use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:aww site:imgur.com dog
詳しくは検索FAQを参照
高度な検索: 投稿者や、subredditで……
17,367 人のユーザーが現在閲覧しています
Read subreddit rules
Patch 5.19 Bug Megathread
We've released the new subreddit CSS! Give feedback here
Join us in IRC to discuss worlds!
2015 World Championship | Group Stage - Day 8 | Live Update & Discussion Thread
No events scheduled
Worlds 2015
/r/LeagueofMeta
Comment Faces
"Riot Pls" List
Related subreddits
More resources
This subreddit is night mode compatible
Dyrus' Final AMA (self.leagueoflegends)
Dyrus が 17時間前 * 投稿
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]Dyrus[S] 411ポイント412ポイント413ポイント 10時間前 (41子コメント)
For example if you swapped faker and bjergsen Tsm would of still lost. But if you swap me with Marin you have Tsm as the first in their group due to shotcalling
[–]blendedwhisky 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント 3時間前 (0子コメント)
TSM Marin shotcalling:
[–]brooklynkidshaq 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 8時間前 (1子コメント)
After making the suggestion that Faker being on TSM would have no effect because of Marin shot-calling, he's getting at the point that Bjergsen isn't a great shot caller.
If a top lane can shotcall it's a gift and major talent same for mid lane
[–]eWill95 [スコア非表示] 1時間前 (0子コメント)
Isn't it already obvious
[+]gosbts スコアが基準値未満のコメント-36ポイント-35ポイント-34ポイント 10時間前 (26子コメント)
I know you highly rate Bjergsen but his teamfighting is no where near the level of fakers
[–]CheetosMascot_TM 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
Actually, I don't think that was his point. He meant that even if you added a mid laner who is considered the best player in the world (even better than bjerg) it wouldn't have made a major change for TSM. But add someone like Marin with his game skill and shotcalling and they would have been top of the group.
I read it as the value of shotcalling rather than the comparison of Faker/Bjerg mechanical skill.
[–]nomansdoom 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント 10時間前* (4子コメント)
teamfighting is a team play. Sure bjergson might have messed up a few times but even faker made some bone headed mistakes at worlds.
[+]gosbts スコアが基準値未満のコメント-29ポイント-28ポイント-27ポイント 10時間前 (3子コメント)
Rewatch Bjergsen on LB when he focused Alistar and died to baron please, then show me when Faker fucks up that hard
[–]cookiesandbubbles 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
MaRin has literally been carrying SKT, I know Faker is a god around him, but the gap between Bjergsen and Faker is much smaller than MaRin and Dyrus. Marin does not feed nor die often. Faker on his Olaf died stupidly twice. Faker has had some very uncharacteristic deaths up til this point in the tournament. While MaRin has finally been perceived as the top God he is since he's been carrying. If we're basing this off World's play, which we should since pre-world's teams were playing far different, Bjergsen is way closer to Faker than Dyrus is to MaRin.
[–]nomansdoom 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 10時間前 (0子コメント)
That was a big fk up because bjergson was the only member carrying the team. Fakers fk ups got covered by his team.
[–]eggeak 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
take notes on how not to argue your point ladies and gentlemen, you never want to look at one mistake a player makes and pretend it's representative of how good they are, that's one of the most unintelligent things you can say in this context
[+]Helixon スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10ポイント-9ポイント-8ポイント 9時間前 (19子コメント)
Lol.... Bjergsen does more damage than Faker statisically. How can you say Bjergsen is no where near the level of Faker when Bjergsen clearly can output more than Faker.
[–]afiqkfizdeq 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 8時間前 (3子コメント)
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. If you think the damage chart is any indication of skill, you're probably a casual player/lower tier. TSM's play style is entirely around Bjerg. Faker will roam/target properly in team fights. He isn't the focal point. I don't know if you follow any other sports like American Football or Basketball, but this would be like a player shooting 40 shots a game and averaging 25 points per game vs a guy who shoots it 15 times per game and average 18. Or a Quarterback who throws it 50 times per game, gets more yards vs a QB who throws it 30. More damage =/= better player. Now I'm not here to talk about Bjerg vs Faker, but what you're saying is completely off. Faker is more efficient in his playstyle because SKT allows him to. Bjerg has to play a high volume damage style because of the way TSM plays. Again, I'm not arguing who's better, but your point about Bjerg doing more damage is off.
[+]Helixon スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント 8時間前 (2子コメント)
Now I'm not arguing that Bjergsen is better or worse than Faker. That is not the discussion here, and that's not a discussion I want to have. I challenged an statement of Bjergsen being "no where near level of Faker", which is simply downright wrong.
"I'm not arguing who's better, but your point about Bjerg doing more damage is off." - The statistics says otherwise so with this sentence you're completely off. Bjerg is doing more damage and I'll remind you that those damage chart is taking into account the gold resources that person has.
"You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about. If you think the damage chart is any indication of skill, you're probably a casual player/lower tier" - This is not how you win a discussion but rather forfeit one. If you want to challenge my arguments, you should do so accordingly by referring to evidence or come up with counter arguments.
[–]darkcloud5554 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 6時間前* (1子コメント)
I think what he was trying to say is that Bjergsen has more damage because TSM is more of a one threat team so he has to do the damage because the team plans on Bjergsen carrying. For SKT they dont have to rely on Faker carrying, because Bang and Marin can both step up and do it. Also TSM puts most of their resources into getting Bjergsen ahead so he is in a better position to do more damage. For SKT they have been focusing on Marin a lot more in the group stages so Faker hasnt had the resources that Bjergsen has had. So basically, because of the different ways the teams play it is basically useless to compare damage done. I am not saying damage done is a useless stat, but it isnt the only thing to look at when comparing these two midlaners. I think both of them are spectacular mid laners but this isnt the best way to compare them because of the different ways the teams allocate resources.
EDIT: As i was reading through your other comments and saw your point about how damage scales over time Im pretty sure TSM also had a longer average game time then SKT did so that would skew the results towards Bjergsen.
[–]Helixon -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
That's probably correct. They also mentioned on the stream that the damage chart was taking gold resources into account. Something along the lines of (damage output) / gold.
Main point is that they really highlighted that Bjergsen was exceptionally well at making the most of what he had.
I'm not a math major so I'm not fully certain what that means and what it doesn't.
[–]gosbts -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 9時間前 (14子コメント)
Bjergsen is better at laning than Faker but so much worse at teamfighting
[+]Helixon スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント 9時間前 (13子コメント)
So I'm going to believe you for a moment just to ask you this:
Why does Bjergsen do more damage (there's only so much damage you do in laning) than Faker, if Bjergsen is 'so much worse' at team fighting?
That damage statistics isn't overall damage, it is damage to champions in which it feels like a contradiction to your statement. If that isn't true, how does he do more damage and still be 'so much worse' at team fighting.
[–]GoRice 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント 8時間前* (2子コメント)
Total damage applied to champions is not going to tell you how good someone is at teamfighting. A recent but good example is how Bjergsen threw a teamfight at baron (against KT) by unleashing his LB combo on an Alistar support. Great damage, but Ali still didn't die and TSM then got roflstomped into the ground because the other team may have done less damage, but they all did it on the carries. Nagne's Azir just unleashed on TSM because Bjergsen blew everything on Ali.
Bjergsen then looks good in the statistics, but because of his idiotic play, his team lost that fight.
Same thing against OG. I'm sure Bjergsen did more dmg as Victor, but who cares that Bjergsen can piss farther when xPeke picks Anivia and castrates the entire TSM team? xPeke's Anivia pick completed OG's poke/disengage comp and basically hammered the final nail in TSM's coffin.
Cute that Bjergsen picked Victor that game, but his pick did nothing for his team. It only made himself look a bit better by doing some damage. It would never have threatened OG as a team. Bjergsen could have picked Veigar to help his team engage on OG. Instead, the moron picked Victor and his dmg purely looked nice in the statistics, it did fuck all for TSM. OG were never going to lose that game thanks to him picking a low mobility poke champ.
[–]Helixon -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント 7時間前 (1子コメント)
"Total damage applied to champions is not going to tell you how good someone is at teamfighting. A recent but good example is how Bjergsen threw a teamfight at baron (against KT) by unleashing his LB combo on an Alistar support. Great damage, but Ali still didn't die and TSM then got roflstomped into the ground because the other team may have done less damage, but they all did it on the carries. Nagne's Azir just unleashed on TSM because Bjergsen blew everything on Ali. Bjergsen then looks good in the statistics, but because of his idiotic play, his team lost that fight."
In judging of Bjergsen's team fighting ability I think you should rather judge how he perform on the champion and not how bad/good their drafting ability as I think that is whole another discussion.
[–]GoRice 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
You've got a point about that KT fight. Bjergsen also missed a lot of stuff so his dmg wasn't going to be great even if Ali didn't use ult.
However, before Bjergsen went in they had vision of Ali, Azir and Reksai. So that was still a very bad call by Bjergsen. He's an assassin that didn't do anything that fight but engage on the tanky support and then got chunked out by the other midlaner (before flashing into the baron pit and dying to baron).
It's not just about teamfighting ability. Since your argument was that "total damage on champions" matters in determining how good a midlaner in general is with this:
Bjergsen does more damage than Faker statisically. How can you say Bjergsen is no where near the level of Faker when Bjergsen clearly can output more than Faker.
I'd like to argue that that says very little about how good a midlaner really is. I'd say xPeke is head and shoulders above Bjergsen as far as being a midlaner goes. His picks these games were not about being the guy with the most damage, but being the midlaner that can win the games for his team. His Anivia, Ori and TF are not known for being high damage output, but they all contributed way more to OG than Bjergsen has done for TSM. That obviously includes the games against TSM. And in the end, that's all that matters. xPeke even took TP Ori against Bjergsen's Syndra with ignite. Syndra did more damage I'm sure, but Ori was more useful late game and ultimately, that was the difference in that second game against TSM, where OG could capitalize more on little advantages while TSM couldn't compete. Such as dancing at dragon and then tping into TSM's base to take out the nexus tower.
Total damage on champions isn't the be all end all.
[–]STEPHENonPC[EffectivePlacebo] (EU-W) 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 9時間前 (3子コメント)
Because you can damage champions outside of teamfights.
[–]Helixon -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 8時間前 (2子コメント)
You're stating the obvious. And I will do the same. Faker has the same amount of opportunity to damage other champions outside team fights as Bjergsen.
Given how damage scale over time, and how a little factor the early game damage is compared to late game damage.
My interpretation of late game play, and I'm just stating my observation is that it's either team fights with or without trying to get objectives, getting picks or farming for next team fight. Where I think team fights being a major if not the most significant part of late game and thus being where the most damage is recorded.
[–]STEPHENonPC[EffectivePlacebo] (EU-W) 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント 7時間前 (1子コメント)
You're looking at a stat that covers the whole game (damage done) and trying to make it apply to a specific part of the game (5v5 teamfights). Your argument is pretty clearly disproven when you actually watch a Bjergsen teamfight v a Faker teamfight, your argument can only be made if you don't actually watch the games.
[–]Helixon -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
Did you read what I wrote about damage done (to champions!)?
Damage done to champions is significantly more impactful late game, where it's usually mostly teamfights anyway.
In simply terms what I am saying is that the longer a game lasts, the more representative is damage done to champions a reflection of that person's contribution to team fights than anything else.
[–]Hideki_Sakamoto 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 9時間前 (3子コメント)
The thing is that Bjergsen gets more resources than Faker, that's why he is able to deal more damage.
[–]LordFireDragon[🍰] -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント 8時間前 (1子コメント)
Not to burst your bubble but you couldn't be more wrong. Bjergsen doesn't get any additional resources from his team.
He created his own advantages in a 1v1. You can't just say that bjerg had "her dur additional resources xD" because he solo killed nagne and was up 50 cs in a 1v1 scenario.
Has nothing to do with resources. The rest of his team just is so mechanically behind their counter opponents that it LOOKS like bjerg has all the resources, which he actually does. But it's because his team is bad, not because his team is giving him everything.
[–]Dawaraven 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント 2時間前 (0子コメント)
being this delusional
[–]Helixon -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 8時間前 (0子コメント)
The statistic I'm referring to, and as you surely have seen is normalized pr gold income, so resources in terms of gold income isn't a factor.
[–]gosbts -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント 9時間前 (1子コメント)
It's not hard to do more damage when you get so much help, Bjergsen gets so many ganks/wards for him. They don't say Santorin is Bjergsens 3rd summoner spell for nothing
My first thought is that it's a team game and though team plays differently. I'm sure Faker get's help in other areas where Bjergsen don't.
Even so, the damage done statistics I'm referring to is normalized on the gold resource that champion sits on. I should have mentioned this earlier (my bad), in which do not speak for the differences in play style, but is indeed a fact a statement for Bjergsen's play.
The analysis put it best themselves: "Bjergsen does more damage with what he has than any other."
[+]kondor35 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-69ポイント-68ポイント-67ポイント 10時間前 (9子コメント)
Woah. You think TSM would've still lost with Faker at mid? Intersting.
[–]lcizzlelc 65ポイント66ポイント67ポイント 9時間前* (0子コメント)
Ugh, you obviously missed the point of his comment.
It's not about who is better individually its about the team as whole.
A team with faker and a poor shot caller isn't going to do as well as a decent team and amazing shot calling. Sure they might win a good amount of games because faker carries, but when they go up against a team with a top notch shot caller and top tier strategies individual skill suddenly doesn't matter as much.
CSGO has this come up all the time. NA teams in CSGO are decent but sometimes lack good shot calling. Their individual skill carries them and then randomly in tournaments they will run up against Brazilian teams that just totally own them. The Brazilian's aren't always the most individually sound but they bring the top tier strategies and that carries them to victory.
[–]Rikiia 46ポイント47ポイント48ポイント 10時間前 (4子コメント)
The gap in skill between Faker and Bjergsen is much smaller than between Marin and Dyrus.
And putting someone like Marin at top for TSM would make them have two threats instead of only one.
[–]IrrelevantGeOff 37ポイント38ポイント39ポイント 9時間前 (3子コメント)
More importantly Marin's shot calling is just stronger than Bjergs at the moment. That's what would make the most difference
[+]Rikiia スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11ポイント-10ポイント-9ポイント 9時間前* (2子コメント)
That is true but I don't know how good Marin's English is, being able to communicate clearly is really important.
[–]Freezing_Lettuce 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント 9時間前 (1子コメント)
I think he was assuming all other things equal, like excluding the language barrier.
[–]Rikiia -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
If that's the case then yeah I agree. If BJ's shotcalling had been better they would have been able to win some more games, some of them were quite close but then they just fall apart and get demolished.
[–]CoolingOreos 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント 7時間前 (0子コメント)
you must be dumb if you didnt undertsand what he meant.
if you replace bjerg with any other talented midlaner faker for example, the result would still be the same because you cannot rely on one person to carry the whole team, you need a shotcaller and teamwork.
[–]fourmi(EU-W) 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント 9時間前 (0子コメント)
Marin initate every move, do perfect tp. Get the team an edge... Of course faker is crazy good... But bjerg is crazy good also. both carry.
[–]City-Slicka[CitySlicka] (NA) [スコア非表示] 1時間前 (0子コメント)
rip your karma
[–]Hitlerdinger -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント 5時間前 (0子コメント)
would have
π Rendered by PID 14319 on app-265 at 2015-10-12 01:36:49.010556+00:00 running 48a4a52 country code: JP.
残りのコメントをみる →
[–]Dyrus[S] 411ポイント412ポイント413ポイント (41子コメント)
[–]blendedwhisky 6ポイント7ポイント8ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]brooklynkidshaq 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]eWill95 [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[+]gosbts スコアが基準値未満のコメント-36ポイント-35ポイント-34ポイント (26子コメント)
[–]CheetosMascot_TM 18ポイント19ポイント20ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]nomansdoom 29ポイント30ポイント31ポイント (4子コメント)
[+]gosbts スコアが基準値未満のコメント-29ポイント-28ポイント-27ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]cookiesandbubbles 9ポイント10ポイント11ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]nomansdoom 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]eggeak 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]Helixon スコアが基準値未満のコメント-10ポイント-9ポイント-8ポイント (19子コメント)
[–]afiqkfizdeq 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[+]Helixon スコアが基準値未満のコメント-9ポイント-8ポイント-7ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]darkcloud5554 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Helixon -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]gosbts -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (14子コメント)
[+]Helixon スコアが基準値未満のコメント-6ポイント-5ポイント-4ポイント (13子コメント)
[–]GoRice 2ポイント3ポイント4ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Helixon -4ポイント-3ポイント-2ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]GoRice 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]STEPHENonPC[EffectivePlacebo] (EU-W) 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]Helixon -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]STEPHENonPC[EffectivePlacebo] (EU-W) 1ポイント2ポイント3ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Helixon -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Hideki_Sakamoto 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (3子コメント)
[–]LordFireDragon[🍰] -3ポイント-2ポイント-1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Dawaraven 0ポイント1ポイント2ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Helixon -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]gosbts -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Helixon -1ポイント0ポイント1ポイント (0子コメント)
[+]kondor35 スコアが基準値未満のコメント-69ポイント-68ポイント-67ポイント (9子コメント)
[–]lcizzlelc 65ポイント66ポイント67ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]Rikiia 46ポイント47ポイント48ポイント (4子コメント)
[–]IrrelevantGeOff 37ポイント38ポイント39ポイント (3子コメント)
[+]Rikiia スコアが基準値未満のコメント-11ポイント-10ポイント-9ポイント (2子コメント)
[–]Freezing_Lettuce 19ポイント20ポイント21ポイント (1子コメント)
[–]Rikiia -5ポイント-4ポイント-3ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]CoolingOreos 5ポイント6ポイント7ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]fourmi(EU-W) 4ポイント5ポイント6ポイント (0子コメント)
[–]City-Slicka[CitySlicka] (NA) [スコア非表示] (0子コメント)
[–]Hitlerdinger -2ポイント-1ポイント0ポイント (0子コメント)