division of Russia (TL:DR "Russian, give all territories to ethnic minorities, you bloody bastard!)

    Also, it's very imprtant to mention, that Russian Soviet Republic (RSFSR), unlike Ukraine, Belarus, Kazakhstan etcetera, never had its own branch of Communist party. When after WW2 some Russians tried to create a Russian Communist party, it ended really bad for them i.e. this https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leningrad_Affair The main groups who were in favor of Bolshevik/Communist policy were non-Russian groups because they got literal languages, new territories, and huge dotations.

    Bonus pic, "Russian" Communists look at you lel http://imgur.com/4xEVend

    [–]Ein Prosit!schitler 5ポイント6ポイント  (5子コメント)

    Looking at this thread (including the now deleted comments) I get the impression that the same can be said about the Holodomor as about the Holocaust: "The Russians will never forgive the Ukrainians for the Holodomor."

    [–]AwesomeLove 4ポイント5ポイント  (4子コメント)

    Can you rephrase? I followed your instructions and arrived at "The Germans will newer forgive the Jews for the Holocaust". This does not make a lot of sense.

    [–]Ein Prosit!schitler 9ポイント10ポイント  (2子コメント)

    It does, it's a sardonic way to describe a situation where the attacker doesn't want to face up to their deeds and thus lashes out at the victim because they survived as a symbol of the crime. Authorship is disputed, it was used by multiple people after WW2.

    [–]Grand Duchy of LithuaniaIExpectYouToDie 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

    That could not be further away from the truth. Germans acknowledged and apologised for their past mistakes. Russians never did that and are denying everything to this day.

    [–]Ein Prosit!schitler 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

    I suppose it seemed somewhat unlikely that Germans would come to terms with their past after WW2. From what I know, it sums up a lot of Jewish bitterness very well, so regardless of the accuracy of the prediction, I like the quote a lot.

    [–]United KingdomBacchus87 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

    Yeah but they weren't real Europeans so they don't actually count as people. Why else is Hitler a dirty word, while Stalin and Mao are mere dictators, when they killed more people?

    [–]State of MindInVin0Veritas 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Because Russians still openly feel sentiment towards him, and Russian authorities not only allow it, they support it.

    Do you imagine similar demonstration to be allowed in Germany with Hitler portraits and swastikas ?

    [–]SerbiaBageer 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

    "Russian communist" yeah fucking right!?!

    Last time I checked Stalin was the supreme ruler of Soviet Union at the time and he was Georgian. Stalin was like Kim Jong Un on steroids, and his word was like Gods gift to people of USSR, and there was no RUSSIAN that could make Stalin change his mind.

    Therefore title of this article is wrong or simply made to be propaganda by saying Russian Communist.

    [–]Russian_Spring 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Stalin was a subject of the Russian empire. He was also a huge russophile.

    To be fair to USSR it was made to be equal, until Stalin made it into a Russian controlled entity. I mean Hitler was Austrian, but we dont see German Nazis trying to pull that as an excuse to dodge blame.

    [–]tbqhfamsmh 1ポイント2ポイント  (26子コメント)

    Can someone TL;DR me on why this is causing so much controversy? Why do so many people get so booty bamboozled when the Holodomor is brought up?

    [–]RussiaRinnve 18ポイント19ポイント  (17子コメント)

    The Holodomor isn't a simple and oh so common case of "one ethnicity killing another", it was a complex event where several different factors combined with a disastrous outcome. However, it is often portrayed as a simple case of "Russians [or Soviets] killing [freedom-loving] Ukrainians", first by Nazi propaganda, then by the West during the cold war. Hence the controversy.

    Personally, as a Russian I feel insulted every time it is portrayed as a "genocide of Ukrainians": this way millions of Russians (and other people, of course) who died during Holodomor go unnoticed.

    [–]Opppressed heterosexual conservative Russian minorityParavin 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Because Eastern Europe is locked in a very hateful faceoff between most Eastern Europeans who were underneath the Russian-dominated Soviet Union, and the Russians themselves. Russians consider it an insult to themselves and to the Soviet Union when implicated that the Holodomor might have been a genocide, Ukrainians consider it historical whitewashing if it is not considered as such. Frankly speaking it's not even about politics anymore - it's about what the common man believes and what his family has taught him. My family made me despise the USSR, so for me it's hard to be unbiased and treat the USSR as a victim of historical revision.

    [–]mataro_1 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

    Look at who the founder of the 90ies might I say The collapse of the White movement would have been crushed before they consolidated much of their power.