4
5

Let's talk about mods. (self.GGdiscussion)

Teuthex が 投稿

並べ替え:
ベスト
トップ新着論争中古い順Q&A
あなたは単独のコメントのスレッドを見ています。

残りのコメントをみる →

[–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSGoats only - tits and asses need not apply -1ポイント0ポイント  (26子コメント)

Is this because you misinterpreted a joke?

[–]the_8th_guest 5ポイント6ポイント  (25子コメント)

No, it's because Judgeholden is objectively terrible at being a mod, as evidenced by the forum they mod imploding due to total incompetence.

[–]Bitter_one13Sometimes I get worried that appeals CAN'T be filed in modmail[M] 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Rule 1. Knock out the last two sentences and you'll be good.

[–]Strich-9 -3ポイント-2ポイント  (2子コメント)

their forum imploded because GGers can't handle debate. They came here so they could elect two of the worse posters from aGG to protect their feelings.

It's going well, you can't even mention what Teuthex thinks about Felicia Day anymore

[–]TaxTime2015Hypocrisy is boring -1ポイント0ポイント  (0子コメント)

The she is only popular because she has a vagina?

[–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSGoats only - tits and asses need not apply -4ポイント-3ポイント  (20子コメント)

You mean AGG losing the pros because the pros couldn't remove a mod who did nothing but behind the scenes moderation? GGers left in a giant hissy fit because they didn't get what they wanted. Anything that is not heavily titled in GGs favor GG has a tendency to try and ruin it or just leave in this case. Its always been like that. GG does not operate well in actual discussion. So you guys came and made this safe space where you can mod away opinions you disagree with and pretend you are winning a discussion.

[–]the_8th_guest 3ポイント4ポイント  (12子コメント)

You mean AGG losing the pros because the pros couldn't remove a mod who did nothing but behind the scenes moderation?

Are you talking about the mod who was found flagrantly violating the rules then sent me a hateful PM when I found out about it and reported it?

The rules violations are well-documented and not up for debate, sorry. In this case reality has a me bias. What you are doing is akin to repeating "ZQ traded sex for good reviews" - repeating something that is very clearly false because the truth is less convenient. The fact that you think you are on the good guy team doesn't make blatant lying justifiable.

GGers left in a giant hissy fit because they didn't get what they wanted.

Are you throwing a giant hissy fit right now? It seems like by your estimation you are.

It doesn't seem like your comments are being moderated out. It seems like you're just angry because people are disagreeing with them. Those aren't the same thing. "Actual discussion" means sometimes people won't agree with you. That's not a sign of bad moderation.

[–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSGoats only - tits and asses need not apply 0ポイント1ポイント  (11子コメント)

Are you talking about the mod who was found flagrantly violating the rules then sent me a hateful PM when I found out about it and reported it?

Did you publish this comment anywhere?

Are you throwing a giant hissy fit right now? It seems like by your estimation you are.

I want a discussion. We were having a discussion on AGG until the Pro-GGers threw their fit. Now I can't because I am getting modded to no end. You all left for a safe space.

[–]the_8th_guest 0ポイント1ポイント  (10子コメント)

Did you publish this comment anywhere?

I published it on /agg and I informed the mods, who did nothing and fibbed to cover for their mod friend. I also informed them that an /agg mod sent me a hateful PM - also no response. They told me that I can't discuss mod issues on /agg outside of a monthly mod thread, which so far hasn't materialized. (At this point it's far too late anyway) Not sure what else I should do - mail you a newsletter?

Now I can't because I am getting modded to no end.

Do you have a concrete example of a comment of yours that was inappropriately modded? The word "inappropriately" is important here - it's quite possible you are being modded entirely appropriately.

If you are making reasonable comments that are being modded out I will support you - I don't like to see people silenced, even people who I greatly disagree with. But I need examples of bad moderation, not just of moderation.

[–][削除されました]  (9子コメント)

[removed]

    [–]the_8th_guest 2ポイント3ポイント  (6子コメント)

    Nope, I'm talking about the time HokesOne didn't report two other /agg posters for doing the exact same thing Janvs did.

    [–][削除されました]  (4子コメント)

    [removed]

      [–]Bitter_one13Sometimes I get worried that appeals CAN'T be filed in modmail[M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (2子コメント)

      Reported, will allow.

      [–]Teuthex[S,M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      R5

      [–]zakata69 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      To clarify, it was the same situation, right? Because you have a habit of making claims that aren't quite as accurate as you want them to be, and I don't want to go looking into this only to find out that there's some weird loophole like the person linking it wasn't an AgainstGamerGate poster or something.

      [–]Bitter_one13Sometimes I get worried that appeals CAN'T be filed in modmail[M] 0ポイント1ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Rule 1, knock out that last sentence and will re-allow.

      [–]TaxTime2015Hypocrisy is boring 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

      I want a discussion. We were having a discussion on AGG until the Pro-GGers threw their fit. Now I can't because I am getting modded to no end. You all left for a safe space.

      [–]SovereignLoverPro-GG 3ポイント4ポイント  (6子コメント)

      GG operates fine in actual discussions, but there is no reason to talk on an anti soapbox. I don't fault anyone for wanting to waste their time on something less tedious than dealing with aGGro's heinous bullshit.

      The actual problem is that SJWs, in every environment, angrily refuse to participate unless they control the discourse, and so the only places to communicate with them meaningfully are the places sane people least want to visit.

      [–]Strich-9 -1ポイント0ポイント  (3子コメント)

      GG operates fine in actual discussions, but there is no reason to talk on an anti soapbox

      Actually the rules there were neutral and people largely didn't get banned or censored.

      Here though, anti's are censored en masse for making arguments

      [–]SovereignLoverPro-GG 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

      I read AGG plenty. I saw the moderation bias personally. It was an anti sub.

      [–]SHOW_ME_YOUR_GOATSGoats only - tits and asses need not apply -2ポイント-1ポイント  (1子コメント)

      Wait GG refused to participate because they couldn't control AGG. Are you saying that GGers are this mythical SJW that we are always hearing about?

      Nice scary strawman there though friend.