上位 200 件のコメント表示する 500

[–]7oba 1569ポイント1570ポイント  (714子コメント)

"Just because you think one transgender person is a fucking dumbass,
doesn't mean you hate all of them, or you are 'transphobic'."

[–]robshookphoto 675ポイント676ポイント  (674子コメント)

It would be GREAT if threads about Caitlyn were actually like Rogan's views. How did he open?

"I have a theory about all this ultra sensitivity and ultra progressive thinking. All this stuff is very good. ... I think that what it is, is blow back against racisim or sexism or homophobia."

Instead, every thread about her has people insisting on calling her "him" or "Bruce," people quoting articles about how it's a mental disability and trans doesn't exist, and just general complaints about SJWs. THOSE are common here, and people are rightly called transphobic for saying them.

[–]Biorach 1033ポイント1034ポイント  (586子コメント)

I honestly am transphobic. I can't comprehend why someone would mutilate themselves to such a degree other than if they were mental.

And I know I'm going to get downvoted to shit for this but whatever.

You can chop up your dick and rearrange it all you want but you still have a Y chromosome. You are still a guy.

WITH THAT BEING SAID - I still treat transgender people with respect. I don't understand them, and I may not agree with them, but I can still like them as people.

[–]IamGroooot 12ポイント13ポイント  (4子コメント)

Piggybacking off this comment:

Would it be transphobic to not date someone because they're trans, even if they've had their genitals converted? I just wouldn't be able to date someone knowing that at some point in time they were the same gender as me. I'm curious what a trans person would think about this.

[–]Accipia 734ポイント735ポイント x2 (47子コメント)

Getting a few facts out of the way here: Some people who are transgender elect not to have surgery. Some people with a Y chromosome are born female, because biology is messy and complicated and not binary. Now on to...

I can't comprehend why someone would mutilate themselves to such a degree other than if they were mental.

Many transgender people don't understand either, and almost all wish at some point their feelings would just go away... but they don't. You describe this as "being mental", but what does that even mean? In my experience, people most often use this as shorthand for saying "I think transgender people should be treated by psychologists by getting rid of their transgender feelings, not by changing their bodies to fit those feelings". And you know what, that makes a lot of sense. In fact, it makes so much sense that it was the first thing that was tried in terms of mental health treatment for trans people. There is just one problem... it doesn't work. Like with treatments for homosexuality, it just fails to have any significant effect, in spite of the range of treatments that have been tried.

So gradually, mental health professionals moved away from that, and started seeing if there were other ways to help transgender people cope. They weren't only transgender, after all, depression and suicide were also skyhigh among this group. Turns out, what does work to increase transgender quality of life is acceptance. By themselves, their environment, and professionals. Hormone treatments and surgery make transgender people more productive, more happy members of society, less prone to all sorts of mental health issues. So, that has become the standard treatment in recent years. Is that mental? I don't think so. I don't think society is meaningfully hurt either by letting these people exist and do their thing. In fact, it seems the more you do that, the better the results for everyone involved.

[–]Giantpanda602 65ポイント66ポイント  (3子コメント)

Excellent comment, thanks for taking the time to clearly explain the issue.

[–]WrongSubreddit 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

For curiosity's sake I decided to look up what percentage of the population has complete androgen insensitivity syndrome. 2-5/100,000 or .002-.005%

[–]CyberTractor 7ポイント8ポイント  (1子コメント)

I'm fairly accepting of trans people, but I'm against teenagers having hormone therapy to prevent puberty. This set off one of my friends saying I was closed minded and he refused to hear out my reasoning.

Puberty is extremely complicated and we don't understand all the ramifications of blocking puberty. We could be seriously screwing those people up in the long-term and as of now have no way of knowing because no long-term study has been done.

Also, teenagers by default are hormonal and make poor choices. I want those kids to get some therapy to see if their gender dysphoria comes from depression as opposed to it being legitimate trans wishes.

Didn't have a good spot to throw this in, so posted it here.

[–]Jedi_Outcast 558ポイント559ポイント  (220子コメント)

I honestly am transphobic. I can't comprehend why someone would mutilate themselves to such a degree other than if they were mental.

That isn't transphobic.

It's a reasonable reaction to someone drastically changing their bodies.

Don't let people confuse you. Unless you think transgenders are less than people, you're not transphobic.

[–]RockTripod 234ポイント235ポイント  (37子コメント)

I love everything about this thread. Finally, we're talking about a sensitive issue with some grace, some care, and some honesty. People aren't being vilified for thinking outside the prescribed norm, and isn't this exactly the fucking point? Joe Rogan is absolutely, 100% on point. You might be a member of a protected class, be it gay, lesbian, transgender, or whatever. This does not put you beyond criticism if you are still a fucking cunt. It's not a bullet proof vest, it doesn't put you beyond reproach, and again, isn't that the fucking point?

[–]Max_TwoSteppen 31ポイント32ポイント  (32子コメント)

I agree with you that people who are different should not be beyond criticism. If I call a specific black man classless, that doesn't automatically make me a racist.

At the same time, it's worth pointing out that in the United States (federally, it may vary state to state) the LGBT community are not a protected class. That means you can commit what would be considered hate crimes (if they were black, disabled, Muslim, etc) and they cannot be charged as hate crimes since it was a result of them being LGBT.

A while back when Indiana caught flak for the Religious Freedom Act, I took the time to read the law and found nothing wrong with it (I am admittedly not a lawyer but the wording is pretty straight forward). In itself all it did was protect the rights of religious business owners. That did not extend to allowing racism, sexism, or anti-Muslim hate since those groups are protected minorities under law in the US. However, it did allow business owners to discriminate based on sexual orientation because of the lack of protections for members of minority genders and sexualities.

Edit: It appears that a law passed in 2009 by President Obama expands the laws to include issues of sexuality and gender identity. Somehow I did not come across this when I was researching the law some months ago. With that being the case, I see even less wrong with the Indiana RFA.

[–]uburoimerdre 6ポイント7ポイント  (2子コメント)

Wait.. LGBT is federally classed as victims of hate crimes.. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hate_crime_laws_in_the_United_States but that was all very well written what you said. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matthew_Shepard_and_James_Byrd,_Jr._Hate_Crimes_Prevention_Act

[–]Max_TwoSteppen 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Ahh, I see. My apologies, this was a number of months ago that I was doing research and I must somehow have missed that information. It's possible I was research protections in my state (which would be superceded by federal law but I might have missed some of the finer points).

I've edited my comment to reflect the reality of the situation.

[–]kalanosh 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

every thread about her has people insisting on calling her "him" or "Bruce," people quoting articles about how it's a mental disability and trans doesn't exist[...]and people are rightly called transphobic for saying them.

I know a lot of people like this that don't and wouldn't treat anyone that questioned and transitioned their gender as less of a person.

But people aren't confusing them, they are attacking people even if their general opinion is to support the movement, people say this is transphobic if it doesn't fit EXACTLY want i believe you shouldn't think or say.

Its interesting cause I believe transgender is primarily a result of our current society to accept gender roles as a fluid definition. So you get people making choices that are caused by gender dysphoria, but is gender dysphoria a result of cultural pressures during our development? Why would someone change their body if they can be whatever gender they want? I don't mean later in life, i mean if media, society, parents, teachers and other school mates saw it the same. Your sexual organs would just be a manifestation of how you reproduce. Not what you wear, how you act, ect. But currently no matter how far we have come in the gay and bi-sexuality rights we still have a cultural that have a high expectation set on each gender from even an infant age. Anyways its a question we can't answer yet without time. But most important is these people are people that aren't fitting the mold we designed and are suffering cause of it, be it cause they are in the wrong body or cultural pressure (though the real answer is never black and white and is probably a combination, i am arguing the majority fit the latter).

I have been labeled a transphobic cause of that view. Also been labeled homophobic cause I believe some gay people make a choice to be gay. I believe choice should be protected as much as someone born a certain way, especially if that choice affects no one else but that persons pursuit of happiness. I argue nothing is black and white and by arguing born vs choice against these conservative egg heads diminishes the possibility it is a choice also. Keeping it ambiguous in the debate focus on the real issue, these are people not harming you just wanting to do whatever they can to be happy in life and find their mate.

Having different views of the 'general' public that are on the side of the 'progressiveness' still gets you labeled. Its kinda of infuriating cause I am still a person who'd fight for peoples right to be happy. Same with some people who refuse to call someone 'him' or 'her'. We make an assumption based on other they are a hater, yet i've seen plenty people like that, that still wish we had a society were people weren't actively hateful towards transgenders.

You can't force people to think exactly like the group they want to. Its obvious in my opinion what created this issue in the first place they are cultivating new issues themselves, creating strict cultural pressure of societal expectations.

Anyways, you obviously aren't these people that would label me and jump quickly to attack the other people. It just seems strange that these people standing up for transgender would want everyone they can get on their side, not pick and choose based on what they agree with.

I had a friend who was a cross-dresser. Grew up in the 70/80s, much older than me. But he wanted to become a transgender, but back then it was very difficult to even try. So he bottled it up and eventually moved to Austin. Thats where I worked for a bit. We were pretty good co-workers and we hanged out a bit. He is comfortable who he is now, just being a cross-dresser. Thing is he calls EVERYONE a 'she'. He doesn't use any other gender pronouns but female for everyone. So i'd just call him a 'him'. Also cause he was totally a dude/bro with us and a chick at the same time. But he didn't care, he never once told me "Mind if you call me a she?". I got yelled at by a co-worker cause I wouldn't call him a she. I said he never identified that way with me, also he calls everyone a 'she', he is not running a campaign on what people should call him and disregards anyone elses gender pronouns. He didn't do it out of disrespect, he honestly just didn't care about gender pronouns.

But this co-worker who called me transphobic and was very hostile to me at work over it, completely ignored the fact i'd call one of our waiters a she all the time who was a transgender, totally looked like a dude though, and introduced themselves as a female.

But I am transphobic cause I don't fit that other person perfect perception of what she thinks the world should be. Even though Andy didn't care, didn't ask me, and never ever introduced himself as anything other than a male.

/rant

I think a lot of people that are supporters that aren't actually dealing with these situation (non gays, bi or trans) sometime forget what the objective is. None of the above people would consider anyone against them if their heart says to stand up for them as they are human.

Example: If someone said
" They may be faggots, but faggots deserve to be happy too"

I doubt any transgender, gay or bi would tell them to fuck off and not help get gays or anyone the right to marry and not be discriminated against. But it seems like other forget the objective and would rather spend time bashing that person.

So it bothers me cause you can't change the extreme opinion by rejecting every progress they've made to change their position. Its rare anyone swings from one stance to the other in a black and white fashion, its always gradual. But some people would fight anyone that makes any progress in their outdate and more harmful mindset even if that person supports the ultimate goal the group is trying to achieve.

[–]TheLetter10 55ポイント56ポイント  (32子コメント)

Transgender here. Kept my penis, wife loves it too much. Not all of us want to "mutilate" our bodies.

[–]permissionjunkie 3ポイント4ポイント  (12子コメント)

interesting. if its not to personal did your wife know you were having these thoughts/feelings before you married? does having a penis cause you any identity discomfort?

[–]TheLetter10 12ポイント13ポイント  (10子コメント)

No she didn't know, but she handled it mostly well. As for my penis, it doesn't really bother me.

[–]FullMetalBallsack 2ポイント3ポイント  (9子コメント)

wait, so you have tits and a penis?

[–]TheLetter10 7ポイント8ポイント  (5子コメント)

Yes. 36B (real).

[–]peasant_ascending 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

how are your breasts real if you were born with a penis?

I'm not trying to be rude, i'm genuinely curious. by "real" do you mean they grew on their own with hormone aide?

[–]TheLetter10 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Yes, I grew them with the aid of hormones. I do want implants though in the future.

[–]nyanpi 4ポイント5ポイント  (2子コメント)

Everyone is always so quick to assume that all trans women get reassignment surgery, but this just is not the case. It's expensive, scary, and many of us do not have crippling genital dysphoria so we choose not to.

In a perfect world, would I have the surgery? Sure, if it was instant and painless and free, but it's not and I do not necessarily hate my penis enough to go through with it. Believe it or not, genitals are not the core of my existence.

[–]biggalactus 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think what's important about the Trans movement is exactly this. You can't take this "group" and bundle them in to a category. No two person is the same. It shows that everyone is exactly different. It's beautiful. No ability to pinpoint. Thats what scares people. There will be no rally where everyone has the same type of experience that made them who they are. Many are afraid of individuals different from our traditional culture or social idea of normal. We can all come together. But the next step in Coexistence is tolerance that everyone is an individual. A group of individuals fighting for individuality!! It's the skeleton key that can unlock a more enlightened humanity.

[–]goldishblue 1ポイント2ポイント  (8子コメント)

What does your wife identify as?

[–]TheLetter10 2ポイント3ポイント  (7子コメント)

Straight woman. She doesn't consist herself as a lesbian, as she's not attracted to women but she is attracted to me.

[–]ShadoWolf 25ポイント26ポイント  (4子コメント)

I wouldn't rest your argument to heavily on genetics. For the most part the frame work for Sexual differentiation is actively fluid in mammals.

reposting one of my comment from a different thread.

XY and XX isn't really the biggest component when it comes to Sexual differentiation. The Y chromosume simple has the SRY gene that starts the process off. if your a programmer think of it like a build flag.

But the interesting thing is that a good chunk of our Sexual differentiation is active. in females FOXL2 chromosume 3 :https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forkhead_box_L2[1] If you Silence this gene in mouse models the ovaries turn into a kind of Testes. For Males DMRT1 actively keep testes from becoming Ovaries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DMRT1[2] http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v476/n7358/full/nature10239.html[3]

Sex is complicated, likely within the next 10 to 20 years it will be possible to use gene therapy to effect primary sexual characteristic. Coupled with tissue engineering, and the possibility for fully functional sex change will likely be possible.

[–]TotesMessenger 17ポイント18ポイント  (13子コメント)

[–]So_Many_546283173817 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

Man I'm going to shitpost all over that subreddit.

[–]ultimatemisogynerd 32ポイント33ポイント  (5子コメント)

Of fucking course they would.

[–]tomtim90 15ポイント16ポイント  (3子コメント)

The sad part is that this is actually a good discussion and isn't disrespectful at all.

[–]Ptolemaeus_II 9ポイント10ポイント  (2子コメント)

Doesn't matter. I got linked there a while ago for expressing that I didn't want my unborn daughter to be a whore.

[–]DoYouCali 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

People aren't allowed to discuss topics anymore. Thought you knew.

[–]StrongBad04 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

Glad to be reminded that there are people who want to shut down honest discussions that are an opportunity to understand other sides of an issue and talk openly about how people actually feel about things, instead reducing all conversations about these topics to those that occur only between like minded people and not across sides.

[–]ONLY_POST_SARCASM 14ポイント15ポイント  (0子コメント)

Oh look, the shitbags piped in...

[–]nogoodliar 20ポイント21ポイント  (7子コメント)

That's what's so strange about it. If we are going to accept a transgender a natural extension would be to accept people who can't help but feel uncertain about transgenders. You can't help being scared of spiders, you can't help who you're attracted to, and you can't help who you're not attracted to. As long as you're nice to everyone, who the fuck cares?

[–]turddit 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

yeah i think everyone should have to disclaim every controversial opinion they have by pre-backpedaling so that college kids don't get offended

[–]GEARHEADGus 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

It was at one point recognized by the DSM-V as Gender Dysphoria. It's an abnormality which in context isn't bad, its just not not normal.

[–]Hurrah_for_Karamazov 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't understand why a word ending in "phobic" (an incredibly condescending suffix) has to be used to describe people who hold a different philosophical position than you.

[–]lelnonnymoose 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

All this stuff is very good.

You didn't provide the full context. He still said that it's way too extreme and that it will hopefully balance out somewhere in the middle. The current state and thrust of this ultra progressive bullshit is decidedly not okay.

[–]blue_wat 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Personally I don't think people who are unwilling to refer to her as "she" or by her new name are transphobic and complaining about SJWs certainly isn't either.

[–]SerenadeSwift 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

A ton of people still called Ron Artest by his old name rather than calling him Meta World Peace and the temporary "Panda Friend" and they weren't considered racist or whatever else you'd consider it. They were just people who found what he had done to be out of the ordinary and didn't exactly view him as a good person. The same can be said about Caitlyn/Bruce Jenner, I mean her own children still call her "dad" so why are people who refer to her as Bruce considered transphobic?

[–]theanomaly904 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

When something is broken it's broken. We have tons and tons of broken people. This is just another form of a broken person... No one is better or worse from their degree of brokenness. The problem with this society is we now want to idolized the brokenness instead treating it what it is, broken.....

[–]OnlyRacistOnReddit 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

He also said that its gone too far. Important to point that out

[–]falconbox 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm not transphobic. I've got no problem with people being who they want.

Doesn't change the fact that he is still man to me. I'll call him Caitlyn, because he legally changed his name. But you can't change gender unless you can somehow remove the Y-chromosome from his genes.

[–]dbog42 9ポイント10ポイント  (3子コメント)

The difference is if you're making fun of someone who happens to be transgender, or making fun of someone because they're transgender. A lot of folks try to do the latter by claiming the former.

[–]FootofGod 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

He hits on my main problem with the people who hide behind PC: trying to hide from me giving them criticism as a person. It puts a barrier between it that cannot removed. If you're a stupid woman, you could grow twenty dicks and now you're a stupid, freakish man. Or whatever. But if you've referenced the fact that they're a woman once, they won't let it go. It's now sexist. Even if you don't, you only think that because they're a woman and they don't respect women. You must be afraid of them. If you DON'T reference that they're a woman, in fact, that's a sure sign that you view women as sub-human and won't even properly address them. It's a game for sniveling little shits who would rather do anything other than face harsh criticism of their person. That I don't like them, or maybe just something they do, down to their very soul. It's, ironically, the most priveleged thing I could ever imagine. Not even God gets to be free from criticism, as much as he tries.

[–]Roez 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I used to listen to Rogan's podcasts. It's entertaining, and if you listen to his views on any one thing they often seem reasonable (he makes good points here). After a time though it's easy to see why he's very susceptible to conspiracy theories. His different ideas are often contradictory, meandering, and all over the place. He will easily believe or bloat one experience into a long and convoluted notion or idea.

He's well read, has a lot of facts and knowledge. His connection of meaning with the facts though is lacking. It's somewhat hard to pin him down and really know what he believes. Still, a good guy and produces good content.

[–]IAmAPhoneBook 80ポイント81ポイント  (3子コメント)

With all that said, they don't even bring up the fact that Jenner has spoken out with less-than-progressive views on gay marriage, which in my mind just fucking reeks of hypocrisy.

[–]ardnax 30ポイント31ポイント  (1子コメント)

just more evidence of her being completely focused on her own shit, rather than the LGBT community.

even though gender does not equal sexuality, she's been given the spotlight and she fucked it up. but she did marry Kris Kardashian, did we think she was going to have intelligent views in the first place?

[–]illestredditorjew 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think her views on gay marriage weren't really out there during this interview, but you're totally right it's plain ridiculous.

[–]Justsmith22 143ポイント144ポイント  (30子コメント)

They raise a great point in this convo.

The problem is closed mindedness and not being open to discussion. There are so many people out there with good intentions who actually use that to internally justify their closed mindedness. It's one of the most alienating things to be around these people who don't accept any conflicting viewpoints, regardless of their intent.

So often people act like they've figured it all out--that they've discovered the key to morality. They somehow think that despite people thinking about and discussing these things for literally thousands of years that they've figured out the answer to ridiculously subjective ideas. It's absurd. Anything that can't be discussed is complete bull shit. As Socrates said, "the wisest man of all is the man who knows he knows nothing at all" or something. It's a statement still equally as relevant today. The only thing someone can justifiably be closed minded about is their own ignorance.

[–]QuitBeingLazy 402ポイント403ポイント  (94子コメント)

Podcasts are the the only place you can find people telling the truth these days. No real sponsors to upset. Just conversations. No commercial breaks every 3 minutes. I don't care what you listen to, but find a daily podcast. You won't go back.

[–]Looploop2128385 174ポイント175ポイント  (30子コメント)

The strangest part about podcasts is going back and watching regular media. The ads, product placement, and political correctness is painful to watch.

[–]metalgearonline12312 169ポイント170ポイント  (23子コメント)

ba doop doop doop Me Undies! Me Undies! No more Sweaty Balls

[–]ISOIO 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

MFW Amazon tells me I'm not interacting with 13 year olds

[–]funkybum 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'd rather see something they actually WANT to sponsor vs. Mega corporations bidding and you have no say in the matter.

[–]AccipiterQ 8ポイント9ポイント  (2子コメント)

I ordered a pair of their boxer-briefs, wearing them right now. They're good...but I don't get what the big deal is. My balls are about as comfortable as they are in my other boxer-briefs.

[–]PavelMatsyuk 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

His reads have produced some of his best moments on his podcast.

I was listening to "How did this get made?" hosted by Dr. Nosedick (or whatever) from The League and when he was doing a read for Blue Apron all I could think was "wow, this dude sounds like a whiney bitch."

I love ole Billy Bitchtit's little comments in the middle of an ad

[–]cooleyandy 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

This American Life is brought to you by Blue Ribbon. Eat delicious food, and make it in the comforts of your own home.

[–]Duliticolaparadoxa 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Right? I would be so okay with ads if they were delivered the way they are in podcasts, no yelling, no convoluted gimmicks, just a man pitching a product in normal volume speech.

[–]Pickles17 35ポイント36ポイント  (20子コメント)

The two people Joe was talking to are Tom Segura and Christina Poschiztky (I spelled that wrong but fuck it, polish is hard). They have a podcast called "Your mom's house" and its fucking hilarious. Get your jeans high and tight and give them a listen.

[–]QuitBeingLazy 3ポイント4ポイント  (13子コメント)

Will do. I'm sure it's good.

[–]Pickles17 1ポイント2ポイント  (12子コメント)

Any suggestions for daily podcasts (I like comedy and science) I've listened to Neil DeGrasse Tyson's

[–]Giygas 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

I know you asked for a daily podcast, but this one has such a big back catalog that you could listen every day for a year before catching up.

Check out Bill Burr's Monday Morning Podcast. If you're into sports, he pretty much likes every sport and talks about them for roughly 10% of every podcast. However, if you're like me and a bit indifferent about sports, most of the podcast is just him talking to himself about whatever topic comes to his mind and it's great. Even the advertisement reads are good because he just completely fucks them up every time.

He does the podcast every Monday morning and now Thursday afternoon.

[–]thedonald420 4ポイント5ポイント  (1子コメント)

I usually listen to JRE, Bill Burr, WTF w/Marc Maron, Your Mom's House, and Ari Shaffir's Skeptic Tank for Comedy and RadioLab and Dan Carlin's Hardcore history for non comedy.

I didnt like Ari's podcast at first (he is a bit cynical) but man his episode with the 9/11 first responder, really powerful stuff.

http://arithegreat.com/ari-shaffirs-skeptic-tank-235-first-responder-a-911-story-with-cris-italia/

[–]willfill 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

It's not every day that one comes out but there's hundreds of episodes; Radiolab. Listen to it, check out "the dark side of earth" or "Galapagos" their episodes are all about different things, but often science and the production value is top notch, the editing and transitions are great. If you want something funny your mom's house is my favourite comedy podcast.

[–]Pickles17 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Thanks for the suggestions. I downloaded the two radio lab episodes you suggested. Also, kiss my pussy!

[–]Camorak 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

Giant Bombcast. Beastcast.

[–]QuitBeingLazy 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I usually listen to Adam Carolla, Penn Jillete's Sunday School, Joe Rogan, and Bill Burr. Mostly comedy based.

[–]DWild_1 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

Other folks have told you about good comedy podcasts, like Bill Burr. It is not always science per se, however TED Radio Hour can give you that fix. Not daily, but they do enough shows for my weekly fix. The recent 2 part Podcast called Screen Time was great. A look at how screens have become so entrenched in our daily lives.

Also, not quite science, but Planet Money is a short podcast and the topics are usually interesting. 20-30 minute length.

[–]Quttlefish 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Man, I've tried so hard to get on board with their show. I love Tom's stand up and the both of them have moments of brilliance, but I can't make it through most episodes. They tend to take a premise and drag it on way too long. Wipegate was fucking dumb and listening to people laugh while watching dumb Youtube clips wears on me. I can handle Duncan rambling about elves coming to dull your razor blades, and Chris Ryan telling the same stories to different academics, but The Mommies tend to lose me pretty quickly.

[–]ShawnisMaximus 28ポイント29ポイント  (15子コメント)

What's the name of the guy he's talking to in this? I remember seeing some of his stand up and he's hilarious.

[–]cardinals1996 3ポイント4ポイント  (2子コメント)

Tom Segura. I saw him in Phoenix and it was the most I've ever laughed in my life. He's one of my favorite comedians.

[–]Pickles17 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

He has a podcast with is pregnant comedian wife and its called "Your mom's house" they have been doing the podcast for a long time now and are pretty damn funny.

[–]ArthurEhrat 373ポイント374ポイント  (11子コメント)

It's more dehumanizing to not tell jokes about somebody, because you are saying " I pity this creature so much that i cant make fun of her"

[–]Ravenman2423 160ポイント161ポイント  (7子コメント)

It's like we watched the same video

[–]ArthurEhrat 33ポイント34ポイント  (4子コメント)

I was just pointing out something that i think it's important for comedians, and for making a point or discuss something, like when a hear somebody saying how far can a joke go or how far can we discuss this. I think pity is the worst feeling you can have for somebody life, its like you only respect this person because you pity her/him.

[–]rockinkingdom 103ポイント104ポイント  (29子コメント)

Here, Bailey Jay, you filthy bastards.

[–]calaber24p 16ポイント17ポイント  (4子コメント)

Shes a pornstar I believe if any of you are extra interested

[–]Cheezy_Ichthyosaur 79ポイント80ポイント  (1子コメント)

Shes a pornstar I believe if any of you are extra interested

"I believe"... Right. We'll go with that. None of us knew who she was and we are sticking to that story.

[–]calaber24p 39ポイント40ポイント  (0子コメント)

starts to panic I don't even know who she is. What was her name bailies james?

[–]Swineflew1 52ポイント53ポイント  (3子コメント)

I remember my first time seeing the gif of her brushing her teeth.
"Holy shit I'd fuck her"
...
"Holy shit I'd fuck him"

[–]president_clint 14ポイント15ポイント  (2子コメント)

Aaaaand now I'm sexually confused

[–]aaqucnaona 40ポイント41ポイント  (0子コメント)

Well, being attracted to feminine qualities doesn't really indicate sexual confusion. You are still the same hetero guy [or gay woman] you were when you first clicked that pic. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–]Deggyy 6ポイント7ポイント  (0子コメント)

No, if you're a guy, you're straight. There's a reason porn isn't just close ups of vaginas. It's the feminine form that turns straight men and gay women on. And man, does she have it.

[–]Mr_Munchausen 76ポイント77ポイント  (13子コメント)

I have a theory about all this ultra sensitivity and ultra progressive thinking. All this stuff is very good. ... I think that what it is, is blow back against racisim or sexism or homophobia. It has just gone so far the other way that it's become preposterous, then it will balance out somewhere the middle.

[–]Jonmad17 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

Isn't that basically how the Hegelian dialectic works?

[–]nonspes 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Basically. In a Hegelian dialectic racism would be the thesis, Ultra-sensitivity would be the anti-thesis, and whatever the next in-between is would be the synthesis

[–]EmJay115 15ポイント16ポイント  (6子コメント)

It's honestly a good theory. I like the way Joe thinks about things. He finds a way to summarize things in a way that makes sense and is hard to argue against. For anyone interested you should definitely check out his podcast, The Joe Rogan Experience.

[–]blackmanrgh 11ポイント12ポイント  (3子コメント)

Sometimes he comes out with absolute bollocks, but I do think he's on point most of the time.

[–]Top-Cheese 2ポイント3ポイント  (2子コメント)

that will happen when you think outside the box. tough not to get carried away, so much information necessary to make sound judgements these days.

[–]Ginsbergs-girlfriend 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I'm glad he said that, because that's exactly how I feel, but I hadn't heard anyone on TV/radio/videos say it. I definitely think that this is a swing to the pendulum in response to all the bigotry that people have faced over the years. And even if people are pushing back against it, individuals are stopping to think about how they treat and talk about other people. Gender, sexuality, and ethnic issues are being given more spotlight. With any luck, we will hit a more neutral point in a few years where people aren't bullied for being of a minority group OR being ignorant (though, granted, if you have been given the opportunity to learn and chose to be mean, that's a different story).

[–]gfysbro 222ポイント223ポイント  (118子コメント)

I would vote for Joe Rogan.

[–]Ravenman2423 120ポイント121ポイント  (80子コメント)

i think hes a generally cool dude and i think he says a lot of smart things but he can also pull the really dumb thing out of his ass occasionally and make you question everything. his opinion on sports, for example.

[–]SensibleDictator 24ポイント25ポイント  (47子コメント)

his opinion on sports, for example.

What's his opinion on sports?

[–]Toasterss 51ポイント52ポイント  (43子コメント)

He doesn't watch sports other than MMA, so I don't know what the guy above you is on about.

[–]jerseywilcomply 67ポイント68ポイント  (41子コメント)

He says things like baseball isn't a sport it's a game of skill, which every sport involves skill. Sure baseball isn't as exhausting as something like wrestling, but I wouldn't call it a game of skill like table tennis is. Also he complains about what baseball players wear and says it's a stupid uniform. The reason they wear long clothes is because they slide in the grass or dirt, if they didn't they would rip up their skin. That's just one example that comes to mind.

He claims to be open minded but says a lot of stupid ignorant shit on a regular basis, like how he was talking about the pope recently without knowing anything about his life, or his political views, or the fact that this pope actually practices what he preaches. I'd like how much more if he really did some research or if he apoligized for being wrong sometimes. He seems more like that LA open minded where its only open minded if you believe what all the liberals out there believe.

[–]luapchung 16ポイント17ポイント  (10子コメント)

But doesn't soccer players tackle and slide on grass

[–]fcx123 52ポイント53ポイント  (7子コメント)

The infield dirt is what really tears shit up when sliding

[–]TyroneBiggums93 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

Try sliding with no pants or socks on infield dirt. See how that feels lol.

[–]sakiwebo 8ポイント9ポイント  (0子コメント)

He's quite biased when it comes to MMA. I like the guy, and I even like his comedy material. However, I've learned to enjoy the things he says, but take his views with a pinch of salt.

[–]trumpsta 32ポイント33ポイント  (9子コメント)

or conspiracy theories, like for example, how he spent 3 fucking hours talking/saying to Neil Degrasse Tyson about the moon landing being faked

[–]Slemo 19ポイント20ポイント  (5子コメント)

That pissed me off beyond belief. Like seriously dude, you bring a goddamned astrophysicist on the show and you spend 40 minutes talking about the goddamned flag waving on the moon. I'm sure Neil was trying really hard to not drop science on Joe.

[–]trumpsta 17ポイント18ポイント  (1子コメント)

Tyson was totally cool about it and explained it in multiple ways and made several attempts to move on, but Rogan wouldn't fucking let it go, would he...

Like there is so much cool shit to ask him and talk to him about, and you choose the moon landing is fake?!

I like Rogan, listen to his podcasts sometimes, but he says a lot of retarded shit, and for someone that is 'open minded' can be quite fucking stubborn.

[–]Higher_Primate 11ポイント12ポイント  (2子コメント)

Part of the reason NDT even went on the show was to discuss the matter with Joe so don't bash him for it. Also Joe wanted an expert on so that he could settle the matter once and for all....and it did, Joe stopped believing in the hoax after the podcast.

[–]icantsurf 1ポイント2ポイント  (1子コメント)

He used to be even more into it before his conversation with the Bad Astronomer a.k.a. Phil Plait. It's worth the listen if you've never heard it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mDLFm-DRPQg

[–]IBeSteadyLurkin 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

In fairness to Joe, he has listened to criticism and changed his views on the subject since.

[–]HolyMateria 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

To be fair, that was several years ago and he no longer believes the moon landing was faked. People can change, you know?

[–]Pasty-torso 40ポイント41ポイント  (9子コメント)

My favourite thing about Joe Rogan is his continued selling of Alpha Brain "to keep his brain healthy"

If that shit actually worked you would be smart enough to not take pills that have:

1) a single clinical test

2)that they ran themselves

3)which contained 17 participants

4) and the best they could do was manipulate the data to maybe show a little bit of improvement.

His actual quote on the Onnit website about alpha brain is:

"it seems to fire your brain up to a higher RPM level ... I feel like it helps me form sentences better" What does that even mean?

This is also a person that fell wholesale into bullet proof coffee, told his listeners not to drink regular coffee because it has mycotoxins. Ok you can say that he went back on bulletproof coffee. But his supplement company still sells it.

I think Joe falls into the trap of trying way to hard to have an open mind. He gets really into alternative medicines, and alternative theories, and alternative explanations for things because he wants to have an open mind. And often he'll try to sell things to his listeners with "you should have an open mind about these things". What someone actually means when they say that is "You should accept what I'm saying without thinking about it to critically". At least most of the time that's what they mean.

He also believed that the moon landing was faked, and believes some bullshit about the building of the pyramids that I can't be bothered to look up. I say all this as a fan of Joe Rogan. I like his show, I like him. But given the size of his show, and how many people take the things that he says as gospel. I wish he would be a little more careful what he spouts as truth.

[–]Tephros 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

I understand what you're saying, BUT Joe almost always tells his listeners to do their OWN research when it comes to nootropics. Not just Alpha Brain but nootropics in general.

edit: He did his job and sold me on Alpha Brain. It did nothing for me and I got a full refund, no questions asked.

[–]slabby 18ポイント19ポイント  (5子コメント)

Seriously. I like Joe, but he's a bit of a conspiracy theorist stoner, and sometimes it clouds his judgment. But I suspect that he doesn't always say what he thinks is actually true or most reasonable, but what is most entertaining. and I can't begrudge him that; he's an entertainer, first and foremost.

[–]Pasty-torso 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

I think he thinks of himself as an entertainer, so I can't get all that riled up about him. But at the same time he is deadly serious about selling the plot of a Bradley Cooper movie to his fans. I think that's pretty funny/ messed up.

[–]zgrove 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

If like him even if he did fully believe in those things (and I think he does sometimes). He isn't changing my thinking, just offering a different perspective. What's the point of listening to someone who you always agree with?

[–]Dolewhip 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

If you keep your mind too open, your brain will fall out.

[–]pmckizzle 209ポイント210ポイント  (27子コメント)

eh, he can be really fucking 'edgy'.

[–]president_clint 100ポイント101ポイント  (14子コメント)

Like 95% of the time I think he's one of the most down to earth humanbeings on the planet. That other 5% though..

[–]rolltideamerica 30ポイント31ポイント  (1子コメント)

We all have our moments.

[–]FootofGod 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

Makes him more real. Wabi sabi, bro.

[–]CharlieTheK 14ポイント15ポイント  (3子コメント)

If you just take some alpha brain you'll get to 100% bro.

[–]ScumSucker- 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

I don't really follow him, could you give an example?

[–]felixjmorgan 7ポイント8ポイント  (0子コメント)

He has an interesting perspective at life but he does say some dumb stuff, and often gets caught up in himself. He's a weird combination of being very open minded while simultaneously being incredibly dogmatic.

[–]Zeppelinlol 4ポイント5ポイント  (0子コメント)

bruce jenner isnt a fucking hero. fuck off.

[–]Dingid_Forester 19ポイント20ポイント  (7子コメント)

the pity point is the most important part i think.. people get too sensitive over topics like someone being transgender, then they are overly sensitive towards the person and dehumanizing them. people who are transgender go through struggles no doubt, but they just want to embrace who they are and feel like a normal human at the same time.

caitlyn jenner knew how people would react, and took full advantage of it by immediately having a reality show about herself and doing the diane sawyer interview. even the "bravery" award she won was set up.. i'm surprised that joe didn't mention that part. for anyone who knows how celebrities like the kardashians make so much money, it was obvious from the start that caitlyn was using the sensitive issue of gender acceptance for her own personal gain and that is just selfish and in bad taste.

the transgender community deserves a better "face" and someone genuine to look up to. caitlyn jenner was simply trying to put herself in the spotlight and get attention so she could make money. she took advantage of how strongly people feel about trans acceptance, and did everything she could to make money off of it.

[–]Poppenhoffer 17ポイント18ポイント  (4子コメント)

How a transgender person who's anti-gay and killed someone became the face of the movement I have no idea.

[–]EllenPaoIsALyingCunt 30ポイント31ポイント  (9子コメント)

Jeans up.

[–]D34THST4R 12ポイント13ポイント  (0子コメント)

YO MOMMA IN THE FUCKIN STANDS!

[–]motoon 29ポイント30ポイント  (2子コメント)

I can't even have my own feelings on this. I can't process this stuff. I have to accept it immediately or I am full of hate. I can change the channel on all this stuff, fortunately.

[–]nnnonline 15ポイント16ポイント  (2子コメント)

Joe's theory is obviously that, a theory, but it makes a lot of sense. We've seen cultural movements swing one way and then the manifestation of its counter-culture over correct throughout history. So I really hope Joe's right in that it'll all balance itself out soon.

I think many of us--or maybe it's just me--are tired of this weird thing happening in society right now where we overact by either criminalizing or lionizing a person having witness one small glimpse of his/her life, which can be dangerous. We've criticized the media for sensationalism, yet we do the same.

"He gave someone food that was hungry, he must be the nicest guy in the world." Or, "She yelled at this person unprovoked; she must be a huge cunt."

But aren't we over simplifying humans to a fault. Most people I know are very rarely one clear cut thing. I try to be a nice guy, but also am a huge asshole when I'm having a bad day. I sometimes give to the poor, but still would much rather buy a new iPhone if I had to choose only one.

to;dr My point is, I feel like, for some reason, something's changed and we don't try to see people as people. We're so eager to oversimplify someone as either all good or all bad. And then get a kick out of others who join in so we feel accepted by those who share our point of view.

I really hope this changes soon for sake of all of us. And, for the time being, God forbid any of us fall victim to this in the negative.

P.S. I get that sometimes people criticize others as a release when they've been wronged. But, I think that stems from a distancing created by technology today that lets us freely share our view without having to listen to others.

P.P.S. Prof. Sherry Turkle has a great book called "Alone Together" that explains the cultural distancing thing.

[–]bat32391 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

Whose the fighter they were talking about near the end of the video?

[–]Moppy6686 3ポイント4ポイント  (1子コメント)

I wanted to like 'I Am Cait'. I did. But she seems to be the most self-centered, vapid, materialistic, annoyingly conservative and oblivious person who's ever gained notoriety.

[–]tiramisuplex 85ポイント86ポイント  (21子コメント)

I agree that it is absurd to consider a crummy person who undergoes a gender transition to all of a sudden be a hero. That is an extreme and unreasonable view.

On the other hand . . .

They are also failing to consider some very simple and reasonable things that they can do to be more sensitive. Like when Rogan says Tranny, and then points it out, yuks it up, and acts like he is trying figure out where to cash in all his cool edgy points. When a group of people identifies a term that many of them do not like to be called, that is the low hanging fruit of being a kind person. "Oh, the word Tranny has built up a negative connotation and makes you feel like a caricature instead of a person? Sorry, I didn't know - what do you prefer to be called?" How fuckin hard is that, Joe? Or how about the way they all describe a gender transition as weird and hilarious. Could there be a person listening who is at a very precarious time in their life that doesn't consider their gender to be weird and hilarious? In fact it is probably very serious and very scary to face the realities of that situation - I don't have the slightest idea but by attempting empathy I can make an educated guess that calling it weird and hilarious is unkind, even if it were to be my sincerely held belief. Or how about snidely calling the woman Jenner hit a "real" woman. Making that distinction is a clear signal to a transgender woman that you are considered inferior to a "real" woman. The only function of that comment was to belittle and humiliate. Rogan doesn't know anything about the woman he is calling "real" - she could dropkick kittens in her spare time for all he knows - but he is making a clear statement here that she is superior because her gender matches the organs she was born with.

The real thing that is going on here is that these three are very cleverly hiding behind the smokescreen of a ridiculous request - consider Jenner a hero for transitioning to a woman - in order to push back against an extremely reasonable request - don't judge, belittle, humiliate, and smear. I find it dishonest, and its too bad because I think the message that Jenner should not be receiving this PC free pass is a good one. I would love to be able to endorse that message, but I can't do it in the context of the rest of this rubbish.

[–]RocketQ 16ポイント17ポイント  (1子コメント)

It's a pity this comment is so far down. Stroll on over to /r/asktransgender, we regularly have to talk people out of suicide and comfort them after they have been disowned. Transition is a horrible thing to go through, but for many trans people its our only hope of being happy. It's also the only proven treatment available to us. I wonder if Joe Rogan would mock cancer patients if he considered their treatment to be weird and hilarious.

[–]jacobi123 9ポイント10ポイント  (0子コメント)

I agree with you about the low hanging fruit. It's very easy to not call transgender trannies.

[–]notabook 395ポイント396ポイント  (50子コメント)

Caitlyn Jenner is a beautiful, stunning and brave woman. And she is a hero.

[–]JaM0k3 51ポイント52ポイント  (0子コメント)

"Buckle up buckaroo!"

[–]Electroguy 13ポイント14ポイント  (2子コメント)

Bruce Jenner was a douche bag as a guy and now she is a douche bag girl. Shes a hero by putting on a dress? No. She is still a douche bag.. how does putting on a dress make you special all of a sudden?

[–]workswimplay 3ポイント4ポイント  (0子コメント)

The fact that we are having so much conversation about transgendered people is a great progression of our culture. Especially since most of it is going beyond them being transgendered and about the person themselves. Reddit has thousands of opinions on here, I'm just glad everyone is thinking about it. Makes it more of a social norm, because it is a lot more common than I probably assume.

[–]Zinski 7ポイント8ポイント  (2子コメント)

Here is the thing, there are so many trans people out in the world today, openly or not, and the fact they have some one to look up to as a sort of inspiration to say "hey, its ok to be who you are" thats great.

Honestly if it can help out a few people in the long run I can deal with all the bull shit on tv and what not, becasue its not that hard to avoid... like just change the show shes on or somthing

[–]MutthaFuzza 2ポイント3ポイント  (5子コメント)

I don't watch Rogan that often, who are the other two people with him?

[–]fourbet 5ポイント6ポイント  (0子コメント)

Tom Segura is pretty funny. I'm not a huge comedy fan so I can't even accurately gauge how popular he is but he's one of the only reasons I check out JRE on occasion.

Would recommend checking out some of his stuff if you're bored or looking for new comedy.

[–]Mentioned_Videos 0ポイント1ポイント  (4子コメント)

Other videos in this thread: Watch Playlist ▶

VIDEO COMMENT
Key & Peele - Insult Comic 30 - Go for it. I can take it.
Slavoj Žižek: Political Correctness is a More Dangerous Form of Totalitarianism 8 - Slavoj Zizek: Political Correctness is a More Dangerous Form of Totalitarianism.
Phil Ochs -- Love me, I'm a liberal 5 - No it's not. Liberals are and always have been "ten degrees to the left of center in good times, ten degrees to the right if it affects them personally." Reddit is filled with that kind of fake-progressive, reactionary hypo...
This Is Not Happening - Tom Segura Overdoses - Uncensored 5 -
Caitlyn Jenner is just a "Dude in a Wig" says Howard Stern 5 - Howard Stern's view is also interesting
Tyrone Biggums 2 -
Tom Green doing a John Burns impression 2 - I wasn't expecting that to happen
D.L. Hughley on Caitlyn Jenner 1 - This sums it up for me...
Bill Burr - Shari's Berries 1 - You should listen to Bill's Shari's Berries read.
Joe Rogan Experience #664 - Tom Segura & Christina Pazsitzky 1 - Official video from Joe's channel.
Guy Plays Table Tennis Every Day for a Year 1 - but I wouldn't call it a game of skill like table tennis is Professional table tennis is quite exhausting. If you don't think it's a sport, you've probably never seen or played anything more advanced that a short pi...

I'm a bot working hard to help Redditors find related videos to watch.


Info | Chrome Extension

[–]accelangel4 2ポイント3ポイント  (1子コメント)

woah I didn't know she killed someone. Fuck.

[–]Mojammer 1ポイント2ポイント  (0子コメント)

What's the seth meyers thing they were talking about at 5 or 6 minutes in?

[–]farman_786 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

joe rogan on caitlyn jenner hmm

[–]bmcelroy 2ポイント3ポイント  (0子コメント)

a month ago redditors crucified me for not thinking jenner was a hero. Now that podcasters, comedians, and South Park made it okay now the hivemind is switching gears. fuck redditors

[–]Big_Ern 0ポイント1ポイント  (0子コメント)

joe rogan circle jerk....